What I wanted that to say was:
In post 495, Chip Butty wrote: In post 98, Chip Butty wrote: In post 94, wilky wrote:
As I said, I didn't have it too hand as I didn't need to read it. Now can we leave it at that and get on with the game instead of having some off-topic smokescreen about who should be finding stuff for you?
You didn't have it to hand? Lol what does that even mean here? Do you need your secretary to pull it from the file room or something?
@CityElectric: this kind of snarky comment isn't unusual for me, as either alignment.
In post 496, Chip Butty wrote: In post 35, mutantdevle wrote:I feel like you shouldn't have mentioned that tbh. Because now any person who chose the number 1 will know that someone who did not choose 7 has the PR they wanted if they don't have a PR themselves.
Speaking of which, Texcat, are you going to tell us what role you chose? Since you are the first in the draft order you are guaranteed to have a PR. Hence you are the most likely candidate for the scum to shoot.
@CityElectric: this and subsequent posts where he tried to explain the question to texcat were the reason I voted him at
63.
Oef, that's way back in the game, lemme see what my original problems with those posts were. Oh, right, yeah. My issue with 98 is that it felt suuuuuuuuper defensive in a weird sort of way and your explanation doesn't really change anything about that to me, tbh. Your later posts seem okay to me though, so there's that.
In post 472, Creature wrote: In post 428, CityElectric wrote:I still am very much not a fan of the amount of work it takes to get Creature to elaborate on anything.
What about the amount of work it takes to get others to listen?
I mean, if you want people to listen to you, put the work in. Statements like 'Anyone up to wagon CommKnight?' without reasons why we should evidently don't get you very far in this game.
Anyways, giving that deadline is coming up soonish, I'm probably gonna do a closer reread on the thread tonight/tomorrow to try and flesh out my reads some more.
