mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)

[schadd_]

i think you're supposed to drink a lot of water to prevent hangover idk

Vote count 2.1

Wh4t (3):

RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, the worst

Garmr (1):

texcat

RadiantCowbells (1):

Wh4t

the worst (1):

Completly Trustworthy

texcat (1):

Garmr

not voting (4):

Gamma Emerald, Havo, Ruby Red, HeWhoSwims

with 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch. day 2 ends september 15 at 17:00 central US time; in (expired on 2018-09-15 18:00:00)

mod notes

• HWS is vla

[/area]

[Havo]

VOTE: what

[Garmr]

What's the case on wh4t again?

[RadiantCowbells]

Also my past experience with garmr includes him guiltying town and me being forced to decide between pling him for it and lynching my game long scumread. I did win that but like

Regardless of garmrs alignment, if the claim is real garmr is too high threat to leave alive so nah.

I'm guessing that you didn't pl him for it, or he might not be still trying stunts like this.

I managed to get scum to react and make it obvious who they were.

you say that but i had been saying bbt was scum d1 so its not like we needed help knowing that that scummy fuck was scum

[Garmr]

Also my past experience with garmr includes him guiltying town and me being forced to decide between pling him for it and lynching my game long scumread. I did win that but like

Regardless of garmrs alignment, if the claim is real garmr is too high threat to leave alive so nah.

I'm guessing that you didn't pl him for it, or he might not be still trying stunts like this.

I managed to get scum to react and make it obvious who they were.

you say that but i had been saying bbt was scum d1 so its not like we needed help knowing that that scummy fuck was scum

Didn't BBT out a buddy through that day who got vigged after my fake claim and that helped the other players to catch him latter on. Since it takes more than one player.

[Garmr]

Just going to be straight out and honest here. Even through I was wrong on Doubting Thomas (the fact they were town not scum, I mean it obvious they had reached and lied about havo to make a case.) I felt like I been slapped around for actually trying in a town game. So I haven't put 100% effort in and I'm playing more risky/gambling. I have tried at points to get back into the game but I don't feel I can. I also feel like it's unfair I give this slot to anyone else since they would have to put up with this game.

Please don't take away this is my standard as town after this game.

[RadiantCowbells]

that's the thing I post in my scumgames x_x

[Garmr]

that's the thing I post in my scumgames x_x

But I'm not you.

[RadiantCowbells]

for my part I'm just... not at all apologetic about the mason situation.
the masons should have realized how bad their interactions looked and that my pushing them for it was at worst NAI and actually addressed the heart of my concern by talking about the convo in mason chat that led up to it
they didn't, they chose to shit on me for being bad for thinking that masons don't talk about how hard it is to read each other when I also have an established record of dealing with masons poorly, and we get to today.

Did I play badly? in terms of reading FA_Q2 wrong yes, maybe. But from another point of view FA_Q2 was playing as an informed player and concealing information about DT that they knew, so how was I supposed to know they weren't scum doing scum things?

[Garmr]

for my part I'm just... not at all apologetic about the mason situation.
the masons should have realized how bad their interactions looked and that my pushing them for it was at worst NAI and actually addressed the heart of my concern by talking about the convo in mason chat that led up to it
they didn't, they chose to shit on me for being bad for thinking that masons don't talk about how hard it is to read each other

when I also have an established record of dealing with masons poorly,

and we get to today.

Did I play badly? in terms of reading FA_Q2 wrong yes, maybe. But from another point of view FA_Q2 was playing as an informed player and concealing information about DT that they knew, so how was I supposed to know they weren't scum doing scum things?

My first time playing with mason I outed them by pointing out they had the exact same read,followed each others votes and town read each other from the beginning like 4 day phases in. Since I was new to mafia I didn't know what a mason was lol. I have fucked up masons a couple of times.

Playing as a mason well that's a different story I have a good history as that.

[Garmr]

Actually I'm pretty good at sniffing out power roles now I think about it.

