In post 262, Cojin wrote:Hikari replaces brother yama
That's Hikari Link. Please don't call me Hikari. Read my signature for some alternatives.
In post 262, Cojin wrote:Hikari replaces brother yama
In post 298, benoni wrote:Posted Tuesday:
In post 264, Hikari Link wrote:I should be able to catch up and post before I go to bed tonight.
Posted Thursday:
In post 272, Hikari Link wrote:I'm moving, so once I get things situated, I will post. It should be either tomorrow or Saturday. Sorry for the delay.
So an absentee has been replaced with another absentee. Nice...
In post 302, Cojin wrote:I have no internet sorry. i would love to post, hell id love to write some uni papers as well but both of those are nearly impossible right now.
In post 308, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE: Frogsterking
I am convinced at this point that he is scum based on a reread.
I will try to post a more detailed analysis later. Annoying to type long posts on my phone.
Also want to apologize for limited activity. I was unexpectedly out of town this weekend with very limited net access.
In post 310, Subcomfreak wrote:@link, you betcha I have a strond suspicion of brothers. Ohh wait aren't you that guy? Yeah, that would naturally be what you would say wouldn't it? Most of your reads are pretty good. I could go onto the frog wagon if you needed another vote. Quite frankly, we need the flips.
In post 311, benoni wrote:Link is in Brother's slot if I remember correctly. I think he's off to a pretty awful start.
In post 307, Hikari Link wrote:VOTE: Frogsterking
I want to say that's L-1 and I personally endorse a hammer, since we have a claim from him.
In post 309, Hikari Link wrote:Well thankfully that wasn't actually the hammer, since Subcomfreak's vote is currently on me. I really hate when people claim they will explain themselves near the end of a day, because then they have an excuse when they don't have to.
UNVOTE: Frogsterking
I'm willing to wait, but I want to hear what you have to say before we have this lynch.
Really?
In post 307, Hikari Link wrote:I want to say that's L-1 and I personally endorse a hammer
In post 309, Hikari Link wrote:Well thankfully that wasn't actually the hammer
Really?
In post 308, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE: Frogsterking
I am convinced at this point that he is scum based on a reread.
I will try to post a more detailed analysis later. Annoying to type long posts on my phone.
Also want to apologize for limited activity. I was unexpectedly out of town this weekend with very limited net access.
In post 316, Cojin wrote:Deadline will go 1 week after i find a replacement, and if it enters night before then night wont end tell the last replacement. i have 2 essays to write and will votecount after im done that.
In post 319, Subcomfreak wrote:In post 315, Jackal711 wrote:Bleh I don't have time for this. Had a long post ready that took 2 hours to prepare then my computer crashes.
Vote: Frogsterking, Smear
Claim:Town Double Voter
Wait, why did you just do that? Serious question.Why the fuck would claim when there was zero pressure?
In post 319, Subcomfreak wrote:@HL, yup, Ihave seen town do it, but I have also seen scum do it. I don't put too much stock into that, but I think he needs the lynch. Frog is also pretty good, he would be me forth. read.
In post 320, Subcomfreak wrote:hmmm... maybe I have played with HL before... Yes, I think I have. Not 100% though.
In post 329, Bub Bidderskins wrote:In post 325, Frogsterking wrote:ggogo town or whatever
If Frog isn't dead then he seriously just townslipped.
In post 339, CooLDoG wrote:^thanks for the bus.
Frogster, I'm not sure if you are directing this at me or bb, but read my post. You are number four on my scum list. And being number four on my scum list isn't a half bad lynch... Bub should eat rope over frog though. Then it will most likly be smears turn. Then on d-3 we can lynch HL.
In post 342, CooLDoG wrote:okay, if/when bub flips scum I will have to do a major iso read to see his stances on everybody. Because quote frankly, I think that we could gain some really powerful association tells from him.
In post 351, Subcomfreak wrote:
In post 346, Hikari Link wrote:In post 345, Frogsterking wrote:Who the hell is Cooldog
Obviously Subcomfreak.
damn, is my meta not that strong all of a sudden?
