Mini 937 - Mafia on Death Row OVER
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Aren't you the one who suggested we talk about our hometowns? I'll take one liners over that any time of the day.easjo682 wrote:pi has it's own day? that friggin awesome
Pickemgenenius has been annoying in the sense that he's been posting shit, that makes no sense and is one line over and over again, but I'm certain this is because he's an annoying person out of game, this jugdement comes from the fact that I recently have been on the mafia chat and PEG has been there being rather irritating.
mind you most people have been posting one liners some far.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Got me convinced and the mssk wagon isn't going anywhere.
Unvote. Vote: GreenDude
You could also try to get discussion going yourself instead of complaining about it and then generically unvoting.Zodiark13 wrote:Sorry everyone, RL decided to be particularly annoying, what with uni work and family members and my social life. I'll try to be more active, kay?
Im quite surprised at how slow this game is going. We've got 12 days to the deadline and were still half out of RVS, with little serious discussion going on.
Unvote
Because I severely doubt anyone else has any arguments as to weather Angel deserves to be on the Sci-Fi channel. Which it doesn't.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
ITT zodiark doesn't get the concept of wagons. Is this your first game, because I just love the fact that you want to stop the thing that was about to generate more discussion, which you complained about some time earlier.Zodiark13 wrote:Ok, starting a wagon because you don't like the way that GD tries to provoke discussion? Thats just fishy. I understand that we are now 11 days away from the deadline, and with little to go on, but a wagon like that could possibly halt discussion.
Vote: Super Awesome Mega Pimp
Also, such a weak wagon would have no doubt attracted scummy attention, because the could just agree with SAMP's points. In other words, at least one of the people on that wagon are scum.
FoS: BrokenBlueprints, My Milked Eek, pickemgenius, MafiaSSKEek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Silly, zodiark, that's content as well, but the idea behind bandwagonning for content is not the votes themselves, it's about getting reactions and stances about the wagon/wagonners/wagonee.Zodiark13 wrote:Is this your idea of content Eek?
Perhaps you should have outed of this game instead. [/semi-joke]zodiark wrote:Thats quite a claim, considering I just /out'ed of a newb game your were modding were I was SE.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
It was a "dig", as you call it. And I'm not discrediting him, I'm just incredulous to him not seeing the benefits of bandwagons. And the fact that he's defending his, as peg put it, "poor posting".
And I don't see the relevance in me not remembering him being an SE. If it were to indicate anything, I'd say it would be that I have a poor memory. Or that he didn't strike to me as an SE.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Are you serious about this?Zodiark13 wrote:
IE, no insults or, as you two have said, "digs".Mod, in rules post wrote: Don't make it personal.
What's wrong with starting that wagon for getting some content? I'll also have you know I was with GD in a previous game and he was easy to read in that game, so having some pressure on him might have been helpful. Unfortunately the wagon is already disbanding.It's not that I don't see the benefit of wagons. I don't see good reasons for this particular wagon to begin with. Need I remind you that YOU are on the wagon yourself?
Meh, poor word choice, blame it on the language barrier.How does a request for an explanation count as "defending"?
You're posting now, aren't you? And you should learn how to take a joke, to be honest.RVS posts don't do much for impressions, since an RVS post was my only post after the /confirm.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Chill dude, I forgot "in retrospect".GreenDude wrote:Note:This is an anger post directed at My Milked Eek
What the heck are you talking about??I'll also have you know I was with GD in a previous game and he was easy to read in that game
I looked so bad in that game. Everyone ,including you, was convinced that I was scum. And you amazing reading skills put me at the top of every one of your lists. Did you misread the deathscene? It said I was town.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Did you really find that comment of mine insulting? And wagonning in that stage wasn't scummy. Unless you want us to be twiddling our thumbs of course.zodiark wrote:The people who did, however, can. Their reasons were non-existent at best, and scummy at worst. Since the vote, they have been absent, apart from the occasional post, mostly either insults or promises of content that never came.
That being said, it is rather odd mafiassk was willing to wagon gd, but unvoted as soon as gd posted something that resembled a defense. I'd assume that a pressure wagon (which it was) would require more momentum than that and I'm sure mafiassk knows this as well.
