I don't see the motivation here.In post 37, II Xigbar wrote:Both posts felt played up.
Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Sure. What role does that and is scum-aligned? Just doesn't make sense to me.In post 45, VI Zexion wrote:Care to finish that thought?
This is a TERRIBLE vote.In post 51, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: 6 Zex
As someone who has no flavor knowledge, all of the names are frustratingly similar.
So what's the point of your vote? It's not pressure related or else it's uselessly pressure related. It's not toward actually finding scum, as clearly stated.In post 54, X Luxord wrote:I'm not coming in with any real scumreads so I'm just poking and prodding at people I consider voteable. Crux of it is really that I just don't agree with your reads. If ever I earnestly push you, I'd explain it.
A disagreement with reads can be stated. A vote is for scum.
I enjoy Marluxia's content.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I agree with this. That's why I didn't vote him.In post 83, XII Larxene wrote:I was onboard with Luxord scum until I saw him copy his notes. I don't really care about the content but I don't see any scum there. The guy has an honest face~! I wanna see more once he gets a foothold.
Quite the elaboration.In post 84, XII Larxene wrote:Actually I'll just elaborate. Vexen and Axel are the scummiest here right now, full stop.
The only reason why I'm not voting Larxene is due to the investigation immunity.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I think you need to take a hard look on what I've contributed then. It's page 5 not 50. I've established reads.In post 112, VII Saix wrote:They have not contributed anything despite having the opportunity to do so.
Which Saix will then follow-up by saying how circular logic is a scumte--In post 112, VII Saix wrote:The 1st and 3rd para are examples of circular logic.
Ah yes, the ole "over-conscious or self-aware player that gets hassled easily" scumtell. Perhaps I should read more about it!In post 112, VII Saix wrote:All 3 of the paras (and Rox's earlier responses) felt like uttered by an over-conscious or self-aware player. It's an observation that usually extra powerful roles are confident and don't get hassled this easily.
I agree with this.In post 116, XII Larxene wrote:Unfortunately, Xiggy looks town, so this will probably be annoying to deal with. Can't wait.
No.In post 122, XIII Roxas wrote:Do you have a desire to join me on my wagon there?
Roxas v Xigbar is townvtown. That being said, here's where scum really lies -
Vote: Saix-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
You may ask! Don't be too shy now!In post 144, VII Saix wrote:I wanna know the reason behind it.
I will pass coach!In post 144, VII Saix wrote:I guess I am saying the same thing in three different ways. So here's the concise point. You need to do 3 things. 1. elaborate your posts, 2. give a reason for your verdicts, and 3. your expectations from others need to reflect in your own playstyle.
I'm glad you talked about how my reads are bad or something useful and didn't just go on some weird tangent about how my posts don't appeal to you because you decided not to ask me about them.
I agree that it was a bad vote but it is not coming from scum.In post 146, II Xigbar wrote:I have a good feeling about Roxas scum regardless of Larxene's alignment at this point. That OMGUS was absolutely horrid.
WAH! I SIGNED UP FOR A GAME WHERE I HAVE TO ASK QUESTIONS AND BE INQUISITIVE AND I DON'T WANT TO DO EITHER OF THOSE! WAH!In post 156, VII Saix wrote:People, I don't have the key to your thoughts. It literally takes just one additional sentence to explain what you are saying.
Buzz buzz buzzIn post 157, VI Zexion wrote:very disturbing lack of scumhunting or just general anything in their ISO;
Usually a TvT argument denotes that I think both are town, yes.In post 158, X Luxord wrote:Based on Axel's previous posts, it does sort of seem like Axel could just be expressing genuine townreads on Xigbar and Roxas though.
Why waste my breath if you won't even read my ISO?In post 168, XII Larxene wrote:But let's talk about why I'm scum!
On Saix:
If you guys want to call me coasting, that's not entirely wrong. Sorry I don't play around all day and sit on my keyboard for more than once or twice a day for this stuff. However, Saix is the antithesis.
