dat wifom.
dat proclamation
In post 2, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:GAME SPECIFIC RULES
During the Night Phase, all players (and mod) send in answers to the topic for the next day. At the start of each day Phase, I will have post with everyone's suggestion (but not who said what).players can guess who said what. If they are correct, they will receive a point. If at the end of the day, your phrase hasn't been guessed, you will receive a point.,Once per vote countPHRASE GUESSES WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED UP UNTIL THE HAMMER VOTE HAS BEEN CAST.At the end of the day, points will be redeemed for a possible 1-shot power role (unless other wise stated) that can be used during any night phase.
*phraseIn post 42, Jake from State Farm wrote:dream?
PlausibleIn post 43, BT wrote:Guess: Guy_Named_Riggs said "We can dance, we can dance, everybody look at your hands"
Needs more votes on Darthe. It's dubious that he bothers bringing up the towncred argument only to go for the nothing vote.
Why are you wagon-hopping for no serious reason?In post 45, Mr_Ree wrote:No Pope brags about how good of a bad Guy they are.
Which is funny because you are OMGUS'ing me:In post 108, Mr_Ree wrote:OMGUS? I'm voting Safety...
Not trying to "paint" anything. You voted arbitrarily trying to call out a scum team then your next vote was on TIP for no legitimate reason (you yourself said it wasn't sully serious). Trying to prolong RVS is scummy, ergo my vote.In post 64, Mr_Ree wrote:First vote was RVS, second vote was semi-serious. Obviously nobody can pick out any kind of 100% sure scumtell during RVS, if, in fact, there exists a 100% sure tell at all.
You should know about that one in particular... >_>
The vote on TIP is because of something wifomy that could go either way. Scum wouldn't proclaim they are good at playing scum unless that's what he wanted us to think. See? Wifomy yes, completely out of the question, no. Hence the semi serious vote worded like RVS.
unvote, vote Safety Dance
For trying to paint my actions as scummy at such an early stage.
I wasn't interpreting, I was asking the mod for clarification. It wasn't made completely clear. I don't know what is weird about trying to understand the game mechanic.In post 88, serrapaladin wrote:BT might be right about Darthe, but I don't like Safety's Ree-vote and his weird rule interpretations.
You do know Mr.Ree just earned a point for guessing Bert's phrase?In post 89, BT wrote:I think same-phrase guessing is a good idea.
Guess: Bert said "Fly little bird"
What in particular do you find weird about the rule interpretatons Serra?
Yay, no D1 argument with Jake \o/ Yes, that was Monopoly, where you voted the cop in lylo. Good times...In post 148, Jake from State Farm wrote:Safety looks painfully town with the whole rule clarification thing. Plus I've butted heads with him before and my early gut read says he's town. Out of the safety/Ree exchange Ree comes out looking worse.
Um, no. He used his VOTE to wagon hop, for a non-serious, blase reasonIn post 157, BT wrote:Jake:
Ree did not 'use' his calling out of a scumteam to 'wagon hop'.In post 51, SafetyDance wrote:Someone who is calling out a scum team under the guise of RVS, then uses it again to wagon hop? Needs more votes
Safety didn't say "hey, Ree is prolonging RVS, VOTE" earlier so this reads like he just wanted to keep his vote supported.In post 117, SafetyDance wrote: Not trying to "paint" anything. You voted arbitrarily trying to call out a scum team then your next vote was on TIP for no legitimate reason (you yourself said it wasn't sully serious). Trying to prolong RVS is scummy, ergo my vote.
This is obviously a serious vote?
No, I don't think he is doing that.In post 420, Mr_Ree wrote:Do you feel Jake is campaigning his own townieness?
If yes, Why did you not include him? If no, why not?
Why are you willing to Lynch more than half the playerlist? I'm assuming you are willing to Lynch your null scum reads as well. Correct me if I'm wrong there.
Wouldn't any townie about to be lynched say they were town? Please quote the posts I campaign my towniness.
@Jake, please let Safety answer for himself.
And you are recycling old lines from Mr.Ree. Lol.In post 427, thenewearth wrote:You, person, are obviously trying to paint us.
Basically you're saying "Shit too town! Must be scum!"
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Saftey
LOL, if you're going act like this, I'll just put my vote back on. Since all you are doing is one protracted OMGUS.In post 438, Mr_Ree wrote:TNE said Mama take this badge...
I would have thought that was Bert...
Safety So what you are saying is you would rather Lynch people who say they are town over your null and scum reads who, you just said you are NOT willing to Lynch.