And what's your opinion on this omgus? Just pointing it out is discriminating (or attempting to do so) mafiassk without trying to appear to do so. I can't think that you can dismiss ssk's vote as omgus so easily, he's got some reasoning behind it so tell us if it are bull reasons or not and why instead of this egging.zodiark wrote:Anyone else think this vote is OMGUS?
About this demon-gant-mafiassk discussion:
I don't like mafiassk trying to tie dg and wolf together. Haven't read his case in detail as I don't have much time right now, but I will do so tomorrow.
And I don't like zodiark egging on mafiassk. Depending on his answers to my questions this might indicate something about mafiassk's alignment.
Anyways, got a test tomorrow, so got to go study.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Yeah, I was just saying that hopping on the wagon isn't scummy. The only thing I perceive to be scummy is mafiassk's unvote.Damon_Gant wrote:Pleasing to see a post from MME, I was literally just about to call for one. Just so you know, I don't think that your entry to GD's wagon was necessarily scummy in the slightest, it was a wagon that was good for getting information. MafiaSSK hampered its usefulness unfortunately by his unvote, but I've said this a thousand times.
lol, I forgot I hadn't unvoted yet.samp wrote:for silently leaving his vote on GD in that last post.Unvote. Vote: Mafiassk.
Cool. Anything else to share with us about the game?Nachomamma8 wrote:DRK, I can breadcrumb my word because I'm Irish and cool . I'm not short and Lucky Charms are nasty to me, so I guess it doesn't work too well...
Much better! Carry on.
-DRK
Vote: My Milked EekEek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Mafiassk and Zodiark.
Zodiark because he dislikes the wagon on gd (not a real reason, but calling the wagon scummy is a bridge too far), fos's the three last ones, including mafiassk, and afterwards he tries to mudsling mafiassk with some nice omgus that wasn't there. And then there's the whole post dismissing mafiassk's defense, which reeks of bussing or pushing an easy lynch.
Come to think of it,Unvote. Vote: Zodiark13Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
I stated reasons on several occasions. I do not see it necessary to state your reasons every time you vote.Super Awesome Mega Pimp! wrote:
Yes. He still hasn't given any update on his thoughts on GD, which is hypocritical given that he's attacking SSK for making an easy jump off that wagon. And, he clearly saw post 246 (since he quoted my vote) but chose not to answer the question I asked to everyone on the SSK wagon.Damon_Gant wrote:SAMP: Are you sticking to your MME vote now that MME has unvoted GD?
And the main reason I jumped to Zodiark is because in my opinion because of his interactions with mafiassk he is the one of the two who must be scum, while mafiassk is independently of zodiark scummy. As I said, zodiark appears to be bussing or pushing an easy lynch, in both cases making him scum pushing a lynch, be it a mislynch or not.
Could you provide a quote where demon_gant actually implies that voting for ssk is bad? My unvote of mafiassk isn't caused by demon in the way you think he did. He made me think about your stance towards mafiassk and your reasonings used in this game.Zodiark13 wrote:Ok, first off, WFT Eek. You jump off gd when people disapprove, and jump straight for the nearest wagon, on SSK, and when you get implied disapproval from Damon, who asks people to post their suspicions of other players, you jump again, to me. Not counting the fact you never even gave a reason for jumping on SSKs wagon, or a reason for leaving it.
Let me bold it for you.^mafiassk wrote:On my OMGUS point against SSK, my opinion is that OMGUS is OMGUS, even if it is well reasoned. I was asking everyone else if they felt it was OMGUS too,because I didn't want to attack him for that reason if no one else thought it was. And how is pointing it out suspicious?
A) there's really not a big discussion to be held on whether or not it's omgus, omgus, unlike other things in mafia, is easily distinguishable and this here isn't omgus. Or didn't you read the wiki?
B) saying "do you think this is omgus?" is you doing two things:
B1) you're testing the waters for some mafiassk pushing
B2) you're asking someone else to say it
B3) you're asking someone else to form an opinion for you
Neither of these answers is a good one. And imo, it's #1 (as you've admitted) and some of #2.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
So,GreenDude wrote:I've just been reading easjo and it seems that he hasn't posted much at all. And not written more than 3 lines.
