Mini 1745: Mutant Mafia [GAME OVER]
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 23, farside22 wrote:In post 20, 3dicerolling wrote:I have my reasons for believing suzune. As for lane, his claim can be easily verified, therefore wouldn't be claimed as scum.
Your going to have to explain why about suz!
Are you implying you don't believe suzune's claim?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 51, Suzune wrote:I don't mind if you suspect me it would be only fair. Farside is the one who ruined my miller claim by informing the town that it was not my only ability.
p-edit, I am actually surprised farside did that honestly. If she was town she should not have contradicted me.
p-edit...it is in post 21
but how did farside know that wasn't your only ability?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 60, Varsoon wrote:I'm interested, but it feels like I'm tumbling down a rabbit hole.
If Farside is informed of Suzune's role and Suzune knew this, then why would Farside ask for more info/claim from Suzune?
It's weird and pings all kinds of strange to me.
I can think of a handful of possibilities, but all of them sound like the kind of shit I'd awkwardly scum-gambit with to either crash or win a game.
This pretty much sums up how I feel right now.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 43, 3dicerolling wrote:From what I've experienced and seen from reading games with Suzune in it, she seems like a relatively conservative player in them. I don't see her claiming Miller as scum.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 100, OceanWind wrote:In post 97, 3dicerolling wrote:Ocean - why do you feel like varsoon is scum for sheeping farside?
Because scum are far more likely to want to bandwagon off of a townie's reasoning and it takes a certain level of skill to convincingly fake their own.
You disagree that Varsoon's sheeping is scummy?
How do you know farside is a townie?
And I am getting mixed feelings about varsoon, but I hope he clears them up!-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 97, 3dicerolling wrote:Ocean - why do you feel like varsoon is scum for sheeping farside?
In post 100, OceanWind wrote:In post 97, 3dicerolling wrote:Ocean - why do you feel like varsoon is scum for sheeping farside?
Because scum are far more likely to want to bandwagon off of a townie's reasoning and it takes a certain level of skill to convincingly fake their own.
You disagree that Varsoon's sheeping is scummy?
In post 103, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 100, OceanWind wrote:In post 97, 3dicerolling wrote:Ocean - why do you feel like varsoon is scum for sheeping farside?
Because scum are far more likely to want to bandwagon off of a townie's reasoning and it takes a certain level of skill to convincingly fake their own.
You disagree that Varsoon's sheeping is scummy?
How do you know farside is a townie?
And I am getting mixed feelings about varsoon, but I hope he clears them up!
In post 108, OceanWind wrote:In post 103, 3dicerolling wrote:How do you know farside is a townie?
And I am getting mixed feelings about varsoon, but I hope he clears them up!
I don't "know" Farside is a townie. I'm townreading Farside because the way she questioned Suzune about not claiming her full role and then questioning for buying it and finally outing what she knows looked pretty clearly town.
The four quotes above are my interactions with Oceanwind. I asked him about sheeping because I don't think sheeping is inherently scummy. He inferred that I disagreed, which I did because I thought it as more of a neutral tell. I proceed to ask him how he knows farside is townie and he falls back on the claim that farside is "pretty clearly town" which I disagree with. And then this post
In post 109, OceanWind wrote:3dice is probably also scum. His first few posts read town to me mostly because I agreed with him that both claims looked town. But his response to my case on Varsoon looks a lot scummier:
1. He is not all bothered by Varsoon sheeping Farside's read to vote him. Town in his place would be a lot more paranoid about a wagon starting on them and tend to look especially closely at who's joining it for poor or non-reasons: in Varsoon's case, it was simple rehash of what Farside already said.
2. The direction of his questioning: him asking me to justify why Varsoon's sheeping is scummy and being oblivious to it and then asking me how I "know" Farside is town is a bizarre line of questioning to ask. Nowhere does he really care that Varsoon voted him.
He immediately turns back on his town read because of 2 points. The first one is because I disagreed with me that sheeping is a scum tell, which is interesting because a disagreement in reads isn't scummy.
The second point addresses my line of questioning. I'm curious why he thought sheeping was scummy because I didn't agree. At no point was I oblivious about it. The line of questioning is directly correlated to ocean's answers. And no I didn't care about varsoon's vote on me because votes earlier in the game are either baseless or to draw out reactions.
