mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't know what this means. Why would you forget me?In post 31, I Am Innocent wrote:Don’t forget texcat-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm guessing RC is town, but I wouldn't bet the ranch that the claim is real.In post 35, horrordude0215 wrote:I don't really see scum pulling a fakeclaim like this on page one though.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I already said that I thought you were town. I could speculate out loud about possible reasons for your claim, but it would just be speculation and I don't think it would be helpful.In post 40, RadiantCowbells wrote:So... If you doubt the claim, what alignment do you think I am and why did I make the claim when I did?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
VOTE: SaudadeIn post 47, Saudade wrote:not to be over defensive here but im town i swear on my mother
And I could speculate on why Saudade's opening post is overly defensive and why he needs to declare that he's town, but most of that speculation would involve him being scum, and so I'll just vote him.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Welcome to you, too. [**Ignoring I Am's objections to being polite.**]
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What exactly were you referring to?In post 78, I Am Innocent wrote:Lol that isn’t what I was referring to but ok
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Maybe. I still like Saudade better. I can't understand why you're town reading him.
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I know humor on the internet sometimes is difficult, but I, at least, found it wryly amusing, and I agree with Garmr that the substance made a good point.In post 125, DoubtingThomas wrote:
This post is so bad. do you think you are funny when you are saying, "What's that? Play a game of mafia?"In post 118, Havo wrote:
What’s that? Play a game of mafia?In post 100, Saudade wrote:Are you 100% sure you want to do this mate?
Yeah, I signed up and everything.
Or do you mean vote you?
Well, you see, you posted something that doesn’t make sense to me. I pointed it out and voted you because of it. And instead of you discussing with me why I have an issue with it, you continue to dodge the specific topic. And imply I’m just bad at the game. IMO you’re coming off as quite defensive when you do this. Which just makes me think it’s more and more likely that you’re not town.
Now if you have any interest in me thinking you are town, thus on my team, I’d think you would want to at least discuss what you said and why you would say it. I believe mafia is a team game. So if you are town we need to work together, give and take, meet each other halfway kind of stuff. But of course if you don’t want to discuss it and want to continue to just imply I’m bad that’s fine too. But I’m more than happy at the moment with where my vote is.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't know what this means.In post 346, Saudade wrote:I liked horrordude better
I don't think town players need to announce that they are town, at the same time claiming that they are not overly defensive, in their first post. I don't know why scum would do it, but I don't know why town would do it either. It was a page 2 scum read, and I haven't seen anything much to solidify it.In post 350, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Texcat, can you explain what made you suspect Saudade initially? You alluded to having some speculation about his potential motivations for entering as he did in 71, but I would like you to further elaborate on why you think a scum player would bother acting like Saudade did. Also, are you less suspicious of him now that you have voted for IAI? If not, then which of them do you think is more likely to be scum?
I don't know what's up with IAI. He never answered my question. I was voting him, but unvoted when he got to L-1. I don't want him hammered without replying.
@mod Are IAI and Fred Campbell being replaced? Their prods were over 48 hours ago and we haven't heard from them.
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Actually sorry to see you go. What question? Only one I saw was what my mom's number is. My mom is in heaven where there are no numbers.In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Texcat you didn't answer my question you scumfuck-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
No way to respond to that except to
VOTE: the worst-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I disagree that my iso is totally blank. And wtf do you think I have not responded to? This is total bullshit. Are you chainsawing for TheWorst?In post 553, FA_Q2 wrote:I can get behind a texcat wagon. Your ISO is utterly blank texcat - you are essentially actively lurking and have not responded to anything, You come back right away with an OMGUS vote and still no actual comments on anything.
Almost to scummy to be scum - almost but not quite. Not sure about the garmr wagon - I don't see what is particularly scummy there. Sure, the claim was garbage but it was a vt claim - essentially the same thing as stating town. It does not narrow scum search for pr roles because there is no reason to think that he is a vt over a pr if not scum - prs would make the same statement at that point. I do not know about the enormous amount of budding going on either.
