???
VOTE: pisskop
It looks like your interests are exactly the same as scums' interests.In post 58, mutantdevle wrote: Cop or doctor isn't so much as what I was expecting. I was more interested to see if they were one of the roles that can actually do something about being targetted by scum. If they did role claim something like cop though (which I don't think any town player in their right mind would do) then I would consider them town.
I doubt that you have read the rules? This makes me think you must be scum trying to be derp-cleared.
You might need to hold up that sarcasm sign and tell us who you mean here.In post 92, pisskop wrote:guys look how town i am
We can, but you seem a little defensive here.In post 94, wilky wrote:In post 93, Chip Butty wrote:I just feel that linking to the setup, or at least pointing me to it, would have been a more natural reaction to my question.In post 91, wilky wrote:I didn't have to read the setup info as I knew how it worked. Why didn't you go find it yourself?In post 89, Chip Butty wrote:We have a winner!
Wilky & NSG : didn't you read the setup info? If so, why not point me to that like texcat just did?
As I said, I didn't have it too hand as I didn't need to read it. Now can we leave it at that and get on with the game instead of having some off-topic smokescreen about who should be finding stuff for you?
Again I suspect that you asked for it to look townie. This info was available in the setup.In post 140, CommKnight wrote:Now, can anyone guess why I wanted this information?In post 127, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Throughout the bidding phases, the thread is locked, however, mafia may collude privately during this time and then again throughout the day.
As town, I think you should always suspicious of people who blindly defend you. Perhaps they are not so blind, after all. Perhaps they know you are town, because they are scum.In post 205, mutantdevle wrote:I don't like the way in which he posts (several posts in a row that just consist of a sentence each) but I still think he is town based on his willingness to blindly defend me so early into my wagon.
Just like I'm suspicious of white knights, I am immediately suspicious of townslips. I almost never think they are genuine.In post 249, Creature wrote:Do you think this is a genuine townslip?In post 145, Viomi wrote:1. I don't think scum gets to talk before draft
Assembler, do you have any thoughts to share? All you've said is that you thought Mutant was newbtown, but you were ok with his lynch?
In post 504, Creature wrote:Also lol, you're all saying if mutant is scum I'm scum trying to save him and if mutant is town I'm scum whiteknighting him.
My guess would be Chip.In post 615, CommKnight wrote: The question is: Chip or City. Which one of those two is scum?
Why are buddying up with the people I'm suspicious of again? Got a reads list, Creature?In post 614, Creature wrote:Hey Viomi and Chip Butty, who should we wagon?
Where wasIn post 626, mutantdevle wrote:It concerns me how quickly lynches come together in this town. All it seems to take is a small push and then the sheep come flooding in. May I ask to everyone voting Viomi, where were you yesterday when concerns with Viomi were originally raised? You had the perfect opportunity to express your distrust of her then yet it is now that everyone is flocking on to her.
Yeah, Creature's on my scum list too, but let's resolve the 1 picks.Chip Butty wrote:Tbh I'd rather be lynching Creature...and I'm a bit worried I'm on the same wagon as CK...
No, Viomi is at L-1. That is hardly over. Quit trying to protect your buddy.In post 701, Creature wrote:No sure if I can do anything more today, but Viomi's wagon is over.
Meta. I played my last game with Assembler.In post 748, Chip Butty wrote:Actually, speaking of Assembler, texcat still hasn't explained why she coloured him green...
tex?
Sure, I'd love for you to vote Viomi. I think she's scum.In post 991, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'll hammer Viomi and Comm if push went to shove today. I think Viomi's reactions to me looking elsewhere are very interesting but are just pre-flip associations at this point. It will be easier to nail her tomorrow after flips and if I'm alive. Also interesting is how quiet everyone was about the Viomi wagon but now that I'm pushing above there's a lot more interest in the thread. My direction feels promising.
This post feels like the lead up to you voting me lol. I've had this scenario many times.
Are you asking me to get back on Viomi?
