To a town aligned player trying to read you there is no difference between lying about your reads randomly and trying to give yourself the ability to change them whenever it suits youIn post 1413, Eiralox wrote:Nah I never had real read on you or pengu, tho pengu... I'm admittedly meh on. frogster dying convinced me you had to be pushed.... and it was interesting. fast, but enchant was fasterIn post 1410, Cephrir wrote: you cant just change your reads every 2 posts
My only super real read now is on Dionysus.
I have other suspicions but not enough to push or even care about rn
other than, don't really care. i got what i wanted, it's not solid but its something
Mini Normal 2289 - Postgame
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
VOTE: enchant"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
cool why tho"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I hate all of you"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
if you're so sure why aren't you doing more about it"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
dionysus, you've been voting t3 for literally the entire game but i didn't really see you mention the scumread hardly at all until 1080:
and this seems predicated on his being partnered with alchemist. so like... sup?In post 1080, Dionysus wrote:
Was this post an actual scumread? Because if it is then this:In post 992, T3 wrote: This push on Enchant seems like Alchemist is caught scum trying to divert attention away by starting a 1v1? Maybe?
is weird.
~~~~~
I've read through alchemist ISO and it isn't as townie as I remembered. The humblebrag on the scummie nomination in #222 is something I've got in the back of my mind. I think there is a decent chance they're partners. T3's reads have been a bit all over the place. I get it, day 1 is hard, but he's not a noob. His progression on alchemist for example just doesn't make sense only for him to not vote him, unless they're scum together and T3 doesn't want to vote his partner. Alchemist also replied to eiralox's post of T3's messy reads and didn't actually acknowledge this inconsistency."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i guess i can try to assess whether t3 is inconsistent, but i feel like a ton of players in this game have been inconsistent so it's weird to pick on him for itIn post 1423, Dionysus wrote:A dagger to my heart </3
But I get it. I've been kind of mia so far today. Truth be told I've been struggling to follow this game because it is pretty much almost entirely vibes and I'm better at hunting scum with logical deductions.
Having said that, I still think T3 is scum. Their contributions may be better than mine in terms of volume, but not in terms of content. Reads changing from one post to the next is fine, but there should be a consistent thread that you can follow to make sense of the person's thought process. T3's reads have been... well not that."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
there are a few weird posts i guess"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
well you see many players are townreading enchant because... uh... ???"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i think i need to review. i feel like a lot of players could be scum"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
what does respectable reasons mean?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
does that just mean that you don't want to say the reason"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i can think of one reason enchant could be talking about that would make me want to eliminate him immediately and one that i would find reasonable
hm"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
ill try to think about this tomorrow"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
The hell did I just read"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i feel like brick just showed that he can generate a whole lot of words and passion so i wonder why that happens at a miniscule perceived slight and not as part of scumhunting
idk the response just seems massively out of proportion even if you read eir's post in the insulting way (which i honestly do)"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
this feels like trying too hard to find a scumread on dionysus for nothingIn post 1517, Brickwalll wrote:
Yes, potentially one of the scum not on the wagon to answer your question.In post 1514, Dionysus wrote:
Idk if I would characterise it as a u-turn. I just re-read and didn't think they were as townie as I remembered, and I thought there was a possibility he and T3 were partners. I was clearly wrong there lol. But I thought T3 was scummier than alchemist so I kept my vote on him and didn't join the alchemist wagon, which was, whether T3 is scum or not, the right call at least.In post 1459, Brickwalll wrote: VOTE: Dionysus
Talk me through your u-turn on Alchemist in D1? Specifically why your u-turn only occurred after he had 4 votes on him. Because on two separate occasions, roughly 500 posts apart, you read alchemist as town.
They then had 4 votes placed on them and then you thought they were T3’s scum partner?
I assume based on #1266 where you discuss how many of the scumteam were on the alchemist wagon that you think I am the one or two who didn't vote for him.
