I am not a fan at all of Shadow Dancer's
policy lynch vote in 41. It's akin to bringing outside influences into games.
In post 56, Maruchan wrote:Starbuck wrote:Maruchan wrote:Interesting idea SnakePlissken, with the 88th poster thing.
@Everyone, does anyone think a mass nameclaim would be beneficial?
Seriously?
Unvote
Vote: Maruchan
Did you not read my explanation?
I am new, I have never played mafia before where there were names besides "cop nilla mafia doctor" and so on. So I have no fucking clue as to when a good time to nameclaim (not roleclaim, nameclaim) is. THATS WHY I ASKED. Sorry that you dislike the fact that I'm new to forum mafia.
I did, but what you asked is akin (I seem to like this word today) to rolefishing.
In post 59, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Shadow Dancer wrote:maru was D1 mislynch in Campaign mafia.
Per was D1 mislynch in lemming mafia.
Both ongoing games, so I won't elaborate.
I never played with vezok before.
I find your reasoning for why they would be good policy lynches to be sorerly lacking.
Refering to a single game (ongoing) where a player was mislynched on Day 1 is hardly reasonable. By that standard any play who has ever been mislynched Day 1 (which usually has scum influence behind the action) should be policy lynched.
I've been mislynched a fuck ton of times on Day 1. Maybe I should be on his list too?
Ridiculous, ShadowDancer.
In post 78, kiwieagle wrote:also for those curious, I find Maru townish and his lynch in page 4 is heavily opportunistic.
Such as...?
And with LordChronos'
Post 76, I am of the lynch all liars mentality.
That's what I have so far. I know I'm still a number of pages behind, but I'm working on it.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3