AND MOOSE
YAY
HAPPY FRIENDS SHOULD BE HAPPY TOGETHER
I suppose he could be trying to 'shake up the waters', but since he doesn't appear to be doing that, I've discarded that avenue of thought.
In post 27, Magister Ludi wrote:I actually think Elli's no lynch vote was a planned move that looks likely to come from scum.
It allows him to parlay his vote into either a vote on some random townie that ignores his vote under the pretense of 'scum ignoring my controversial move so as not to get their feet wet' Or vote anyone that votes him under the pretense 'scum looking for an easy target, revote; boomheadshot', (since common site metagame is that self voting is scummy,)
Town motivation looks minimal. He doesn't actually want a no lynch, and if he does (lol?) that is vote-able. I suppose he could be trying to 'shake up the waters', but since he doesn't appear to be doing that, I've discarded that avenue of thought.
In post 45, Magister Ludi wrote:Elli, you had seven different players post after you, all ignoring the no lynch vote, or at least avoiding directly commenting on it, since my vote means I wasn't ignoring it. If you wanted to make some argument that scum were 'ignoring your outlandish play' you could have done so. But you didn't