Picking Shield means you’re defensive. Being defensive is a scumtell.
VOTE: TemporalLich
Picking Shield means you’re defensive. Being defensive is a scumtell.
Or scum or a Cop because they also have guns.In post 47, Chemist1422 wrote:What if I picked Pokemon GunIn post 43, Alchemist21 wrote:Picking Shield means you’re defensive. Being defensive is a scumtell.
VOTE: TemporalLich
Does that mean I’m a vig
Depends on the person.In post 82, Farkran wrote:@alchemist, same question, how much do you rely on meta to gamesolve?
Little early to be doing associatives.In post 94, TemporalLich wrote:Little late to assume we're still in RVS...In post 89, Severa wrote:Little early to be asserting that people are chainsaw defending TL.
pedit: Severa is a scumlean, don't have much to indicate Severa!scum besides the defense. If by a miracle Farkran flips town Severa falls up to null.
Bitmap has a lot of scum equity but I still prefer flipping Farkran because a green Farkran absolves Severa and Farkran has done nothing towny this game unlike Bitmap
Well I don’t know you so I’m going on the general way new players play.In post 98, Farkran wrote:You placed a vote on me, so that person would be meIn post 96, Alchemist21 wrote:Depends on the person.In post 82, Farkran wrote:@alchemist, same question, how much do you rely on meta to gamesolve?
Ok that’s... probably more suggestive than we want in our game threads.In post 109, Farkran wrote:I want your reads in my every hole pleaseIn post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
Not gonna lie I’m tempted to take the former option just because I still don’t fully understand these mechanics.In post 108, Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
That’s 100% an RC quote.In post 126, Salamence20 wrote:The fuck?In post 121, TemporalLich wrote:it's called a soft claim and it helps in case I get to L-3In post 120, Severa wrote:What is the point of this?In post 116, TemporalLich wrote:I have a memoriae that doesn't help scum at all, ftr
Either you are RC or you are actually Severa the fucking FE character.Severa wrote:Ok there's two ways we can play this
Do y'all want the way that wins more reliably or the one that involves less of me shoving my reads down your throats.
Fuck me either way
I believe SEVERA’s claim.In post 211, Severa wrote:My name is SEVERA.
In post 239, Severa wrote:I was just in the mood to do dumb shit but then I threw up and now I'm not really in a silly mood
The game is crazy enough that I believed it.In post 238, Severa wrote:I mean idk how anyone took that guilty seriously and idk how you ever claim in reaction to it lol
Explain how it’s scummy and maybe they will.In post 245, Bitmap wrote:Y'all seriously going to take sheepy mc sheep Alchemist and not push him?
I mean, it’s kinda what you do and I just figured you were taking it farther for the sake of the Severa roleplay.In post 255, Severa wrote:You believed that I was serious after I called everyone scrubby scrub scrub WOATs?
Yeah I went back to where I came from.
Is it not?In post 265, Farkran wrote:Do you still believe this is my first scumgame?In post 260, Alchemist21 wrote:Yeah I went back to where I came from.
It’s not apparent that’s a scum-play description.In post 275, Farkran wrote:I mean, i have my true first scumgame on this site in my signature...In post 274, Alchemist21 wrote:Is it not?In post 265, Farkran wrote:Do you still believe this is my first scumgame?In post 260, Alchemist21 wrote:Yeah I went back to where I came from.
Didn’t most people use Charge Discs?In post 277, Evenstar wrote:We aren't lynching Salamence today, even though he's an idiot. I don't like Farkran, Severa or TL. Bitmap could go either way.
Charge Discs produce the least information possible, and are therefore scummy. They also benefit the most from coordination, which is also scummy. Blast and Accele are both towny, because they give information one way or the other regarding whether you have an ult worth using, but Accele is the most towny disc because it gives cover to our Doppel users.
Personally I feel like Salamence's NA is broken AF, since it allows a Magia every turn if coordinated well. That said, there's a really easy way to test it, so... Yeah, they can live for now.
If it’s the same 2+2 I’m thinking of the site still exists, unless someone else bought the domain because it’s mostly about poker now.In post 284, Farkran wrote:Ok. Now that you know though, can you scumcase me properly?
