@Eddie dammit! ninjae'd
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
this might be my confusion, but...In post 15, Eddie Cane wrote:agreeIn post 13, FireScreamer wrote:Disagree.In post 12, mozamis wrote:"He said that some things are really best left unspoken,
But I prefer it all to be out in the open..." (Billy Bragg, "Sexuality").
Good advice for playing as town!
Lets all be out in the open as possible as town and screw scum over!
this looks really self conscious and trying-too-hard. I'm happy with my Dog vote, but you're next on the Moz list.In post 134, Eddie Cane wrote:you should probably vote me over fire though as I did take his argument.
In post 162, Barleycorn wrote:would you still think this is ai if it were the case that eddie has done something similar before
this guy has to be town or we are all screwed.In post 211, Barleycorn wrote:for some clarity in what i'm doing, i think 189 + 191 is scum but i'm trying to see how possible it is that town!eddie made those posts.
this guy is town.In post 247, aronagrundy wrote:so if he really is hung up on anything he can ask again.
how can town be over eager? This game isnt about looking cool and laid back. Its about finding ou twho is lying. Simple as.In post 293, Transcend wrote:overeager town
No. I think you're town. It's my paranoia. You were supportive of what i said, which is very unusual on the internet, and particularly in mafia, where suspicion is rampant, and people like to let off steam and disgree with people for a laugh etc So i was stunned when you said nice things about me! And then the paranioa kicked in, as I've been buddied up to before.In post 261, Keyser Söze wrote:Are you in fact NULL on me?
is it turquoise?In post 272, Eddie Cane wrote:that's a beautiful shade of blue
screw it, she sounds honest.In post 275, DogWatch wrote:for one, I was playing on a phone all day yesterday while road tripping, so it was difficult to go back through past pages and quote things out.. It wasn't a conscious effort to avoid you.
a reason would be good.In post 281, Barleycorn wrote:VOTE: mozamis
keyser feels slimy. but i'll go back here since i think we can actually lynch this one.
love the word! let's get the word POLEMICAL in there too!In post 376, aronagrundy wrote:demagoguery
an but no come on he is town
well, criticising you has got you posting at leastIn post 401, gerryoat wrote:also i find it funny moz said i was useless that game. when he was either the mason who got lynched (LOL) or the mason who let his partner get lynched (LOL). i forgot who i subbed in for
In post 491, FrankJaeger wrote:Moz or aro idc
and what the fuck is this?
It was very lat elast night, i went to bed. I am now defending myself.In post 467, DogWatch wrote:What kind of response is that? If the votes are wrong, defend.
This is bullshit. Before this wagon on me, there hadnt been any real suspicion on me. So i had nothing to answer to.In post 467, DogWatch wrote:I just skimmed your ISO and really don't see much defense on your part at all whenever suspicion was raised. It's like you want to fly under the radar and hope everyone finds someone else to vote for.
i think he rvs'ed me? I dont think he asked me any questions until the recent Moz wagon.In post 501, DogWatch wrote:Did you not just say barley had been on and off you all game?
Lets fight them on the beaches!In post 558, FireScreamer wrote:Without people participating in day 1 there are no associations to look at day 2. And people frequently use your logic to ensure just that for themselves Frank. Yes we are going to lynch probably a townie today and probably for bad reasons. Yes we should still try to lynch scum. You lay yourself out there. You form opinions (that you stay flexible with), you push on things that seem odd and you try. Are other days more fun? Yes. Does that matter? No. We are working gradually through a process here. Work we do now will be flawed, but those flaws will be sanded down in the hindsight of days to come. Engage in day one. Read and be read. No excuses.
Did lol at this.In post 572, momo wrote:My name is MOMOMAN.
ah lol ok understood.In post 584, momo wrote:I am MOMOMAN on EM.
See, this looks town to me. He's right out in the open. Its almost kinda naive.In post 639, momo wrote:VOTE: Frank
Lets lynch Frank, have a good feeling about this.
Investigate me tonight, I will come out town.
its very close.In post 683, DogWatch wrote:why fire over frank? I know you were sus on both of them, just wondering
I think you should always vote your strongest scum read, unless the deadline is close/its clear they are never gonna get lynched this day phase.In post 686, DogWatch wrote:ok i just figured since they were both in your scumpile, you'd vote the one with a wagon
In post 691, momo wrote:what about me moz
completely forgot i read him as town early on.In post 697, Keyser Söze wrote:I know reads/stance's can change... (your posts were nearly 600 posts apart) but do you think Fire's early posts are still "empty", upon your re-read?
@ Kevin Spacey: I think it was this kind of post that made me think Fore was town. He seemed robust and forthright in his defence.In post 93, FireScreamer wrote:Nothing i've said has been off topic and I'll respond to someone trying to discredit an argument due to its source with the scorn that it deserves. I'm attacking the actions and not the man.
looking forward to it.In post 731, FireScreamer wrote:tomorrow i'll fully go into 3 or 4 people I want to talk about.
In post 823, Transcend wrote:fire's probably town i don't know if there's any way scum can fake that
VOTE: frank
indeed, i forgot i town read you early on.In post 850, FireScreamer wrote:forgot the first read existed