In post 382, BBmolla wrote:In post 380, Smear wrote:I am town vigilante.
Hrm.
Not sure what to think about this.
Should we test the claim? Or do you guys just think it's a fake claim?
In post 386, Bub Bidderskins wrote:Vig claim is easily testable. Smear, kill benoi tonight please.
In post 373, BBmolla wrote:@Bub I'm a bit curious why you keep reaffirming that Frog is town. Could you explain this read to me?
In regards to Smear, I'd be fine with voting him, however I feel Frog is scummier atm.
Frog is town because he's so obnoxious and blatantly anti-town. Being flaboyantly anti-town is a town-tell, especially since he's not experienced enough to pull some crap like that as scum.
In post 410, CooLDoG wrote:^wanna bet everybody that he says is town actually is town?
unvtote, vote: bubIf I'm not already.
Also, on the meta thing... I have hydred 2 games with bub. I know how he plays. This is consistent with his scum mentality. Not necessarily his specific moves, but with the general way he thinks when he plays scum. He does want to commit unless he gets a good lynch prospect, which is exactly what we are seeing here.
All votes need to go on Bub and then Smear needs to publicize his vig target. Then we all need to get down on our knees and pray for a doc save... Wait,
@smear, how many shots you got?
In post 421, CooLDoG wrote:Ohh one thing before I get to my real post. HL, I'm currently going through the normal game review process and because of that I had to look on the wiki page as to what roles I could include in my game. X-shot vigs are not allowed in mini norms, thus he can kill as many people as nights that he is alive. I answered my own question by looking back at that page.
Wiki wrote: Closed Normal Games should satisfy the following rules:
The game should have at least one Mafia or Werewolf group (of at least two members). A second anti-town group can be given a separate Mafia family name, or can be a Werewolf group. There should be no more than two mafia/werewolf factions, and no more than one Serial Killer.
The game must contain at least one Vanilla Townie (allowed names include: Townie, Vanilla Townie, Innocent Townsperson, Citizen). A sample Role PM for the Vanilla Townie must be included in the rules post.
Mechanics which are explicitly Non-Normal include:
Those affecting a role's alignment (no Cults).
Anything which significantly affects the core mechanic of majority/plurality lynches (no Kingmaker, for example).
Anything resolving with a random element, with the exception of missed night choices. It must be included in the public ruleset if you are resolving night choices in this way.
Post Restrictions (other than those included in the ruleset, such as "No quoting your Role PM").
Lying to the players, including False Role Reveals and "Scum Masons".
Night action redirection (no Bus Driver, Lightning Rod, Nexus, or Redirector).
Alignments other than Mafia/Werewolf, Pro-Town, and Serial Killer (no Survivor, Lyncher, or Jester).
Roles which are explicitly Normal include:
Vanilla Townie, Sane Cop, Doctor,Vigilante, Roleblocker, Mason, Innocent Child, Jailkeeper, Tracker, Watcher, Gunsmith, Miller, Bodyguard, Role Cop, Doublevoter, Hider, Neighbor, Neighborizer, Jack of All Trades, Serial Killer, Mafia Goon, Mafia Traitor, Mafia Godfather, Mafia Framer, Mafia-aligned versions of above roles
Modifiers which are explicitly Normal include:
Even/Odd Night, Non-Consecutive Night,X-Shot, Bulletproof, Neighbor, Compulsive, Macho, Weak, Backup (with or without primary role present)
Roles which are explicitly Non-Normal include:
Non-Sane Cop, Blank Vig, Non-Sane or Quack Doctor, Janitor, Survivor, Lyncher, Cultist, Jester, Mafia Mason, Bus Driver, Lightning Rod, Nexus, Redirector.
Modifiers which are explicitly Non-Normal include:
N/A
Normal Games may use any amount of approved roles (so long as there is at least one Vanilla Townie) in conjunction with approved modifiers.
