Cause she's stalking me and being in all my games, clearly that's a tell of the Mafia.
P-Edit: Mafia don't pick the PR's
Lol your gonna just make me pay for kicking your ass as scum so many times aren't you? <3
What's the difference between mutleyminimalpostingtown and mutleyminimalpostingscum in
LOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLIn post 36, jsmith1234 wrote: With nothing else to go off of, I currently recommend lynching an experienced player, since newer players tend to be easier to read, and it's not like anyone here is so new that they're potential liabilities if left running the show.
##Vote: JasonWazza
It was a REAL vote, don't fucking try and hide it.In post 91, bubbajack8 wrote:Realness? I questioned jsmith. I had a reason for that post thing.
Agreed.fuzzybutternut wrote: Pro-Tip: None of that matters, Bubba. Experience means nothing.
SO HOW DOES LYNCHING A PERSON WITH MORE EXPERIENCE HELP THE TOWN IF MY ALIGNMENT IS RANDOM?bubbajack8 wrote:Pro-Tip: Practice makes perfect. Experience matters.
WELL YOU MOTHERFUCKING SHOULD, IF YOU ARE TOWN YOU ARE A MISLYNCH, AND IF SO YOU ARE GOING AGAINST YOUR FUCKING WIN CONDITION BY NOT PROVING YOUR ALIGNMENT.bubbajack8 wrote:And when I said I don't give a shiz about helping my alignment, it was in response to Sakura's post and should be read "I don't give a shiz about helping PROVE my alignment." As that is what she was talking about.
Maybe, just maybe, people will sheep you if you have a better reason then "HIS EXPERIENCED AND MUST BE THE MAFIA BURN HIM!!!!!!!!!!!"In post 182, jsmith1234 wrote: I think Jason is off with his read, and even though I'd like to get rid of him, it doesn't seem other people are on board, so I'll go for someone else I'd like to get rid of based on his posts so far (and his latest vote).
"I find what he is doing anti-town, but that doesn't make him scum!!!!!"In post 178, SoundsofMusic wrote:Jason, while I find alot of the things he's doing anti-town (the stuff you are calling him out on), I can't really find any scum intent in any of his posts.
He's flailing, but not because he's scum but because he doesn't know how to handle the pressure that everyone is giving him, He's pretty much been the center of attention all game, and no one is really trying to get him out of it which bothers me quite a bit.
It sounds like he's trying to hard, but maybe it's because he is?
It's already apparent that he in a " I'll be dammed no matter what I say" kind of mindset currently though how he's handling it is townish in that, he isn't really to overly defensive. He isn't an experienced scum-player so he would be in hyper-panic mode at this point and I'm not really feeling it.
No, No, No, NO.In post 179, SoundsofMusic wrote:This is really, really town and it is also something I would personally say as town and have trouble faking as scumIn post 146, bubbajack8 wrote:@Sakura: I'm not Jester -_- I just don't give a F about being lynched, because ultimately it will help town when they realize I am town.
IF IT WAS A REACTION TEST, HE FAILED AND SHOULD BE LYNCHED CAUSE HIS GRADING IS SCUMIn post 182, jsmith1234 wrote: I assumed all this pressure on bubba was a reaction test (which I'm starting to think it isn't), and even if it is , it's run its course imo.
Hence why i said this Mutley.In post 187, JasonWazza wrote:You are the worst Innocent Child ever, but thank god you are or i would lynch the fucking shit out of you.
It's not scummy when he is being worthless.In post 202, bubbajack8 wrote:Jason, Mutley, and Sakura for scum 2014.
I mean really attacking the IC because he would like to have YOU lynched and calling him worthless? Thats scum behavior.
Jsmith, if you do go through my games youll notice I always get to L-2 the first day. And each and every time ive been town. The only time ive gotten past D1 with no pressure, was the game i replaced into as scum, and when i came in i was widely accepted as town even though people expected who i replaced.
That tooIn post 314, Mutleyddmc wrote:plus really bubba you still haven't given scum motivation for attacking an IC
This is your reasoning?In post 262, bubbajack8 wrote:I'm not saying conf town = right Jesus.
You can discredit arguments I don't care.
It's scummy to not care if a clear dies, because then all his future arguments automatically don't matter.
Now stop going in fucking circles.
