Raivann wrote:Ok then..Upon first read I dont like Manz'sjumpinon MM for noticing the difference in Mods rules or sample PMs or whatever.
I also dont like MM's quick vote on Manz. He does seem a littlejumpyto me
Mini 855: Colorless Rainbow Town (Halted for list mod error)
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
This is really scummy. You basically have said the same thing for each of these two players. The first part basically says you don't like how Manzcar jumped on MonkeyMan576, and the second part says how you don't like how MonkeyMan576 jumped on Manzcar. You using the same evidence for each of them, as well as playing both sides of the argument is how you have earned my vote for today's lynch.Vote: Raivann.-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
Fuzzyman Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 641
- Joined: May 31, 2008
- Location: Palmdale (Come Back to Me)
I would go so far to say that 5 votes over a weekend is highly unreasonable to expect.ZEEnon wrote:As you can tell from my fairly late reply, I cannot be on as frequently as I would like to. Therefore, I don't know what could happen from the time I sign out to the next time I sign in. For all I know, it's been a hectic weekend, and I was unable to sign on. Therefore, a lynch could be realized even before I could see it progress. I think that even without voting him, voicing my suspicions of him gives the same results as me actually voting him. Hell, I said I would be voting him. Therefore, I think it gives the same result.-
-
ZEEnon Goon
-
-
cruelty Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 950
- Joined: July 14, 2009
-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Are you suggesting that people shouldn't vote for who they find suspicious? What's wrong with 5 votes when it takes 7 to lynch? Moreover, two of the "votes" were FOS's, why are you exaggerating his condition?Fuzzyman wrote:
I would go so far to say that 5 votes over a weekend is highly unreasonable to expect.ZEEnon wrote:As you can tell from my fairly late reply, I cannot be on as frequently as I would like to. Therefore, I don't know what could happen from the time I sign out to the next time I sign in. For all I know, it's been a hectic weekend, and I was unable to sign on. Therefore, a lynch could be realized even before I could see it progress. I think that even without voting him, voicing my suspicions of him gives the same results as me actually voting him. Hell, I said I would be voting him. Therefore, I think it gives the same result.-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
+1ZEEnon wrote:I think you misunderstood what Fuzzyman wrote because I don't really understand what you are saying, MonkeyMan576.-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
-
-
Dizzle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 267
- Joined: June 16, 2009
- Happy Scumday!
Monkey, as there are currently 2 votes on Raivann, I believe Fuzzy was saying that it is unlikely for 5 more Raivann votes to occur this weekend. Maybe you knew that and just have no problem with a quicklynch. Either way, I don't like how you cast suspicion on Fuzzy for merely saying that a quicklynch was unlikely. He was neither advocating for it or against it. To assume otherwise is plain scummy.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Are you suggesting that people shouldn't vote for who they find suspicious? What's wrong with 5 votes when it takes 7 to lynch?Fuzzyman wrote:
I would go so far to say that 5 votes over a weekend is highly unreasonable to expect.ZEEnon wrote:As you can tell from my fairly late reply, I cannot be on as frequently as I would like to. Therefore, I don't know what could happen from the time I sign out to the next time I sign in. For all I know, it's been a hectic weekend, and I was unable to sign on. Therefore, a lynch could be realized even before I could see it progress. I think that even without voting him, voicing my suspicions of him gives the same results as me actually voting him. Hell, I said I would be voting him. Therefore, I think it gives the same result.-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quit twisting my words. Major, obvious word twisting. 5 votes does NOT mean quicklynch, and I specifically said that he was only on 2 or 3 votes.Dizzle wrote:
Monkey, as there are currently 2 votes on Raivann, I believe Fuzzy was saying that it is unlikely for 5 more Raivann votes to occur this weekend. Maybe you knew that and just have no problem with a quicklynch. Either way, I don't like how you cast suspicion on Fuzzy for merely saying that a quicklynch was unlikely. He was neither advocating for it or against it. To assume otherwise is plain scummy.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Are you suggesting that people shouldn't vote for who they find suspicious? What's wrong with 5 votes when it takes 7 to lynch?Fuzzyman wrote:
I would go so far to say that 5 votes over a weekend is highly unreasonable to expect.ZEEnon wrote:As you can tell from my fairly late reply, I cannot be on as frequently as I would like to. Therefore, I don't know what could happen from the time I sign out to the next time I sign in. For all I know, it's been a hectic weekend, and I was unable to sign on. Therefore, a lynch could be realized even before I could see it progress. I think that even without voting him, voicing my suspicions of him gives the same results as me actually voting him. Hell, I said I would be voting him. Therefore, I think it gives the same result.-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
-
-
Dizzle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 267
- Joined: June 16, 2009
- Happy Scumday!