New/variant roles may be included in limited number (no more than 1 in a Mini, 2 in a Large), and should be based on the usual role mechanics: Killing, Protecting, Investigating, Blocking, Voting, Enabling and Communication.
Games which are otherwise Normal may still be more suited to a different Queue. For example, a game with a large number of Doctors may be better run as an Open Game (after review in the Open Discussion Thread) or as a "Hospital" Themed Game.
Prior to running, all Normal Games are subject to a mandatory review for normalcy and balance by the Normal Game Review Group. To learn more about this process, visit this page.
In post 423, CooLDoG wrote:In post 418, Frogsterking wrote:In post 417, BBmolla wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bub
Seeing what people have said, and also the huge push on Frog being a beacon of towniness, which I don't see, leads me to this vote.
What a surprise you follow the trend yet again?
Do you happen to have a chain saw. This is noted for a future time.
In post 419, Frogsterking wrote:There are mafia on Dub's wagon
As well as this. Any given wagon on town that goes to lynch will have some scum on it. That is a fact, you can quote me on it. Who are the scum on his wagon anyway? BB for sure, but who else. I noticed the plural.
HL/smear. This is where I disagree with common practice in dealing with vigs. While normally I do think that the vig should not say his target, I personally think that with a scummy player claiming vig it is best that he goes public with his target. If he doesn't it closes the door on directing the very likely possibility of an sk. Now to try to out guess the mod here, but I would not be entirely unsurprised if there was one. Lazy (no offense, I am being objective) and noobish mods tend to have SKs, for better or for worse. Who doesn't want the thrill of a very swingy set-up? I personally want a public target for at least the first night. I don't want to deal with bullshit doc saves and other crap that a town player might do at random.
In post 423, CooLDoG wrote:HL on him wanting the doc.
First off, never direct docs to yourself if you do not have a power role and there is a claimed one. Much less two. Even though I think that you could actually be town (as much as I fucking hate to say it) we need to have someone on at least one of the PRs. The possibility of an infinite shot vig is to important to lose to wifom.
In post 423, CooLDoG wrote:second, as scum I would flip the coin 9/10 if I have a vig shooting tonight and someone wanting doc protection. I would slam my kill on that 2x voter faster than the mod can open the QT for night talk. I'm being serious...
In post 423, CooLDoG wrote:@HL CooLDoG thing.
Ohh, don't worry I am amazing at scum. My town play does still lack a little. I want to know why jakle thought it necessary to claim. Why did he keep dodging? For me the issue kept building the longer he refused to answer the question. I have also explained why I want the vig to claim. Yes this is very much counter to the generally accept way of dealing with a vig claim. But guess what, that is how I would personally handle a vig claim in an ideal world where I am god over all the cute animals. But you are right, Don't trust anybody. I have been screwed over many times by sticking too strongly to town reads. Once bub hits the rope and we get some good replacements (we are getting those now, woop woop) we really need to get into hard core scum hunting. Mostly dealing with association tells to bub.
In post 423, CooLDoG wrote:ninja edit: wait... I could put a 1-shot vig in my game. THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING. [/joke]. Honestly, I thought you could not put x-shots in a mini norm. for real. But, you activat4d my trap card: hahahaha!,
Vigilante (town; very common; 4+ players): You can kill other players. Actions: kill
So I wasn't wrong. But I honsetly did not think you could put an x-shot in a norm game.
In post 425, CooLDoG wrote:^don't try to say that you don't want the doc protect.
In post 425, CooLDoG wrote:Also, I'm just putting it out there, but I think I'm likely the kill target tonight. I'd normally be content in my towniness that I would likely have Doc protection or at least that there would be the threat of Doc protection and so the mafia wouldn't come for me
So you are the likely target but don't protect me? Is that what you are trying to say? If you are the most likley target than you should be protected... Also, why would scum kill a scummy slot?
In post 432, CooLDoG wrote:^doesn't get it. http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?tit ... Version.29 try that there. I actually don't like tar at all, but this can actually apply if bub flips scum.