I got to what... L-2ish... before saying anything about my alignment. Why are you ignoring the numerous times Jake has said he was town...?
Vote Safety Dance
Yes. Your misrepping.In post 442, Mr_Ree wrote: Doesn't help reading their slot = happy to lynch
Null and gut scum reads = Not willing to lynch
problems reading slot = Null,
Gut scum = Not willing to lynch.
Is anyone else having a problem with this?
See, this isIn post 443, thenewearth wrote:Already tying the knot
Jake:In post 447, Jake from State Farm wrote:^ I realize I always call him gnr and then I was like WAIT A FUCKING MINUTE. GNR sang that song.
am I right? who knows but damn if it doesn't make sense.
at this point through we need to get through the phrases and then we can all lynch serra. That is an awesome plan
In post 444, Darthe wrote:I still disagree with "the plan" but, considering what it is isn't saying that you have a clear solution counterproductive to it?
In post 460, Dry-fit wrote:Yeah I don't think discussing this hypocrisy thing further is going to be productive.
Meanwhile, Darthe continues to do nothing as we near deadline and the game needs a serious kick in the ass. TNE is doing the same.
Vote Darthe.TheIrishPope wrote:I think...
I dunno what to think.
We need a flip. ANY flip.
This really shits me. The person trying to talk about POEing just buttfucks it by smugly voting against everyone else, whilst keeping track. The whole point is so we know who DOESN'T get points.In post 550, Mr_Ree wrote:4 players left to guess for rosebud
About the same for mama
Poe it and we can finish these two off this VC.
Gotten rid of the irrelevant crap. Your confirmation bias and butthurt because of previous games is not an acceptable reason, activity is not an alignment tell anyway, nor are you applying this to everyone - just Serra. Also bargaining? No Jake, you are not anywhere close to conf-town to be trying to negotiate. If you are town and will attempt to gamethrow by just unconditionally tunnel then don't be surprised if you don't last long yourself in this game or future ones.In post 511, Jake from State Farm wrote:basically he isn't explaining his reads, he is going out of his way to avoid explaining his reads and he isn't scum hunting. He is pushing for a darthe lynch and can't even provide a singlular good reason for why. The only reason he does give, serra is equally guilty of doing himself. Not to mention he has the audacity to accuse me of tunneling when that is all he is doing himself.
there is absolutely no town motivation to deny town information and that is what he is doing by refusing to explain himself.
on top of that he is doinging absolutely NO SCUMHUNTINGand now the icing on the cake is now he is lurking and people thought my hatred for lurking was bad before, having just lost 2 games due to both scum lurking I have a hatred for it more then I ever have.
NOW you know me, most people know me and how stubborn I can be.
ask yourself this. What will make this game less annoying, lynching serra day 1 and shutting me up OR not lynching him and have me tunnel on him every single day phase until either he is lynched or I am killed?
In post 1, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Activity
1.Prods will be issued to players if they have not posted within aI will also send reminders on request as long as at least 30 (1 Day, 6 Hours) hours have passed since the player's last post.48-hour period; they will have 24 hours to respond in the game thread before I search for a replacement.
2. Players who have been prodded 3 times are subject to replacement without further notice. Player-requested prods do not count toward this total.
3. If you anticipate being away for at least 48 hours, please PM me or post a V/LA notice in the thread with the expected date of your return.
You are confusing me for someone else I think. Link the game?In post 570, Jake from State Farm wrote:Where the fuck is safety. He can confirm this isn't the same Serra as clue
For someone that has been paying attention to the setup and guesses this is clearly a faux attempt at stupidity.
No, that's just your opinion. If it is your opinion, put your vote where your mouth is and vote IV.In post 577, Jake from State Farm wrote:Effective immediately lurking is no longer a null tell. If town is lurking then they will just be a casualty of war.
In post 579, Jake from State Farm wrote:post 147 is a useless post, why are you pointing to that post?
In post 577, Jake from State Farm wrote: links? cause BT asked him and he said he wanted to wait for more people to post, I asked him and he kept refusing me.
In fact you are doing all of those too bar lurking. You're tunnelling and myopic focus on Serra is helping stall the game which is denying us information and a lynch. Tunnelling on one person is not someone who is trying to find scum but someone who's already made his mind up on who his target is (tunnelling).In post 586, Jake from State Farm wrote: you are tunneling
lurking~ applies to IV
stalling~ applies to IV
denying town information~ applies to IV
not playing like someone who is trying to find scum~ applies to IV
Thank you. Someone is cognitive.In post 589, Dry-fit wrote:SafetyDance actually makes good points about innocentvillager.