I think that mafiassk can be perceived in one way to be scummy but if you look at it a different way, there is logical explanations. So I would rathervote:easyjo
1) a lurkervote (while ignoring peg and others (like magna said))
2) fence sittingEek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Unvote. Vote: easjo682.
Paraphrasing the post I quoted:gd wrote:I didn't say I voted because he was lurking. I'm going to show some posts that I found interesting tomorrow.
Fence sitting? Where do you see that?
- "mafiassk appears to be scummy, but then again, he doesn't"
And your vote was in the context of:
"I've just been reading easjo and it seems that he hasn't posted much at all. And not written more than 3 lines."
Explain to me why this isn't a lurkervote. Also, when asked about it, you say:
"I read through easjo and I if you would like I will show what certain posts drawed my attention."
A magical case, only available on request and after buying a gold membership card. As asked before, why not show us these posts now?
Patience is a virtue, my friend.zodiark wrote:Then get off the wagon going nowhere, and get on the one going somewhere.
I also think either Zodiark could have posted a summary for mafiassk or mafiassk could have posted more than those posts. Sure, adware and stuff, but he still managed to slip in 10 or so posts.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Are you being serious? I only hoped onto easjo because we were less than a day from deadline. I'd rather had us lynch you, but that wasn't happening yesterday.Zodiark13 wrote:And reFoS: My Milked Eek!. For gratuitous wagon-hopping, with little if any reason on each.]
A half hour between posts isn't ninja'd. And my vote is explained throughout day 1. Or did you lose your memory of that day?zodiark wrote:Gah, ninja'd.
Eek, explain your vote.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Yes, they have. Have you truly forgotten about day 1?Zodiark13 wrote:
This being the only reason for THAT jump. What about your jumps onto GS and SSK, which still haven't been explained by you.Are you being serious? I only hoped onto easjo because we were less than a day from deadline. I'd rather had us lynch you, but that wasn't happening yesterday.
I'm sorry, I didn't know that as soon as someone defends himself against a case (I didn't really lay one out) that you cannot suspect or even dare to vote that person anymore.Zodiark13 wrote:And my vote is explained throughout day 1.
I was under the impression that I had defended myself against his "case". If you still have problems with me Eek, bring them forward.Asking Eek why he's voting him is just ridiculous, I think Eek made it clear yesterday who his main suspect was and why.
It's not as if your defense decreases the value of my arguments. The mere observation that I don't remember any defense being remotely valid (or even there) is a nice indicator to keep my vote on you.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Yes, but the issue I'm having with that conclusion is that samp's isoposts have ambiguity in them.
- peg being scum
or
- zodiark being town
I'm not sure yet which case would be most likely and I think it to be worth the effort to reread samp's D2 postings. And I will do so after this post.
As for the Inventor recipient claim. I'll provide my opinion about it after getting an answer to this question:
@death sauce: did the pm, in which you supposedly received a one shot power, contain the words inventor or did it hint at an inventor? Or did you assume inventor because of that game you played?Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Ok, the Day 2 samp-ISO starts on #030.
#030 - Strong anti-peg post.
#031 - Anti-peg post and pro-zodiark remark. He mentioned post 340 and I still don't see the protown motive behind that post.
#032 - Recap of "zodiark has protown motives"
#033 -WE ARE LYNCHING PEG TODAY GOT IT? GOOD.
#035 - Urges people to vote peg. Thought zodiark was the vig. (!)
Ok, so we got strong pushing for a peg lynch and several mentions that zodiark is protown.
However, his post #035 makes me think he investigated zodiark. This line in particular: "Well shoot, I was certain Zodiark was the vig."
Also, not the change in his tone towards zodiark in #028 to #031. In #028 he wanted to lynch zodiark (or easjo) and in #031 he called him protown.
Only one explanation: Zodiark does not have a gun.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Sure, I follow you on that, as I found and still find 340 not to have any protown motives, however, it's samp saying he thought zodiark was the vig and doesn't think so anymore that makes me think he investigated zodiark.DeathSauce wrote:
Iso 30 is more than a "strong anti-peg post". It s a vote for peg with no explanation and is his first post of the day.My Milked Eek wrote:Ok, the Day 2 samp-ISO starts on #030.