@hl, so this was all some elaborate night action directing scheme? Okay, I'm glad I broke that up. Don't try to direct night actions when your slot was scummy as hell before you came into the game.
more bub votes plox
In post 434, CooLDoG wrote:^fine, you go ahead and do that. So directing the vig is not okay... but directing the doc to you is fine. Okay... I wouldn't suggest the PRs to listen to him, but hay, whatever.
In post 437, Frogsterking wrote:Hikari do you think I'm Town now
I think you're Town so you and we can be Town buddies
In post 440, CooLDoG wrote:In post 438, Frogsterking wrote:Wait do you people actually use wiki tells on this site. lol...
No, not generally, but it works on noobs like you.
@benoi, yeah he hasn't done this before. But his mentality is the same as his scum mentality is. He is just trying to get town cred when they flip town. He is currently crashing and burning.
Ohhh yeah, So link, you weren't directing the doc in your post...Scumvig should kill you for that...
In post 441, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:In post 429, Frogsterking wrote:Hikari ur wrong my behaviour is in my meta. GNR can confirm
While I would say, did not see this coming, frog does play like this, even if it's annoying. I haven't played with him enough to know if that's how he plays as town, or just overall. The only other game I was in with him, he was town.
In post 442, Lowell wrote:since when do people get away with saying "hey guys, I bet I'm the scumkill tonight" and us playing along?
In post 456, CooLDoG wrote:Guys. We have just won the game. Lets go ahead and lynch already.
The scum are with 90% certainty
bub
frog
brothers/HL (not there is someone named hiraki on the site other than HL)
game ove guys. Its been fun. Long deadlines made this possible... Now lets get to lynching.
In post 490, bionicchop2 wrote:@mod- With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch.
@hikari- your post makes me very uncomfortable. You are making a lot of assumptions without asking a basic question:@Smear- did you target somebody last night and if so, who?
In post 491, bionicchop2 wrote:EBWOP - Hikari Link
I generally don't read signatures, but just got to the post in the game where you replaced and asked not to be called Hikari. Considered leaving it just to see how you respond to the conflict, but I don't want to misinterpret genuine frustration.
In post 490, bionicchop2 wrote:Hikari automatically jumped to a role blocker conclusion.
In post 494, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 420, Hikari Link wrote:
Also, I'm just putting it out there, but I think I'm likely the kill target tonight. I'd normally be content in my towniness that I would likely have Doc protection or at least that there would be the threat of Doc protection and so the mafia wouldn't come for me, but in this situation, I've got a few problems.
This is just absolutely horrible. Why would you have been a target if your predecessor was a scum read for many players? Why would you be a target with 2 town PRs claimed?
In post 495, bionicchop2 wrote:OK, so game read is done. This is going to be a tough one because there is a lot of questionable play going on. Here is my current list of reads. Anybody not included is null either due to inactivity or too close to middle of the road to be worth discussing for me ATM.
In post 495, bionicchop2 wrote:Brothers / HL- Getting a scummy vibe of some key odd posts (call for double voter to lynch 2 players, stating they will be nightkilled). Had an early kind of town read on brothers and the brothers / subcom back and forth is a little hard to gauge.
In post 495, bionicchop2 wrote:Frog- also seeming scummy, but discounting some due to playstyle. I guess my frustration here is that they should have been lynched after they claimed a non PR at deadline. The fact that the wagon changed SO quickly onto bub has the feeling that he is mafia and mafia (subcom) took an opportunity to quicklynch someone else. HL says they are fine with frog getting hammered, then takes first chance to vote someone else.
In post 495, bionicchop2 wrote:smearOnly 1 game on site. fake claiming vig? nah. Case against him would need to be solid. Yesterday's case against him was kind of weak.
In post 495, bionicchop2 wrote:Guy_named_riggsgets my newbtown read for the day. I don't know why players (Frog/sub/benoni/BB) jumped on him. Sure he hasn't been the best scumhunter, but nothing he did screams 'scum' and his play matches his completed newbie game. Look how he actually believes the dayvig non-claim from DTM and then rationalizes he must be scum because the person didn't lie so the claim was fake. Is newb-mafia making that post? No. If they believed the dayvig claim, they would do their best to not annoy them by voting them and getting attention.