Pedit: old site no longer exists, i played there 8 years ago. I think they transfered over town of salem though
Why?In post 309, Salamence20 wrote:In post 78, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m with everyone else on Farkran. His posts look like it’s his first time playing scum.
VOTE: FarkranIn post 287, Alchemist21 wrote:If it’s the same 2+2 I’m thinking of the site still exists, unless someone else bought the domain because it’s mostly about poker now.In post 284, Farkran wrote:Ok. Now that you know though, can you scumcase me properly?
Pedit: old site no longer exists, i played there 8 years ago. I think they transfered over town of salem though
If it wasn’t scum nervousness like I thought then I don’t have a case.
UNVOTE:
These look bad in hindsight too
Any thoughts so far?
Odd thing to comment on an RVS vote from hundreds of posts back.In post 366, Gamma Emerald wrote:ReeeeachIn post 43, Alchemist21 wrote:Picking Shield means you’re defensive. Being defensive is a scumtell.
VOTE: TemporalLich
A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.In post 368, TemporalLich wrote:that's pretty obviously a catchup post alch
The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy
Really? I couldn't tell from your posts so far.In post 472, Gamma Emerald wrote:YuckIn post 254, Alchemist21 wrote:Explain how it’s scummy and maybe they will.In post 245, Bitmap wrote:Y'all seriously going to take sheepy mc sheep Alchemist and not push him?
Of course then they’d be sheeping you and you’d have to vote them too.
I’d kinda been liking Alchemist up to here but this is twisted
Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history. If that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummy
Strong reads sure. I don’t remember them stealing leadership before.In post 534, Farkran wrote:@anyone with experience with gamma: is it compatible with his meta to produce strong scumIn post 528, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’ll expand later but for now my strong reads are likeIn post 525, Sujimichi wrote:You seem to have read and engaged now. Could you post your reads list?In post 517, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Suji I hadn’t read much of anything before now, and I want to post a lead rist before voting rn.
Severa and Salamence town
Farkran and you scum
reads after putting so much effort in catching up and trying to steal town leadership from a player she is TRing?
If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.In post 561, Evenstar wrote:Can I get a readslist, even if it sucks?In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254In post 571, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
Why did you feel a need to disagree with it? Did you think any part of my post was serious?In post 576, Gamma Emerald wrote:The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.In post 571, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.
Probably Gamma. I know other people are looking at them, but not for the same reasons I am.In post 580, Evenstar wrote:What do you think is your most non-consensus read atm?In post 569, Alchemist21 wrote: So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.
You’re the first one to reach out to me so you’re a bit Towny too.
Gamma’s the closes thing to a scumread I have right now but it’s not definite.
You are correct that it was a discredit, and that’s because we disagree on whether sheeping is scummy. This isn’t the first game I’ve been accused of being scum just because I followed consensus. It’s not an accurate tell, and I’m not even much of a sheep; I just agree with what I agree with, and agreeing with people doesn’t make someone scum.In post 585, Gamma Emerald wrote:254 came across as a double discredit to me. You discredit his belief that sheeping is scummy by telling him to explain and then strawmanning his argument by saying the votes that would follow would also be sheep and need to be voted by that logic, which is not true imo. You also discredit any wagon led by him on you by creating the implication that the wagon would be dishonest via an assumed hypocrisy.In post 573, Alchemist21 wrote:While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254In post 571, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
I’ll say it again - agreeing with consensus doesn’t make someone scum.In post 589, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think it’s fair to say you have been agreeing with others a lot. Yes, you’ve raised points yourself but it seems like you’re more than happy to sit behind someone and cheerlead them. I think the Boonism for that action is warlocking? It comes across as scummy because you’re trying to promote the idea without taking as much responsibility. I know scum do this because I did it myself subconsciously once when I was starting out.In post 575, Sujimichi wrote:I can't argue with your opinion.
And, yes, I have stated where I agree with others. This is true. Consistently is not an adverb that is accurate, however.
