Mini 1524: Olympian Gods Mafia - Game Over
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
"Every great journey starts with a small step." ...starting to read through. seriously, only ooba and mirari are people I haven't played with
~~~
No comments on p1.
At mollie on post 46: are you serious with that townread? explain?
~~~
Bringing first good stuff into the game - post 63 is good by mollie. I can definitely call that a townread.
~~~
Longpost 78 by mala. I don't like it.. too many reads too quick into the game.
~~~
Elaborate on your post 83 please, mirari. it looks like your vote is serious. why?
~~~
laughed loudly at wisdoms 89 & 90, lol...bees...that's a verb..
@whiskers please explain this post
that really makes no sense. as repeated in 101.
~~~
@mirari 102: what the hell is that you're talking about? any theories? what makes sense and what didn't make sense that you voted and unvoted? you can't post 102 and 103 without explaining
also that doesn't make senseIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I'm not criticizing the size of your post. I'm criticizing its content. having so many reads so quickly, that's a real feat. I had like, one, and it was weak.In post 110, Malakittens wrote:78 isn't too long, really Shos? It's about the same size as your catch up.
Wisdom - his ISO the last few posts by him are reading as defensive. I can quote them if you like, but for me it makes me lean town on him.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
that's a page 2 post, don't you think that talking aimlessly is the only thinkg you can practically do?
anyway, I agree with that theory, didn't realize that was a 'theory' lol.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Thats bullshit. Nobody gets caught in rvs, ppl can always say PH MAN IT WAS RVS Y U SO SERIOS..that is not a tell. Not ib rvs.In post 123, pirate mollie wrote:@ shos
yes it is a serious read. arc's entrance into the game was easy and breezy I mean she did not give a flying fuck how she looked. <------ townIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
please elaborate on how what and why. It so happens that I have no scumreads yet, and I do have townreads. how does that work?In post 127, Grimgroove wrote:VOTE: Malakittens
For suresies.
I also think one of mollie/Arcangel is scum, but not both.
I have no townreads yet, which is peculiar.
current leaningtownreads are mollie(explained earlier) and whiskers - whiskers' posting of late sorta looks like it comes from a town mindset. disagree, but town.
@131:...no. that is not defenive in the slightest..
and dat 'new playstyle'..I don't get it. what's your point? what are you trying to say in here? "oh if I look odd/scummy then just ignore"?
VOTE: Matt
seriously, this is the most inactive mattgame I have ever seen, I meanw ut. he was usualy superhyperextraactive. now he only has a few one-liner posts and he's EVEN VOATING MEEEEE i mean WUUT
@Des 140: can you explain to me more what the hell 'telegraphing his own future towntells' means? I'm totally misunderstanding something or it's just bluntly unrelated to the quote?
and in 142 - do you think it's a legitimate reason to vote mala right now?
143 by wisdom is good. might join dat wagon actually.
<removed quote of 145 asking for a link>
Mala's next post looks ok. sincere.
des witha nother filler.
[going afk, will continue later]In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
continuing my catching up, from page 7.
The bolded is very much true.In post 152, Wisdom wrote:I haven't even tunneled on you yet, so the fact you're making a huge deal out of it seems fake to me.
But sure, you're free to replace out any time. You know such threats don't work on me anyway.
@matt 157: why is mala town?
I am right in 158, and @159 wisdom: I'm not trying to discredit anyone; I'm wondering if these are reads 'just to have reads', or are those real reads coming from town. I see no reason for that read and entirely disagree with its existence. the fact that mollie is an early townread doesn't make her conftown.
I like whiskers' posts here. @164 tho - not necessarily. as town I do that to spot fails in the scums' fakeclaim if such is invented and not given. as scum I do it too, jsut to make perfect fakeclaims. usually it works - sometimes I get shat up by maestro... >_>
@165.
the first part with des - as I said I don't even understand dez's post so I'm totally not following.
regarding the second part - I don't get it, do you agree or not that it is a towntell? I think that it is. I thought that I'd invented that in oen of my last games - don't remember where - but I'd used it once and it worked, at least. That's not a something mainstream, as in, taht you'd expect people to actually follow an idea of 'if he says that being a horse is town and then bees( ) a horse then he is town', so I don't see scum being super cunning and plan it all ahead..
mollie explain your vote on 168 plzx
@mirari post 170: what made you decide that if nacho is scum then wisdom isn't??? that's liek totally out of the blue.