But around the 300 post mark you said they were town leaning. Again at the 800 post mark you confirmed they were town leaning. Did you not re-read here to confirm this read? Surely if by the 1200 post mark you are now seeing them as scum, you certainly would have started picking up these subtle scummy nuances between post 300 and 800, but you didn't - you just confirmed them as town?
for the most part this iso just didn't make me feel much of anything"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i think penguinpower has had quite a bit of thread presence actually"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i still don't love this but with alchemist having flipped town i dunno how mad i get to be about itIn post 814, Dionysus wrote:
You missed the important part where I said I liked his analysisIn post 812, Cephrir wrote: alchemist: town for being engaged and scumhunting
cephrir: scum for no explained reason despite being more engaged and scumhunting his cute little ass off and having good analysis as stated in this very post
ok
Infer what you will from that
i don't like the way this post seeks consensus instead of just giving an opinionIn post 1011, Dionysus wrote:
I have never played with ceph, so I have no idea what his meta is like, but this post feels a bit over-engineered and self-aware to me. Anyone agree?In post 1005, Save The Dragons wrote:
i think he would have. some back story is that he's been really good at getting red PMs as of late. Like ridiculously so. So i think he's just exhausted from being scum. As he starts getting green PMs again he'll start to get more comfortable so this tell will fade in time but i think he's just pissed off at only getting to play scum recently and i think it would have shown more. i think he's attempting to play here which is not what i would expect from scum!ceph.In post 882, Frogsterking wrote: I am taking your perspective on Cephir seriously. For example I don't get the sense reading his ISO that he knew your alignment at all. I think it may have been genuine. Do you feel like he would have burned out sooner as scum?
that is not to say he can't be scum, i'm still hesitant to lock him as town because maybe he is already over getting all those red roles. like i think after temple game, scum!ceph would make sure to be suspicious of me but then arrive at a tr of me (i don't know if he did that later part yet) but that's what i would expect to make it look like he was sorting me.
i don't necessarily have a problem with one changing their mind, but the reason offered here is really underwhelming for meIn post 1080, Dionysus wrote:
Was this post an actual scumread? Because if it is then this:In post 992, T3 wrote: This push on Enchant seems like Alchemist is caught scum trying to divert attention away by starting a 1v1? Maybe?
is weird.
~~~~~
I've read through alchemist ISO and it isn't as townie as I remembered. The humblebrag on the scummie nomination in #222 is something I've got in the back of my mind. I think there is a decent chance they're partners. T3's reads have been a bit all over the place. I get it, day 1 is hard, but he's not a noob. His progression on alchemist for example just doesn't make sense only for him to not vote him, unless they're scum together and T3 doesn't want to vote his partner. Alchemist also replied to eiralox's post of T3's messy reads and didn't actually acknowledge this inconsistency.
in my opinion, you are; however, this post feels weird coming from someone who (above) has a problem with t3 changing their mindIn post 1519, Dionysus wrote:
idk man am i not allowed to just change my mindIn post 1517, Brickwalll wrote:
Yes, potentially one of the scum not on the wagon to answer your question.In post 1514, Dionysus wrote:
Idk if I would characterise it as a u-turn. I just re-read and didn't think they were as townie as I remembered, and I thought there was a possibility he and T3 were partners. I was clearly wrong there lol. But I thought T3 was scummier than alchemist so I kept my vote on him and didn't join the alchemist wagon, which was, whether T3 is scum or not, the right call at least.In post 1459, Brickwalll wrote: VOTE: Dionysus
Talk me through your u-turn on Alchemist in D1? Specifically why your u-turn only occurred after he had 4 votes on him. Because on two separate occasions, roughly 500 posts apart, you read alchemist as town.
They then had 4 votes placed on them and then you thought they were T3’s scum partner?
I assume based on #1266 where you discuss how many of the scumteam were on the alchemist wagon that you think I am the one or two who didn't vote for him.
But around the 300 post mark you said they were town leaning. Again at the 800 post mark you confirmed they were town leaning. Did you not re-read here to confirm this read? Surely if by the 1200 post mark you are now seeing them as scum, you certainly would have started picking up these subtle scummy nuances between post 300 and 800, but you didn't - you just confirmed them as town?
reminder to myself to investigate the validity of this postIn post 1601, Dionysus wrote: Laughing so hard at that failed NM hammer
Some thoughts on furtive:
- #537 - this is his first explicit scumread and it took 40 posts to get there. His contributions up until this point were also mostly kind of nothing-y. A few votes here and there with light commentary, but no serious pushes on anyone.
- #544 - more meat on the bones developing from this point.
- He later agrees with frogster's top 3 townreads and his scumread on ceph in #695, although he doesn't think enchant is scum based on how they normally play, which contradicts ceph analysis.
