Second game on here, first normal one as my first one is a noobie.
VOTE: Maki Harukawa
Good luck everyone!
I agree with this. I feel like it would be too obvious an action for scum and especially for experienced scum.In post 57, Jodaxq wrote:Not sure what to think about this. It seems so scummy that I can't see scum doing it.
I can see what you (and others) are saying. I'd personally think scum doing something like that would take a risk as it could lead to more discussion which might hurt scum... then again I don't have too much experience around here and nothing else about Tchill seems suspicious to me.In post 105, davesaz wrote:Scum might do it for exactly that reason. There is usually far more pressure on the hammer vote, especially if quick. And if it's a bus they get to use it as an argument against being a partner for the rest of the game.In post 100, HeWhoSwims wrote:I agree with this. I feel like it would be too obvious an action for scum and especially for experienced scum.In post 57, Jodaxq wrote:Not sure what to think about this. It seems so scummy that I can't see scum doing it.
For now I'm asking myself too, not because they look scummy to me but because I just haven't seen them do anything really pro-town... unsure what exactly to make of odd, on one hand his "screenplay's reaction is out of place" is a bit weird to me but after that he seems to dive into the wagon on screen. Calling beef and jodaxq "very town" again this early is eh.Tchill13 wrote:how in the world are beef and odd getting thrown around as town reads?
I can definitely see this, their content is empty content if you get what I'm saying. One thing that separates Dave from Maki is that I feel Dave's post at the very least allow for a bit discussion, albeit it is others discussing while he watches on from the sideline (why?). It's a small thing but it's something I'm not seeing as much in Maki's posts.In post 179, Jodaxq wrote:I'm a little concerned about how reluctant Davesaz seems to be about contributing. Most of his posts are just asking everyone else what they think. Maki Harukawa also seems to be a little guarded.
It is certainly better to ask them for their thoughts, it's a great way to enable discussion and as I mentioned I think that's the good part about your posts, but I see what Jodaxq (I think?) was getting at as there's not that much new content from your side. I'm not sure if that's worth a scumread for now however since as I said you're enabling discussion and I doubt that's what scum would want to do.In post 184, davesaz wrote:Is it better to ask people questions aimed at finding out the reason behind their posting, or assume what their reason was?
Let's look into these.In post 206, Tchill13 wrote:2 scum in (Dave, beef, screen, odd)
What I'm meaning here is that I'm mostly reading Beef as scum but some stuff ticks me off. Mainly his sudden jump on Havo although I am leaning nullscum on Havo for the time being.In post 222, davesaz wrote:This hits me as a place where you wanted to say something else but then couldn't figure out how to say it. What you ended up with was mind and heart thinking roughly the same thing which seems odd to state them both. Trying to hide something?In post 220, HeWhoSwims wrote:My mind says nulltown but my heart says null somehow because some stuff seems weird and I don't know with which of those two to go for now.
You mean the wave vote? That's because I want to see the guy post and then see what he contributes (which hasn't been that much at all so far). Surely inactivity is a big scumtell but he's on V/LA and I guess we can assume he has his reasons for it.In post 701, Beefster wrote:^ I'm not sure what you mean here. Something seems a little off and sheepy about this.
Uh, sorry but what else am I supposed to say?In post 1138, Beefster wrote:In post 1137, HeWhoSwims wrote:Yeah mason silence is worrying.
Havo in the above posts checks out... if Screen is mafia then that almost confirms the fact the "masons" would be too. And I do still suspect Screen.
The masons-are-alive scenario is tricky. It seems a bit over the top for me for two of a scumteam to claim mason with the possibility of counterclaims, and then survive night one and go silent. It is a huge risk and although it could happen I'm doubting it for now.
VOTE: HWS
Out of these I'm honestly only fine with putting a vote on Screen for now. Dunn isn't that much of a frequent poster but 1205 is scumhunting and IaI has indeed slipped under the radar. Havo, imo, has had good posts since the day change (although short, it still puts attention to the mason stuff).
Havo, day 2:In post 1217, Srceenplay wrote:Since you are talking about today.
Show Havo great posts.
Show my scumy posts.
My Havo read on D1 went from scumlean (before that huge night where I missed like 15 pages of mostly shitposting) to nulltown to null(ish) at the end while I was more consistently scumleaning on you for your posts on D1. Both of you have proven yourself on this day so far though as opposed to some others.In post 1223, Srceenplay wrote:Was Havo d1 good to you then or are you just basing you read on that slot based on d2?