GG's 174 is a very good post.
next page.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
GG's 177: there's a difference between these two quotes - mala and nacho. both are not so bad imo. nacho's case is practically RVS so it's really uninteresting, not everything you do in RVS really has a purpose at first. mala's case is actually a legit question: why a person treats another differently than two others?
wow 188 is really bad
191 too. I don't remember even what my own alignment was in les mis, and I'm not reading you on gut here. and penguin?? the hell?
and see, GG, this is the kind of posts that you are actually right about. no reason at all to post stuff like this:In post 194, Mirari wrote:In post 180, Wisdom wrote:shos -Scum
ooba -Needs to post
Malakittens -Scum
Wisdom
Nachomamma8 -Maybe town
ArcAngel9 -Town, I think
penguin_alien -Leaning scum
Desperado -Town
pirate mollie -Town
Whiskers -Leaning town
MattP -Town
Grimgroove -Town
Mirari -Town
Why leave yourself out?
This is where my gut is standing.it's freakin 200 posts into the game. that doesn't go through.
alrightIn post 196, Grimgroove wrote:In post 188, Malakittens wrote:I have a decent way of reading pen. The more she doesn't post the more of a chance she's scum. So yes my vote was to bait her into posting (which worked the first time)
Hmm, it's not what you said before.In post 193, Malakittens wrote: It's not the lack of activity that's making me lean scum on her. It's the fact she appeared right after I voted for her that makes me really lean scum on her.
I want to see how your 1v1 with Penguin plays out when she gets here. But I don't see you initializing the conversation with her. Apart from that empty vote and a tongue-in-cheek comment that you'll leave that vote there I haven't seen any concrete effort from your side to spur Penguin into action.
officially GG=town
VOTE: malaIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
starting page 9, reads so far are
SCUM
Mala
mirari
Mattp - only leaning
TOWN
grimgroove(again, FFS XD)
whiskers
sortanulltown - mollie
all others are null.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
ok. ooba. what the hell.
I like des's 202. null on wisdom tho.
someone needs to go back and explain to me all interactions related with 140... -_-; if it's important, that is. if it's skippable let me have that.
@mala: I don't get it. how is it similar in timing to that NY game post? I see no resemblance; that is a very long and timetaking post to make, and it doesn't look like you 'just voted her' or something.
@213: well uh, not really. Matt has been rather inactive - much unlike himtown the way I know it - and it doesn't look like that vote has any reason at all, otherwise I'd have noitced it on my first readthrough of it. Mirari joining with a vote on me right after your post is...strange. No reason stated there, too; and calling for more votes.? I dunno.
well, so then, @Matt and @mirari, why are you voting me? is that a serious vote?
@mirari 216: tell me, 1. why are you encouraging a wagon on me, and 2. why are ooba votes bad? it's 200 posts into the game and all his posts are literally empty pictures.
@mala 217: still don't see your point.
mollie keeps being good, perhaps she should return to th town pile
@des and wisdom: why the votes on penguin.?? this is really surprising, couldn't spot any flaw in any of his posts.
@post 22 wisdom so was that a reaction test? also can you spoiler me some quotes of how he's sheeping you? I really wanna finish reading in 7 minutes and go to bed
223 is a perfectly good post that can get PA to the town pile as well.
224 - so wisdom saw that scummeta in peng's posts as well? this is what you're saying? or is this just coincidence?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Guess who's back.
back again.
shos is back.
tell a friend.
*continues from page 10*
~~~
@ooba 230: that's pretty awesome indeed. if I understand you correctly it's most townie: wisdom->mala->gg->AA9->most scummy?
what analysis is it that you liked in GG?
can you elaborate on your mala-town read? I don't get it at all.
I'm with mollie in the whole -defensiveness- discussion. I can see how it makes him scum obv if he was faking it but that's practically wifom, the question if he is, and I'm taking the nacho=town part of thsi wifom. I've done it before successfully and I do it again
245 - ????
