Well I would
Or I could
Perhaps I will even
But wait! I am definitely voting MonkeyMan576 after he mispelled my name.
It's ZEEnon, get the capitalation correct or else you are referring to someone else.
Manzcar wrote:It is WIFOM to say that scum wouldn't rolefish their own roles. it isn't like scum is going to drop breadcrumbs on their roles. If something doesn't make sense to me or seems off to me I will ask questions.
Manzcar wrote:What I find funny is that Monkey keeps saying that I am attacking him and trying to incriminate him but all I did was ask a question. That is when he voted me. I am still not sure whether or not he is scum but I also feel that others need to get involved and more discussion needs to happen.
Manzcar wrote:I would like Zee or Monkey to explain why it is scummy rather than say a town player wouldn't question someone rolefishing scum roles because that is WIFOM. Because as far as I can tell that is all that there is to this argument.
Scien wrote:Eh? Really? You thought Manz's question was intending to incriminate? I would like to examine this... why do you think that. How is the way he worded it different than any other question that someone who is suspicious of someone else would ask?
Scien wrote:Hmm this is interesting as well. Not 7 posts of yours before this, and roughly 20 mins you had said you thought the argument as town vs town. You changed your mind? What made you do so?
Scien wrote:Eh with two votes on him, I don't think that potential is very high. You think that it is higher than the benefit of additional pressure would get you?
Raivann wrote:Ok then..Upon first read I dont like Manz'sjumpinon MM for noticing the difference in Mods rules or sample PMs or whatever.
I also dont like MM's quick vote on Manz. He does seem a littlejumpyto me
Raivann wrote:probscum=Zeenon,MM
Raivann wrote:I support either a Scien or Zeenon lynch.
Vote:Scien
Scien wrote:Yes, that is part of the issue of this whole mess I agree. He did generalize, and it will be hard to tell if this was intentional or unintentional at this point I agree. However I believe this post makes it sound like you were certain one way or the other, and I would like to ask you if that is the case:ZEEnon wrote:The problem with the question you asked is that instead of specifying your question to say 'mafia roles', you generalized and made it just 'roles', which also infers that he is rolefishing. So you put his post in a negative light, perhaps on purpose, perhaps unknowingly.ZEEnon wrote:This was my thought too while I read that post of his.MonkeyMan657 wrote:I think his intentions were clearly to incriminate me.
Scien wrote:What you are saying now makes sense. However again, when you said it originally it sounded different than what you are saying now:ZEEnon wrote:I fully realized this while I wrote that. Although I feel the argument could potentially be town vs. town, Manzcar is in actuality my top suspect. I'm not sure if that makes sense to you.Not trying to give you too much of an out, but this might be because I am putting too much meaning into town-vs-town. What do you mean by that term. I am having an issue about how you can think an argument is town-vs-town, and have one of those 'town' be your cheif suspect.Zee wrote:Reading through some more of their back-and-forth posts, I currently see the MonkeyMan576 and Manzcar argument as town vs. town, with MonkeyMan576 leaning the more likely town.
Skruffs wrote:I singled your vote because your vote came immediately after Zeenon 'passed' on answering the question Raivann asked about why Zeenon thought you were 'null' if your behavior was striking him as both town AND scum. The implications seem pretty obvious to me.
Skruffs wrote:So ZEEnon saying that you were both pro town AND scummy SHOULD HAVE made him say, "And that's suspicious", instead of disregarding it in the same sentence.
Scien wrote:Number two, do I detect a whiff that you are happy about this?
Scien wrote:How were we to know if your computer was broke or not. Even when you come in and tell us that's why you have been gone, how can we know that you are truthful. For all I knew you were keeping tabs and not contributing. In that case I needed to pressure in order to get you to talk.
Fuzzyman wrote:2. His scumlists seem to just be inverses of what people think of him.
Fuzzyman wrote:3. He says that he is NOT SURE whether the positive aspects of Scien's play outweigh the scummy, yet still has a vote on him.
Fuzzyman wrote:I look upon his upcoming MM post with great anticipation.