Has anyone actually read this? Really read this?In post 108, VII Saix wrote:12 Larxene: Her claim is pro-town. A scum invest-immune doesn't gain much by claiming, at such early stages. On the other hand, it's a weak town role if any, so if she is a scum invest-immune, she had to be a really audacious/even defensive player to claim so early. Clubbed with this however are other things that make her a stronger townlean for me. She dislikes 4 Vex and clears 10 Lux for exactly the same points that I found valid in Vex's and Lux's behaviour. Suggests logic at work.
OK.Saix wrote:Her claim is pro-town.
There's really no reason to explain your thought process here.Saix wrote:A scum invest-immune doesn't gain much by claiming, at such early stages. On the other hand, it's a weak town role if any, so if she is a scum invest-immune, she had to be a really audacious/even defensive player to claim so early.
After explaining why the claim was a pro-town move, more justification is needed.Saix wrote:Clubbed with this however are other things that make her a stronger townlean for me.
Clear implication that he thinks that scum can't act logically which is clearly wrong.Saix wrote:She dislikes 4 Vex and clears 10 Lux for exactly the same points that I found valid in Vex's and Lux's behaviour. Suggests logic at work.
And yet again - what? No one who has ever played scum leaves Excel notes? Are you serious? This is scum 101 and, if I have a hunch, I have no idea why Xigbar doesn't go after this sort of behavior.In post 108, VII Saix wrote:10 Lux: I was scumreading Lux for fluffposting till I read his excel notes. No one goes to that extent as a scum. His notes serve as a good enough evidence for me to believe he is a town. But his other posts have been shaky. So, overall, null. Actually I wanna shift him to townlean. Will see what happens.
Let's act shady and then complain about other people not explaining themselves!In post 108, VII Saix wrote:11 Marluxia: I really didn't like their 77 where they are shading 10 Lux. Their points for shading Lux also are invalid acc to me. There's a possibility that I might be wrong about them, but I am not revealing the reason.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Can we go a little deeper into this? Mostly because I don't get the relevance here. I get what you're saying but I don't get how it leads to scum rather than, as you also stated a possibility, something about her just playing the game a fun way.In post 189, I Xemnas wrote:I worry that the attitude presented by her, especially in her entrance, is overcompensating to hide her treacherous intentions.
Ok - so here's my question - which one of these is an actual stronger scumread?In post 189, I Xemnas wrote:Yet regarding Lexaeus, I must note that his stated reason for voting Xigbar rings hollow, it appears irrelevant to Xigbar's loyalty.
A) Person who votes based off of bad logic
B) Person who coasts and isn't posting relevant things
Keep in mind that if I'm coasting, you're just as guilty!
I'm starting to feel this way too but Marluxia is just as guilty. Xaldin has just been posting more recently.In post 192, V Lexaeus wrote:Xaldin, however, I can get behind. Three posts and not one of them showing even a hint of Town thinking.
It was only a joke Mod!-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Are you implying that scum can't be honest?In post 205, IX Demyx wrote:I actually really like this for the honesty in the post so there's that.
219 is a great post for determining alignment.
224 is a scumclaim.
I don't get how someone actually says THESE:
And can IMMEDIATELY follow it up with THIS:In post 224, VI Zexion wrote:Trying to discredit my take on your content thus far as just noise doesn't invalidate the reasoning that I've stated; you're welcome to state my reasoning as noise but I think it pretty apparently is not. I don't find the reasons for your townread on Roxas to be genuine; I find the manner in which you are engaging me here to be furthermore scummy; I think that your attitude insinuates that you "know better" about "how the game is played" and that's a position from which you inherently have the advantage, it's a position from which you're poised to start an argument and win it in order to prove a point, not to scumhunt; I think if you were interested in scumhunting you wouldn't discount my critique of your read as just noise, the lack of receptivity from you when you've just started your catchup is scummy because the strength of your read as you're defending it right now doesn't match with where it should be if you were town just at this point in your understanding of the game and your development of your reads.