248 is perfect. PER-FUCKING-FECT. works perfectly with my mala scumread.
253 really doens't explain shit. and if you're so insistent that by meta you know peng is scum, link me.
@260: how does ooba look town to you, wisdom? he basically posted twice with 4 words reasoning to his reads after 250 posts. that's thesecondmost active lurking I've ever seen, and if it continues like that, it's an excuse to
I'm kinda not liking wisdom and mollie a tad. both my townreads, yes. it seems like his interactions with mollie are continuously "short question" "short answer" "ok" and vice versa. that...doesn't look like two townies. either two scums trying to look like they're putting content in the game, or that wisdom is scum and just asks quetsions to seem like he's scumhunting or something, and doesn't follow them up, it's like every answer by mollie is perfect for an 'ok' and end of game..
not enough for a vote anyhow, and associations in D1 is bad anyway.
@penguin 267: I really don't get your way of thinking. if he posted sucmreads that consist only of one person, why would he vote someone else?
oh sheesh 269 is such a necessary post. it also explains your opinion on what's happening in the game(which deserves an opinion with PAs vote) perfectly, Mala.
scratch that thing I said about ooba, he can post through pictures well, so disregard day active lurking accusation.
@ooba: I don't understand how that setup specs makes mala town in your eyes. there's really no reason to think someone is a hammerer, and even if, that role is not pro-town and can very, VERY easily be faked by scum(obviously).
@post 274 by wisdom: what the hell are you talking about.? how is matt related here to anything? and @276 by you too and @des later - don't you think that was entirely unnecessary, especially considering mirari's content at the time in comparison to the game? how is that null? stupid is obvious, but would a townie do that?? I realize it's weak but I find it scummy nonetheless
@ooba 277: derpsy?
@280: why is arc a possible vote for you? and what the hell about me, lol, I don't understand the sentence.
@282: what buddying indeed? O_o;; am I blind in need to ask so many stupid questions? or am I just really stupid lately? I don't understand shit of what people are talking about in like 2 posts each page
wtf is going on with the rest of the page until my post lol
Mala is still scum as I voted. good post, me.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I'm changing mirari back to null.
I agree to that. but I think that catch where GG took mala (and later when she 'suddenly' came out of the hydra) is more strong(stronger?) so I'm keeping my vote there.In post 309, Desperado wrote:@ Shos: Penguin's scum for her confirm-vote on Mirari over her question to Wisdom + experiential meta
it's better than Matt tho. he hasn't ever posted yet, am I correct?
"I think you're scum, shos. I don't think you're actually contributing thought or analysis to this game with your big posts. They contain a lot of filler. " -mirari
tell me, what part of my post is filler, and what subject have I touched while having not expressed me opinion about?? in other words, tell me how this sentence of yours is not completely bullshit?
and about ooba: you're wrong, but it's ok, since you played only two games onsite. every so often you'd find someone gimmicking stuff like that(see: ponies, lol XD), it is definitely not alignment indicative. I thought it was worth some voting(only for pressure) because it appeared that he was going to continue posting that way, which will literally allow him to active lurk, while posting very few posts, each with only a tiny bit of content. but well, now we know it's ot going to happen so that kinda declines. that's still all null, tho.
@mala 311: why am I naive?
@312: are you going to keep lurking, matt?
a discussion about me, interesting.
315 is good. 'neutral until suggested otherwise' is right imo.
316 is WUT. I was literally reading it with my mouth wide open. my melodrama in tone??? fixation on theoretical arguments??? what the hell are you talking about??? <--- is dramatic lol
^^^^ this btw supports my mattp scum theory; he keeps not doing anything and when it seemed like he's going to do something he responds with 'shossoundslike scum to me'. compare to hyperactive townmatt - still on the list.
@318 mala: I don't have a problem with townreads. the thing that I had a problem with was the *amount* of what was supposedly *real* townreads; when I combined that with the amount of posts in the game at the time - it seemed sooooo far fetched, may as well catch at least one scum ont he first two pages, you see? that's not how it works. it NEVER works.
tl;dr: I think you faked it. too many early townreads, and waaaaay too early.
wooohoooo 2 more pages to gooooIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
this is true.In post 328, Whiskers wrote:
That's stupid.In post 322, Wisdom wrote:@whiskers
It's called meta, and for many of us it's aprimary scumhunting tool.You'll have to deal with it.