- #1018 - a full readlist with enchant in urine colour and ceph as his highest scumread.
From here he has been pushing ceph, T3 and NM. There are two interesting things from the furtive ISO - the first thing is that it took a while for him to really get going and there was a lot of posts that didn't move the game on any. I know I have been guilty of this myself, but I am pretty inexperienced in this queue unlike him. But the most interesting thing for me in the furtive ISO is the disagreement on the enchant meta. I've never played with enchant (and sorry but I am not reading any old games lol, not got time for that) so I don't have an opinion on this myself, but this + the nullread on enchant from furtive positions him nicely as a potential scumpartner to enchant if they flip red. So ceph/penguin vs enchant/furtive + someone else. If this scumpair is legit then NM moves down my list slightly, as I don't think a hammer on your partner would have made any sense for him as a scum player at this stage, with the contributions he had made. He could have just coasted by. But doesn't rule him out with ceph/penguin if furtive turns out to be town."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i hate the lack of post numbers in quotes post-upgrade so much"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
dunno why one would not just let t3 answer this himselfIn post 56, furtiveglance wrote:
I'm guessing the latter - if T3 townread you but thought you were wrong they would probably say thatIn post 55, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
Bad as in bad reasoning or scummy?In post 45, T3 wrote:In post 23, Cat Scratch Fever wrote: VOTE: Eiralox
That feels like a scum entrance. Why are you sheeping Dionysus onto a vote on someone who hasn't confirmed their PM?I think this post is bad
I also am liking brickwall's most recent posts
how do these two posts (page 7 and page 14) come from the same person? finding scum on page 7 is impossible, but on page 14 you can be sure enough to call basically everyone with votes town?In post 160, furtiveglance wrote:In post 158, Save The Dragons wrote: do you really expect me to find scum by page 7relatable
interesting that you think scum have stagnant scumreads. when was the last time any of your reads changed meaningfully?In post 537, furtiveglance wrote: Yeah I think Cephrir is dodgy. Not for the Lycanfire comment about Dionysus but the way Cephrir handled my slot which his predecessor pushed on. I've caught scum replacements for having stagnant scumreads before
VOTE: Cephrir
you've been attacking me all game for as far as i can tell, pretty much just this... i feel like if you really felt this level of conviction you should be doing more to get rid of me
can you think of anything different about my experiences in temple vs warrior cats that might make me behave differently other than alignmentIn post 883, furtiveglance wrote: You got me on board for Cephrir now
I just think he feels more similar to Temple than Warrior Cats
He's bitter rather than detached
I've been thinking about the difference
Why did you get off? and why Alchemist?
ugh i always want to scumread people who unironically scumread me in every game repeatedly without ever thinking "maybe i just don't vibe with cephrir's personality" but i'm usually wrong on that
i've seen this "queue up" idea more than once in the iso... why not just push these things then and there?In post 1188, furtiveglance wrote: I'd like to queue up a vote on Not_Mafia since that's probably my closest thing to a scumread that overlapped with Frogsterking's
other than frogsterking having scumread him, why do you suspect not_mafia?In post 1465, furtiveglance wrote: This game's become a little less interesting to me recently
I'm happy to move to Cephrir or Not_Mafia if they're gonna get more votes than T3
Does anyone have a question for me? I find it engaging to talk to specific players
for me, and i did go through his iso a bit ago just didn't see much worthy of comment, he just looks like not_mafia. i think he belongs in the poe and if i were lacking for suspects i'd consider going there, but as i have so many slots i feel less than stellar about, someone dead null isn't on my priority list"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
In post 161, Save The Dragons wrote:In post 139, Save The Dragons wrote: ick
i think you missed it but this is a mindmeld right hereIn post 140, Brickwalll wrote:
I think the exact opposite. I think that’s what scum could possibly do.In post 138, Alchemist21 wrote: Speaking of Townreads I forgot to mention earlier that I think Eiralox is prob Town because I don’t think scum would just walk into the thread announcing they’re gonna sheep another player and then self-vote to comically prove the point.