[RadiantCowbells]

i have scumread masons in every game i've played with them and correctly called the pairing out (but as scumbuddies) a ridiculous amount of times

[Completly Trustworthy]

This lynch is coming together too fast, we're already at l-2 and there's been no resistance at all. If Wh4t is scum, then the scumteam could defend him by implying Radiant can't be trusted, which would be pretty easy to do after he helped lynch the masons. The fact that so many people are quickly agreeing to lynch Wh4t is offputting to me. We should at the very last talk for a few days and wait for Ruby Red to make some comments.

[texcat]

for my part I'm just... not at all apologetic about the mason situation.
the masons should have realized how bad their interactions looked and that my pushing them for it was at worst NAI and actually addressed the heart of my concern by talking about the convo in mason chat that led up to it
they didn't, they chose to shit on me for being bad for thinking that masons don't talk about how hard it is to read each other when I also have an established record of dealing with masons poorly, and we get to today.

Did I play badly? in terms of reading FA_Q2 wrong yes, maybe. But from another point of view FA_Q2 was playing as an informed player and concealing information about DT that they knew, so how was I supposed to know they weren't scum doing scum things?

RC, you were quick to say that we should let scum sort out the Garmr fake claim. Why didn't you say the same thing about the masons yesterday?

[Gamma Emerald]

Also my past experience with garmr includes him guiltying town and me being forced to decide between pling him for it and lynching my game long scumread. I did win that but like

Regardless of garmrs alignment, if the claim is real garmr is too high threat to leave alive so nah.

What threat? Now that a scum is caught, watcher can't get another hard guilty until that scum dies.

[Gamma Emerald]

Probably going to get me lynched but Yolo. I did fake it I thought I was going to get all these responses to use as data. I mean I been setting it up since day 1. But everyone guessed right away. I was going to reveal on the tip of texs lynch.

Give me your thoughts on reactions ASAP.

[Gamma Emerald]

Though why would you claim x shot if you intended to retract anyway?

[Completly Trustworthy]

I believe he claimed he had x-shots so it would make the hypothetical setup more balanced and increase the likelihood people would believe him. So there is an easy explanation for why he did that. Overall, your comment feels like weak shade Gamma Emerald. Nobody was talking about Garmr anyway, why did you have to question him in a manner which indicated you didn't believe he was actually trying to fakeclaim?

[Gamma Emerald]

Hi, why are you answering for Garmr when you know that's something you shouldn't do? And I thought of that myself, I just wanted to see if he'd squirm when I pressed him. So thanks for ruining that.

[RadiantCowbells]

for my part I'm just... not at all apologetic about the mason situation.
the masons should have realized how bad their interactions looked and that my pushing them for it was at worst NAI and actually addressed the heart of my concern by talking about the convo in mason chat that led up to it
they didn't, they chose to shit on me for being bad for thinking that masons don't talk about how hard it is to read each other when I also have an established record of dealing with masons poorly, and we get to today.

Did I play badly? in terms of reading FA_Q2 wrong yes, maybe. But from another point of view FA_Q2 was playing as an informed player and concealing information about DT that they knew, so how was I supposed to know they weren't scum doing scum things?

RC, you were quick to say that we should let scum sort out the Garmr fake claim. Why didn't you say the same thing about the masons yesterday?

these are very, very different situations

[Completly Trustworthy]

Gamma Emerald, I made that post because I wanted to see how you reacted to an accusation. I'd say your stated motive for asking Garmr why he said he had x-shots was pretty good, so I can get behind that line of thinking. Now, you're one of the players alongside Ruby Red I'd like to hear more from. So far you've commented on many posts from the game, but I would like to know what your current position on all the players is. Can you post a reads list for everyone still alive?

[RadiantCowbells]

hi i'm bored of this game so i'm going to let postie post for me glglglglglglglglglgl

[RadiantCowbells]

no not actually ur all fools

[RadiantCowbells]

ct's defense of wh4t could ez be svs

[Garmr]

Hi, why are you answering for Garmr when you know that's something you shouldn't do? And I thought of that myself, I just wanted to see if he'd squirm when I pressed him. So thanks for ruining that.

So you literally are allowed to answer for texcat but if anybody else answer for me that's wrong?