That'ssostupid.
If it worked, it would take any fun in the game, out of the game.
Also, it's not consistent or reliable.
Also, it'sstupidto rely on as yourPRIMARY SCUMHUNTING TOOL ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??!
@wisdom: GG and I played like 4 games in a row together where we were both town(and one before where I was scum).
@wisdom again: meta is a weak tool. it 'works'? nnnnope. when I started playing I intentionally mimiced my town meta at the time because I knew it was going to be looked at. it worked perfectly. I have an awesome scum winrate. that's why meta is a reaaaaally weak tool for me most of the time. I can have SUPEROMGWTFBBQPERFECT hit with someone's play with his scummeta that I know of, but if that's the only thing i have against him, that's probably not going to yield my vote. meta me (lol), you can see that
OH MY GOD GG I LOVE YOU SO <3 dat post made me smile the entire post funny, I didn't remember that the scumgame was the Mafia under the Sea. so you basically never saw my scumplay. interesting.
ho-ly-shit where did you pull that wall from xD wisdom, just take a look at the date, mmkay? and now go take a look at a towngame where I had to catch up. good. now go eat some dinner.
my read on matt - it's not stupid it all. this is not a decline of activity, this is not-existing-of-it. Matt has posted like, what, 7 posts the entire game? and take a look at their content; do you remember ANYTHING that he said apart from 'shos is scum'? no. you know why? because he NEVER SAID ANYTHING APART FROM THAT. I did not mention scummatt being inactive, no, but I did mention that matttown is superfuckingamazingly active, didn't I? and last time I checked I want to lynch people who are not town. I'm not voting him, no, because that's only meta and I'm not going to push a lurker policy lynch(did that for the first time this month lol) and PA and mala are more likely scum; but I can't ignore his inactivity, especially when he DOES jump and post once in a while, showing that he IS reading the topic and is INTENTIONALLY lurking.
why wouldn't he, if he thinks they're wrong? you make it sound like he's only trying to discredit you. GG hasn't done that, he's only told you why he thinks you're wrong.In post 337, Wisdom wrote:Ok, that's definitely weird. Since when do you shoot down my scumreads like this?
oh wow those posts until 342 are really bad, wisdom. GG just said that he would dig the SPECIFIC things IN the wall that made him townread me, and that we've learned that me making walls is null. how on earth is that making you vote GG, after he said 'let me give you something to work with'?
I might be biased but GG is still supertown on my list and I'm kinda losing it on wisdom
*sigh* i'm just repeating GG, it seems he wrote everything I did, like, literally.
lemme just read the entire page till I continue.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 328, Whiskers wrote:
That's stupid.In post 322, Wisdom wrote:@whiskers
It's called meta, and for many of us it's aprimary scumhunting tool.You'll have to deal with it.
That'ssostupid.
If it worked, it would take any fun in the game, out of the game.
Also, it's not consistent or reliable.
Also, it'sstupidto rely on as yourPRIMARY SCUMHUNTING TOOL ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??!
well nothing to add.In post 337, Wisdom wrote:Ok, that's definitely weird. Since when do you shoot down my scumreads like this?
Matt, you've extensively repeated how I am scum. what are your other reads? any opinions on anyone else at all?
who else is on those 7 reads?and can you elaborate on how you acquired those?
and if you think I am partners with GG you're horribly mistaken. I'd love to be, but I never, EVER, go OMG I LUV U SO with scumpartners. EVER.
stopped at peng's 368 will continue in a whileIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
seriously?In post 371, Wisdom wrote:
SeriouslyIn post 370, shos wrote:248 is perfect. PER-FUCKING-FECT. works perfectly with my mala scumread.
Look at stuff like this
This is not only not "perfect", this is only a stupid thing I came up with the time and thought it will be funny. BUT OF COURSE, it goes with your scumread, let's mention it and say how awesome it is.