-
-
Dizzle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 267
- Joined: June 16, 2009
- Happy Scumday!
-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
I didn't read it as 5 MORE votes, I read it as 5 votes. So my bad on that, but I am not in favor of a quicklynch, for the record.Dizzle wrote:
I'm not quite understanding. By more count, 5 more votes over the weekend would be a quicklynch.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Quit twisting my words. Major, obvious word twisting. 5 votes does NOT mean quicklynch, and I specifically said that he was only on 2 or 3 votes.-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
@MM- Now that we're all on the same page, what do you think of the original quote in that pyramid? ZEE is saying that he doesn't want to Vote because of the possibility of a quicklynch over the weekend. How viable do you think that is?
@Fuzzy- What do you think of Raivann's read on you?
@cruelty- You've said that RoleFishing Scum PRs is dangerous, how advantageous do you think it is? Do you believe the risk is worth the reward?
@Dizzle- You said that you were awaiting Raivann's justification for his read on Fuzzy. He gave it. What are your thoughts on his response?
@Sweep- Post something damn it.-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quicklynches rarely happen unless there is a late scum bandwagon or there is strong public opinion against someone. Since we have both manczar and Raivaan as possible suspects at this point, I don't think a quicklynch is likely, or if it were to happen, the obvscum at the end of the lynch would give the town an advantage as far as info is concerned.d3x wrote:@MM- Now that we're all on the same page, what do you think of the original quote in that pyramid? ZEE is saying that he doesn't want to Vote because of the possibility of a quicklynch over the weekend. How viable do you think that is?-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
With that interpretation of how it would go down, do you think ZEE withholding his Vote is questionable?-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
-
-
Josh Lyman Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 384
- Joined: February 23, 2009
- Location: Washington
Apologies for lack of formatting: posting from my phone.d3x wrote:@Mod- VoteCount, please?
Vote count:Sweep (13) d3x (136) ZEEnon (150)
Raivann: 3
d3x: 2Scien (7) Raivann (123)
ZEEnon: 1Fuzzyman (100)
Hero764: 1jasonT1981 (4)
Through post 171. With 12 alive it's 7 to lynch.
Note: I am looking for a replacement for Sweep, per Sweep's request.
I'll update again in about nine hours.-
-
Dizzle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 267
- Joined: June 16, 2009
- Happy Scumday!
I don't think there really can be any justification for "leaning town" on someone who has only uttered 2 sentences. I agree with Fuzzy that Manzcar's original response wasn't antagonistic but I don't see how throwing out a vote with his 2nd post could possibly be considered as pro-town. Sitting back and voting while letting others take the lead in discussion (and thereby possibly attracting suspicion) certainly shouldn't lead anyone to think that Fuzzy is probably town and Raivann deserves scrutiny for believing otherwise.d3x wrote: @Dizzle- You said that you were awaiting Raivann's justification for his read on Fuzzy. He gave it. What are your thoughts on his response?-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
I don't disagree with your p173, but I do wonder if your feeling is so hardline now, what exactly were you looking for when you said...I look forward to hearing Raivann's reasoning.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.