So to summarize these events, Oceanwind town reads me, then scumreads varsoon for "sheeping" early in the game. I questioned his line of logic because I disagreed with him, and he immediately turned it into a scumread on me, which is super scummy and opportunistic.
VOTE: OceanWind
Also funny to note that Ocean voted for me, who is the same person his townread, farside, is voting. IMO this is more sheeping than what Varsoon did, which is hypocritical.
I'll finish reading up on the game after this post.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 120, Dierfire wrote:@Ocean
Are the following accurate descriptions of your impressions of the game?
1. Varsoon is likely Mafia because he followed Farside's vote on 3DR.
2. 3DR is likely Mafia because he didn't question Varsoon's vote on him.
EDIT: Maybe it would help if I first get a clearer picture of what your case on Varsoon is. I guess that you could say that "fine" is a null read. Maxous and 3DR have not especially struck me as Town or as Mafia thus far.
EDIT AGAIN: I acknowledge Suzune's point that Ascetic can be Town; my point was that an Ascetic Mafia could make Lane's claim to draw (and negate) Town power without too much risk.
This is actually a pretty town post.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 151, OceanWind wrote:I feel like someone even semi-competent at the game should realize I'm town by now (with the obvious exception of Varsoon since he was locked in a tunnel). I don't know if Brantz is actually this bad at the game or just scum.
"I'm town and you all are bad if you don't know it!"
Give me a break.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
Right now I'm at:
Town:
Suzune
Lane
Lean Town:
Varsoon
Townish:
farside
Dier
Lean scum:
OceanWind
Everyone else is null at this point.
@Xtoxm - Why do you feel like the ocean wagon is bad?
@Fuzzylogic - What are your opinions of people so far other than varsoon and ocean?
@Wanderer - Can you express more of your thoughts to the game?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 207, Suzune wrote:What I am curious about is do you think Lane would have claimed right away regardless of my miller claim?
Is this directed at me or wanderer?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 210, OceanWind wrote:In post 185, 3dicerolling wrote:I didn't care about varsoon's vote on me because votes earlier in the game are either baseless or to draw out reactions.
Varsoon's vote on you was for acting "being too chummy and accepting." Farside's vote on you was for "accepting claims too quickly." I don't buy that you thought Varsoon's vote was not at all influenced by Farside's or was non-serious.
It never at all crossed your mind to ask "Varsoon, why are you voting me?"
Maybe I thought Varsoon's vote was non-serious so I didn't address it? Has that crossed your mind at all?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 207, Suzune wrote:What I am curious about is do you think Lane would have claimed right away regardless of my miller claim?
I'm not sure he would have. I believe he saw your claim and either realized claiming his role would be a good idea too, or thought we were mass claiming.
In post 214, OceanWind wrote:@3dicerolling -
1. How did Varsoon go from you having mixed feelings on him to leaning town?
2. Point out something in wanderer's posts that isn't related to me where you thought her posts were "logical and cohesive." Explain in detail why you think this makes her town. (I don't care about wanderer's suspicion of me as I'd expect you to "townread" it regardless of your alignment.)
1. I read through the thread again, and a lot of his opinions and logic line up to mine. He's not as strong of a townread, but he does ping townish.
2. The type of questions she asks are thought provoking, and I think if she was scum that questioning farside would be a bit dangerous, so I feel like she's town.
In post 217, farside22 wrote:In post 203, 3dicerolling wrote:I honestly don't see the point of 2 people checking lane. It would be stupid for lane to claim something like that as scum, thus he wouldn't claim it. Why waste 2 prs on someone who is most likely town in the first place?
Wifom I don't think helps to discuss but again didn't say it had to happen.
I can explain my crazy thoughts after the game if your curious.
I doubt you are though.
I just don't think lane as scum would be ballsy enough to claim something like this. I would be happy to hear your theory post game if you would like.
In post 219, OceanWind wrote:In post 218, lane0168 wrote:I think oceans ppint about another vote at that point with 13 players and saying town would be more paranoid is totally wrong and like what 3dice caught about ocean seeming like he knew far was a townie by calling her townie.
No it isn't. 3dice's point about me "knowing" Farside was town is the stupidest thing I ever heard. I'm reading Farside as town. Having townreads is not the same as knowing someone is town.