I didn’t know how to take your post, and when that’s the only post about me and suddenly you’re saying I was Towny, it’s a little confusing.In post 591, Gamma Emerald wrote:It could have been serious but my post wasn’t 100% serious eitherIn post 579, Alchemist21 wrote:Why did you feel a need to disagree with it? Did you think any part of my post was serious?In post 576, Gamma Emerald wrote:The comment on the RVS vote was me disagreeing with your point on multiple level. I don’t think game choice is connected to play style, and defensiveness is not always scummy.In post 571, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
Is that all, it feels like you have more you want to talk about.
Like if I was really going to go after that do you think I just say “reeeeeach”?
I can be pretty sassy towards bad takes. The only things wrong are the ideas I’m scum for agreeing with people and that I’m scum for calling the previous idea a bad take.In post 594, Gamma Emerald wrote:Eh this kinda makes sense but the fact there’s so much I find wrong in that small post is not a good signIn post 590, Alchemist21 wrote:You are correct that it was a discredit, and that’s because we disagree on whether sheeping is scummy. This isn’t the first game I’ve been accused of being scum just because I followed consensus. It’s not an accurate tell, and I’m not even much of a sheep; I just agree with what I agree with, and agreeing with people doesn’t make someone scum.In post 585, Gamma Emerald wrote:254 came across as a double discredit to me. You discredit his belief that sheeping is scummy by telling him to explain and then strawmanning his argument by saying the votes that would follow would also be sheep and need to be voted by that logic, which is not true imo. You also discredit any wagon led by him on you by creating the implication that the wagon would be dishonest via an assumed hypocrisy.In post 573, Alchemist21 wrote:While we’re at it you can explain what scum motivation you thought was in 254In post 571, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m still waiting for you to answer this.In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m right here buddy.In post 558, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t have much more to say right now. I’m trying to understand Gamma and that conversation will take some time.In post 555, Evenstar wrote:If I had a specific question in mind, I would have asked it. Penny for your thoughts, I suppose?In post 549, Alchemist21 wrote:If you want more from me then talking to me is the way to do it, not voting someone you just put in your Townreads.
In post 520, Alchemist21 wrote:Maybe you thought it would be awkward if you didn’t acknowledge our history.In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:And yet I don’t say anything until I react to that later post. Why do you think scum!me feels I have to acknowledge our history? It’s less important to me than my history with, say, MariaR or A50. Yes I did have a solid read record on you but unlike those two I don’t think we play together enough rn for me to care.In post 378, Alchemist21 wrote:The thing is Gamma hasn’t really commented on me since that game I fooled them as scum; before that they claimed to be an expert at reading me. That’s been a while ago, so for them to make such an odd comment towards me now, it seems like they feel they HAVE to comment on me for some reason.In post 371, TemporalLich wrote:oh alright...In post 370, Alchemist21 wrote:A) It’s still an odd comment for an RVS vote.
B) I thought Gamma had been here the whole time and didn’t realize they were catching up.
just means Gamma is NAI-weird and off-meta, not scummyIf that’s not what it was then what was that comment on my rvs vote about?
Adding a bit of your own perspective to something you agree with isn’t scummy at all. Idk where you get that from.In post 601, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yes, but the way he’s doing it is extremely shady. He’s like “ah yes, this makes sense”. I have noted in my history here two ways scum will agree with people that are solid tells imo. The first is where scum will support a townie’s idea by bolstering the Townie’s argument while adding little of their own content to it. This is what I mentioned I was caught for in the past earlier, and it serves scum because it helps keep them blameless. I have noticed Suji doing this in spades. The second method is when scum entrench themselves into one argument, then a Townie makes a better one and they hop on at full speed to the Townie’s idea. I caught scum doing this in a game that I can’t recall the name of but that I know had Aliens in the name, and the reason why it’s scummy is it’s a demonstration that they aren’t interested in honest discussion, they just want the argument that best suits them. I don’t recall Suji doing this but I feel like someone else may have done it this game if not him, so it’s something to keep in mind.In post 593, Alchemist21 wrote:I’ll say it again - agreeing with consensus doesn’t make someone scum.In post 589, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think it’s fair to say you have been agreeing with others a lot. Yes, you’ve raised points yourself but it seems like you’re more than happy to sit behind someone and cheerlead them. I think the Boonism for that action is warlocking? It comes across as scummy because you’re trying to promote the idea without taking as much responsibility. I know scum do this because I did it myself subconsciously once when I was starting out.In post 575, Sujimichi wrote:I can't argue with your opinion.