In post 498, bionicchop2 wrote:@HLNot going to quote battle, but will give answers to your key points:
1. I don't see the point in mentioning a player I have no read on. You have a frame of reference if I mention them later and say scummy, you can go back and see I had no read on them earlier. Not sure why you are asking me to add filler. To me it seems like you are maybe asking directly about benoni, or you didn't see that my non-reads are just 2 inactive players and benoni. I guess I can go ahead and indulge that request (maybe next time ask me directly - what do you think about benoni?). I have some issues with their style, but haven't seen much solid content I can wrap any thoughts around. Only instance in my head that sticks out is at one point they were questioned about why they weren't voting a player, then they voted them (think it was on brothers). I made a note that I didn't like that post (#106).
In post 498, bionicchop2 wrote:2. I understand the whole end of the day was a mess and I wasn't in the flow of the game. The double lynch thing irked me. Even if I think 2 people are scummy, I would prefer to lynch one, re-evaluate, then lynch the other. Killing both at the same time would require 100% confidence both were scum. The frog thing was just weird. Everybody seemed to think he was scum. He claimed blue. Bub made a comment about thinking he towntold post lynch (even though lynched hadn't gone through) and the speed at which people dropped off frog and jumped on bub seemed really off. Again, I have the advantage of knowing he was town while reading, but I didn't see anything that would have made me consider him a top suspect.
In post 498, bionicchop2 wrote:3. Yes Smear has EM experience, as do I. Even on EM, vig is a bad claim. Also, setups are open there and when you fake claim there are direct motives there. You expect a cc and often you claim a role like cop or doc if you are fishing for roles.
In post 498, bionicchop2 wrote:4. I don't dismiss inexperience, but I think I am getting a better feel for reading new players and I get a very new town sense from riggs. The biggest flaw I see is they give players town reads just for posting lists that seem like they have content in them.
In post 498, bionicchop2 wrote:5. As for your vig assumptions, I already backed off that in my follow up post. I have moved it to the null box.
In post 500, bionicchop2 wrote:As a side note, those players stating they will reread need to do so. It wasn't that hard of a read, though I don't run over every post with a fine tooth comb. If you already read it once, it should be easy to refresh your memory and start expressing some opinions. More important is that we get a new active discussion going.
In post 500, bionicchop2 wrote:To jump start it, tell me who you had your vote on to end the day and why you voted them. Do you feel the same about them now after two town players have been revealed? Do you feel Bub was lynched because mafia pushed that way or did town turn on him and mafia just quietly sheeped along?
In post 502, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Link,
I have to agree with the reread thing. It gets boring going back through it.
@MOD IS THE PLAYER LIST UP TO DATE?
I'm going to wait to reanalyze till i get the player list
In post 504, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Okay then..
We assume 3 scum
which equates to
3 scum and 8 townies
...and only 3 people are actively playing right now...
not cool
In post 518, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:1.) It doesn't Like I said, set up peculation
2.) Don't know
3.) clear? none. Although, I think that link, smear, and you are town. But not clear town reads.
In post 520, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:I'm not going to sit back and wait, but I'm also not jumping right into it. I would prefer to wait till people actually posted before I continue.
In post 538, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:In post 536, Hikari Link wrote:
Guy_Named_Riggs: Scum-lean. I get the idea that he is feigning ignorance at some points. To date, he has asked what a miller is, how many mafia there re, and he put forward that DTMaster might be a Day Vig in the same post that he voted him. The third thing is the part that has me most suspicious. Why even mention it when he is obviously not the Day Vig at that point and furthermore, it is slightly suspect to me that he knows what a DAy Vig is, but not a Miller. It's not a huge thing, but it is nonetheless something that doesn't sit well with me. Aside from that, just wanting to sort of hang back until discussion starts up again is kind of null. It could be newb-town motivated or scum motivated. Either way, we needEVERYBODYto contribute as much as possible.