It's SUCH a textbook scum move. If you look in all of my scum games, I guarantee you I say a variation of this line in about half of those games. Granted, this isn't important right now because my claim isn't verifiable in anyway but I am sure it is right for most players.In post 224, VI Zexion wrote:I'm talking to you because my concerns are with you; just because I think you're scummy doesn't mean I'm dead-set that you're scum end of story and never talk to you again; even if I were sure you were scum I would still talk to you because I treat my scumreads like they're town and that's playstyle.
It's OK! I am apparently being censored!In post 236, XIII Roxas wrote:I do have townreads. I don't have much in the way of solid scumreads and I have a fair number of nulls, but I have some solid townreads and some are on players not oft. talked about and/or controversial, e.g. Marluxia, Axel. That, aside from obvious ones like Larxene.
Yucky.In post 244, XIII Roxas wrote:{Xaldin}
You were doing so well!In post 244, XIII Roxas wrote:Marluxia}-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Stance. Play has moderately improved since Page 1.In post 252, XIII Roxas wrote:By Yucky, did you mean that Xaldin is Yucky, or did you mean that my Xaldin stance is Yucky?-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
In post 144, VII Saix wrote:Axel, you are essentially omgus-ing coz there's no reason accompanying your vote.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
That's fair. How long until you move your vote to a bet--In post 266, I Xemnas wrote:To clarify, I do not suspect Larxene of treachery right now. My initial impression of her attitude was that she was an overcompensating traitor, but as I delved deeper into the records, I started to see the possibility that her attitude is a result of tomfoolery, not treachery. What I still find relevant is that Xigbar's initial impression was similar to that of mine, which I believe to indicate that our perspectives, and thus our intentions, are the same; to find the traitors.
How the FUCK am I being an inactive player at this point?Xemnas wrote:Whether your lack of activity-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
No more nice Axel now - this shit is starting to get infuriating. I haven't fucked around this game and I've answered most people's questions and offered my own opinions about the game. Meanwhile, my main "scumtell" is that I haven't talked about the game. When asking for clarification about this, I get nothing.
I amsosorry I haven't brought anything revolutionary but you guys don't even read my posts. So like great?-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Right but to follow up on this, godfather gets a town result. Larxene's((? might be a different person, I'm not checking) ability implies that if you check her, you get no result.In post 281, IX Demyx wrote:
The question was about the scum motivation for wanting to be checked, not for avoiding it.In post 279, III Xaldin wrote:
Godfather isn't immune, he comes back as town, scum.godfsther would want to be targeted not discourage it.In post 257, IX Demyx wrote:Godfather
How did you even come to that conclusion.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
If it's a disagreement, then why do you think I'm scum? For disagreeing? Feeling bad? Now I want more too!In post 291, XII Larxene wrote:Axel's 76: Don't like how he takes issue with how Luxord uses his vote in the absence of scumreads. It just looks like a disagreement about how votes should be used and it... god, I should do this later when I can actually words. I didn't like the post, feels bad. "A vote is for scum." is so... something to be declared in a discussion thread.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
OK - and that's your best scumtell on him?In post 297, XIII Roxas wrote:Wherein Xaldin continues to do nothing.
Definite pass.
In post 303, VII Saix wrote:Who is opposed to Axel lynch and why?In post 144, VII Saix wrote:If you really think I am scum, the motivation needs to be to take me to L, and you aren't gonna achieve that with this post and such a vote.
11 days to deadline.In post 303, VII Saix wrote:This decision can't happen closer to the deadline.
Tell me right now what town player actually worries about getting acertainlynch - rather thanAlynch - 11 days before the deadline.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Saix's posts literally just go around in circles. I don't like Vexen's content but I appreciate that he's trying. I agree with Zexion on Xigbar but again, I'm scum because (enter nothing here)
Meanwhile, my entire post on how Saix's posts are fake as fuck is just flat out ignored. I'm scum for not giving out content but the one post that has content is blantantly ignored. Like what the fuck do y'all want? I'm starting to lose the last little bit of care I had to be honest.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Please don't assume things - I said started and it's a couple days into the game.In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:@Axel if you don't care then why did you join the game? You have 20 posts and you haven't seemed to care from the start
You also haven't asked what you're confused or need clarification on.In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:you haven't talked about reasoning in any depth
Feel free to quote this! This is a complete and utter misrep!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:you say that Roxas' claim doesn't make sense
Nope! Yet again, you're assuming my intentions rather than ASKING me questions. No shit you have no clue what I'm thinking if you're trying to get into my head without talking to me.In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:you shade Luxord by saying he should have hard reads when it's page 2
I think they are - that's our disagreement.In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:you say you're scumreading Larxene but refuse to vote her for what are basically NAI reasons
Wow! Opinions!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:your reasoning for your scumread there is completely lacking + you agree with her 83 but don't even challenge or seem to notice the fact that the post doesn't make any sense
Sounds familiar, no?In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:you vote me because you think I don't want to talk
Nope! Still not playing the game to your rules!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:saying "I scumread Larxene because X, Y, Z" is establishing a read
You are fake news!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:discredit Saix for scumreading you rather than respond substantively
Go on! Mash on the keyboard harder!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:6 posts into your ISO and I already need a new paragraph because of how disgusting this is...
Feel free to quote a post where Saix tries to engage with me on a substantial basis of in-game talk and I owe you nothing but the sweet satisfaction of being wrong!In post 375, VI Zexion wrote:You refuse to engage with Saix again
I'm kind of getting bored now though - if you have questions, please stop assuming you know what I'm thinking and fucking talk to me and stop stuffing words into my mouth.
Xigbar why can't we form a townbloc together and win the game again
lolIn post 406, VI Zexion wrote:Yeah you are 100% creeping me out so I need to exit thread I think or I'm going to end up scumreading you.
This reads game flavor to me.In post 424, II Xigbar wrote:'you supposed traitors' feels like he's trying to hard to distance himself from the traitors. Like, you guys- as opposed to him.
Can you go more into this?In post 424, II Xigbar wrote:is weird. If he thought I was a blatant liar he should be outright pushing me, rather than questioning, and I strongly feel like that he's scum for that.
See? We both see the same shit man.In post 429, II Xigbar wrote:"xigbar was killed b/c obvtown and invested and to frame xaldin"!!-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
But I feel exactly how you feel about Saix about Xaldin.In post 463, II Xigbar wrote:I don't feel as confident that you're scum as -others- do but if you vote Xaldin I'll be a lot more willing to townread you.
I just don't see scum flashing anywhere with Xaldin's posts rather than inactive player. I've read everything you've said, don't get me wrong, and there was a second where I thought he could be scum. But I don't really see that. I don't even townread the guy, just don't scumread him.
Do you think it's impossible for me to have 2 scumreads?In post 464, XII Larxene wrote:His vote progression is also very strange. He votes Zex in 93 with reasons, then doesn't mention him again and switches to Saix in 143. Seems to be ok in 148, then focuses on Zex again in 249 and 452 with no more mentions of Saix, but leaves his vote there.
I am still more than willing to switch to Zexion if you wanna team up there.In post 474, II Xigbar wrote:Backed into a corner when she thought that the wagon was 100% going through she voted and made a huge show of it with this post.
As soon as there's another viable wagon with Larxene switching over she's immediately off this wagon.
Wait - this is your response? To everything? Really?In post 482, III Xaldin wrote:Zex how the can you scumread both me and xig? It makes no sense.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Xigbar's post about Zexion's vote switch isIn post 485, XI Marluxia wrote:I think that Xigbar is probably town. I don't think the level that he panics about the game going out of control it it's not going exactly how he desires is faked and I don't think the worry about people interpreting his imminent death as a frame kill is faked.
I think his argument that Zex is scum who hates bussing and is trying to keep their partner alive by saying they're not lynching them to spite Xigbar is a little wonky, though - if Xaldin is scum, Zex most definitely isn't.righton the money.
For a player who questions the fuck out of everything, he just randomly switches his vote around? Really? You're going to go with he was being coy for once?-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
In re-reading that post, I want to point out that there's something suspicious about that vote/post rather than it being a very solid connection, if that makes sense? I dunno, I've been toying with the idea of voting Xaldin because that entrance back in was terrible. I will compromise on deadline.In post 494, II Xigbar wrote:Axel, I'm concerned that you've agreed with me on Xaldin scum but are refusing to vote them.
