No I'm not stalking anyone.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
between this and this it just feels forced.Unvote, vote: Confid
I just don't like how he and Duck unvote and point at Par as soon as Nacho calls them out.
That was a good case? Seriously? Why?@Dramonic: actually, it says a lot coming from him. Because he's in the scummiest slot around, yet he just made a very good case for lynching you first.
Your right. I swear I hate your new style. Every time I read it I just want to tell you to stop.DTMaster wrote:Farside. Why are you lying. You said I dint push any one and you've read up to page 6? Hello hat happened to my muzz case page 5. Did just ignore my vote and case?
Why is muzz scum over duck? Reading it, seems most of your point is based on him using meta.Parama wrote:I know that question is not supposed to be taken literally but asking it while not voting Kenman is somewhat contradictory.farside22 wrote:post 62 why does the question bother you?Muzzz is scum and duck isn't? I mean, I've already posted the case like 5 times now. I'd prefer a scum lynch over a town lynch any day.farside22 wrote:post 138 I really hate this post. Why sould players switch?
I saw duck vote for ken for meta. Unvote him and then try to still make him look suspicious afterwards with no vote.para wrote:Anyways, I don't know about you guys but muzzz is coming off as the scummiest from the last few pages. His vote on Confid comes out of nowhere and is quickly abandoned in favor of a duck vote... a vote for which I honestly have no clue what the reasons are, though it appears muzzz tried to give one. Add that stupid meta post from an older game and it only makes it look like he's stretching for reasons to vote. He also seems to be pressuring duck to vote, and at this early stage in the game, not voting is NOT a problem. unvote, vote: muzzz
You also stated you thought scum was not on any wagon. Why is this?SpyreX wrote:I'm not duck. Duck lost his marbles and if I hadn't replaced into that spot IFarside wrote:duckduck96/ SpyreX post 66 seriously? You cut out where he states being used to 2 scums and go for the trying to understand roles better? post 70 scum alert, scum alert!! post 173 enter spryex who does the I'm not duck speech. Does this mean becuase you replaced that the spot you took is less suspicious? post 186 Really after everything going on your attacking lurkers? Seriously?probably would have lynched the hell out of him.
Its not a simple function of "lurkers" look at that non voting category when we were sitting where we were. Then look at details of what Dram was doing.
What do you think about Locke and the point I made about how he just focas's on Muzz's post?SpyreX wrote:Too much heat. There's a spread there and I was more concerned with finding the scum within the smallest and easiest to peek at grouping - the vultures.
The first part doesn't answer my question in the least.muzzz wrote:@Farside: it was a good case because it made me want to lynch Dramonic.
What do you think would be Locke's chances of being scum, if we assumed for a second that DuckSpy is town?
What is IIAO?This is IIOA
Your a claimed hider but I did call you out for making a meta point and wondering wtf you are thinking. You going to "hide" behind your claim and continue to make points that are scummy that's on you.Why no mention of my double standards on that same matter as pointed out by DTM?
I see your post as a lot of information, but I can't really sort out who you think is scummy. Explain please?
far wrote:My vote would be for spyrex or Locke at this point.
unvote:
vote: Locke
Blantly pushing one player over the other for weak reason's that can fall under the player he is ignoring. Does the verbal repeat of what everyone else said and offer's nothing new to the game. Very classic scum tells all around.
I would vote either one but locke's comment about voting for NS based on no reason and following is way scummier then spreyx.muzzz wrote:@Farside: Spy called Dramonic anti-town lurkerscum (if you'll permit the paraphrasing), and then I looked at Dramonic's post and decided that Spy was right and Dramonic could do with a lynching. It's really that simple. If this doesn't answer your question, then I'm not getting the question.
Now can you please tell us what possessed you to vote Locke when half your arguments against him seem to be based on the assumption that Spy is scum?
Your going have explain what IIOA has to do with asking you about wanting to lynch duck 5 post later after saying to wait.Nikanor wrote:IIoA stands for Information Instead of Analysis.No, I mean my double standard on duckduck and muzzz both using a meta argument. I called duckduck out on making a meta argument, but didn't say anything about muzzz's meta argument. Why didn't you say anything about that?farside wrote:Your a claimed hider but I did call you out for making a meta point and wondering wtf you are thinking.I don't understand this. I thought it was fairly obvious. What prompted you to say this?farside wrote:You going to "hide" behind your claim and continue to make points that are scummy that's on you.And who do you think is town?farside wrote:As for the second I think I was pretty damn clear at the end. I assume you didn't read everything so here is the short point at the end I stated.
