![Death :dead:](./images/smilies/icon_skull.gif)
![Death :dead:](./images/smilies/icon_skull.gif)
Toog, I think you and I went for the same ride thereIn post 14, Toogeloo wrote:Hail to the King, baby.
You ever signed up for a game...
Then you signed up for another game...
Then you played and finished the second game you signed up for...
Before the first game you signed up for started?
Happened to me.
She says, but with no vote. smh
Guys, I think I have found the easy pocket target this game
You're a weird post.In post 46, Dunnstral wrote:Weird post.In post 44, Lukewarm wrote:Guys, I think I have found the easy pocket target this game
Please noIn post 69, marcistar wrote:yeye gotta beat my world recordIn post 39, Lukewarm wrote:She says, but with no vote. smh
I feel like that was pretty popcorn specific. For the first half of the game, I was repeatedly asking for the gun, and hoped it got me town read, and then hoping that the gun bearer would not shoot a town read. And it worked for a while. Hectic had me as one of his top town reads for that same reason early on.In post 198, Toogeloo wrote:Luke, tell me how I was so fooled by you last game. What should I avoid in trusting you?
Do not like.In post 235, Toogeloo wrote:A little early for this assumption given the slot. It's also a type of claim that could easily draw these types of conclusions, and Mafia could bank on that.In post 213, unwnd wrote:Likelihood of Rhia lying about role is zero
JJH adding negative utility to town to fux with them also decently high
Binned
Base a scum/town alignment on other actions not easily fakeabke.
I don't know what either of these things mean lolIn post 239, unwnd wrote:Nobody has Cakez'd but I sorta think someone is ManWithNoNameing.In post 238, Cabd wrote:Nobody has Cakez'd yet. I'll let you, and the thread, know. Loudly. Repeatedly. Mockingly. Annoyingly.In post 228, unwnd wrote:Do you think the exhaustive mix or light and heat you're emitting could get someone speedwagoned?
Do you want to try it? I wouldn't test your faith as scum here
Was I snickering to myself about my role?In post 248, unwnd wrote:I just thought Lukewarm snickering to himself about his role was odd
You're the one who brought it up my dudeIn post 280, unwnd wrote:That just makes you a targetIn post 271, Lukewarm wrote:Which means that the crumb does not make sense unless I point to it. Isn't that like, the point of a crumb?
In fact, talking about this sort of invalidates the point you're trying to make with a crumb. It is indeed used to allude back to, but only when you have ready information or something to speak on
Why even mention this
We all have to start somewhere CabdIn post 306, Cabd wrote:Imagine making a general crumb instead of some super meta abstract art bullshit in this playerlist lmfao.
At this point the scum team know that I have "a role" but don't know any more, and since this appears to be role madness, do you really think that it makes more sense for us to give out more info then that?In post 303, unwnd wrote:Crumb was an epic fail
You might as well talk about it now because if you're not scum they've already either
1) Decided to kill you
2) Fuck with your role in some sort of fashion
I meant that you were saying to NOT do that.In post 320, Kate Bishop wrote:Half of you have outted roles or crumbs already don’t point that at me I’ll run you into the dirt
Because you started asking about it?In post 334, unwnd wrote:Then why did you give extra info by saying you were crumbing something in the first place? lolIn post 318, Lukewarm wrote:At this point the scum team know that I have "a role" but don't know any more, and since this appears to be role madness, do you really think that it makes more sense for us to give out more info then that?In post 303, unwnd wrote:Crumb was an epic fail
You might as well talk about it now because if you're not scum they've already either
1) Decided to kill you
2) Fuck with your role in some sort of fashion
I will decode the crumb if more then just you want me too, but it feels bad to do that with ffery/notty waving a sign around about it being weird to mass claim day 1
I feel I'm not getting my point across
I again, don't know what this meansIn post 342, Cabd wrote:VOTE: Toog
I think I'm into thecrackers stagewith the unwnd-luke back and forth.