If you don't understand why 3dice is scummy, I'll go over it again:
1. Farside voted 3dice
2. Varsoon voted 3dice
In post 47, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: 3diceDude's too chummy and accepting (and too willing to vote for me, hm, yes, mmm).
Thinking this an RVS vote is a huge stretch considering 3dice's posts so far have been about accepting the claims and Farside had already called him out on it. If I squint, maybe I can see the part in parenthesis as a slight joke but overall not RVS.
3. I point out in Post 93 that Varsoon was sheeping Farside and also argue that it was a non-serious post.
4. 3dice's response:
In post 97, 3dicerolling wrote:Ocean - why do you feel like varsoon is scum for sheeping farside?
He says nothing at all about the vote not being serious. He buys my premise that the vote was serious and instead argues with me on a theory point. If he thought the vote was serious, he would at this point be questioning Varsoon about Varsoon voting him.
It is a natural human tendency to notice votes on yourself. Town or scum, when someone votes you, it sticks out and people tend to take notice much more than they would votes on somebody else. When Varsoon voted 3dice with rephrased reasoning from Farside, 3dice no doubt noticed it. When I called out Varsoon for sheeping, I think 3dice here would also want to know why Varsoon voted him regardless of 3dice's alignment. But instead of asking Varsoon that question he asks me to justify why sheeping is scummy. This isscummybecause a player in that position would be curious about Varsoon's vote. 3dice is suppressing his curiosity, ignoring Varsoon and instead questioning meforquestioning Varsoon.
To extrapolate on this: assume that you are town in a game and a quick wagon develops on you with minimal reasoning and the playernames of the people that wagoned you are A, B, and C. Let's also assume at this point that another player Z calls out B and says that B hopped on the wagon with poor reasoning. Would your reaction at this point be to hear what B has to say or do you ask O to justify why B's hop on to your wagon was scummy? The first is natural because we're always curious about why people voted us. The second is contrived with him trying to put up some sort of faux-objective front and is not a natural town thought process at all.
His question is also rather silly. It is fairly obvious why sheeping is scummy - or rather it is obvious why a town player would consider sheeping to be scummy regardless of the alignment of the sheeper. This is a mafia theory question and is fairly pointless. There are so many other very relevant things that needed looking into. If 3dice was town here, he'd be asking Varsoon why Varsoon disbelieved the claims (since 3dice himself bought them). He would also be clarifying with Varsoon whether the vote was indeed serious. Instead he asks me a theory-related question.
I think the actual reason he was asking me that contrived question to justify my suspicion was that he believed that Varsoon was going to be townread (based on Suzune's and Farside's responses) and wanted to get in and buddy up to Varsoon.
1. Let's break down Varsoon's vote on me:
In post 47, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: 3dice
Dude's too chummy and accepting (and too willing to vote for me, hm, yes, mmm).
Pay attention to the bold part. "too willing to vote for me" is obviously a joke about me voting him in the first place. You have to be blind to not see this. It is also important to note that this post was on the second page of the game. This early in the game, there are some serious votes, but for a player'sfirstpost this early in the game it is most likely a pressure vote or a non-serious vote, which is the case with Varsoon's vote.
2. No, actually I was more curious with your intention behind the scum read. I do not believe sheeping is inherently scummy, so I asked you based on your opinion of the "sheeping" on what you believed was motive of the post, so I could better understand your intentions.
3. I don't care what you think "natural human tendency" is. When I saw the vote, I recognized that it was not a very serious vote, and so I continued on pursuing other thoughts. Understanding that the vote was not serious, led to me not caring about responding it. Everything you said here is just random jargon for your mis-representation of me.
4. Most players that get random voted or voted non-seriouslydon'trespond to it. Heck, in just about every game I play where I get voted non-seriously I don't care to respond to it. Whether town or scum.
5. I already answered this above, but I'll reiterate it. I did not think the vote was serious. You apparently did and said that sheeping was scummy. I disagreed and wanted to know your intentions behind this because what makes sheeping scummy isthe way it is done, not the fact that it is done at all.
6. I think this is a 100% misrep and that you don't understand that sheeping isn't inherently scummy.
And no, me pointing out the question about farside isn't really a point. It was just used as a reaction test, and you bit.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
Found some spare time (and got bored of studying!)
In post 224, OceanWind wrote:In post 222, 3dicerolling wrote:1. I read through the thread again, and a lot of his opinions and logic line up to mine. He's not as strong of a townread, but he does ping townish.