It's because you wrote three paragraphs of frustration against me and my play rather than analyzing what I've done. Sorry your plan isn't working too well here buddy!In post 495, VI Zexion wrote:Tell me how many scum jumped all over this shit and pushed Axel:
OK - that's fair but you at least agree there's something suspicious about it? Doesn't fit the puzzle of Zexion too well.In post 500, XIII Roxas wrote:This is also not a bus vote.
PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTIn post 506, VI Zexion wrote:Xigbar it's pretty clear that I think you're bussing Xaldin
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAIn post 506, VI Zexion wrote:Anyway I'll follow you onto Xaldin
Ja definitely feelIn post 517, IX Demyx wrote:I'll probably vote Xaldin just cuz I don't have a read there and the wagon doesn't feel gross to me, most recent vote notwithstanding. Still wanna go and reread his posts to be sure tho, but like between Ziggy and Rox there I'm almost willing to just don my fleece and baa along, ya dig?-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Nevermind - this is possibly VIIn post 549, VII Saix wrote:Stick to your vote in the end if it leads to no lynch
Xemnas proceeds to not vote...why?In post 567, I Xemnas wrote:Xaldin, should you prove to be innocent, let it be known that your death was not in vain. You shall be remembered as a martyr, and your name will be venerated for eternity, while the traitors among us shall be remembered for nothing but their failure.
wow really? If any of you actually take Saix's opinion seriously after this post, you just need to look at this post againIn post 591, VII Saix wrote:By the way, two people have a double vote? That's kinda ridiculous, and I am not buying it.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I agree with this but I just read Luxord 1's posts and damn is it hard to compromise here.In post 702, II Xigbar wrote:There are 17 hours left in this game. If we no lynch attempting to lynch this slot today do you think there's a chance in hell that we don't assume that the NL happened because scum weren't voting and quicklynch them tomorrow?
You're voting them or you're ensuring that Saix isn't just not lynched today, you're also ensuring he's not lynched tomorrow.
I'll read this in the morning (~6 hours) but I would much rather an actually shitty slot like Marluxia here. Player will continue to prod dodge an give minimal content. Xemnas also fits this case but well...-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
That has nothing to do with Marluxia as much as it has to do with Xaldin.In post 924, IV Vexen wrote:
Or doesn't read your posts/the game at all enough to realize that no actions happened last night.In post 916, VIII Axel wrote:Can someone explain to me a world where Saix will tunnel down my throat for "not posting enough in-game content" but doesn't say shit about Marluxia other than calling him a SR once and forgetting about him the entire game?
Nope, I only asked why Saix has called me out for not posting enough. He has also done it to:In post 920, XI Marluxia wrote:I don't really like you whining about all lurkers not being treated fairly by Saix.
Xemnas -a confirmed townie:
In post 363, VII Saix wrote:Mod, possible to please disregard posts such as these and prod Xemnas? it's between more than 48 hours since their penultimate post and even that was content-wise zilch.
If someone is a conf town, they better be more active and involved. This slot is idle.
Demyx:In post 592, VII Saix wrote:With all due respect, Xemnas is useless.
In post 112, VII Saix wrote:Axel and Demyx are closer to the null pile coz there's nothing much to go by. Why are they not in null then? They have not contributed anything despite having the opportunity to do so. I could most likely push them to the null pile, if they made more sense to me.In post 706, VII Saix wrote:Maybe even Demyx, or Marl, or maybe even Rox, with sufficuent cases against them.By the by, thanks for making me re-read some of these posts!
Then silence? That's a cool claim!In post 108, VII Saix wrote:11 Marluxia: I really didn't like their 77 where they are shading 10 Lux. Their points for shading Lux also are invalid acc to me. There's a possibility that I might be wrong about them, but I am not revealing the reason.