This was one of my first games of mafia that I joined outside the newbie queue (I actually think it was the first). I had asked those questions about the roles because I honestly didn't know them. I came to this site not knowing pretty much anything about the game (except it involved town lynchin scum). Also, I will still be here, but I am waiting on my reads till discussion starts back up.
In post 540, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Day 1 was a mess. I'd rather wait for fresh info as oppossed to a hot mess of info
In post 541, BBmolla wrote:Oh lol this wagon on me. I'll comment on it tomorrow, I'll be fully rereading then.
In post 536, Hikari Link wrote:Frogsterking: Town-lean. Sad to say I think I was wrong about this guy, but on the reread, there were a couple of things that really stuck out to me. Posts like these are actually not bad and he was one of the first to pick up on BBmolla being shady and in his own way, he has been trying to push on GNR for a while now, though not very successfully. I was so focused on his bad logic being scummy that I didn't stop to think that he could just have bad logic without being scum. I mean, if he really was scum, he had every chance to jump on the Bub wagon too, but he constantly supported Bub. Plain and simple, I was wrong about him.
Guy_Named_Riggs: Scum-lean. I get the idea that he is feigning ignorance at some points. To date, he has asked what a miller is, how many mafia there re, and he put forward that DTMaster might be a Day Vig in the same post that he voted him. The third thing is the part that has me most suspicious. Why even mention it when he is obviously not the Day Vig at that point and furthermore, it is slightly suspect to me that he knows what a DAy Vig is, but not a Miller. It's not a huge thing, but it is nonetheless something that doesn't sit well with me. Aside from that, just wanting to sort of hang back until discussion starts up again is kind of null. It could be newb-town motivated or scum motivated. Either way, we needEVERYBODYto contribute as much as possible.
These two reads are terrible. How can you have town on Frogster while having scum on GNR? Makes NO sense. At all.
In post 544, RandomActs wrote:Back in the groove here. Hoping others join in too.
Haven't been able to do a full re-read, but I did do an iso on Lowell. Not much to go on, I'm afraid. Besides bub, he had a vote on on frog for awhile. But he wasn't pushing very hard on any one person. I don't think this NK will tell us much.
I'm somewhat bemused by Link's confidence in his game play. I don't know him so I'm hoping he'll prove himself worthy of the bravado. But I do have a question for you like (which I'll admit is a bit of tweek, but not entirely): Assuming your superior scum-catching ability, why do you think Lowell was the NK and not you? Just asking.
In post 545, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 544, RandomActs wrote:I'm somewhat bemused by Link's confidence in his game play. I don't know him so I'm hoping he'll prove himself worthy of the bravado. But I do have a question for you like (which I'll admit is a bit of tweek, but not entirely): Assuming your superior scum-catching ability, why do you think Lowell was the NK and not you? Just asking.
I am on and bored, so here is my thought. making no assumptions about Link's skills as a player, mafia tend to target somebody they don't think will be protected, but didn't have too much suspicion on them. Once a protective role shows up dead or they feel they can sneak it in, they off the stronger player.
In post 549, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Why is a dayvig less likely a role I would know next to a miller exactly?
In post 552, HowardRoark wrote:Attempting to analyze the NK choice can become a WIFOM disaster. (I'm just saying.)
In post 552, HowardRoark wrote:We really need to hear from Smear, including a response to my question in 439.
In post 552, HowardRoark wrote:@Guy_Named_Riggs: I want quality contentNOW!! Give me the name of at least one of your scum suspects with some solid reasoning.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:Okay, finished rereading a bit.
Frogster is still scum, GNR is still town.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:This wagon on me still sucks. How come I went from "townish" to "OMG SCUM"? Something seems off.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:In regard to my day one play, to be honest I just wanted to the game to get a move on. I only threw my vote down when I saw wagons I was okay with.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:Link's read on me flipped a 180, which makes no sense based off of Howard's few little sentences.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:And then bionic jumps on when looking at his post it would appear I was his weakest scumread.