2. The type of questions she asks are thought provoking, and I think if she was scum that questioning farside would be a bit dangerous, so I feel like she's town.
1. What "opinions" and "logic" of Varsoon's pinged town for you? It reads as you simply trying to gain an ally because he suspects me. Let's do this: what opinions not related to me does Varsoon have that pinged town to you? Why?
2. Be more specific because this reads like a bs explanation. What questions did Wanderer-nl ask that provoked your thoughts? What thoughts did they provoke? Why would questioning Farside be dangerous?
In post 222, 3dicerolling wrote:1. Let's break down Varsoon's vote on me:
In post 47, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: 3dice
Dude's too chummy and accepting(and too willing to vote for me, hm, yes, mmm).
Pay attention to the bold part. "too willing to vote for me" is obviously a joke about me voting him in the first place.
Your sole response to my case is that you thought Varsoon's vote was obviously a joke. If you pay attention to the underlined part, it doesn't compute. There was a jokey bit added at the end but at best, it is ambiguous - which is a reason to ask him about it.
1. Post 60 was a big one that I agreed with. Also, I felt like his entrance and attempt to apply pressure on me was town motivated. Lot's of little gut pings that add up to a town read.
2. No, I meant she was poking at others with questions, like fuzzy. I re-read what she said about fuzzy, and I actually agreed. Fuzzy basically summarized the varsoon vs you and didn't take much of a stance. To look at wanderer questioning farside, it's important to note the circumstance. If wanderer is scum, and farside is town, then she is actively challenging a player with a pr (well if you consider a neighbor a pr), which is pretty ballsy of an entrance. That being said, there is some stuff I can't really go into right now about me town reading the slot, but I will definitely explain more in the future.
3. Since when is "chummy" a serious word in mafia? I believe if Varsoon seriously and wholeheartedly agreed with farside, then he would have said something such as, "3dice seems to be accepting claims very quickly, so I am going to vote him with farside", but no, he goes out of his way to make his vote seem silly. Why you might ask? Because it was a non-serious vote to begin with.
In post 229, Dierfire wrote:@Ocean
In post 169, Dierfire wrote:Farside, Suzune, and Lane have claim-related reasons for me to read them as Town. Until something happens to question their claims, they get a pass. I will expect Farside and Suzune to continue to sort each other out, and as I mentioned before I would like someone to check Lane's claim at some point because it's easily verified. A protective role should probably be the one to do it.
Ocean and Varsoon had an argument that appeared Town on both sides. I'm reading them both as Town.
Maxous, Fuzzy, and 3DR are Null right now. 3DR has had more posts without saying much (other than his thoughts on the claimed roles). My vote probably should have gone on him rather than on Maxous.
Updates to this:
Maxous is still Null. I need to see the reasons for his reads in 215.
Fuzzy is still Null, I guess, until I can figure out what he's saying. I don't clearly understand what he's saying about the claims (seems to say that Lane's claim is more suspicious than Suzune's?). I don't at all understand what he's saying about your initial interaction with Varsoon (fake from both sides?) or how that squares with his interpretation of the game in general. He said that he would gather his thoughts on it but never came back. I would read him as Mafia if I felt confident that my interpretation of his words were correct.
3DR seems false to me. I'm reading him as Mafia. His main reason for reading you as Mafia seems to be that you were reading him as Mafia for disagreements on theory (whether Varsoon's vote was suspicious, whether he should have asked Varsoon about it). I don't like that he's able to say "theory disagreements are not a good reason for a vote" but then seems to believe that players casting votes for theory disagreements are Mafia; to me, that seems like a problem frequently encountered by Town players and the ability to argue against it implies knowing so. Maybe this is a bit too recursive. I'll rephrase. I think that 3DR has parked his vote on you and is more concerned with defending himself from your vote than with arguing that your vote is coming from Mafia. His attitude is less that your vote is bad because you are Mafia (that is, that your actions reflect nefarious intent), and more that you are Mafia because your vote is bad (that is, that your reasoning is insufficient to prove that he is Mafia and therefore you must be Mafia).
Your points on Wanderer in 210 and 212 are good, which makes me sad because I want Wanderer to be Town.
My read on Brantz is mixed as I said, but having caught up with 3DR I feel better about him (I would find it relatively unlikely for Mafia to vote together on a wagon of this size, so I'm betting on a single Mafia player, which would most likely be 3DR).