Do you think that I am honestly without any doubt scumreading Saix for not scumreading my other scumread? How did this make sense in your head?In post 920, XI Marluxia wrote:I don't think that it's a real attempt to read him
Yes, he was down your throat with such posts like:In post 920, XI Marluxia wrote:especially when he said that he was willing to lynch me earlier, when he had more reasons to jump your shit other than "not posting enough", and when he was pretty open about you not being a significant read for him earlier, just the most significant.
Oh! He voted you and Roxas, right?In post 112, VII Saix wrote:From Scumlean to Scum: Axel, Demyx < Vexen < Marluxia, Roxas.
Nope!
Hey! That's weird...still no vote?In post 112, VII Saix wrote:Marluxia and Roxas are at the top for the aforementioned reasons, but if I had to make a choice I will vote for Marluxia coz of Rox's semi-claim.
Well! That's definitely a flip flop!In post 114, VII Saix wrote:I would not like to vote for Marluxia too.
I guess I'm wrong about who you are then? This was quite an unexpected and weird post to read.Xigbar wrote:Your gods are not our gods, Axel. The people that you worship are dead and gone, and you're not even an old player. Nor a good one, frankly.
My playstyle obviously seems to offend you, the respect that I'm given by others obviously bothers you, so you pretend that you don't know who I am and bash me anonymously?
Please. It's pathetic and you need a serious dose in humility.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Wouldn't a bad player also make the same move to ignore teammates?In post 956, II Xigbar wrote:With virtually any scumteam possibility I can come up with, their play makes no sense as scum. Someone on their team would be telling them to stop poking me.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
1) Too scummy to be scum is totally a thing
2) I can only use my power when there's more than 9 people alive. I either use it N1 (12 people) or N2 (10 people, assuming no vigs)
I don't like how Xaldin is just twisting things because he's clearly butthurt that he couldn't use his PR but I think that still leans townsidrd rather than scum-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
These posts are what fuel my Vexen TR.In post 1107, IV Vexen wrote:FTR, I have varying degrees of townreads or needs a cop reads on everyone except
Xal
Saix
Dem
Lux
I'm fairly certain lynching those four is an autowin, and I don't want Xal to go before using his triple-track so he has to be tomorrow. Today, Saix has given me the impression that he actually does know what he's doing, which is even more damning of his behavior D1. Pretending to be VI to get townreads is not at all something town does, and I can definitely see someone trying that in this.
Not gonna vote there until Xig gets his chance to make me laugh with an attempt at lynching me, but I'm almost certainly gonna vote there later.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????In post 1112, XI Marluxia wrote:And this is like when two kids are talking behind your back and then they laugh and point at you but when you confront them they act like nothing happened.
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
And I apologize, this post has been delayed due to RL constraints that are now 100% gone. Hope y'all are ready.In post 1526, XI Marluxia wrote:One can only hope.
Let's reminisce about how this was right! I don't have too much to comment there except that it means I or Xigbar are dead tonight. Oh well!
I agree but now I have way too many town reads. Marluxia and Zexion cannot be the only scum here.In post 1521, XIII Roxas wrote:Okay so I don't have the words to vocalize the why but at this point I absolutely do need to vocalize: 1428 is town.
What?In post 1529, XI Marluxia wrote:I'm pretty much ready to vote Vexen again, but I'd like to see a few votes come off Saix first.
Why does every post that Marluxia make give me a very weird and bad feeling??
I don't think you're fucking up either.In post 1536, I Xemnas wrote:This post by Axel is like a distillation of what gets said to a confirmed town who isn't totally fucking up and can't be ridiculed for a stance. It's a much less subtle approach than Vexen's was. It's a level of politeness that I don't often see in mafia.
Anti, I appreciate that you put actual game (like since we're talking about Saix, you posted the data battle) relevant videos in the votecounts. It's fun!
I will admit that I hate role debates/arguments/etc. so my opinion here is baseless and probably wrong. It is definitely the weakest part of my play. I don't think Xigbar is lying here about how he knew there was a strongman which is why he mostly is town. I don't think you come into a game as scum and start revealing your cards left and right. Then again, Xigbar is a far more long-term strategist than me. How much so? Not that much.