In post 557, BBmolla wrote:Get off me, your wagon is silly.
In post 560, Cojin wrote:prods will happen eather tommorow or friday.
In post 559, BBmolla wrote:In post 558, Hikari Link wrote:So you decided to sheep rather than scumhunt? It's not like the Day was so long that it was growing unwieldy and needed to be cut short.
Literally half the playerlist was afk. If we even wanted to lynch we'd have to all agree, not just some.
In post 559, BBmolla wrote:Bionic didn't jump on until after two votes. He expressed his weak scumread on me before and didn't vote me. Why the change? Oh, right, bandwagon, got it.
In post 559, BBmolla wrote:Once again, Frogster is scum, how many times do I have to say it?
In post 575, BBmolla wrote:I don't know what to tell you. The setup was xylbot generated, so maybe Cojin didn't look up whether Psychiatrist was normal?
In post 576, bionicchop2 wrote:AlsoFoS Link. You strike me as more thorough and I would have expected you to uncover those, but you just glazed it and didn't dig deep enough.
In post 578, BBmolla wrote:Hm.
Maybe there is no SK, and because of that is was okay'd?
Yeah if I'm not a legal role that's pretty bogus. Go ahead and lynch me I guess, doesn't seem like I'm very useful anyway.
In post 581, bionicchop2 wrote:Link - There can be a variant, but it has to follow this:
New/variant roles may be included in limited number (no more than 1 in a Mini, 2 in a Large), and should be based on the usual role mechanics: Killing, Protecting, Investigating, Blocking, Voting, Enabling and Communication.
In post 582, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 579, Hikari Link wrote:
In post 576, bionicchop2 wrote:AlsoFoS Link. You strike me as more thorough and I would have expected you to uncover those, but you just glazed it and didn't dig deep enough.
This may come as a shock to you, but as it turns out, I'm not infallible. I look at a lst, see the role is not explicitly named as normal or non-normal and that the page regarding the role is not listed as such either, and I move on.
Only an FoS currently. You have been active and hunting, but those are only signs of a strong player, not necessarily town. You were early to vote BB, so you get some town points for that anyway until I decide a bus happened.
In post 583, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 567, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Yes, though I think I know what you're going to say...
Before day ends Riggs needs to explain this.
In post 587, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:In post 583, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 567, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Yes, though I think I know what you're going to say...
Before day ends Riggs needs to explain this.
I thought he was going to claim VT. I figured, if BB was scum, he would claim VT. Most scum claim that.
or, he would have claimed someother power role like cop or jailkeep or something, hoping to out the real power role.
In post 590, bionicchop2 wrote:In post 586, Hikari Link wrote:In post 585, bionicchop2 wrote:It's too bad, by the way, that you went and let out that BBmolla's claim couldn't be, because if GNR had said that he had a feeling it was going to be Psychiatrist, we could've gotten two scum for the price of one once you let the cat out of the bag.
Meh. I don't get greedy
In post 591, bionicchop2 wrote:Oh and Link - if you protect me tonight, I will protect you, OK?
winky face; wifom nod; giggles.
In post 592, Frogsterking wrote:I was going to lynch BB but if he were scum why wouldn't he claim a real role that's not stupid
In post 595, HowardRoark wrote:@BBmolla: That claim buys you no sympathy from me.
@Guy_Named_Riggs: Honestly . . . are you not reading the thread?!?!?!? Bub is dead (569) and it's already very clear that Smear needs to report (570).
@Hikari Link: Can I answer your role action question from my understanding?
In post 597, bionicchop2 wrote:Link - I don't see the point in a counterwagon. I am all for additional scumhunting if you want to keep the day going, but voting elsewhere doesn't sit right with me. BB is pretty much confirmed mafia for fakeclaiming, so I am not lynching anybody else. There are rare instances in an open setup if I could determine which mafia role a player had then I would hunt for a more dangerous mafia role and save the safe bet for a later day, but today the lynch has to be BB.