In post 249, LTVNGambit wrote: In post 242, GuerillaWoo wrote:I don't mind your wagon on Tommy for now but what do you think about Dva and their vote on you? Also LTVN: bad town or bad scum?
What have I done in your eyes which makes me out to be bad town or bad scum? This is just posting for the sake of looking like you are inputting. Why don't you do what you asked Saudade. Try to do something helpful rather than antagonistic.
How about having bad reads for one. Not just in terms of content, but you don't seem to have any townie paranoia at all. All I'm getting from you is this sense that you're looking for an excuse to vote and pretend you're aggressive by acting like i guess the nice way of putting it is the protagonist of a greek tragedy
You also only started actively posting directly after being called out for coming in, voting, then leaving with like your first post multiple pages in. If you go back and read my post where I first pointed this out, you got super defensive about "lurking" when I legit never brought that up. Like I never actually said you were lurking. At all. Which is hilarious, you literally gave yourself up as a lurker. You're playing reactively to people's reads of you.
Now you've accused two people of not posting content which is p funny.
It isn't informed scum content, and it isn't a scumslip. First of all there is a difference between declaration and an assumption. He didn't say with certainty that they are town v town. "Feels like" is an assumption.
This sentence right here. Good semantic analysis there bud.
You defended Tommy pretty strongly and I'm assuming that's why Saudade put you two in his lynchpool. Shame, woulda liked to hear it from him tbh.
Hey here's a bad read
In post 190, LTVNGambit wrote: In post 182, Saudade wrote:
informed scum content, scumslip =]
VOTE: Tommy
if the whole doughnut ezkielrage and the angry guy tunnelling guy could unvote because you guys are playing into a bad position
Okay, let's say hypothetically you are right about it. What do you think about this:
In post 149, Alchemist21 wrote:
I feel the same.
Ezekel ISO in the previous game shows that he does withhold his vote.
Doughboy has been doing some ballsy stuff this game if he’s scum, and the last game shows a big back and forth between him and Ezekel and that old interaction has probably painted Doughboy’s memory of him especially considering Doughboy had never mentioned Ezekel in that game until shit went down.
Or are you just not going to bother to respond because you cbb to read walls of quotes?
Pretty lazy for a "town" don't you think?
Like someone saying they don't wanna read three walls of text that say the same thing is scummy now. Good thing you put town in quote marks otherwise, phew.
To be fair, this is as close as you get to a proactive read, and you're just doing it in defense of another user.
In post 248, LTVNGambit wrote: In post 209, GuerillaWoo wrote: In post 171, LTVNGambit wrote:
This makes it seem as if you want to start a wagon, and jump on at the end due to the unvoting.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: GuerillaWoo
Not caring whether somebody is town doesn't make sense to me, sure we have a town majority, but if we lose 2 town, day 1 and night 1, then it becomes more difficult.
This is... What. Who unvoted other than me? It's my wagon, I literally started it. I hopped off because L-1 at page 7 is cutting it close and I'm trying to prevent an early lynch.
How in the blissful divine swan fuck is that "jumping on at the end due to unvoting."
This is such an obvious lie. You. Trying to prevent an early lynch? In what world? You are the one who is pushing most for an early lynch along with Saudade
Calling someone a liar then lying you lyish lie man pants on liar
It's actually pretty weird that I'm having to defend unvoting someone under the accusation that I didn't in fact unvote, I actually voted. This is a bad read. Actually it's the reason I'm having some doubts about you being scum. You rarely see scum make bad pushes like this. The possibility that you're bad town exists.
There's also your weird unspoken relationship with Tommy (hubba hubba). So, I think I misspoke, you're not bad scum, pal. Cuz you've essentially forced us all to look at Tommy suspiciously, but I honestly think it's very possible you're setting him up.
If you're not setting him up, yeah, bad scum. But who am I to judge, I'm the king of bad plays lol
Anyhoo, that's the gist of it. I'll be doing a quick audience q&a after a five minute break, thank you all, remember to like follow & subscribe