i've already been over this and gone back and forth about it, i feel no need to do so again, but i still think it's scummyIn post 155, Save The Dragons wrote: what content are you expecting from me
you also missed where i mind melded with you regarding alchemist's post
i dunno if i think this mindset is consistent with how ive seen you portray your meta in other games. is reading you early impossible, or isn't it?In post 231, Save The Dragons wrote:
you're supposed to take more than 5 seconds to read meIn post 226, Frogsterking wrote: Dragons how am I supposed to realize that you're Town from your existing ISO?
you don't have to solve the game D1 it's okay
i do think enchant is scum and i think std is not partnered with enchant probably but rereading my own post about the dionysus vote gives me some pause that maybe they could beIn post 525, Save The Dragons wrote:
i think these are all incorrect, i think you're just wrong about my intention with the mindmeld thing, i think my mood dictates whether I'm fun and i'm having a bad time lately, i think the voting you is NAI it doesn't make me sus it makes me a jerk as either alignment, and unless you're also scum here who knows i'm town it's not the same thing because your read would still have been biased.In post 517, Cephrir wrote: @std here's why ive been suspecting you even the dumb stuff
-i still think post 155 is needlessly affiliative and not good and it's strange to me the way you phrased it ("you missed that we mindmelded" just doesn't seem like a correct characterization of the events that occurred to me). perhaps you will remember "needlessly affiliative" as something i look for
-i have nothing to support this but i think you're more fun as town and you haven't really been that fun here
-i think you know that i can get tilted and i would think you would not want to activate that by greeting me with a vote and a reminder of all the reasons i feel ambivalent about mafia
i don't agree with your insistence that i can't derive any meaningful meta from a game in which i was scum. i think you were obviously town in that game. many other players were non-obviously town. this is something scum need to pay attention to to figure out where their mislims are going to come from. it's puzzling to me that you can't see the difference -- you played very differently from this there
also from now: -i dunno why you weren't feeling enchant enough to vote dionysus for no reason if he was playing exactly to your scum-enchant model you've just explained
the last part is the only relevant thing and i guess i was waiting to see what enchant would do but enchant continued to just troll the thread
so do youIn post 1639, Save The Dragons wrote: you seem rather muted this game furtive"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
where did this read go?In post 987, T3 wrote: Cephrir's reaction to Frogster's deathtunnel does not feel like exasperated town at all
(this is in response to me questioning the initial empty eiralox vote)
trajectory on eiralox since this has been believable but i still don't get the beginning
(don't try to click the arrow to go to this post, i fucked my quote up)"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
bluh
for now i guess i'll VOTE: Dionysus"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
nm do you still hammer anything in elo
because that seems like, not very good"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Results plz"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
My personal balance philosophy is 3 medium strength power roles vs 3 goons, and adjust from there"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I mean we should probably have more than one player weigh in on the order"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I'm not entirely sure we even need to massclaim at all but you probably do have to"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Please bring woof to our useless heathen heartsIn post 1730, Firebringer wrote: i literally was hoping penguin was scum here so i could just troll along. Do i need to be a hero and solve this game for yall"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Also depends on what they areIn post 1735, Firebringer wrote:
depends on what scum have.In post 1734, furtiveglance wrote: Brickwall/Dionysus/Enchant/NM makes 4 PR, is that too many?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I have a lot of ai content in this game honestly. I challenge you to figure me out without being told the answers, that's how learning happensIn post 1740, Firebringer wrote:
i will do so.In post 1736, Cephrir wrote:
Please bring woof to our useless heathen heartsIn post 1730, Firebringer wrote: i literally was hoping penguin was scum here so i could just troll along. Do i need to be a hero and solve this game for yall
btw cephrir obligatory terrible question i hate so much but since ur always scum in games with me i gotta ask it:
Why should i think ur town this time?
if not feel free to tell me, i won't tell anyone. Might just help u out since ur the first to talk to me."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
My cutting wit has gone underappreciated this game I just want to be lovedIn post 1749, Firebringer wrote:
honestly telling me to learn is pretty scummy.In post 1745, Cephrir wrote: I have a lot of ai content in this game honestly. I challenge you to figure me out without being told the answers, that's how learning happens
Ill consider this scummy answer as townie for simplicity and the fact i enjoy you.
I THINK SCUM CEPHRIR WOULD KNOW I DONT LIKE READING"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I guess we might as well just claim at this point since we're already most of the way there
I'm VT"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
In post 1760, Firebringer wrote: damn cephrir telling me he had some goodd cutting jokes/witty remarks in the game makes me want to read.