How the fuck anyone can think shos is town is beyond me.
take a look.In post 248, Wisdom wrote:
which apparently, you're also doing. I voted you and you popped up.In post 246, Malakittens wrote:I disagree. She's still doing the similar post only when called upon thing that she did when she was scum in Manical (Mastin-NY)
you voted Mala in post 241, (link), timestamp: 8:47.
Mala responds in post 246. timestamp: 8:52.
HOW ON EARTH CAN 248 BE ANY BETTER?!?!?
and then mala responds with
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUSIn post 253, Malakittens wrote:
I'm switching between hydra accounts, in between tabs discussing, in skype chat with Chamber trying to fix my League DNS issue (I crashed and can't log back in.) and playing fetch with my kitten. I'm multitasking, it's fun, but annoying.In post 248, Wisdom wrote: which apparently, you're also doing. I voted you and you popped up.
do you honestly think that what you posted is wrong????In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
he literally just answered how me not being a townread flipped to yesIn post 374, MattP wrote:In post 244, Grimgroove wrote:I don't understand the penguin-votes from the previous page.
Townreads are coming in.shos is not one of them.In post 321, Grimgroove wrote: I'm not liking MattP as town much either.
My partial agreement with shos' readslist (don't see the Mirari-scum though) makes me read him as town even moreso,though his catch-ups reminded me heavily of shos-town already(so this is not simply an OMGUR).In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
post 196.In post 383, Malakittens wrote:
The fuck are you referring to?I agree to that. but I think that catch where GG took mala (and later when she 'suddenly' came out of the hydra) is more strong(stronger?) so I'm keeping my vote there.
omgus, much? any reasons to that or you're going to pull a matt and go 'he sounds scum'In post 385, Malakittens wrote:Fuck I really want a Peng lynch, but at this point I think I'll be more than willing to settle for a Shos lynch.
I'm not at all reading him as town not one bit in the slightest.
@387 mala: yes, the fact you played a ton with each other doesn't matter at all regarding my thoughts, lol.
"this is transparent as a ghost to me, but mollie can be at times also". can be *what* also/at times/whatever.?
and I was not saying that you ARE faking reads, i was saying that you WERE. remember? gamestart? page 0.9? dozens of townreads?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 316, MattP wrote:Oh, well I think he sounds like scum.In post 385, Malakittens wrote:Fuck I really want a Peng lynch, but at this point I think I'll be more than willing to settle for a Shos lynch.
I'm not at all reading him as town not one bit in the slightest.
why do everyone keep calling me scum with nothing to go with it except 'oh suresies he is scum'? =\In post 388, Wisdom wrote:grimgroove isn't scum if I go by how shos is buddying him. Unless it's on purpose.
Anyway, there's no chance I'll be supporting any other lynch after his recent posts.
funnily enough, that post where I said that me partners with GG was immediately between your posts, but it was aimed at the post where matt posted that me and GG are scum, lol. pretty funny.In post 391, Wisdom wrote:ok maybe it's on purposeIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
oh so matt just doens't have the time to explain his reads eh. sure. ok. it's not like the game relies on people talking. may as well RNG..
and wisdom, please refer to 397 again. how can a 'I vote you and you all of a sudden pop out' claim be wrong when you voted him and 5 minutes later he all of a sudden popped out.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
one might argue that 316+ has some quality(I dun think so, calling me scum for being dramatic and stuff; next post were ok I guess) but here are ALL of matt's posts up until 314.
Dear wisdom,
Please see this spoiler. find me the *quality* in them. For you have said that 'Matts posts have it. period.'
so let's allow you to show me how I am wrong.
Spoiler: the quality posts by matt
inb4nobodyhastimeIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
seriously? you think that was a reaction test? that was such an obvious rvs lie, 53/57 are there just because you actually took it seriously. either way - that's not a 'solid' response, lol, and in no way does this show he is town.
@157 - how the hell did that stop you, lol. he literally just said 'mala is town stop fighting'. please do explain how this is the most helpful thing for you in the topic.
@162 - uh, no? he just said that he thinks I'm scum and that I would eventually scumsip.
@314 - do you start a game thinking that EVERYONE IS SCUM? not null? when I ask you why you think someone is scum, do you really answer 'tell me why not'?
and that is ALL his posts, I went through his ISO and +'d every single one of them. the posts you're talking about probably came later, but that is also after I said that matt wasn't doing shit.
and if, ffs, you can show me how ONE of my post is 'theatrical', I might be able to respond. see, you don't just say 'X is scum'. you say WHY you think so, so that if you're wrong, people can show you that you are. you're not playing with a town mindset at all, you're just tunneling as best as you can, ignoring everything and defying truths, deflecting any attempt to make you actually SAY WHY YOU THINK I AM SCUM. if you had said that you didn't have time I might've just gone with the flow and let it slide waiting, and probably forget about it later because that's just how I am, but you've invested so much time in arguing an empty point, you've bypassed mala by far
VOTE: wisdom
with an additional "oh my god you truly suck" sidenoteIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
whenever someone can tell me why they think I am scum, please do.
also, please do not use 'you sound like scum'. it's been used by four people now.
I'm off to sleep. looks like I'm going to be today's lynch, but it's not too bad, and much information will float from this wagon. so spam the thread as you wish guyz, you have at least 18 hours free from shosIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Well, an unexpectedly light day at work, so i can phonepost.
Mirari. You say my posts are filler. Quote me some of that filler, and iso matt. I do not see how that computes.
My push on wisdom - is light. Im voting wis because omg dat tunnel was incredibly without logic, as you can see with what whiskers posted. But i never PUSHED wisdom at all. I pushed you at the time, perhaps to some extent PA, but i only said anything against wisdom in like 2 posts after being overwhelmed by ill logic.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
You saying my vote is useless is in no way a reason to vote me. If my opinion isnt popular, that doesnt make me scum. Edpecially when the popular vote is on me myself. I stand on my own and state my opinion, its not like ww are nearing deadline.In post 444, Mirari wrote:
1...2...3...4... Yup. That's how many people on your wagon.In post 442, shos wrote:also, please do not use 'you sound like scum'. it's been used by four people now.
I said your content posts were filler. I still don't understand why you are pushing for Wisdom. You and penguin are generally being useless with your votes. But, you do have earlier emphasis on the vote. She doesn't.
Matt, is it odd that a pseudo-bloc has formed this quickly?
Ooba, hun, you should probably change your vote.
Earlier emphasis on vote=??In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
wisdom.
it seems like you are being Matt's pet. the moment he just mentioned a possibility that he has to reread me, you flipped and all of a sudden you're not even voting me.
tell me, what made you decide to move your vote?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I was talking to wisdom, obviously, are you reading the thread?
and wis nobody misrepped you here. you have probably missed the part where matt's posting seems to have only helped YOU. from our POV, that's all shit, both you and matt at the time. Matt's later posting became good and legit(even if wrong ofc). yours did quite the opposite.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
it sure sounds like it, tho.
for example, that first example that you gave - the 'reaction test'. well. firstly, I'm like 99% sure that this was not a reaction test, and rather it was just a bullshit lie matt was saying which is perfectly fine because that's what people say in RVS.Matt - was it planned to be a reaction test or not?-to confirm. then, you say that you called the RT, and pretended to not know that this is a reaction test. that sounds the most fake you can say EVER. that's really not even close.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
*
oh my god how the hell did we not see this guys. this post is SUCH FUCKING BULLSHIT. I mean seriously. WHAT THE FUCK.In post 163, Whiskers wrote:
Wrong again! You answeredIn post 129, helium-3 wrote:
your welcome since I answered after the person who you addressed to answered!In post 126, Whiskers wrote:Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.immediatelyafter I asked it, in the very next post, in fact. As in, my question was 120, and your answer was 121.
So are you lying, or just stupid?
wow cool. try reading.okay. so you think he was being defensive yet faking defensiveness.
tbh i am not even surprised.tbh I am not even sure what we are talking about even more
of course you don't.idgi
VOTE: whiskersIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
well I have o say I am disappointed. I expected moar, but that's enough.
everyone seems to have ignored this post:
except for, obviously, wisdom:In post 517, shos wrote:*
oh my god how the hell did we not see this guys. this post is SUCH FUCKING BULLSHIT. I mean seriously. WHAT THE FUCK.In post 163, Whiskers wrote:
Wrong again! You answeredIn post 129, helium-3 wrote:
your welcome since I answered after the person who you addressed to answered!In post 126, Whiskers wrote:Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.immediatelyafter I asked it, in the very next post, in fact. As in, my question was 120, and your answer was 121.
So are you lying, or just stupid?
wow cool. try reading.okay. so you think he was being defensive yet faking defensiveness.
tbh i am not even surprised.tbh I am not even sure what we are talking about even more
of course you don't.idgi
VOTE: whiskersnow. what could that be? hmm.
see that asterix (*) at the start of that post? right before the quote? that's the sign 'I am faking it'.
see, wisdom, THIS is a reaction test. behold.
what I learned from it is that you are even more surely scum. you didn't ask any questions, wonder anything; I pulled an unreasoned 180 on my townread, and you were just taking the bait - you take every idiotic excuse anyone would give you to vote me.
if this wasn't clear, I just picked my best townread(whiskers)(well perhaps should've chosen GG, but at the time whiskers came to mind) and ISOed him, and looked for a long post and quoted it, without even reading, and posted a general statement OH MY GOD THIS SUCKS SO BAD - just like the reasons for the votes on me were. STUPID.
Whiskers is still high on my town list.
wisdom is still high(actually much higher now) on my scum list.
VOTE: wisdomIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
oh I'm sure that wasn't, yeah. beacuse so many things changed between the posts. I mean, there was even a VOTECOUNT.In post 536, Wisdom wrote:@shos
That was not a reaction to your post. That was me removing my vote from Whiskers because I don't think he's scum anymore.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 516, shos wrote:it sure sounds like it, tho.
for example, that first example that you gave - the 'reaction test'. well. firstly, I'm like 99% sure that this was not a reaction test, and rather it was just a bullshit lie matt was saying which is perfectly fine because that's what people say in RVS.Matt - was it planned to be a reaction test or not?-to confirm. then, you say that you called the RT, and pretended to not know that this is a reaction test. that sounds the most fake you can say EVER. that's really not even close.In post 522, shos wrote:You misunderstood. I asked if post 23 was a planned reaction test or not. Plain and simple.MATT
answer please.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
peng and matt(sorry for using huge that seems to be the only way you guys read my posts now).
I *am* shos and i dont see the case on me. Read: it is not that i disagree, i just dont know. So far all you said was "his posts are filler" and "sounds like scum". Please correct me if im wrong.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
What game are you reading wizdomIn post 657, penguin_alien wrote: It seems like even if I disagree I should at least get what the arguments about shos areIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
??????
Huh?
667 is correct. Where did you get that she thinks im scum from??
She asked what the case is. I said there is none. Asked matt to provide. Maybe you can do that too.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I dont recall peng saying that.In post 663, shos wrote:So far all you said was "his posts are filler" and "sounds like scum". Please correct me if im wrong.
Anyway arguing semantics of language us useless. Please YOU provide me with your case. With quotes.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Ye know what, not fuck this. The fact that youre dick measuring in order to avoid answering my question should be seen by all.
The nacho vote was another bait for you. Just a proof that you do not ignore me as you say you do. So you did not jump like a chicked all over corn on that post, youve learnt. But you still took it.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Te improper use of huge letters is probably because Im on phone and cant easily cutn paste.the tone in 158 is completely calm, the caps are to imitate ya know, its not me shouting. Is that your case?
You have not answered my question. If you did link me to it. Its really not hard. Third time im asking.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Seriously wisdom???
Shos: *question*
Wisdom: I already answered!
Shos: where??
Wisdom: i answered you that the answer is that i dont wanna answer
-.-In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Im at work, during the day i only can play via phone from work so talking about thevrecent posts is all i cab do.
Wisdom, thats just a lie. If you actually read my posts youd know my readlist. Peng and mala are other scumreads, whiskers gg and mollie are townreads. Stop bullshitting.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Wisdom, how bout you look at the posts that i make from home, from a computer and not by sms? Youll find your omg so desirable scumhubting there.
Pedit: the votes onnacho and whiskers were not real. They were bait for you. AGAIN! If you read my posts youll find that ive already said that.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I havent opened your linjs but i remember what youre talking about gg, lol. Iirc, i repeated you because i read and commented om the spot. Asin, read 300, write something. Read 301. Read 302. Write. Etc. So it was all alreadyvwritten by the time i read your post.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
BEWARE! le wall coming. but I recommend you read it, it will be worth the while. I promise a real case down there.
~~~
tbh i don't actually remember why I think peng is scum. I'll probably find it if I ISO myself tho I remember that mala is scum because GG caught her red handed on something foolish, don't remember what, and well I had tons of stuff against mala iirc. Mala hasn't posted in a long while now - am I wrong?
I can recall why GG and whiskers are town. whiskers was being the only one who actually thinks from a protown POV, trying to actually read and understand things in the whole me-discussion; GG was sorta the same I think, but just like 10 pages before whiskers. In short - I get townreads on people who look like they drop towntells(which hasn't happened this game apart from a slgiht one of mollie during gamestart) and on people who say what I'm thinking before me. so GG and whiskers are there, and are there strong. If I die, make it my will to keep these two alive.BTW mod, can we possibly have more frequent votecounts? I know the game's pace is hard to follow but I need it
Wisdom's play has been purely and utterly terrible. I remember having a short townread on her during the girst few pages I think, but then he started not making sense, clinging to bullshit and nitpicking everything that was in reach. when she finished tunneling mala(which happened just because mala went lurkmode if memory serves right) she started sheeping Matt for no visible reason. That claim about the 'reaction test' at gamestart sounds fake as hell, Matt's post was obviously not serious and if anyone even considered taking it seriously I'd be in awe. the fact that wisdom considered this a reaction test is really stupid - because I see no way in which town OR scum would react differently to that. the fact that he DID respond, and the fact that it made Matt get a townread on him based on "we know each other well" is foolish; when you really know someone it makes it even worse to get a good read on the start, because he knows that you know him and can easily fake it. But Matt later sttarted playing like a normal person with a town PoV; wisdom, onthe other hand, sheeped matt on whatever he did, voting and unvoting, and repeatedly refused to make any sense of anything. I prodded wisdom to tell me WHY he thinks I am scum like a dozen times; all those were avoided, deflected, etc. only when I pressured him on it, he finally gave in and quoted his post:
as an answer. why are ou scum? because you're scum! obviously, lol. note that "I will" if people are stupid? well, lots of people are stupid apparantly, and they asked him about it too, and when FINAL-fucking-LY he answerd, his best answer wasIn post 404, Wisdom wrote:shos, you are obvious scum, I don't need to say anything. I will, if people are stupid, but I don't think it will be needed.
. now this, is just foolish. I have three scumreads and I had them for a looooong time. they've been stable for a while since all I was doing lately was responding to this fucking deal about ME. the only change that happened was Matt, whom I was scumreading at the time but when he took his wits back I removed him from the list.In post 698, Wisdom wrote:
kIn post 694, Whiskers wrote:Could you please give some sort of reasoning for a case on shos?
For starters, he's not scumhunting and he does not have anything resembling a scumread (besides the one on myself, which is ridiculous).
Is that enough for you?
Back to the 'answer' - so "not having a scumread" and "not scumhunting" is the case on me. half of it is plain wrong/lie/whateveryoucallit, and the other is extremely subjective- but well, even if, then there's AA9, PA, Nacho - possibly more - that fit precisely this description. not a word on them? oh that's fine, cuz when you're in the tunnel, you're in the tunnel. you're committed to gget a person lynched, it doesn't matter if he's town.
I would like to see whatelsewisdom can pull out his ass. I maen, he said 'for starters', right? so there's gotta be more than that? right?
~~~
one more thing I want to say about Wisdom. I lured him to a trap twice. he took the bait 2/2 of them. I'll talk about the first - since it is more important and I wanna go to my gf. in it I was pulling a "180" on whiskers; that was utterly bullshit spewing on my townread, and wisdom didn't even ask anything, all he did was vote me. no words. when I told him about that, he said that the vote was entirely not in context with my post.
lots of quotes, explanations after them:Spoiler: big spoiler