Mini Normal 1950 [Engame: Mafia Victory!]
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
yea whyIn post 18, necro wrote:I think UC Voyager is likely town.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
I've never done this. Have no qualms with it.In post 7, ChaosOmega wrote:On day 2 and onwards (until the vanilla cop role is claimed or killed), every player posts a result as if they were the vanilla cop; the actual vanilla cop tells the truth and everyone else makes up a result. It does possibly give scum more info on who isn't the vanilla cop (if someone claims an incorrect result on one of them, for example), but it guarantees that we have all of the investigations as public knowledge while allowing them not to claim and draw a NK.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
You should always be able to explain a read, even a little bit. That's why it's a read and not just a feeling.In post 67, Morality wrote:
Why would someone be able to explain it right now? Looks like you’re saying stuff for the sake of saying it.In post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.
VOTE: Zulfy
That last sentence seems tacked on.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Cuz the reasons for doing that are dumb.In post 63, wavemode wrote:
Why notIn post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Riley Cake was an Accountant alt. Basically just esoterically trolling with their over the top posting style. Due to not having any scumreads I´m okay with having my vote parked on him because I´m okay with him not in the game.In post 99, Vanderscamp wrote:
What is Riley cakin'?In post 97, Zulfy wrote:I don´t think Voyager is scum, just out there riley cakin´
Gonna keep my vote on himno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Haven't you ever been bitten in the ass in LYLO?In post 131, Rhah wrote:I consider lynching people because you don't want them in endgame bad practice.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Don't be scummy, that's not my argument.In post 161, Vanderscamp wrote:If you lynch people because you don't like they're style you're probably going to lose a lot of games.
Critical thinking skills are lacking. I've been in games where I was obvtown and the other person obvscum and town lost cuz of the third person's colorful personality.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Does this readslist have a specific format?
no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
How does Rhah's weak scum read on you involve itself with UCV?In post 143, CheekyTeeky wrote:UCV keeps digging a scum hole for himself (which I'll break down shortly) and this only makes it easier for scum to hide (as rhah 's weak scum read on me proved)no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Doubcasting which players? UC Voyager he saysIn post 155, Rhah wrote:Doubtcasting players simply for expressing doubt on you is pretty scummy.
Rhah you said it was pretty scummy of CheekyTeeky to cast doubt on UC Voyager ´for expressing doubt on´herIn post 167, Rhah wrote: Literally, the post where you go "UCV is scum.. .maybe too scum."
Spoiler: actual footage of UC Voyager expressing doubt about CheekyTeeky
But it was actually an RVS and a townread, see.
But then later you say it was cuz of this. I thought it was cuz of the doubtcasting.In post 167, Rhah wrote:I'm pretty sure that atmosphere was at least floating around already given that he was being wagoned, so I really didn't see why you had to add that as your input when it could have been... maybe.. other sorts of content considering your two prior posts in the slot are just naked votes. This is the notion that's condemned me, apparently.
Explain yourself bitteno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Oooh this sounds like a frustrated townie.In post 189, Rhah wrote:In post 187, CheekyTeeky wrote:Do you have any arguments for town to use as evidence of your sorting?
None that will seem sound when they come out of whatever filter you're putting my posts through.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Those are both things I already knew.In post 193, Rhah wrote:155 is referring to CTs response to me. Not UC Voyager. The second post you quote is me answering a question.
Let´s clarify, who was doing the doubcasting and who were they casting that doubt on?no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
I think you're lying.In post 224, Rhah wrote:Given that you seriously asked this question I will decline to engage.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
He thinks you didn't understand that was sarcasm.In post 223, CheekyTeeky wrote:
What?In post 221, Vanderscamp wrote:
Really?In post 218, CheekyTeeky wrote:
:/ VOTE: necroIn post 217, necro wrote:Yes I plan to wait until 2 hours before the deadline so my buddies and I can secure the lynch with our nefarious plans!!
*cue evil cackling*no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
I was asking in order to evaluate your affirmations dummy.In post 227, Rhah wrote:
If the answer to your initial question isn't obvious to you already from either my own or her posts then the conclusion must be that I'm lying. If you see no doubt casting from her then I have no hope for you.Zulfy wrote:
I think you're lying.In post 224, Rhah wrote:Given that you seriously asked this question I will decline to engage.
