In post 204, VI Zexion wrote:@Xaldin I basically disagree that Larxene's tone in response to being challenged on the claim is null - I think there's some pretty clear scum motivation in attacking people who don't just accept the claim at face value; you could argue that it's just personality indicative or part of the roleplay that Larxene seems to be doing or whatever and I don't think it's a strong point for that reason but I don't think you can just discard it out of hand. Think you've also basically just dismissed the other points without engaging with them on an intellectual level at all; the crux of it is that Larxene's reads are badly formed and badly held and none of it feels very town - you can disagree with the way that's expressed but I don't think it's very reasonable to just say "those points are bad there's nothing wrong with Larxene" and not engage with the read beyond that. What is your read on Larxene?
Part two of this is... what are you doing with your vote? What are any of your reads besides Xigbar? Why is Xigbar even a scumread? Don't think you've explained anything at all and I'm starting to wonder which of my scumreads might be wrong if you're scum here because 182 is frankly pretty awful from you - I'm presuming you're scumreading Luxord here? Literally zero nuance in your stances here that might help me see that you've put thought into your reads or the gamestate overall at this point.
It was snarky and I do not see how snarky responses can be seen as attacking, I do believe she is playing the character and it is AI (In all honesty I would too but I dunno how to roleplay Xaldin
)
I think Larxene is town yes.
I did engage all points mind you.
I said how the first was pretty bad because it tried to make snarky/roleplayish into looking like an attack.
The second point was about a read being lazy which not only is it not an alignment thing most of the time but it was way to early to have solid reads anyway
His last point was the one he self contradicted. He said she didn't care about his content when in the same post she said would await for more.
Then xigbar goes to vote me which is in on itself a read he hasn't explained and just stated. Which is in his own words lazy, something he was scumreading Larx for.
As for my vote, I don't vote much in general. That something I always did and probably always do.
Casting 1 vote is nothing, do you really need to see a vote in order to get the feeling someone expresses a scumread?
As for others reads I can tell you that Laxeus seems pretty iffy, his vote on me was pretty horrible and opportunistic there. He followed a read from xigbar that he had not explained without explainign anything himself.