Don't like the gazer or w4at slots but cannot really put my finger on why. Going to have to go through their iso a few times again.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I know he's not bad. Doesn't mean he's town.In post 1002, RadiantCowbells wrote:krazy is bad just ignore him-
-
texcat
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Not going to happen. I'm not voting claimed masons on D1.In post 1065, RadiantCowbells wrote:and girls too obv
I don't not want skygazer and tex to vote because of their gender-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1305, Garmr wrote:
No offence but you pick the player that Krazy struggles to read? I can guarantee you that him being uneasy about trying to figure out my style played a part of why he wanted me gone.In post 1111, Krazy wrote: Best solve for 2/3
Garmr-- viewtopic.php?p=10397913#p10397913 this looks like scum!Garmr to me,but I have struggled with reading this particular player in the past.
We just lynched a claimed mason, and you say it's no biggie.In post 1286, Garmr wrote:Welp I was wrong oh well no biggy.
Aside from the obvious 2 flips since D1? Some of it has to do with the attitude I mention above. RC seems contrite. Garmr isn't. And I don't know what is up with the duck.In post 1322, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In this case then, please explain why the change from D1.In post 1298, texcat wrote:I don't object to a Rc lynch. But think it's possible that RC is just bad town. I think Garmr is more likely to be scum, based in large part, on Krazy's read.
IDK. I'm not an expert in RC meta. RC does seem like a willful strong person who doesn't let facts get in the way.In post 1318, Havo wrote:
You think RC is just “Bad Town”? Seriously?In post 1298, texcat wrote:I don't object to a Rc lynch. But think it's possible that RC is just bad town. I think Garmr is more likely to be scum, based in large part, on Krazy's read.
When has RC ever been just Bad Town?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1291, the worst wrote:In post 1234, texcat wrote:VOTE: Radiant Cowbells
I thought this was town, but I can't see town continuing the push to lynch claimed masons.
????In post 1288, texcat wrote:FA_Q2 (7):RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, Havo, Completly Trustworthy, the worst, Garmr, Gamma Emerald
These people can't all be scum, but this is a good place to start.
VOTE: Garmr
I wouldn't rule it out.In post 1300, the worst wrote:
talk me through when and why your mind changed after yesterdayIn post 1298, texcat wrote:I don't object to a Rc lynch. But think it's possible that RC is just bad town. I think Garmr is more likely to be scum, based in large part, on Krazy's read.
do you see RC/Garmr as scum together?
Late yesterday it became apparent that we were going to lynch a mason unless RC stopped the push. I hoped that voting RC would wake them up and get them to look somewhere else. Didn't happen. I still think RC could be scum, just not my top pick today.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
It wasn't just a mason mislynch. It was a mislynch of a mason whose partner confirmed them.In post 1343, HeWhoSwims wrote:I'm conflicted by RC
On one hand I doubt he'd want to be the leading push for a mason mislynch.. On the other hand I've gone along with the "it's RC he can be very pushy as town" train of thought (if that makes sense) so maybe scum!rc thinks he can get away with this? Anyone who has like, more meta experience with RC?
I'm also fine lynching texcat, tbh. TW doesn;t convince me either, but at least he's active which may help in reading him later, tex isn't that active.
That's my $0.02 for nowClaimed and confirmed mason partners.And it wasn't just RC, it was 6 other people who followed along with him. Don't you think that might be more indicative of scum than meh, tex isn't that active, or meh TW doesn't convince me?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'd like to see Havo respond to this, but he wouldn't be my pick for a vote today. He did not post after the mason claim, so I'm not sure whether he saw it or not.In post 1339, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Something just seems off with Havo's latest posts. In 1318, they ask whether Rc is really just "bad town", implying they are suspicious of RC. Then they say that they are on board with voting someone that Radiant is pushing in 1319 and soft defend him in 1320 by asking whether he needs to be flipped. These posts seem really contradictory, I'm not sure whether Havo is just sheeping other people or not, but I'm starting to become wary of them.