What is the difference for you when someone not being useful and being town?dramonic wrote:I see no reason to lynch Confid. He's not being useful, but he's not being scummy.
Either SpyreX or NS is the play today.
AND it seems people want to keep spyreX alive, therefore...
moar NS votes.
If I didn't have those scummy vibes from you I might agree but LL gives information in my view and has contributed nothing to the game that wasn't said by others. (Again you miss this point)muzzz wrote:My point is that that link is more of a reason to lynch Spy than it is a reason to lynch Locke. Misguided townies occasionally end up defending scum, but I think I've yet to see the scumbag that's stupid enough to put up a chainsaw-defense for a townie.DTMaster wrote:A lot of the LL case is based on the LL/Spy link (remember Spy replaced duck duck which I already commented on)
It was highly questionable comment in my view.You just pointed something out. Was it scummy of me to do that? Was it town of me to do that? What's the point of asking me about it (which you didn't do, btw)? I'm obviously not going to claim day cop.
Let me look at this again. But I keep getting the impression you want me to call you scum based on your claim. I would rather wait and see on you first.No, not over. But you should be looking at everyone objectively. Something one person does should affect your reads on another. If you think I'm town and that I did the same thing, how is it a scumtell for Locke and not a scumtell for me?
This is soooo scummy. farside, a town player isn't afraid to share his town reads, because chances are good that the scum will figure it out based on voting history and stuff like that anyway. A scum player is afraid to share his town reads, because he doesn't want to narrow his mislynch options.
Plus, you already said you think I'm town earlier in this post.
How is Locke an easier lynch?
So far all your attacks on me are why didn't I call you out for the same thing that locke did and then saying I'm going for an easy lynch over trying to get you lynched. So yeah I see this as you trying to get me to say something negative about you.nik wrote:ect me if I'm wrong, but I believe the term is 'building a strawman.'
I disagree. I don't see that.nik wrote:I ignored what muzzz said at first. Locke did the same thing to duckduck. That's what I mean when I say you have double standards in regards to him and I.
Add to a question I have reading a few things. If you heard of a hider before why did you feel the need to claim so early?Why am I scummy?
I'm tempted just for the active lurking he's doing these past few days. I just swear he's going to flip into a VI.SpyreX wrote:Pssst Farside he was the one I was talking about who jumped in after I mentioned said not playing and opted to do nothing.
Further he knew who I was talking about.
Psssst Lynch him kthx
This is assuming the kill was performed by a serial killer. Plus in the normal I created I had 3 mafia and 1 serial killer which I see in most 12 player set ups.Nikanor wrote:Based on the mod information, I really highly doubt we have an SK. Not being able to roleblock as lone scum RB in a two-man scumgroup with an SK makes for a fairly imbalanced game.
Do I really need to post all the mini games that did this ^Nikanor wrote:That's stupid. Sorry, but a game in which you can lose from a single mislynch isn't a normal game.farside wrote:Plus in the normal I created I had 3 mafia and 1 serial killer which I see in most 12 player set ups.
Oh so your a SK then?SpyreX wrote:Woah, WOAH.
I didn't claim vig. Or not claim vig. I claimed the kill. Sheesh.
---
That said, Farside you need to lay out your whole role entirely because that result doesn't make sense.
And it would be awesomeo if the mod could weigh in on NaR.
I thought for a moment that maybe a mod would do insane cop, but flavor of finding a gun in your place leads me to believe I am quiet sane and I was told you were not home. Would you like to explain this?Fate wrote:TWO FUCKING WORDS: KATE LOCKLEY.
I HAZ. A GUILTU AND A HIDAR CONFLICTING RESULTS.
TRANSLAYTION: INSANE COP.
SHEESH U GAIZ
only scum know if there is one mafia left.MrSuave wrote:WHO NEW MAH FALVORZ WUD GO DIZ FAR?! =D. *ahem* Hypothetically, if there was only the RB left, then they would have to choose to RB or kill, not both.