If someone is crumbing a PR then 1) why would we want it "outed" like this when it's not necessary, as opposed to in a situation where Havo is potentially lynched? And 2) it strikes me as ironic to not believe a PR claim while your own PR claim is being discussed heavily. Combined with quite some other posts on D2 you're not being very pro-town for a townie.In post 1214, Maki Harukawa wrote:VOTE: havo
I think this should be lynched now that I think about it
Havo pr softed and with a doctor flip I doubt town has anymore prs
Why exactly do you think Beef and Dunn are being scum right now? I can see some arguments maybe but... they're not really my top suspects so to say.In post 1261, I Am Innocent wrote:Prododge until tomorrow. See the vote count, not that three of the scummier guys in the game voting me bothers me, but reasons when I catch up?
No, but it is a bit eh that you refer to the "town has no more prs" stuff when your own pr is being heavily discussed if you get what I'm saying.In post 1286, Maki Harukawa wrote:so by your logic of I'm a pr i can't doubt other prs? I see
I mean, the only investigative role is gunsmith. And gunsmith could have been killed early on like Doctor was is in this universe, and with that it was apparently a 2-shot. Masons have each other confirmed as town but other than this they can't do shit and when they're out, one of them is bound to be killed. So whether or not Dunn's claim is real (and a meh play) or scum faking it (not likely for me at this point). If it's true however I would wonder what Beef's apparent role is? I'd say it's an X-shot thing anyway.In post 1511, I Am Innocent wrote:Think about it people that is 6 clears in a 13 player game essentially:
Town gunsmith
2 masons
Town doc
2 clears from gunsmith
Give me scum roles that could counter this amount of power in a 13 player game. This would be a ridiculous amount of power in an 18 player game, it is impossible in a game this size.
Off to get my car serviced pretty much all I have to say anyway.
Why? There has been 1 kill last night, after Doc has died. Wouldn't multiball have 2 kills last night without a doctor present?In post 1513, Toranaga wrote:it would have to be multiball at this point
I don't find this too weird... PR wouldn't want to claim themselves unless it's really necessary, right? Which means a PR with a guilty can only crumb. And besides we know 3 people were a PR that's not investigating.In post 1531, Havo wrote: From just a quick skim through. I find it funny we have so many PRs but not any kind of a guilty on someone from any of them.
This is very true and big part of my own reason to believe the claim. Why the hell would scum do it? It only gets a target on their back if anything. I still think it is possible to have this PR, because masons aren't that valuable unless a) they claim and b) one of them flips, and neighbours honestly don't mean shit for the game, right? Doesn't confirm anyone as town or scum. Plus doctor would need someone worth protecting, I guess. Re:Pro-town balance, Scum could have a doctor and/or traitor since I think they show as "no gun"? Assuming we have a 3-person scum team with one of those two roles, 2shot-gunsmithI think dunn's claim is -fine- actually because he did it at start of the day and there wasn't much of a reason for him to do so as scum. it's not like dunn would have been lynched this gameday anyway and it's not a safe claim if you're doing ahead of others, for the odd chance another investigative might counterclaim you.
If this was directed to me; that's not what I mean. I'm not scumreading Wave because of him being neighbours with who is for me the top townie after Tora. All I think we can get from the neighbour pair is that at least one is town (2 scum being neighbours is pointless) which would be Beef. Some might think "oh wave is scum by default" in that case because "why else would there be neighbours?". Neighbours could just as easily be two townies no? My scum!wave read comes from his inactivity (which Beef says carries over to the neighbourhood), not from being paired with Beef.In post 1665, Tchill13 wrote:From my understanding if you think beef is town then wave should pretty much be lock scum.
Okay, that makes sense. This is my 2nd game here so I can't use meta stuff on anyone and I'm not aware of anyone else's meta. I think I saw Havo post a similar thing ("This is not the townie Tora I know" or something, iirc). While I still think you were way OTT with that tunnel, your D3 has been great, so perhaps itIn post 1675, Tchill13 wrote:I tunneled because I was convinced tora wouldn't play that way if he was town based on the things I had heard and seen from him I expected better but I forgot everyone is capable of a bad game. I also haven't played the best. Then I created a reasonable possible scenario that confirmed that bias.
QFTIn post 1686, Toranaga wrote:neighbours are literally NAI and mods in MS have done absolutely everything to fuck with the kind of assumption you're making
This must be a typo that I never noticed because I was null town on beef with my gut feeling conflicted. I was mostly reading beef as town, not scum (hence the "some stuff ticks me off" one sentence later).In post 1708, Toranaga wrote:scumreading, but nulltown reading and also null? I'm failing to grasp HWS's thought on beef...In post 250, HeWhoSwims wrote:What I'm meaning here is that I'm mostly reading Beef as scum but some stuff ticks me off. Mainly his sudden jump on Havo although I am leaning nullscum on Havo for the time being.In post 222, davesaz wrote:This hits me as a place where you wanted to say something else but then couldn't figure out how to say it. What you ended up with was mind and heart thinking roughly the same thing which seems odd to state them both. Trying to hide something?In post 220, HeWhoSwims wrote:My mind says nulltown but my heart says null somehow because some stuff seems weird and I don't know with which of those two to go for now.