#030 - Strong anti-peg post.
#031 - Anti-peg post and pro-zodiark remark. He mentioned post 340 and I still don't see the protown motive behind that post.
#032 - Recap of "zodiark has protown motives"
#033 -WE ARE LYNCHING PEG TODAY GOT IT? GOOD.
#035 - Urges people to vote peg. Thought zodiark was the vig. (!)
Iso post 32 weakens, rather than strengthens his comment in iso 31.
Wow, this is a serious twisting. I'm not defending peg in any way as him not being investigated doesn't clear him in any way in my eyes. I looked into samp's posts and I found that he investigated zodiark. And apparently if the conclusion we draw from isoing samp is different from your conclusion, we're defending peg?DS wrote:
Look at that entire post again. It is another push to lynch peg, and his comment about Zodiark is in response to me.Eek wrote:However, his post #035 makes me think he investigated zodiark. This line in particular: "Well shoot, I was certain Zodiark was the vig.
I think you are trying to read to much into SAMP's posts rather than seeing the obvious strong effort to lynch peg. Your efforts to save peg are noted.
I see. Well, if it didn't it would have somewhat confirmed you to be not lying. I'm having quite a few issues with your claim and bordering on not believing you at all.ds wrote:It contained the word invention.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
The only case he has is that we believe samp investigated zodiark and he thinks that means we're defending peg, which we both, if I may speak for you as well, aren't doing at all. Rather ridiculous and bordering on some weird form of tunneling if you ask me and I'm not sure if we can have that at this stage of the game as it is hindering and distracting.
I'm not liking DS and I wouldn't mind a lynch of either peg or DS.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
This very much so. I can think of no justifiable reason to kill mafiassk from ds' perspective.Zodiark13 wrote:
Congratulations, you just confessed to attempting to kill a pro-town role. Until his flip on the morning of D2, you would have had no knowledge that SSK's claim was fake, and you just claimed the kill. There is no pro-town motivation for you killing SSK. I say, what you did is, you agreed with your scumbuddies to kill Magna, then tried to kill SSK with the gun you were given.N1 either GD and I targeted the same player or he didn't use his vig power, not that hard to comprehend.
mod, how about some peg?Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
1. I'm all for it, obviously.Zodiark13 wrote:
Remind me not to get your gut to do jury duty.I understand that the right lynch based on solid facts is DS, but my gut is telling me not to go with that.
Since almost everyone seems to be waiting for the opinion of the replacement, I'll go ahead and try to provoke some discussion to keep us busy until then with two questions;
1. What is your position on the DS lynch?
2. Will the replacements position have an effect on yours? If so, why? If not, why not?
2. Depends. I think a replacement changing my read on DS would need a lot of bad play or obvscum play. The replacement changing my read on peg should be obvious as I do not have a (non-neutral) read on peg due to absence.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
DRK and I were in a (highly enjoyable) game as scumbrothers last year and there was a role handing out bullets/guns. So, I figured, perhaps you assumed inventor and DRK got his inspiration in that game.
Why we're not voting you yet want to lynch you: it's LyLo and we're waiting for a replacement to catch up. It doesn't hurt to have a new opinion.
As for the claim-requests: I'm up for it. I only see benefits from it given the current situation.Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
I'm glad to see ToD concludes that Zodiark was investigated, albeit because ToD wants samp to have investigated Zodiark and not himself. One thing that bothers me, though, is that he concludes that samp found a gun with Zodiark and apparently ToD thinks that samp would not announce this when there are two living claimed vigs (GD & DS). I'm pretty sure if samp found a gun on Zodiark, he would have mentioned anything, so I believe ToD wrongly made that conclusion. The reason behind this is rather obvious and for ToD a necessary move.
I'm thinking scum on the peg/tod slot. Partners would be DS and any of [Zodiark/wolf/nacho].
As for the inventor: if it's not zodiark, then there is no inventor as I see it. Anyone in favor of the claim hasn't claimed inventor yet, DS can't be the inventor and zodiark is the only one against it (going from memory).Eek!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium