Mini 85 - Shadyville - THE GAME IS OVER... see inside!!!

Kerplunk · Post Post #56 (isolation #0) » Mon Feb 02, 2004 6:42 am

I am confirming. Going to read the thread.

Kerplunk · Post Post #59 (isolation #1) » Tue Feb 03, 2004 2:14 am

Ok, I have read the thread now. That took long, didn't it?

Don't have a thing to go on. The only ones who acted scummy are UT and c_d, but both claimed believable roles, with the weakened part and all. I wonder if the mafia is also weakened.

And I'm also pretty scared by all the votes I have on me, right now. Could at least some of you follow MeMe's example?

Kerplunk · Post Post #85 (isolation #2) » Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:20 am

vote: Untrod Tripod

. First I did believe him, now I don't.

Kerplunk · Post Post #110 (isolation #3) » Sun Feb 15, 2004 5:57 am

Night 1:
UT protects MeMe
MeMe blocks UT (confirmed by ZONEACE)

Night 2:
c_d lingers round MeMe's house (to protect her?)
MeMe goes to the cliffs to roleblock gin
gin is thus probably also at the cliffs

So, maybe gin is a killer and MeMe didn't roleblock him properly. Is there any indication in your PM that you are a weakened roleblocker?

And what's with the birdseed?

Kerplunk · Post Post #117 (isolation #4) » Mon Feb 16, 2004 5:44 am

I also found his vote for gin strange. There was no indication gin should be scum, was there?

vote: Caveman

.

As for my roleclaim: I am the Rebellious Teenager (or something like that). Although it's safer to just stay in my room I can sneak out my window every night and I might find something worthwile.

I ask about the 'safer to stay in' bit to the Mod, but he couldn't (or wouldn't) give me any details about it. I guess it means that I have chance that I might live if I get attacked if I stay in.

First night, No Idea decided to stroll around and found a note from a detective saying that chaotic diablo is 'town'. On night 2 I also decided to go out, but I found nothing.

Kerplunk · Post Post #119 (isolation #5) » Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:42 am

It's 'something like that' because I don't want to copy the role-PM literally. Quoting the Mod is not allowed in this game, I think. Don't want to be Mod-killed, you know.

Kerplunk · Post Post #124 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:09 pm

Caveman wrote:No, kerplunk. No indication of scuminess here.

Well, I understand now why you voted for gin. It's better when you post reasons why to you vote for someone in the same post. That's more clearer. Well, I believe Caveman's claim. It's very plausible that the note I found came from him, the careless detective.

unvote: Caveman

.

I think it's best to gather all the info and do a reconstruction of last night's events. I would do it now, but I don't have the time at this moment.

Kerplunk · Post Post #125 (isolation #7) » Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:26 pm

In order to get it all sorted: gin, could you tell us how you were blocked? Because UT was blocked by MeMe by a blow on the head and also Caveman was struck on the head but not by MeMe.

And, where's Leonidas?

Kerplunk · Post Post #139 (isolation #8) » Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:24 am

I beginning to see a pattern:
night one:
UT targets MeMe
UT gets blocked

night two:
gin targets MeMe
Caveman targets MeMe
both get blocked

I have a theory: maybe MeMe is an SK/mafia (mostlikely SK) that cannot be investigated. Also ZONEACE saw MeMe heading towards the cliffs. Why would MeMe head towards the cliffs? To block gin? But why would gin would be at the cliffs; he is not the killer (he got blocked). Therefore I think MeMe went to the cliffs to kill modargo/c_d and not to block gin. Gin (and Caveman) were being hit on the head, because they targetted MeMe. Maybe it's just paranoia, but I think it accounts for all the things that have happened this night.

Before I place my vote on you, MeMe, what is the name of your role?

Kerplunk · Post Post #144 (isolation #9) » Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:36 am

I did not vote for you, because it was a theory I came up with when I posted. So, I wasn't sure if it was entirely correct. But as you say, ZONEACE didn't get a smack on the head. So, I guess, my whole theory collapses.

Still, this is strange. Let's say MeMe is not a killer and she tells the truth. She went to the cliffs to block gin. But why did gin go to the cliffs? To protect MeMe. So, either one of them is lying. I tend to believe MeMe. Her post was convincing, because she countered the foundation of my theory (that she couldn't be inv./prot./targ.).

So, we have a roleblocker(?) who hits people on the head masked. And a roleblocker who hits people unmasked (MeMe). And the first is still uncounted for. I'm really curious what the Leo's replacement has to say.

Before I forget,

FoS: gin

for the above paradox at the cliffs.

Kerplunk · Post Post #156 (isolation #10) » Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:45 am

Korais, what's your rolename? And I'm highly suspicious of gin, two reasons:

- he claims the third doc
- his role as doc and he being at the cliffs doesn't fit in the reconstruction of last night's events (it leads to a paradox)

But if he's the/a killer and MeMe blocked him, how could there be only two kills? It could be a Vigilante, but I doubt it. And we still don't know who hit Caveman in the head last night. Something's very fishy.

Anyway,

vote: gin

.

Kerplunk · Post Post #187 (isolation #11) » Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:14 am

There is still something unaccounted for. Let's assume there were only two killers last night still alive. If gin is one of those killers and he was succesfully blocked, why were there still two killings?

- It could be that gin is mafia, but that another was sent. But why was gin at the cliffs?
- It could be that gin is truly a doc and tried to protect MeMe at the cliffs. But why was MeMe then at the cliffs if she is a roleblocker?

You see that letting gin guilty or unguilty leads both to something illogical. I see no solution for question 1. And the only solution for question two is that gin is a doc and that MeMe is a killer, but that doesn't really make sense to me either. What do you all think of this?

unvote: gin

Kerplunk · Post Post #191 (isolation #12) » Mon Feb 23, 2004 7:06 am

Kerplunk wrote:There is still something unaccounted for. Let's assume there were only two killers last night still alive.
If gin is one of those killers and he was succesfully blocked, why were there still two killings?

This stil bugs me about gin being a killer. Maybe there is a Vigilante among us. But if not, how can you explain this?

Kerplunk · Post Post #260 (isolation #13) » Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:27 am

Kerplunk wrote:I have a theory: maybe MeMe is an SK/mafia (mostlikely SK) that cannot be investigated. Also ZONEACE saw MeMe heading towards the cliffs. Why would MeMe head towards the cliffs? To block gin? But why would gin would be at the cliffs; he is not the killer (he got blocked). Therefore I think MeMe went to the cliffs to kill modargo/c_d and not to block gin. Gin (and Caveman) were being hit on the head, because they targetted MeMe. Maybe it's just paranoia, but I think it accounts for all the things that have happened this night.

Ooh, I was

this

close...

Congratulations, MeMe. Nice one.

Just on a side-note: It was a very weird day the day I got lynched. I thought happily that gin would get lynched (yay, they're buying my claim..!) and then I come at check the thread the following morning, expecting to see gin lynched and all I see is vote: Kerplunk. Bah. Still, it was a fun game, with all the information that ZONEACE got and the cliffs-thing.

Great game, shady. Thanks!

Kerplunk · Post Post #269 (isolation #14) » Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:39 am

MeMe wrote:You really scared me there.

I can now peaceful retire from MafiaScum, I scared MeMe.

Kerplunk · Post Post #270 (isolation #15) » Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:43 am

Oh, and I have still a nagging question for the town. Why did everyone think that gin kille dsomeone on the night MeMe

blocked

him. I mentioned it a couple of times, but no-one seemed to pick that up.