In post 36, jsmith1234 wrote: With nothing else to go off of, I currently recommend lynching an experienced player, since newer players tend to be easier to read, and it's not like anyone here is so new that they're potential liabilities if left running the show.
##Vote: JasonWazza
In post 108, jsmith1234 wrote: We've already seen how a relatively newer player can make this game easier for town (i.e. awestfie is almost certainly town for her noobslip). We don't really need a bunch of experienced town players in this game if there are several newer players who can make getting reads easier imo. Yes, a more proper way to approach this is to go for the experienced player who has shown to be a far better mafia player than they are town player, but I didn't go through the effort of figuring that information out. Bottom line, I'm not advocating a lynch of a newbie game IC because they might trick me as scum. I'm advocating it because relatively inexperienced players are less likely to trick me as scum, so I'd prefer they be alive rather than the experienced ones. The ease of reading newer players outweighs the benefit of having a bunch of experienced town players imo.
@anorway: Personally speaking, Jason didn't do anything scummy (he only made one post before I voted him). I just prefer to lynch an experienced player is all, and he was a viable target.
Hint the only post you can somewhat construe as scumhunting is the following:In post 186, jsmith1234 wrote: And I've played long enough to know that people don't like my reasoning for early lynches lol, so I'm not going to try to convince town that we should lynch you/Mutley because of non-scummy reasons (though Mutley's behavior could be somewhat construed as scummy), even though I think it's proper play.
And even that is fucking reaching, it's more like town hunting out of experienced players.In post 274, jsmith1234 wrote: Between Jason/Mutley/fuzzy, I'd personally prefer to lynch between Mutley and fuzzy. Though I think Jason's logic is flawed and his behavior isn't conducive to rational discussion, his posts/arguments provide more information on his thoughts than the other two. The other two's posts generally come across as "you're scum...keep flailing scum...that's so scummy...etc.". Their posts don't provide a clear picture of their thought process or argument, so I can't even judge their logic, because it's hardly been presented. If bubba does end up getting lynched and flips scum, I'd sooner think one of the 3 were bussing over them all being town.
THE IC IS ADMITING HE ISN'T SCUMHUNTING BUBBA, NOW WHAT YOU GONNA SAY?In post 328, jsmith1234 wrote:I have not said I think anyone is scum, Sakura.
Not that opinion, Is he scum?In post 379, Saki wrote:Don't listen to him?In post 374, JasonWazza wrote:@Saki, ISO bubbajack, and give us your opinion.
Yeah ummm, NS is technically on the wagon already, we are waiting on Saki.In post 401, Mutleyddmc wrote: Any way this game has stalled, can one of you read bubba realise he is scum and hammer so we can come back fresh tomorrow k thx
You realize a bah post has no in game info AND you don't get a bah post if your lynched right?In post 416, bubbajack8 wrote:Obligatory.
Oh and to go even more with the I told you so.In post 279, bubbajack8 wrote: Fuck you, told you so, Bah post.
Never mind me, apparently i can't read, i thought there was a doctor as well.In post 434, jsmith1234 wrote:No protective role in this setup can stop a kill. Only roleblockers can.
Given we have a proven no kill, my speculation is the roleblocker claims, this doesn't assure his death as he can still do a roleblock, and we lynch the scum, the rest of my speculation is this, we probably have at least one more PR, i doubt that a scum team would pick none of the upgrades (i personally would pick 3 of them so )In post 435, fuzzybutternut wrote:ohey jsmith. You're actually in this game. Cool.
Jason- What's your speculation concerning last night's events?
And here is the traitor.In post 532, qwertyuiop wrote:We should lynch either the claimed roleblocker or the person they blocked, one of them is likely to be scum. I don't see what else there is to say.
No, i'm saying there's no reason to post, your basically conf scum.In post 563, fuzzybutternut wrote:you're saying there's no reason for people to be active in a game that strives off of people being active?In post 561, JasonWazza wrote:I don't see any reason for the people voting fuzzytobe active, more the people who aren't voting fuzzy need to either vote him and help lynch him, or they need to tell us why they aren't voting him.
lolwut
In post 475, TheGreatOne wrote:Looking at Jason's and jsimth's reasons, I agree completely.
I am the roleblocker, and I blocked fuzzybutternut last night.