Most of my reads right now has been consistent on play rather than role. It feels awful but if this is definitely TvS (which based on play looks like it too) then Xigbar is 100% the town here now.
What I don't get more than anything here is why do I only have one ability?In post 1598, II Xigbar wrote:although I will point out that Axel's theoretically could if the strongman flavour was just like Eternal Flames or something.
Vote: Vexen
I don't think 1638 is a good defense and even reeks of buddying.
This was my next tier scumread. But I agree with you, it was a bad vote overall in context.In post 1660, X Luxord wrote:Yeah I recalled correctly, Axel is sidelining the Vex/Xigbar fight really fucking hard and this vote is completely useless.
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
His role - I have no confidence in the possibility of Saix making up a role like that and not saying to his buds "Are you sure this is going to work?"In post 1701, X Luxord wrote:Are you completely convinced that Saix is town now?
Can you talk about why if so?-
-
VIII Axel Goon
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I said the same thing. Zexion and Marluxia are my only two choices tomorrow regardless of this lynch.In post 1711, IX Demyx wrote:This is such a scum just moving votes to whatever is getting a lynch.
How are people ignoring this guy?
I hope you are aware that includes my trust - regardless of your incorrect read on me.In post 1720, II Xigbar wrote:I'm cashing in every bit of vested trust in my reads on this vexen read. Act like I have a guilty on Vexen and treat this as a 1v1.
This is a terrible argument and you have to know that it's a little ego-boasting. More than the usual.In post 1721, II Xigbar wrote:I've seen this behaviour so many times before and it's always, ALWAYS from town. Scum do sheep me but they do it different, they try to add their own shit to it because they feel like it looks better.
@ALL: The deadline is tomorrow and Vexen is at L-1. Please do not vote outside of Xigbar or Vexen.-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I don't see any scumtells here.In post 1736, IV Vexen wrote:There is no way in hell townxigbar gets this lynch on me through. Look carefully at what he's posted today. We spent a week waiting for a case that a ten year old could have typed in 20 minutes. He has literally not referenced a single piece of it since. He's calling me scum while shouting about how everyone owes him the trust to lynch me and other people are voting him cause they don't like him. This isn't about popularity, but instead of arguing why I'm scum he's doing his absolute best to ensure it is.-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
This didn't happen.In post 1799, IV Vexen wrote:He active lurked for no reason through the entire dayphase
That's not what happened either.In post 1799, IV Vexen wrote:dropped a shit case that was supposed to convince everyone and god of my guilt and then immediately abandoned it to try to trade his name for my lynch
Why would anyone want to repeat themselves? It is about the one biggest pet peeve I have with mafia. I don't want to requote myself. Go read it yourself and refute it, then we'll talk more. If you're saying that he dropped it and hasn't refuted something, then there's something we can talk about. At the moment, I don't 100% see that.
You quoted Post 476. A post on Page 20ish. Really? You're going to pretend that everything is the same?In post 1804, V Lexaeus wrote:He fights strongly for Xaladin then offers to be it the next day.
Then just gloms onto a survival wagon on Vexen.
Luxord is switching spots with Lex atm.
Most of the commentary in this is down-right awful if not just also randomly posting quotes that are clearly part of Xigbar's playstyle rather than being towny or scummy.In post 1815, IV Vexen wrote:Spoiler: Not even close to townposting
Same.In post 1862, X Luxord wrote:I don't understand why you're unvoting?
I am 100% on board with this assessment and its why I'm OK with Vexen as much as gut is saying no everytime I look at his role again and again and again.In post 1891, X Luxord wrote:Like, I wish both of you would stop acting like things that aren't "WOAH HOLY SHIT WOW 100% SCUMCLAIM FROM LUXORD FOR SOMETHING" when you aren't even critically thinking about anything I'm saying and are just wildly slinging shit at me.
I'm not fucking scum and the more you push me for shit-tier reasons the more I just want this game to be fucking over.
PLEASE.In post 1938, IX Demyx wrote:Can I interest you all in a marlexia lynch?-
-
VIII Axel
-
-
VIII Axel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: July 20, 2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
-