for being a degenerate drunk.
Although DRK is obv scum
the page 3 fucking dumb claim. Awesome dude. Now with the hypothetical doc we have 1/2 chance of two deaths (assuming they kill one of you) as opposed to the 1/6 chance of two deaths + the 9/12 chance of one. Someone good at game theory do this calculation for me, I'm bad at math. But my gut says this was wrong, particularlly asuming that the scum could wisely choose to not kill one of you and thus secure a free kill. And if you just fake claimed, I will murder you with fire. LAL ftw.In post 45, Eddie Cane wrote:he didn't soft mason, we are lovers.In post 43, CooLDoG wrote:Imp, rvs target =\= lynch target.
@drk, 3rd vote always scum.
Don't like boo's soft mason claim.
Booskins is the best wagon right now. More pressure would be god. Although a lot of people will probably try to get onto the cmm wagon for no reason. Lets wait and see for a little bit.
cmm wagon is good wagon. vote cmm now!
could be either, lynch me to find out.In post 54, Eddie Cane wrote:now the question is does that useless effort post get town cred or is it scum trying to play king
An accurate statement, thus why I did not vote him.In post 57, implosion wrote:Eddie can be dumb town.
I don't have a sense of humor.In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo
meta is bullshit and correlates with bad lynches.In post 69, TwoFace wrote:Yet you have made posts in games you later said was a joke...In post 67, CooLDoG wrote:I don't have a sense of humor.In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo
it is, but we don't have many cmm posts to go off of, need him to post more.
there isn't any. It just gives scum good nk targets.In post 107, Desully wrote:Why do people insist on making town lists ?? What value is in it??
scum lists aree somewhat useful in later days, not d1 and certainly not this early into d1.In post 108, TwoFace wrote:no clue, read lists are stupid and should never be done
not an omgus, but you literally just said you like the cmm wagon. Seems like fishing for the easiest wagon to be on, as superhans points out in his next post.In post 111, DeathRowKitty wrote:Were you intending to take me up on the offer (is that what the "speak of the devil!" meant??) or were you just changing votes?
Either way, I'm a frog of my word so
Unvote: IAlwaysWinSometimes
Vote: CooLDoG
fite me
In post 97, DeathRowKitty wrote:I really like Desully he is COLD AND LOGICALI am going to buddy him a bitso i can turn on him more easily when I have enough evidence to decide that he's the remaining scum.
meta is bullshit.In post 136, implosion wrote:have you seen cooldog's play before
I would fucking love for you to make this a mainstay argument for my wagon. I will be laughing my ass off in the dead thread.In post 139, TwoFace wrote:What about him saying he doesn't have a sense of humor yet when you search past games you find examples of him saying things he said was a joke.
Somebody who makes jokes should have totally seen that claim as a joke
In post 136, implosion wrote:have you seen cooldog's play before
implosion wrote:it's not even meta it's literally acknowledging the fact that different people are differently likely to be able to detect a joke jesus christ
Voting for a town player bad? I mean, given the options, I am not the worst vote in this game if we are being honest.In post 149, Eddie Cane wrote:cooldog. why should I change my vote in 10 words or less
early in the game you have to start the scum hunting off from somewhere, and what motivation is there to make a joke lover claim on page 3? I don't understand you point.In post 204, Eddie Cane wrote:seriously. what it allows him to do is make a case and appear to be contributing to town. he didn't actually take it seriously, no competent player would ever take that seriously IMO, and he doesn't expect to be sheeped on it. it let's him push an unrealistic bad angle hard and "genuinely" and get off from it scrape free. it also excuses him from having to take actual stances. this is scum, fucking lynch it.In post 142, Eddie Cane wrote:scum motivation is a free large content post. he got to type a wall early in the game and 'contribute' to townIn post 140, implosion wrote:...sometimes people miss things?In post 139, TwoFace wrote:Somebody who makes jokes should have totally seen that claim as a joke
in particular i feel like cooldog is the kind of person who'd possibly take something like that literally. This isn't from scanning random games, this is from having seen him post on ms for years in discussion forums. And i certainly don't think he'd lie as scum about thinking that it was legitimate when he knew it was a joke. it's mostly moot anyway. it's not a strong read.
Do you think he's scum lying about having thought it was serious? What is the scum motivation for lying about something so arbitrary when everyone else would obviously know it's a joke?
cool, whatever, lynch me.In post 223, TwoFace wrote:AgreeIn post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
my point is that if this is the bar that the town sets for a lynch, then they should go ahead an lynch me for it. Meaning, if people are going to push for this type of lynch I think the rest of the town will get a pretty clear picture of the fabricated scum case on me. However, I agree, I'm probably not going to get lynched on this. It really is quite the flimsy case of: "he misred page 3 joke, got out of rvs on it, thus lynch him". And this is quite degenerate.In post 245, Superhans wrote:This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:cool, whatever, lynch me.In post 223, TwoFace wrote:AgreeIn post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.
The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.
@whemeatar why Desully?
no
meta is bullshitIn post 280, WhemeStar wrote:I realize from past games that scum are usually the ones to lead the mislynch on me. Don't do it this game please and thanks
because it is a bad vote.In post 281, WhemeStar wrote:Why am I the only one voting Desully. If someone votes him with me it will make me happy
don't necessarily like this, seems like going for an easy lynch.In post 286, horrordude0215 wrote:The site meta for shitposters is more than a little annoying, because it's almost impossible to read them either way. It's the only time I will ever call for a PL - you're either going to be productive to town and make good quality posts, or you're going to be lynched.
But this is actually horrible because not only does wheme come out to play right after he only gets two votes on him, but he also shifts his vote and trys to get a buddy with the sheep comment. My vote stays.In post 287, WhemeStar wrote:Says the one who's posts aren't quality posts at all lol. More like scum trying to push a mislynch by calling it a "policy lynch". It won't work so stop trying.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: havingfitz
I'll sheep u implosion
I think it could be some of both. I think that, for example, eddie legitimately thinks that I am scum, I think he just tunneled too hard. I think fitz might be a sheep that could go either way, especially considering that his latest post looks good. Two face seems to just be a parrot along for the ride, and thus he would be the person I would peg as most likely to be scum on my wagon.In post 305, Superhans wrote:@CoolDog
Do you think your wagon is mainly misguided towny or deliberately a scum push?
Pedit what am i looking at?
how high are you? Seriously? There is a difference between saying he isn't scum and I need more information to tellIn post 307, Desully wrote:In post 118, CooLDoG wrote: .....it is, but we don't have many cmm posts to go off of, need him to post more.
.....not an omgus, but you literally just said you like the cmm wagon. Seems like fishing for the easiest wagon to be on, as superhans points out in his next post.In post 111, DeathRowKitty wrote:Were you intending to take me up on the offer (is that what the "speak of the devil!" meant??) or were you just changing votes?
Either way, I'm a frog of my word so
Unvote: IAlwaysWinSometimes
Vote: CooLDoG
fite me! ! ! ! ! !
CoolDog why do you think CMM needs to be defended from votes if you're the one who voted him first???
I fail to see anything beyond a mere intuition or feeling in this post. No logic to be seen.In post 313, TwoFace wrote:I can't speak for others on the wagon, but I am most definitely using logic. Logic tells me that nothing from CD seems genuine or what I would expect from a townieIn post 301, Superhans wrote:The CoolFog wagon is being pushed by a players who are using rhetoric rather than logic or keeping an open mind.
and I agree with this point (to a certain extent) but you are not producing any content what so ever. You seem to be okay with any lynch that has a realistic chance of happening, thus the vote. At least fitz has some reasoning for his votes.In post 315, WhemeStar wrote:Too all of you saying I'm sheeping to get a buddy.In post 229, havingfitz wrote:His first couple posts were just RVS nonsense. What did you "really" not like about them?In post 228, WhemeStar wrote:Really didn't like Darklyns first couple posts... cmon man you put me in a rough spot
And what rough spot? All the votes (zero) he got?
This is why I'm voting Havingfitz. Him being scum and me being town makes him want to ask those exact two questions
No, it is that if you only make posts about me I will vote you. Where you vote actually lies does not matter. Tunnel vision bad, and an easy way for scum to make posts that look townie.In post 320, Eddie Cane wrote:see, how I interpret this is "unvote me or I'll start pushing your lynch". aka, you'll town read me as long as I unvote you. am I misunderstanding? if so, what did you mean by that?In post 258, CooLDoG wrote:Yes, I was probably a bit hasty in the first post, and I admit the contradiction. I think that people who vote to lynch me off of this case probably deserve some scum points. However, I can see how making this case could come from scum or town. SO yeah, you got me, I'll admit it.Still not going to vote you (depends on how far you take this tunnel),still need more info to decide on two face, still happy with my drk vote.
good job, the person who wants people to read only read the first sentence. Most excellent sir, have your i can readz certificate:In post 278, CooLDoG wrote:VOTE: whemestar
Content less posts. No meaningful justification for vote. Rears head only when voted.
this, 100% this.
I personally don't think I did. However, I can see why people would see it that way.In post 417, Superhans wrote:Did you "lie"?In post 416, CooLDoG wrote:the current argument on me is not that I lied and thus lynch me, it is that my "lies" are scum motivated.
exactly my point about wheme. I don't see a town village idiot here, I see scum trying not to get lynched and attempting to get wagons started for the only reason of getting to a lynch that isn't him.In post 435, TwoFace wrote:Id have to researchIn post 431, WhemeStar wrote:Fruit vendor
Why claim though?
fruit vendor also just opens up a cluster fuck load of wifom... but generally if confirmed it is more likely to be town rather than scum.In post 439, TwoFace wrote:But to answer your question wheme. People who think you are scum aren't going to believe your role until it can be confirmed. Assuming it gets confirmed.
nods, this is a true understanding of the wagon on me.In post 493, horrordude0215 wrote:I think you, like several others, have been tunneling on CD all day.
Your vote appears to have justification to it, but I don't agree with the case, and I think confbias has been coming into play because it's as if every single one of his posts have some sort of scumslip/tell in it.
Same. I do not see town motivation for claiming a weak ass role so early. Especially considering the fact that it could easily be a scum role as well. Confirming it will not necessarily be alignment indicative. With that said, I tend to think that there is a strong possibility of him telling the truth about the roll, especially considering the fact that we will receive fruit from him. The question I'm asking is should we wait for d2 to get the confirmation of this, or will it really give us that much information.In post 530, Boonskiies wrote:I'm not convinced on the TownWheme.
what, no, very fucking bad. Scum gets kill, duh. Also any sort of roll that scum may have to prevent it will be used that night. So very bad. Scum points for this suggestion. Scum have an inherent motivation to get the information of where the fruit goes...In post 568, Boonskiies wrote:we should decide who he gives it to, tbh.