The deadline is Sunday night...which is convenient.In post 590, LnGrrrR wrote:Dry, not yet. It's a busy weekend for me (my kid turned 4 today; going to the World Series game tomorrow, wife's bday Sunday).
That said, I have a few reads right now (on page 11). Just figured I would wait until I finish to share fully.
No, it's not a lie Jake. I gave all the reason's why after I said that. Good job ignoring it.In post 593, Jake from State Farm wrote:ok the bolded is an outright lieIn post 591, SafetyDance wrote:In fact you are doing all of those too bar lurking.You're tunnelling and myopic focus on Serra is helping stall the game which is denying us information and a lynch. Tunnelling on one person is not someone who is trying to find scum but someone who's already made his mind up on who his target is (tunnelling).
secondly if you were reading the game you would know that I was already suspicious of Ree before I was suspicious of serra, my focus changed to serra when his actions proved to me he was scum so technically I am not tunnelling on anyone. The fact that I changed focus off Ree, who I was tunnelling on since I had less against him as it was mainly gut and went to Serra who is less gut and more based on his actions in the game proves I am not tunnelling.
Bargaining!
Sheeping, with an out posted.In post 514, Bert wrote:I feel so guilty about being behind, man ahahaha
Vote: SerraNot confident in this vote, but I think Jake's town, so there's that?
Self-preservation vote and a hypocritical question - he gives no reason why he's voting.In post 562, Darthe wrote:Also, VOTE: unvote vote serra
What are the reasons for each of the people voting Serra to be voting him?
More sheeping.In post 606, Dry-fit wrote:Well looks like its time get a-lynching.
Unvote. Vote: serralpaladin.
It's your lucky day jake.
Fuck knows.
Fake reads? OMFG. The temerity of you Jake. FFSIn post 611, Jake from State Farm wrote:how about the fact that as deadline is near we have a player (safety) who in a last ditch effort to save serra has now started tossing a new person (IV) into the equation and at the same time attempting to discredit the person pushing serra (me)?In post 608, LnGrrrR wrote:Can someone break down the reasons why they think Serra's wagon is better than the Darthe wagon?
Also, what a weird game to go see last night.
There is no town motivation to all of a sudden discredit by falsely accusing me of things that anyone reading the thread can plainly see I am not doing.
how about the main proponent to a darthe lynch just happens to be serra and he has out right refused to explain why he is his biggest scum read other then saying that he is being useless which applies to serra as well.
Us darthe useless and kind of scummy? absolutely but Serra has refused to explain his reads and since scum have to fake reads, refusal to explain them hints that his reads aren't genuine.
that's my opinion anyway.
Unacceptable. You've been in the game since the start and you have no thoughts on the game? If you've read enough to know the VC and the phrases guessed, you've read enough to have reads on the game, let alone enough content to scum hunt and play the game.In post 601, innocentvillager wrote:I know I haven't posted any content yet so I'll try to give some quick thoughts by skimming a few ISOs of some people
In order to accept this we have to believe several things:In post 601, innocentvillager wrote: Also @Safety I might not be a "newbie" but I've only seriously played outside the newbie queue once, and that was an open game. I didn't understand how the setup worked, although I did read the part about guessing. So no, not "clearly a faux attempt at stupidity."
But also did this:In post 389, innocentvillager wrote:Honestly I still have no idea how mini games work lol
How many scum are there?
In post 319, innocentvillager wrote:I just realize that TIP:12 has been guessed at least twice
Which shows intelligence enough that you are tracking the game enough to know who's been guessed, who hasn't and is targeting phrases outside of the plan when it suits him.
That's on the Thursday. Game started on the Monday.In post 174, Jake from State Farm wrote:you are on record for calling 4 or 5 people town or probably town, and haven't provided any reason why especially when some of these people are not obvious town in the slightest, specifically ree, Tip, and tne so asking you to explain those town reads and you complying is what we are doing here. I don't give a rats ass who hasn't posted, you need to justify how you have strong reads based on so little.
I'm pushing you because I am fairly certain you and ree are scum buddies so I am not going to let up because you have some mafia theoryesque objection.
now explain your town reads.
In post 578, SafetyDance wrote:As to my vote, I've given my scum reads and people willing to lynch, Darthe and Serra are not in them, so I am not going to vote them let alone try to appeal to people to vote them.I will only do so to prevent a no lynch.
In post 638, Jake from State Farm wrote:if he is town I will forever be wondering why he waited until 1 day before deadline to finally speak out about how "bad" my case supposedly was despite posting numerous after I originally stated my case and why he waited 3 days before deadline to even speak out against serra's lynch. He says I have been pushing serra since the 4th day, where was he the remainder of those days?
keeping your moth shut until deadline isn't town motivated at all.