IS THIS A TRICK!?!?!?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Explain?In post 1768, Brickwalll wrote:
Activated N2In post 1764, T3 wrote:
what's your n1 result?In post 1752, Brickwalll wrote: I’m the town shrink. Although CSF ended up dead after I checked them so not a very good shrink"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Underpowered since u have to activate the bulletproof"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I wonder if there can be 4 PRs if one of them is brickwall since the role he is claiming sucks eggs"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
And by 4 I mean 5
5 is kind of a lot I guess idk"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
This is a bit of a weird role since psychologists are pretty much worthless by night 4In post 1781, Brickwalll wrote:
Negative.In post 1771, T3 wrote:
is that what your modifier is called?In post 1768, Brickwalll wrote:
Activated N2In post 1764, T3 wrote:
what's your n1 result?In post 1752, Brickwalll wrote: I’m the town shrink. Although CSF ended up dead after I checked them so not a very good shrink
Officially I am the town even-night psychologist.
Every even night (2,4,6) I can select one player to see if they have an inactivated night killing ability. If they have killed a prior night or the night I check them, then it comes back as negative. If they have the ability to kill but haven’t done it then it comes back as positive and presumed scum. It wasn’t until Dion came up as a vigilante that I realised there were read herrings out there."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
@brick why did you target CSF
@enchant why did you target brick and what is your modifier
@masons did you crumb and what does your pt look like"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Get good imoIn post 1779, Firebringer wrote:
gonna hipfire the scum team in this game:In post 1750, Alianna wrote: Not_Mafia (1): Eiralox
furtiveglance (1): Save The Dragons
Brickwalll (1): T3
T3 (1): Brickwalll
Not Voting (5): Not_Mafia, Enchant, Cephrir, PenguinPower, furtiveglance
Eiralox, Cephrir, Furtive."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Shit, ur right
The narrative is that I'm partnered with the slot you replaced, we gotta give the people what they want"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Do we smell bad or something"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Wow. U managed to be speciesist towards two different animals at once. HatefulIn post 1809, furtiveglance wrote: I think skunks do yeah, especially mafia ones"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
No wonder you haven't been implementing any of our wacky plans"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
nm what have your targets been & why"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
earth to enchantIn post 1792, Cephrir wrote: @brick why did you target CSF
@enchant why did you target brick and what is your modifier
@masons did you crumb and what does your pt look like
come in, enchant"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i feel like there is some support for the idea that notmafia has had this claim planed since at least yesterday given his comments but im not sure how he managed to not protect frogsterIn post 1829, Brickwalll wrote:
You’re giving me way too much credit. Think this was a plan by scum in terms of NK.In post 1818, furtiveglance wrote: I think Brickwall just chose to claim a random PR instead of 1v1ing Enchant
CSF was pretty mutual and easy NK target. I have been more confrontational and thus been kept around. I think this would have been discussed amongst scum and now furtive is putting that plan into action. Starting the bandwagon and the rest will hold on.
I also have zero belief in Not Mafia’s claim. He’s making it up as he’s going along in my opinion.
VOTE: Furtive"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i would never tell you not to have funIn post 1833, Firebringer wrote: cephrir on a scale of 1 to super cerial.
How serious should i take this game tbh
i personally have been having fun trying to solve it despite the lack of success ive experienced thus far
but maybe if we killed enchant that would change
anyway i dunno how bout a 4 id enjoy some woof-content if ur down to try a little"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
it's the lack of success that might change"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
on the other hand i do have to admit the claims tell a story with a seemingly obvious solution"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
is masons + BG + neapolitan + vig too much power
what could scum have to balance that"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
i mean your claim fits with NM's claim and brickwall's claim seems sort of sillyIn post 1839, Enchant wrote:
Surprise meIn post 1838, Cephrir wrote: on the other hand i do have to admit the claims tell a story with a seemingly obvious solution"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
is it even worth wondering whether the masons are real"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Scum jailkeeper??"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
No I didn'tIn post 1843, Enchant wrote: You forgot psychologist."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Even night psychologist can't even get a false positive on the vig unless he holsters
It doesn't make sense"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
im ready to go to the part of the game where we try to find this guy's partners
VOTE: brickwall"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
if im a skunk you're soon to be a very stinky martin freeman"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
an unexpected argument, to be sure"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25353
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish