To save humanity?In post 2300, II Xigbar wrote:I think Demyx is our best bet right now.
Naah. I am going to pass on that offer.
To save humanity?In post 2300, II Xigbar wrote:I think Demyx is our best bet right now.
I'm not gonna ask zexion to do anything because our convo right now is basically two bulls being bullheadedIn post 2313, X Luxord wrote:Axel can you please poke Zexion to explain why they're not voting me and voting Saix instead?
I am in complete agreement here. Let's be very clear. I just don't think that's the best way to play the game now that we have performed 2 MLs.In post 2317, I Xemnas wrote:My concern is that the confbias and grudge he's holding show that his approach isn't logical at all, his reads are screwy and he'll vote town in XYLO.
Firmly agree with this. Only reason I'm not voting Marluxia is due to this. Same with Zexion and our little PT.In post 2320, X Luxord wrote:So, can we vote someone we think is going to flip scum?
In effect, lynching Saix is pretty much equivalent to not lynching him as it brings us down a cycle.
Though, I strongly agree that we should be pushing him to use his shot tonight.
In post 2323, I Xemnas wrote:@Xigbar, Zexion, Roxas:
Do you agree Zaix should use their vig shot tonight? If so, we should be talking about both who to lynch and who to vig today. If not, then please tell me why not. We're on evens and their role is the fix for the global roleblock.
In post 2302, VI Zexion wrote:In post 2261, I Xemnas wrote:As far as I'm concerned, the alternative to lynching you now is for you to use your vig shot as directed by town tonight.
In post 2327, VIII Axel wrote:I'm not gonna ask zexion to do anything because our convo right now is basically two bulls being bullheadedIn post 2313, X Luxord wrote:Axel can you please poke Zexion to explain why they're not voting me and voting Saix instead?
It's actually pretty funny from an outside view how clashy our PT is, if that makes sense? it's basically me - hi, then zex - hey, how do u feel about this, then me - im not voting you (as a response), and then zex is like what doe that mean
In post 2327, VIII Axel wrote:Firmly agree with this. Only reason I'm not voting Marluxia is due to this. Same with Zexion and our little PT.In post 2320, X Luxord wrote:So, can we vote someone we think is going to flip scum?
In effect, lynching Saix is pretty much equivalent to not lynching him as it brings us down a cycle.
Though, I strongly agree that we should be pushing him to use his shot tonight.
@Xemnas: 2 MLs meaning that the two people dead are town who were lynched.In post 2297, XI Marluxia wrote:Zexion, why did you neighborize Axel? Did you know you'd have a post restriction when doing so?
Only one town player has been lynched, though?In post 2335, VIII Axel wrote:Keep in mind that Zexion hasnottalked about 2330 in the PT, even though he has the ability to do so and confront me directly about it. Additionally, if Zexion wants to go ahead and call bullshit on anything I've said so far, Zexion has the gif ability to do so. If Zexion does do so, the PT won't mean too much anymore and I'd be worried about the surprise I referenced earlier.
Why do you think it's fake?In post 2326, IX Demyx wrote:Can we lynch the person faking a posting restriction?
In post 2313, X Luxord wrote:Axel can you please poke Zexion to explain why they're not voting me and voting Saix instead?
Because I have literally no idea why they would be from what they're posting if they think I was apparently bussing and am being fake compared to just "oh well Saix said Axel is a nightskipper".
I don't get it?
In post 2335, VIII Axel wrote:Keep in mind that Zexion hasnottalked about 2330 in the PT, even though he has the ability to do so and confront me directly about it. Additionally, if Zexion wants to go ahead and call bullshit on anything I've said so far, Zexion has the gif ability to do so. If Zexion does do so, the PT won't mean too much anymore and I'd be worried about the surprise I referenced earlier.
This also raises Axel's stock a bit, in my opinion. It's a fairly smooth townslip if it's coming from scum and he doesn't seem like he'd have that range as scum.In post 2338, VIII Axel wrote:OH - Ok. I'm stupid. I forgot Lex was a night kill.
This acting as the basis of Demyx's push today is also absolutely atrocious. I don't know if it's typical for him as a player, but none of his pushes this game have seemed genuine; they've all been shallow and poorly reasoned.In post 2292, IX Demyx wrote:Zex doesn't have post restriction. That's stupid.
Stop feeding into that nonsense
This is how confusing the PT is.In post 2340, VI Zexion wrote:In post 2313, X Luxord wrote:Axel can you please poke Zexion to explain why they're not voting me and voting Saix instead?
Because I have literally no idea why they would be from what they're posting if they think I was apparently bussing and am being fake compared to just "oh well Saix said Axel is a nightskipper".
I don't get it?
Oh, and remember this? Where he actively calls bullshit on me for this?In post 2341, VI Zexion wrote:In post 2335, VIII Axel wrote:Keep in mind that Zexion hasnottalked about 2330 in the PT, even though he has the ability to do so and confront me directly about it. Additionally, if Zexion wants to go ahead and call bullshit on anything I've said so far, Zexion has the gif ability to do so. If Zexion does do so, the PT won't mean too much anymore and I'd be worried about the surprise I referenced earlier.
Do you think scumXaldin targets those three players as scum tri-tracker? And then actually claims the results?Marluxia wrote:Axel being town would make Xaldin more likely to be scum, but he doesn't look particularly scummy. Am still probably most confident lynching in Demyx/Axel and moving onto Zexion if we see a town flip in Axel and revisiting some of my weaker townreads if Demyx flips town.