I mean, of course not from your pov.In post 354, ManateeGal wrote:no i do not think so
Her lack of a presence early on. Especially 253 , which felt like something she said in Tarot ? (this may be wrong, I have not gotten a chance to look back, but it felt that way)In post 465, Cabd wrote:Can we like, ACTUALLY talk about that marcistar read though, Luke?
I got the exact opposite impression from her replies to unwnd, they sort of reminded me of my first large theme.
What data do you have that makes you feel otherwise?
Which from my pov, felt wrong. I have played more games with Marci then anyone else on site (except T3 lol), and I generally start out talking directly with her in every game that we play in (as both alignments). And if felt extra weird, because I specifically talked her into playing this game with us, and she clearly immediately got the joke I was making, and played along in post 19In post 279, marcistar wrote:i was a bit concerned about 16, since im not sure if i like how luke reached out to me specifically.
I would not call my vote a sheep vote. I saw your post, and thought it was scummy, and voted you before I even got to the point that LLD voted you for it.In post 516, Toogeloo wrote:I wouldn't say convinced. It's more like an obvious conclusion based on my previous statements.In post 514, unwnd wrote:Erm, convinced so soon?
What's your individual reason to not like Luke if I may ask
Luke vote on me is just opportunistic and more of a sheep vote.
What do you mean by self resolving here?In post 518, unwnd wrote:I would give them more leniency just by being quick to establish their role, which puts them into a self-resolving at this rate
I think that never happened lolIn post 892, Kate Bishop wrote:unwnd claimed a daycop guilty on you. Thoughts?
In post 901, Cabd wrote:What a.... lukewarm... response.
Well, I am missing like 200 posts worth of context, so hard to properly respond.In post 902, GuyInFreezer wrote:I did that first!In post 771, GuyInFreezer wrote:Yeah Lukewarm ISO is… pretty lukewarm.
It’s 15% RVS, 25% role/setup stuff, 40% pointless back and forth mentioned above, and 10% jab at Toogeloo.
I don't think you died because you tried to lead...In post 647, unwnd wrote:Bloodstained is over so I can infer and complain about it openly
Last time I tried to lead I died for it
Never again!
In post 916, unwnd wrote:I specifically got wagoned for thinking Pooky was scum lol
Those are not the reasons I personally thought you were scum. but I guess I can't speak for everyone elseIn post 917, unwnd wrote:Which he was
Who just happened to be beloved princess
Then when I tried to kick and scream about killing Annie I still died
(:
Claiming is more damaging to your game then dying unclaimed?In post 712, Toogeloo wrote:Well then die it is. My full claim on Day 1, 18 hours in is more damaging to my game. Sorry, not sorry.In post 710, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want Toog to full claim and not this half claim garbage, or die.
I do not like this post :/In post 727, Toogeloo wrote:I'm struggling with this manatee claim the more I look at it.
The initial claim is that it kills a random townie if it's not on the Lim wagon.
Then it's clarified that it kills the person it's on if they aren't the Lim wagon.
Then it's further clarified that it's once again a random player if the vote isn't placed at all.
I feel like that is a lot of edits for one, but I'm really struggling with the random aspect of it. Is it random townie, or can scum be in the pool? Does this seem like a role that should have an actual random modifier to it? Does this seem like a role that would be more than 1-shot in a 13 player game?
I think I'm still at L-2, so why hasn't there been any discussion on where to direct this shot considering how hard LLD has been pushing to have me ran through?
I'm surprised at how little discussion has been had on this, and if the role exists it seems like a role very susceptible to scum influence.
In post 728, Dunnstral wrote:Scum influence and not actually belonging to scum?In post 727, Toogeloo wrote:I'm surprised at how little discussion has been had on this, and if the role exists it seems like a role very susceptible to scum influence.
It feels like you spent most of the post saying Manatee was scummy and then pivoted into this
Except half that post was pointing out the changes in the claimed role?In post 733, Toogeloo wrote:Then on your reread of the post, you'll notice I talked almost exclusively about the role and the lack of discussion surrounding it's mechanics as we approach end of day.
BTW, I don't know why you have this giant mancrush on me spanning multiple games, but I'm married.