ME? What about you. How the fuck do you think your lying, your bullshit, your play is in anyway pro-town? It didn't work in Monopoly, it hasn't worked in other game, how the fuck do you think it works here?In post 639, Jake from State Farm wrote:I also want to know why he has an issue with me "supposedly" tunneling serra since the 4th day and I am bad because of it (despite making an actual case), yet serra has been tunneling darth since day 3 (without even attempting to make a case) and that's perfectly acceptable?
no that isn't town motivation either.
Your case on Serra is tunnelling. Glad you now admit that you were wrong (and lying) and that you were on Serra since was 4 days in. Nice try at deflecting when the focus is on you and your case.In post 629, Jake from State Farm wrote:*snip*
In post 509, SafetyDance wrote:We have plenty of time. There's things I want to discuss too when I can free some time.
If you can't grasp any reason out of that then please, do us all a favor and replace out. Mafia is not a game for you.In post 418, SafetyDance wrote:Sorry guys but I am now at /LA indefinitely as I can only access at work until laptop is fixed. I'm not sure what I will do on the weekend, will think of something.
Friday morning of a Sunday night lynch. That's 2.5 days, not 1. It's even more now that it's been extended.In post 631, Jake from State Farm wrote:Found it myself.
Safety - I made my case on Serra on the 16th or so. Why did you wait 4 days before deadline to finally speak out? Why did you wait 1 day before to argue my points and offer a counter lynch?
For someone who opposes this lynch so much, you certainly waited until the worst possible moment to speak up
In post 621, SafetyDance wrote: telling you how weak your reasoning are and that they can be applied to IV,
Just showing people evidence of Jake trying to troll.In post 625, Jake from State Farm wrote:and your case on IV could basically be copy and pasted as a case against Serra.
Engaging and having thoughts of your own would help. My thoughts on TNE and TIP are known, I've stated the case on IV, all you need to do is vote to one and that's 2 votes. Some of these lurkers come in, see the cases and discussion and vote and hey, that's 3-4 votes and a wagon. People have been around AND posting. Same applies for IV. It's not re-inventing the wheel.In post 632, Dry-fit wrote: What other lynch do you think is going to happen? The only other realistic one is Darthe, but I prefer Serra to him. With the activity level in this game nothing else will be possible before deadline.
This guy just admitted to ignoring the game the whole three weeks plus and people are ok with it. Lolwut.In post 634, innocentvillager wrote:But I just skimmed for guesses; bold things are easy to see. So ha. That refutes basically your whole argument. I didn't read when I was guessing. I know I'm town so I'd rather me get the guesses right than some scum so I tried to guess well anything that wasn't guessed. Lul
Oh this is the part where you explain how SK = part of scum team and how he's my buddy. This shall be good!In post 676, Jake from State Farm wrote:Hey SafetyIn post 669, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:serrapaladin - Serial Killer has been lynched Day 1
What, awesome for actually have two scum in his lynch pool? Thanks! Happy withIn post 682, Jake from State Farm wrote:I think I have had enough guessing this game. I will say if Safety is town he is <bites tongue>
In post 660, Jake from State Farm wrote:@safety - day 2 if we both alive. I'm asking you to be more active and to take yourkuriboesqposts down a notch. I play this game to have fun and you are ruining it for me. If you can't chill out with your bs attitude please replace out. I haven't been nearly as bad as you but I'm going to chill out also.
I don't want any excuses about your activity day 2. No waiting til near deadline to speak up.
Thanks
Yet you were more than happy to throw stuff my way when I didn't agree with you. I quoted the Serra wagon, there was one person on there who thought he was scum, you. That's not obvious, don't apply hindsight-bias. If you go back on your posts, you kept trying to link people as buddies to Serra, that's not searching for a SK, that's searching for mafia, which he was not. As I pointed out too, lurking in this game was done by nearly all the players (by ALL the mafia), yet you accused only Serra, then tried to accuse me of it.In post 688, Jake from State Farm wrote:It's more for the fact that you tried to get me replaced and insulted my play. So fuck off. Also you insulted me even more by calling me kuribo jr or whatever you said. You are a despicable person and it was completely uncalled for, especially when I was right. How you could possibly defend somebody who was so obviously scum and OMG he was actually scum is unfathomable. You obviously had carried a grudge coming into this game and essentially said so in one of your earlier posts.
You owe me an apology and if you don't I seriously hope you diaf