I could go along with this. I'm tired of the naked let's lynch tex posts.In post 1340, Completly Trustworthy wrote:The Worst is also suspicious to me. He repeatedly said Texcat was scum, but only bothered to sheep RC and Krazy. In fact, he said in 986 that he didn't understand why people wanted to lynch FA. If that was the case, then why did he just go along with voting him multiple times? In addition, the majority of his posts do not relate to solving the game and it feels like he's active lurking. Just look at his ISO and you'll realize the vast majority of his posts are worthless.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1348, Garmr wrote:Meh I waited to see how people act long enough long enough if you want lynch actual scum today lynch tex
VOTE: texcat
lol I don't know what that means, but it looks like OMGUS.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
100% fakeIn post 1352, Skygazer wrote:VOTE: Garmr
Knowing what I know there's like a 95% chance this is a fakeclaim unless town is way overpowered-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I've been wondering the same thing. It doesn't make sense from a scum pov, unless they've gotten really over-confident after killing the masons. Garmr doesn't strike me as the type of player that is so sure that he's right that he fakes a guilty as town, but TW seems to think he might.In post 1364, Completly Trustworthy wrote:If Garmr is faking this claim, he is probably scum. If so, why would he make a claim that would probably not be believed? Texcat was looking like a player who could easily be lynched, so I don't understand why an incriminating fake claim that essentially sacrifices a member of the mafia would be something the scumteam would go through with. Does the scumteam think that Texcat is a PR and is worth sacrificing Garmr for? If that is not the case, I can't think of a reason to bother with a fakeclaim this early. So I believe that Garmr is either telling the truth or is running some type of gambit.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm guessing that you didn't pl him for it, or he might not be still trying stunts like this.In post 1386, RadiantCowbells wrote:Also my past experience with garmr includes him guiltying town and me being forced to decide between pling him for it and lynching my game long scumread. I did win that but like
Regardless of garmrs alignment, if the claim is real garmr is too high threat to leave alive so nah.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
RC, you were quick to say that we should let scum sort out the Garmr fake claim. Why didn't you say the same thing about the masons yesterday?In post 1408, RadiantCowbells wrote:for my part I'm just... not at all apologetic about the mason situation.
the masons should have realized how bad their interactions looked and that my pushing them for it was at worst NAI and actually addressed the heart of my concern by talking about the convo in mason chat that led up to it
they didn't, they chose to shit on me for being bad for thinking that masons don't talk about how hard it is to read each other when I also have an established record of dealing with masons poorly, and we get to today.
Did I play badly? in terms of reading FA_Q2 wrong yes, maybe. But from another point of view FA_Q2 was playing as an informed player and concealing information about DT that they knew, so how was I supposed to know they weren't scum doing scum things?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
First, I disagree with your assumption that if RC is scum, he is the only scum on the wagon. Second, I don't see what that has to do with voting Wh4t. Third, I don't know why you think you can only solve the game if we lynch Wh4t.In post 1445, Havo wrote:
If RC is scum, there’s a very good chance that he’s the only scum on the FA wagon.In post 1443, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Basically, I'd would normally be voting for Wh4t right now, but I'm currently hesitating to do so because plenty of people from the FA wagon(you, Sky, Havo, TW) are on it. RC, I followed your lead once and it didn't pay off, now I want to be more careful before doing what you say. If you and others engaged with me further, this problem might be fixed.
If RC is town, then there’s a very good chance at least 2 scum on that wagon.
Just vote What, and I’ll solve this game tomorrow.
That’s why my activity has been throttled. I’m waiting patiently for Day 3. If What is the lynch today, we’re good. If someone other than What is the lynch, then all bets are off. I know it’s asking a lot, but I’m supremely confident here.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
It bothers me that Wh4t has just disappeared when he is the vote leader, but I'm not sure that means anything as far as his alignment goes.In post 1467, Completly Trustworthy wrote:We need to start talking again, if we keep posting at the same rate, we're handing the game to the scumteam.
@mod -- Could we get some prods for Wh4t and Gamma please?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
This is bananas! My ISO is not so long or dense. You should be able to see where I have been suspicious of IAI/Gamma Emerald since the beginning of the game.In post 1624, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Looking at Texcat's ISO, the only comment about GE before the vote was in 859, so I would like an explanation as to why they did it.