But the first time you call her scum isIn post 196, Rhah wrote:
CT ---> RhahZulfy wrote:
Those are both things I already knew.In post 193, Rhah wrote:155 is referring to CTs response to me. Not UC Voyager. The second post you quote is me answering a question.
Let´s clarify, who was doing the doubtcasting and who were they casting that doubt on?
The first reason Rhah ever gives for planning on calling someone mafia is this:In post 131, Rhah wrote:
I had planned on calling you mafia, but it was immediately overshadowed by UC being scummier, I think.CheekyTeeky wrote:UCV if you're town I'm going to be mad. You're so obviously scum that it makes me think you aren't...but then you are, right?
So which one is it?In post 155, Rhah wrote:Doubtcasting players simply for expressing doubt on you is pretty scummy.
I ask you and you talk down to me trying to evade having to explain it.
But I'd like you to.
VOTE: Rhahno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Hey.In post 328, Chip Butty wrote:Zulfy: seems obsessed with Rhah and who doubtcasted who. Nothing else of substance.
Could you please summarise the case on Rhah, because it seems early to be tunnelling and I'm not seeing anything substantial coming out of this yet.
Yea I'm tunneling Rhah, I feel more effective if I Focus on one thing at a time but plan on looking at the Luca stuff today.
Summary: He contradicts himself on his reason for ongoingly engaging CheekyTeeky. When confronted all he does is despair.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
But that's not what you were referring to when you first talked brought it up. You changed your allegation for convenience's sake, and every time I've pointed it out all you've done is moan about how I'm just not understanding you while refusing to explain.In post 331, Rhah wrote:If being accused of setting up mislynches and just shading isn't being doubtcasted a little then I don't know what is. I feel as if we'll be on to bigger and better things now though, like lynching necro who's probably mafia. So I don't know that it makes sense to continue pushing this thing now. Also your approach to me hasn't mentioned anything I've done that doesn't refer to CT, which is still a portion of my play.
It's also disingenuous of you to say that I've only focused on you and CheekyTeeky when that's at best one out of 2 things I could have focused on. Early game, see.
You're just a stubborn bum and there's no point pressuring you anymore.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Then what's the point of anything????In post 337, wavemode wrote:It's no-assedno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
I'll look at this someday but not now since I've paid you too much attention already.In post 338, Rhah wrote:I didn't understand your progression on Morality (or where Una's response to you leaves your postiion on him, I know that your vote is still there) and I didn't like your recent few posts in addition to the one I just quoted.
and you're probably wrongno investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
In post 355, CheekyTeeky wrote:Damn Morality I think you're town because you wouldn't push me this hard knowing my flip. Otherwise suicide. Yeah I'm a fan of OMGUS so lynch me.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: UCV
becauseIn post 365, CheekyTeeky wrote:Morality is scum. Doubt = zero.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
how did this go, moIn post 345, Morality wrote:I mean, my Zulfy read hasn’t really evolved persay. I’m pretty confident they are scum, and now with my CheekyTeeky suspicion, along with some of Rhah’s responses, I’m pretty confident that Rhah is a mislynch. I still feel that Zulfy was saying things for the sake of saying them, and other than that, I can’t really explain why I feel he’s scum, besides the obvious him pushing Rhah, which just comes out to be circular reasoning due to the question, “What if Rhah’s scum?” I’m pretty confident that eventually I’ll be able to explain my Zulfy read better, but it’s page 14, so I’ll just need some more activity before I can start breaking him down. He’s aware I’m here watching his posts, so he’ll likely be posting in a way where he tried to trick me if he’s scum, and if I’m wrong, and he is actually town, I feel i’ll Be able to figure that out sooner than later by POE’ing out other players when I start to town read them.no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
gyal mi love the way that you wine for meIn post 401, necro wrote:Yes it's my first game ever and I have made the mistake of linking myself to my partner being wagoned. Shucks, this game is very hard!!!no investigation no right to speak-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
-
-
Zulfy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: October 3, 2015
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.