For not random voting.
Open 140 - Trendy and Subversive C9 v3 (OVER) before 781
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Unvote
Vote: AT
This is a serious vote.
AT lied. (Fl did have a random vote and its not like it was hard to find.)
AT lied again. (i did random vote)
AT acted like a single random vote on a player without any votes was trying to make a bandwagon.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
He said ""random" vote" that's different from Random Vote.AndyTony wrote:1. What? lol I didn't lie - I said Fl didn't make a random vote, and he admitted it..
He just needed me to clarify that I was pointing out it not being random YET not being serious eitherfuzzylightning wrote:so maybe it wasn't a "random" vote, per se....
You give reasons with random votes.2. You had a random vote? If it was random, why give a reason?
It's hardly random when you say "For..."Empking wrote:Vote: ekiM
For not random voting.
This is a bunch of lies.3. Any vote that is scum-hunting or serious in nature is a vote intended for a lynch, or a wagon to lead to such - - are you saying you put serious votes on people to protect them from wagons? lmao
I never said my vote was serious. AT is the one saying that.
I'm right so he resorts to Ad Homs.lol Don't waste my time, Little guy...-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Are hyou as retard or do you know what a random vote is?AndyTony wrote:
He was clarifying that though it wasn't random it was NOT SERIOUS - and I agreed with him - pay attention in the future, Emp.Empking wrote:
He said ""random" vote" that's different from Random Vote.AndyTony wrote:1. What? lol I didn't lie - I said Fl didn't make a random vote, and he admitted it..
He just needed me to clarify that I was pointing out it not being random YET not being serious eitherfuzzylightning wrote:so maybe it wasn't a "random" vote, per se....
In the random stages the reasons are often humorous or don't make sense, or are exclamations of why they're random - - there are reasons for voting that pertains to GAMEPLAY and that makes it an actual vote - - you voted based on someones GAMEPLAY.Empking wrote:
You give reasons with random votes.2. You had a random vote? If it was random, why give a reason?
It's hardly random when you say "For..."Empking wrote:Vote: ekiM
For not random voting.Fake AT wrote:
OMG serious vote based on gameplay.Fake wrote:Vote: BodHe used an E in his post.
No I didn't, I said one quote was ad hom instead of responses.
You just finished saying I don't respond to anything, and this is your idea of not being an ignorant hick?Empking wrote:
This is a bunch of lies.3. Any vote that is scum-hunting or serious in nature is a vote intended for a lynch, or a wagon to lead to such - - are you saying you put serious votes on people to protect them from wagons? lmao
I did.- - How is ANYTHING written above in my quote a lie? Are we to take you on your word? lol give EVIDENCE
I never said that.
It was serious because you based it on someone's gameplay - - Are you trying to say that if you vote and mislynch one of our town people, you can get off the hook by saying it wasn't serious? Is this a sick version of simon says? We don't have to hold you accountable for any votes unless you state "This is serious" ? lmao lmao lol!!!!!!!!Empking wrote:
I never said my vote was serious. AT is the one saying that.
To be clear:Empking wrote:
I'm right so he resorts to Ad Homs.lol Don't waste my time, Little guy...
Myself and another player have decided to nickname Emp "Little Guy" until he decides to play the game like an adult/rational person.Fake AT wrote: I play adult like. I just resort to stupid insults when I casn't defend myself. I real adult.
Says mister. "Oops, Scum just quick hammered. I better distract the town by pretending to be the real hammerer."Emp, Zwet, Millar - - they're all lopped up in the "WTF"? pile because they have a fetish for being lynched.
Emp is trying to distract us, rant and rave - and either get somebody mislynched, or have himself done in - - he's screwed over MANY towns by acting scummy as a towny or distracting us from real scumhunting.
Says the guy who can onlyGrow up, little guy.thinksteral one insult.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Do you know what a random vote is?AndyTony wrote:
Above speaks for itself...and makes me laugh lolEmpking wrote: Are hyou as retard or do you know what a random vote is?
Its an example of a random vote thayt you would consider a serious vote based on gameplay.
What is this an example of? Do you understand what I mean by voting based on gameplay?Empking wrote:Fake wrote:Vote: BodHe used an E in his post.
OMG serious vote based on gameplay.
In the post with the evidence.
Where's the evidence then? You can't just SAY it's there lolEmpking wrote:
I did.- - How is ANYTHING written above in my quote a lie? Are we to take you on your word? lol give EVIDENCE
I did. I random voted.
Then explain yourself!Empking wrote:
I never said that.It was serious because you based it on someone's gameplay - - Are you trying to say that if you vote and mislynch one of our town people, you can get off the hook by saying it wasn't serious? Is this a sick version of simon says? We don't have to hold you accountable for any votes unless you state "This is serious" ? lmao lmao lol!!!!!!!!
Wow.
Quoting a fake version of me is childish....Empking wrote:
Fake AT wrote: I play adult like. I just resort to stupid insults when I casn't defend myself. I real adult.
When did I give that as an excuse?And you've been told what is expected of a decent player on mafia scum "Slayer's Gambit" is hardly an excuse to play poorly.