This is why my vote is on Viomi. Lalendra not only explained her vote when she made it (592), but later, in response to Mutant, detailed the posts from Viomi that she disliked (734). She gave us plenty of information about her vote.In post 1201, Viomi wrote:I was hoping to get a response to this
But sadly Lalendra seems dedicated to the cause of refusing to give any information whatsoever.The only conflicts are made up by you attempting to misread you, and then you refuse to continue your ISO because you're not town trying to find scum, you're just scum trying to find enough reasons to make your vote seem justified.
I guess. Although she didn't ignore his rebuttal; she did respond, of sorts, in 957. And the below seems like a gross mischaracterization. She gave a lot of information, and then said that she had nothing further to comment on.KidAmn wrote:I think Viomi's issue is with Lalendra not responding to her rebuttal and requests for comment on said rebuttal, though?
Viomi wrote:But sadly Lalendra seems dedicated to the cause of refusing to give any information whatsoever.
RMFPIn post 1204, texcat wrote:This is why my vote is on Viomi. Lalendra not only explained her vote when she made it (592), but later, in response to Mutant, detailed the posts from Viomi that she disliked (734). She gave us plenty of information about her vote.In post 1201, Viomi wrote:I was hoping to get a response to this
But sadly Lalendra seems dedicated to the cause of refusing to give any information whatsoever.The only conflicts are made up by you attempting to misread you, and then you refuse to continue your ISO because you're not town trying to find scum, you're just scum trying to find enough reasons to make your vote seem justified.
We need to lynch Northside today. You left out
Wait, I thought you already claimed to have been jailed lady night. Are you changing your story?In post 1880, Viomi wrote:Though, only one could be vig because either I or KidAmn were jailkept, which means we had a role backup. Which also means can we lynch LUV or tex already because one of them is n3 vig kthx
In post 1738, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I’ll try to get to this tonight.
I don’t see an issue with the way North hammered but I’m still suspicious of her. Consider my vote there.
In post 1740, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don’t want to lynch North if it’s based on not waiting for a claim.
Smells like a policy lynch.
Can you explain your read on Northside? What happened in the five minutes between consider my vote there and I don't want to lynch her? And what does pretty decent mean?In post 1870, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Probably not. North is pretty decent
Northside must have a good role since she was number 2 in the draft. Don't you think it would be better to lynch her before vanilla sum?In post 1887, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still scum read North. I just don’t agree with the overall basis of the wagon so I rather lynch elsewhere.
Perhaps you should.In post 1901, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don’t know. I haven’t taken setup into account.In post 1892, texcat wrote:Northside must have a good role since she was number 2 in the draft. Don't you think it would be better to lynch her before vanilla sum?In post 1887, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still scum read North. I just don’t agree with the overall basis of the wagon so I rather lynch elsewhere.
In post 1726, momo wrote:Okay guys.... before I vote nsg, I don't want this day to end just yet.
We need to find who MD was pushing against...then we need to decide if the kill was for wifom, then we lynch nsg, and then we go on to win the game
In post 1956, Viomi wrote:How am I supposed to respond to your claim that he somehow knew what we were talking about in his PT? I'm pretty sure scum don't have day talk so..
In post 1957, sheepsaysmeep wrote:yeah the setup page says they dont have daytalk
Doesn't anybody bother to check anything? I'm pretty sure at least one of you three is playing dumb here.In post 1959, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Scum not having day talk doesn’t refute anything he’s accusing you two of.
Other Information
An individual Mafia member cannot nightkill and use a power on the same night.
Tracker/Role Cop/Watcher/Cop results should be worded in a way to stay ambiguous to redirection; "Your target went X" or "Your target is X", for example.
The Mafia team has the ability to daytalk.
Why are you unvoting? Northside is scum.
Aster and Viomi seem pretty stuck in their views. Is there anything I could say that would convert you to voting Northside? Perhaps Fitz will have fresh eyes.In post 1973, sheepsaysmeep wrote:anything else game progressing to say
I'd like to wait for Fitz.In post 1979, Creature wrote:If only we stopped sillying around, northsidegal would already have flipped scum and we would be lynching LUV.
I think scum have been doctor hunting. MisaTange and Mutant were both killed in hopes of killing the doc.In post 1986, havingfitz wrote:N2…I have no idea why mutant was the NK. He really only pushed Chip. I don’t know if a claim was involved. Is there a chance he was killed by someone other than scum?