Spoiler:-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What made you change your mind about at least 2 scum on the FA wagon?In post 1445, Havo wrote:
If RC is scum, there’s a very good chance that he’s the only scum on the FA wagon.In post 1443, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Basically, I'd would normally be voting for Wh4t right now, but I'm currently hesitating to do so because plenty of people from the FA wagon(you, Sky, Havo, TW) are on it. RC, I followed your lead once and it didn't pay off, now I want to be more careful before doing what you say. If you and others engaged with me further, this problem might be fixed.
If RC is town, then there’s a very good chance at least 2 scum on that wagon.
Just vote What, and I’ll solve this game tomorrow.
That’s why my activity has been throttled. I’m waiting patiently for Day 3. If What is the lynch today, we’re good. If someone other than What is the lynch, then all bets are off. I know it’s asking a lot, but I’m supremely confident here.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What are your reads Garmr? Perhaps you should post them before you start accusing me of coasting.In post 1694, Garmr wrote:Tec cats going to use me as a excuse to coast so sorting me may be a good option-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm not going to vote CT, but I would vote Havo. CT is town, and I'm sorry he replaced out. I much prefer Garmr. I may not have time until the end of the week, but I think you could put together a pretty good case on Garmr.In post 1713, the worst wrote:
this is p good mostly I think btw so if not Have we just lynch CT's slot. :0In post 1590, RadiantCowbells wrote:{RR, RC}
{HWS, Skygazer, Havo}
{Texcat}
{Gamma Emerald}
{Garmr, TW}
{Wh4t, CT}-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
It looks like you are the one deflecting. Do you think we didn't notice that you didn't answer the question? Do you have any reads?In post 1705, Garmr wrote:
Nice deflectionIn post 1704, texcat wrote:
What are your reads Garmr? Perhaps you should post them before you start accusing me of coasting.In post 1694, Garmr wrote:Tec cats going to use me as a excuse to coast so sorting me may be a good option-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
This looks a lot like an admission of guilt in lynching the masons.In post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guilty-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched. <Shrug>In post 1771, Gamma Emerald wrote:
He never said wasn’t responsible in fact we went over this d2, you’re just twisting things at this pointIn post 1769, texcat wrote:
This looks a lot like an admission of guilt in lynching the masons.In post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guilty-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1777, the worst wrote:
throw me some quotes which made you feel this way?In post 1775, texcat wrote:Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched.
It was really just the one. And it's just that he's taking credit forIn post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guiltypushing to lynchthe masons, not just voting the masons. He's arguing that he didn't need to fake a guilty on me to get lynched. He could have pushed me instead of the masons and gotten me lynched. I guess that where I sense that he's bragging. Like he thinks he's so good that whoever he pushed would be lynched. What doesn't make sense is that on one hand he says he didn't need to fake a guilty on me, and on the other hand, he did fake a guilty on me.
I already commented on this. This does not seem to be the normal town reaction to getting confirmed masons lynched. Compare it to RC's reaction.In post 1286, Garmr wrote:Welp I was wrong oh well no biggy.In post 1273, RadiantCowbells wrote:Hi I expect to be literally hated right now
RC feels bad and tries to explain where he went wrong. Garmr seems to be trying to preempt us thinking that he voted for the masons because he was scum, by saying that he was wrong. And has continued that.In post 1275, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have literally never, over the past 5 years I've been here, seen a mason mason interaction anything like this one. If anyone wants to dig through my history in search of that they are welcome to but I had every reason to believe masons wouldn't actually talk about being unable to sort one another and them doing so now amazes me and I couldn't really play around it. Sorry for being super wrong but I was just trying to win.
I'm not jailkeeper enabler if I have to say that, I just didn't want to die n1.
I realize some of this may be my confirmation bias. But the facts are thatIn post 1770, Garmr wrote: Yeah I lynched the masons never denied it doesn't make me scum just wrong at the time.Garmr is the only person who has been on the wrong side of both lynches.Not only did he push to lynch the masons, but he did not vote Wh4t, and looks to be subtly trying to defend Wh4t.In post 1402, Garmr wrote:What's the case on wh4t again?In post 1454, Garmr wrote:
I don't dislike the wh4t wagon I just don't understand why his being scumread I asked multiple times but got no answer.In post 1453, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Garmr, why do you dislike the Wh4t wagon and want to vote somewhere else? Can you say why you think GE is more suspicious or make a case for Wh4t being towny?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
-
-