In post 4413, skitter30 wrote:Vt
In post 4457, nomnomnom wrote:JOAT, with a tracker and gs shot.
In post 4541, Nero Cain wrote: So, I'm a role cop.
In post 4413, skitter30 wrote:Vt
In post 4457, nomnomnom wrote:JOAT, with a tracker and gs shot.
In post 4541, Nero Cain wrote: So, I'm a role cop.
In post 4872, Vorkuta wrote:so nom, Vork flips VT and it's post-game. You are asked why the game is over and your reply is?
Actually things went very smoothly all things considered. the shitstorm happens later?In post 4447, Nero Cain wrote:first thing first is that I'm a (likely the) town investigation role so that means I full claim last. Then I'm going to talk about things.
makes some sense actually. i dont think he should have auto-checked me.In post 4544, skitter30 wrote:Why the fuck do you .... not claim the sketchy miller claim, wtf
I also expect vork, being so sussed, would not make the nkIn post 4550, nomnomnom wrote:Also the fact that if Vorkuta is scum, he did not make the nightkill.
In post 4558, nomnomnom wrote:I also have a strong feeling that you would have checked either me or Shoshin after that day 1 too.
I wasnt here, but why?In post 5349, nomnomnom wrote:Like that night 1 check should have been you or me from the way he phrased it. That salad check is bullshit. I think this is scum that doesn't want to confirm anyone as town if he was to flip today.
Im a miller. i asked the mod about what happens if a gunsmith cops me, or a Neapolitan does.In post 5360, nomnomnom wrote:pedit: I don't get it, can you explain?
In post 5361, pisskop wrote:Im a miller.
yea.In post 4562, nomnomnom wrote:Does Performer really make a setup where there is a possibility that my one gs shot returns 2 positives on two townies...
youre gonna have to hardsell that. Im still reading. And doing other things on the comp, but slowly reading.In post 5366, nomnomnom wrote::/
I'd very much like to get this over with, I don't see Nero town here.
yea.In post 4615, Creature wrote:pisskop, nomnomnom and I are likely all town
So it's just between Vork, skitter and Nero
this is possibleableIn post 4617, Creature wrote:Maybe we should nolynch and have Nero confirm pisskop's miller claim?
again, there isnt.In post 4620, nomnomnom wrote:There is literally a follow the cop built in the setup.
I do tend to agree though, that town is opedIn post 4620, nomnomnom wrote:This is just not possible without scum powers.
this is such a stupid question for this point in the gameIn post 4673, skitter30 wrote:Again why do u think ur dying tonight?
yoIn post 4700, Nero Cain wrote:encryptor can be either alignment. It wasn't a hard guilty until you fake claimed vanilla.In post 4695, Vorkuta wrote:lso I am 99% sure that town!PR nero outs such a hard guilty in his VERY FIRST POST and VOTE OF THE DAY, and not.... 'slow-draw mass claim' which we're obviously going to be doing anyway.
checkmate
yeaIn post 4715, Creature wrote:Is there anything towny Vork has did this game other than not doing anything all game?
Yea, appears that one of the new changes.In post 5398, nomnomnom wrote:I thought encryptor enabled daychat in any PT they were in, so I don't think that's how it works.
Yea. Like a miller with no cop?In post 5411, nomnomnom wrote:With that said, a subversion of that trope, by giving town a sort of encryptor role without being able to be recruited would be funny if not bastard. Wonder if you could come up with something brilliant with that.
no its not. Stop doing whatever it is you think you are.In post 5430, nomnomnom wrote:The only reason you want a NL is, in the back of your mind, you think to yourself "haha nero can be a town rolecop and if that's the case then scums need to kill there
okay GLHFIn post 5431, nomnomnom wrote:will not go anywhere.
you dont know what impossible means, apparentlyIn post 5436, nomnomnom wrote:"SKITTER IS VORK'S PARTNER DESPITE THE PROOF THAT THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE"
Its legit extra tacked on.In post 5494, Creature wrote:Is pisskop's role any useful without Nero's rolecop?
No, it makes it easier to excuse his play, not harder to discern his alignment.In post 5521, nomnomnom wrote:How he plays makes it hard to discern his alignment
I can read him just fine. And so can you. You are just excusing himIn post 5526, nomnomnom wrote:If he plays like this as town then it makes it hard to discern if he's town or scum.In post 5523, pisskop wrote:No, it makes it easier to excuse his play, not harder to discern his alignment.In post 5521, nomnomnom wrote:How he plays makes it hard to discern his alignment
What kind of play on words is this? lol
considering talk is what people who don't have a literal fucking guilty doIn post 5707, nomnomnom wrote:Honestly PK your posts are giving me a bad vibe, you've been pushing Vork without even reading the thread. You have not considered any talk that was brought up today. You still refuse to claim fully. You've been doing the same thing as Nero earlier on which was to shut down any discussion about anything and saying that only the 1v1 matters (which should not even be a logical train of thought since you said you were likely to be nightkilled, and when asked why you also dodged the question). You have been trying to push a very very VERY unlikely pairing (and been arguing about it being impossible, despite it very much being close to the impossibility realm). You said you fully believe, 100%, that Vork is scum, yet your vote is a No Lynch right now. You have no been posting anything aside from people talking to you in a frustrating tone and trying to dig Vork's grave.
What am I supposed to do all of this? Like, you are one of the reasons I am so hesitant voting Vork. Nero might be right that you're acting scummy and mirroring what he's saying as a tactic, but I still have heavy doubts. And honestly as crazy as it might sound? I think you could be a lynch today because for the life of me I'm starting to get anxious about this 1v1.