Xtoxm has not given me much detail. I'll leave that as a Null read for now.
Oh, and Buckwild is in this game, apparently?
Conclusions: I'm moving my vote to 3DR.
UNVOTE: Brantz
VOTE: 3DR
I don't know why people like to mis-rep me in mafia, but you do a great job of it! I did not vote on Ocean based on a disagreement in theory. I voted on Ocean based off an opportunistic feel I received from his vote. If you payed attention to the timing of his vote, it was just as I was beginning to question him. I felt it was sketchy, so I voted for him. And I laughed at "parked". Look up your mafia terms next time you use them. That being said, there is much more to mafia then voting someone specifically with the mindset of assuming they are scum. That produces a bias outlook on them and can result in a mis-read. I'm approaching Ocean based of the opportunism I felt and am trying to get a read on him from our back and forths. Saying that I'm defending myself is correct because I'm not just going to be lynched over a mis-represenation of my post.
I have been thinking this over, and I have changed my mind on Oceanwind. Mainly because of this post here
In post 234, OceanWind wrote:In post 229, Dierfire wrote:3DR seems false to me. I'm reading him as Mafia.1.)His main reason for reading you as Mafia seems to be that you were reading him as Mafia for disagreements on theory (whether Varsoon's vote was suspicious, whether he should have asked Varsoon about it).2.)I don't like that he's able to say "theory disagreements are not a good reason for a vote" but then seems to believe that players casting votes for theory disagreements are Mafia; to me, that seems like a problem frequently encountered by Town players and the ability to argue against it implies knowing so. Maybe this is a bit too recursive. I'll rephrase. I think that 3DR has parked his vote on you and is more concerned with defending himself from your vote than with arguing that your vote is coming from Mafia.3.)His attitude is less that your vote is bad because you are Mafia (that is, that your actions reflect nefarious intent), and more that you are Mafia because your vote is bad (that is, that your reasoning is insufficient to prove that he is Mafia and therefore you must be Mafia).
I'm having a bit of trouble following this read. Can you clarify a few things for me:
1. I believe 3dice's main reason to read me as mafia was because I had a townread on him which changed to a scumread based off of him questioning me. The rest of our wall back-and-forth has been me arguing that his questioning of me doesn't make sense from town and that he would be more inquisitive about Varsoon's vote and motivations and Varsoon's suspicions of the two claims if he (3dice) were town. 3dice argued that he thought Varsoon's vote was non-serious and that this justifies him not questioning Varsoon.
2. Can you point out where he said that theory disagreements are not a good reason for a vote? And where he then believed that players casting votes for theory disagreements are mafia?
3. Can you quote examples of where he did this and why you interpreted it in the way you did?
As I stated earlier, I felt Oceanwind's initial jump on me was opportunistic; however, this post contradicts my initial stance. I don't really see a scum oceanwind sticking his neck out to argue against logic that was being used against me.
If anybody knows me, you know I can be very adamant about my reads as town, but I remember someone once gave me the hint as town (I believe it was mastin) to not keep my vote on someone where my read has begin to alter on. Even if you are both knees deep in wagons (I know you aren't anymore, but this happened in another game, a long time ago)
UNVOTE: Oceanwind
I'm going to try to sort through some of my null reads. If anyone wants to help engage me, that would probably help improve my confidence.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 312, BRantz wrote:Actually... Tom can wait.
VOTE: farside22
There is no way she is town this game.
Well this is a bit of a stretch.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 337, pisskop wrote:What Im seeing in ocean's isos are shotgun attacks.
What I smell from you is flatulence.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 339, Suzune wrote:
Do you have something constructive to add?In post 338, 3dicerolling wrote:What I smell from you is flatulence.
I said pisskop smells bad. How much more constructive should I be?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 342, pisskop wrote:In post 341, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 339, Suzune wrote:
Do you have something constructive to add?In post 338, 3dicerolling wrote:What I smell from you is flatulence.
I said pisskop smells bad. How much more constructive should I be?
Thats not fair. Didnt I win us the game in blitz?
By pissing of the scum team? Technically yes, but I convinced Ika
I'm hoping to see you transfer your really good moments from that game to here. Time will tell I suppose, but currently you and flatulence are dancing.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 345, pisskop wrote:And as soon as we play in enough games to be capable of assessing one another with an acceptable degree of error Ill let you talk about my game.