No you didn'tAnd your whole case is childish and blown out of proportion on your end. You based this whole case on calling me a liar - I proved to you I wasn't lying.
The game we played in where you lynched the claimed un-counter claimed deputy.
Can you please better explain this? It seems obscure and yet another attempt to distract usEmpking wrote: Says mister. "Oops, Scum just quick hammered. I better distract the town by pretending to be the real hammerer."-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Justv wanted to make sure.AndyTony wrote:We all know what a random vote is - you gave a HORRIBLE example with that letter "E" thing -
Scum are able to do scummy things before page 3.Besides, Emp, I don't need to defend myself to you, you have no case - we only just broke onto the second page, and you think I'm scum because I'm a "Liar"
I'm a liar because I used someone as an example of who didn't make a random vote? Someone who agreed they didn't make a random vote,
No he agreed that he didn't do a ""random" vote". Don't put words into people's mouths.
Ad Hom.but wanted it to be clear that it wasn't necessarily serious?
Nice case, Little Guy.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Him being scum is one possible reason.ekiM wrote:
Huh? There clearly are situations where claiming is the correct move, even if it will lead to your NK.AndyTony wrote:It's best to play it by ear as we have no idea what the circumstances may be like, and in a game with more than one scum, claiming is beyond foolish as it will help the person's scum partner find the best NK -
About this argument that's taken up a whole page: If a 'random vote' is one cast without any serious claim that the caster finds the target suspicious, then all the initial votes in this game were 'random'. I believe that would be the usual definition, and the one Empking intended. I'm not sure why AT thought it worth arguing the toss over a semantic point to try and accuse Empking of inconsistency.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
And presumably the same is true for FL (?) as his vote was supposedly also not random.AndyTony wrote:@Uncle Pain
- Your question to FL suggests a "flaw" and "argument" - - I rather regard it as a misunderstanding over how one regarded a simple word - - And yes, I was being overcautious - - I've played with Emp enough to know that he often YES - votes for reasons much like the one he first gave, hence, based on his meta, I understandably INQUIRED as to just how serious it was - - - - The bulk of the head to head was me clarifying I wasn't lying.
UP: Yes.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
He's lied (one of which can not reasonbly be argued to be a misunderstanding or a difference of opinion) and attacked for silly made up reasons.fuzzylightning wrote:AT, before you start accusing me of not having thoughts, when I was writing the post, and yes it did take me 20 minutes to write that post because I had received a phone call during that time, so bear with me that I didn't see your post until now.
Honestly, UP what are you trying for, if you are putting him at L-1 you better have a better case than something based on a few misunderstandings that were ironed out, as none of them are clear enough scumtells to lynch someone over. Honestly, I want everyone who has a vote on AndyTony to put out reasons as to why they feel he is the best lynch for today.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
FL: I've posted more words than you, I've posted more posts than you and I've only missed one day. How am I the lurker?
The lies are (off the top of my head): AT saying our votes weren't random and more importantly him saying Clu had agreed with him when it was clear Clu hadn't.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
There's 100% chance that there's someone who's role makes AT's claim definately false. (Unless he really is the cop.)Uncle Pain wrote:Empking: Hmm, I understand your point, giving his own life to reveal the cop… but there are two strong points against it: firstly, it all depends on the timing of the self-vote in comparison to Spolium’s reaction to it (Dusk/Night). Secondly, there’s only a 50% chance that we have a cop at all. I consider it too risky to pull off such a trick. But I agree with you: just in case, let’s wait until Day 2. We lose nothing by doing so.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I'm I right in thinking that you think I'm scum because I scum hunted early but I didn't push it to heavily which would've gave scuim an excuse in the case that I was wrong?PhilyEc wrote:
Empking, but thats always the case for me. He was on Andy from the beginning and seemed to slip away from the debate as things turned ugly for Andy. Seems like he took advantage and let town tear Andy apart. I don't remember Empking making 'opportunistic' moves though which makes me doubt my own suspicion as such a move is more of a scumtell in my opinion.
.
I don't think AT has a point, his main argument was that people were suspicious of him and even he thought AT should be hammered.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
FL is scum, are we agreed on that?PhilyEc wrote:
Hmm? I'm not entirely sure you're being honest of course. I dont assume anyones being honest at the moment, Day One really didnt help seperate scum from town and vice versa. I'm merely trying to be careful here, I think theres good reason towards being careful >_>Clu wrote:I gave my reasons right after this section of the post, so why are you speculating about them?
Yes, realised this later today while re-reading ._. Even more reason why Empking's proposal to quicklynch is a bad idea. I'm willing to go a week into this till Im sure who one/two of the scum is/are.Clu wrote:
If we mislynch, there won'tPhillyEc wrote: I know this is what I do when I'm scum but I'd like to wait, QL's just fuck up the game for the next day, especially when its a mislynch and to be fair thats quite likely seeing as how he could genuinely be having computer issues.bea next day. That's careless Empking, if youaretown.
Lynching scum is good. Are we agreed on that?
We should lynch FL. Are we agreed on that?-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.