And, yes, I have stated where I agree with others. This is true. Consistently is not an adverb that is accurate, however.
Without what reasons? I think my feelings on Gamma are pretty clear in my other posts?In post 609, Evenstar wrote:This feels like a copout, at least when you say it without reasons like this.In post 582, Alchemist21 wrote:Probably Gamma. I know other people are looking at them, but not for the same reasons I am.In post 580, Evenstar wrote:What do you think is your most non-consensus read atm?In post 569, Alchemist21 wrote: So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.
You’re the first one to reach out to me so you’re a bit Towny too.
Gamma’s the closes thing to a scumread I have right now but it’s not definite.
I already elaborated when asked and my interaction with Gamma included me trying to make sense of what I was scumreading them for. Those explanations you wantIn post 613, Evenstar wrote:Your example non-consensus read is based on meta you have and other people don't, and is therefore difficult for any other player to evaluate unless you give something more of a basis for it. I would also have expected you to elaborate a bit on it rather than just saying "it's X."
The answer to that question should be obvious. If it's different from what everyone else was saying then it's not the consensus. And I was answering Evenstar asking what my most non-consensus read was, and this was as best as I could answer it.In post 621, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why does different reasons = non consensus for you? I don’t think there’s anything AI about this but you seem rather particular about this so I want to figure out your logic here.In post 582, Alchemist21 wrote:Probably Gamma. I know other people are looking at them, but not for the same reasons I am.In post 580, Evenstar wrote:What do you think is your most non-consensus read atm?In post 569, Alchemist21 wrote: So far I’m only sure on Townreading Severa and Salamence. Severa’s main is someone I’ve played with a lot and I’m fairly confident this is their Town play. Regardless of whether Salamance’s claim is real or not, I don’t think scum would cave so easily to a fake guilty on them so I townread them for the response.
You’re the first one to reach out to me so you’re a bit Towny too.
Gamma’s the closes thing to a scumread I have right now but it’s not definite.
I disagree. I think I'm coming around to a Town Gamma, and if Gamma and I both realize we're Town it adds a lot of value to the game. This is why I wanted to talk with Gamma, to try and get a better understanding of them here, and I think I am.In post 622, Evenstar wrote:Not sure you're really doing anything of value there, to be frank. I'd rec pivoting to examine someone else and coming back to Gamma later today.In post 617, Alchemist21 wrote:I already elaborated when asked and my interaction with Gamma included me trying to make sense of what I was scumreading them for. Those explanations you wantIn post 613, Evenstar wrote:Your example non-consensus read is based on meta you have and other people don't, and is therefore difficult for any other player to evaluate unless you give something more of a basis for it. I would also have expected you to elaborate a bit on it rather than just saying "it's X."arealready there.
wut?In post 624, TemporalLich wrote:if you're not committed you're trying to stall out D1, therefore Evenstar is scum
VOTE: Evenstar, even if hammer
Oh, you're right. I thought that said "adding a little" instead of "adding little." Still not sure it's really scummy though.In post 640, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Alch I think you slightly misinterpreted me. Adding a bit of your own perspective is not scummy, I agree with that, but I’m pretty sure I specified that adding nothing was part of the problem.
What does legible vs illegible mean?In post 743, Evenstar wrote:How I Actually Sort:
Legible Town | Legible Scum
Illegible Town | Illegible Scum
For a minute there I thought you were saying you were deliberately trying to cause confusion.In post 806, TemporalLich wrote:well at least I'm succeeding in causing confusion...
the scum shall not win, lest this timeline die...
How strong is your TL Townread?In post 858, Bitmap wrote:I don't think pops is town. Literally ez push after ez push and I still think TL is town.
That and a volatile style aren’t really good reasons to be Townreading him to me.In post 868, Bitmap wrote:Strong based on neighborhood. But this can change starting D2.In post 860, Alchemist21 wrote:How strong is your TL Townread?In post 858, Bitmap wrote:I don't think pops is town. Literally ez push after ez push and I still think TL is town.