I generally mix what I've already picked up on people's play with how they are playing in the current game and work onward.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
It's not just you suzune. I got questioned for my town read on wanderer.
And about theory, it's honestly a different story for each player.
Player A might say that action X is scummy, while Player B might think action X indicates a town player. Then Player C might completely disregard action X in place for a scummier action Y.
It all really varies from player to player, but there are some common grounds to things most players agree are scummy. It's just a very minute amount of common grounds.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 357, OceanWind wrote:In post 355, 3dicerolling wrote:It's not just you suzune. I got questioned for my town read on wanderer.
The reason wanderer was townread by at least some players is that she was echoing a lot of the popular sentiment at the time and parroting the popular reads. Your and Varsoon's scumread on me happened before wanderer posted anything. Wanderer was taking advantage of town sentiment at that time and assuming at least one of you are town, simply telling you what she thought your internal thought processes were.
I think you should rethink your townread of her just because she said things you agreed with or were thinking yourself because these weren't original thoughts she added to the game but rather a rehash with similar types of reasoning you had already posted in the thread.
No read this early is set in cement for me. I felt like wanderer wouldn't be too difficult to read, but I'm having a more difficult time reading pisskop.
And her thoughts weren't all completely rehashes. The fact that she voted farside proves that she wasn't completely committed to bandwagoning you. Her questioning was new as well.
P:Edit - Even thought pisskop is currently flatulence, I'm not ready to wagon him. I'm still working on developing a read on him.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 364, OceanWind wrote:In post 360, 3dicerolling wrote:The fact that she voted farside proves that she wasn't completely committed to bandwagoning you. Her questioning was new as well.
The fact that she voted Farside is actually incriminating on her part because based on her thoughts so far, she should have voted me. I think she voted Farside not because she wasn't committed to bandwagoning me (which isn't a scumtell anyways) but because she didn't want to look opportunistic by joining at that time, the largest wagon. Instead she wanted to leave me up as a "compromise wagon" on her "second scumread" later on in the day so she doesn't take heat for it.
You don't think wagoning Pisskop is an effective way to get a better read on him?
I can see the angle you are attacking here. I'm just not completely sold that was the motivation behind her post.
Wagoning can be a pretty effective way to get a read, but it's less effective when he knows I'm just voting him to drive his wagon up. It's basically like when you vote someone and are like "derp, pressure vote"
@Dierfire - I outlined why I thought it was opportunistic in post 185, but if you need further explanation, I would be happy to elaborate.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 374, pisskop wrote:rather than atually check you shove your foot down your throat onan attempt to look thought out
In post 375, Dierfire wrote:In post 372, pisskop wrote:wanderer left the site, shame on you
That's fine, I guess.She was already dodging questionsbefore the replacement.
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 476, farside22 wrote:In post 473, pisskop wrote:All youre doing is distracting me.
No I'm in a bad mood.
I'm ready to be done with mafia (sadly and happily at the same time).
Seeing the same crap thrown in and people just ignore the obvious scum and I feel like screaming at the computer or pounding on the table.
Then I see some bad fucking reasoning why players scum read someone and I'm looking at my computer and wonder how many brain cells I lost reading it.
Tell you what.
Vote confirmed scum brantz, lets see him flip scum and then scum team will kill me and I can be done with this game.
mmk?
farside.
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
Honestly man, I'm not really too confident on my scum reads this game. I think a pisskop lynch would reveal a lot through interactions, but I still think wanderer is town, and I can explain why now.
I just finished playing a mini normal game (http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=63842 here if you want to take a look) with Wanderer where we were both scum. I feel like I got to know wanderer scum very well, and quite frankly, her opening post looked nothing like she did in the mini normal game.
I'd like to see the replacements light on this game. (particularly the lane slot because I'm town reading him pretty hard)
@Skull - Will we get a deadline extension for the replacements or nah?-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 537, OceanWind wrote:@3dice - Why do you think she voted Farside over me?
Probably because her gut felt like farside was scummier than you? I can't really read her mind.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
In post 545, pisskop wrote:Dier or ocean is where the rope's going today if I can help it.
You might want to push dier then because my votes not going on ocean today.-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-
-
3dicerolling Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
-