I agree with you up until your conclusion.In post 62, davesaz wrote:Tea's 57 is casting shade on what look to me to be a couple of good leads.
Tea would be a good vote but I think the careful play by Norwegian is scummier.
VOTE: Norwegian
VOTE: Tea
I agree with you up until your conclusion.In post 62, davesaz wrote:Tea's 57 is casting shade on what look to me to be a couple of good leads.
Tea would be a good vote but I think the careful play by Norwegian is scummier.
VOTE: Norwegian
How is the timing similar?In post 89, Chemist1422 wrote:Your vote on Layla had similar reasoning and timingIn post 87, Luca Blight wrote:What have I done that’s the same as NorwegianboyEE?
I disagree with this. Content is gold at this stage of the game, regardless of whether the arguments are good or bad.In post 110, Layla wrote:I don't actually find tea scummy. I have him as null, but true null, not leaning towards any alignment.
1. People showed concern about 74. It's a bit overzealous and overall bad yes. Does it draw aggro? Yes. But is it scummy? Remember that bad != scummy.
2. His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?
Now why do I say such thing when I pretty much don't have any read on tea? Because I think the direction of arguments thrown against him is wrong and that kind of arguments only bring wasted pages in the game.
I don’t like this; it feels very showy.In post 246, Zote the Mighty wrote:UNVOTE:
The speed at which the Tea wagon built up and the little resistance it had is definitely something worth noting. It makes me think that scum either found an opportunity to hop on an early wagon, or found an early opportunity to distance from their partner. I'm gonna take a look at all the people who voted for Tea.
This feels like playing innocent about the setup. The OP is pretty clear in what it says - why is he expecting anyone to answer this question?In post 233, Wake1 wrote:So taking a cursory glance at the game, I have a few developing reads, but not much yet. In general I really hate Day 1 and do much better on Day 2 and onward, because I have solid information to work with.
Before I post my reads I have a question because it's not clear: are we dealing with more than one Scum faction? Because the way I read it in the OP it feels like there being two Scum factions is definitely possible.
This seems like he's just giving commentary on Vork's actions rather than trying to work out the meaning behind it. It's a very easy thing to jump on.In post 235, Wake1 wrote:As forVorkuta, I don't really like how he jumped on Flavor's wagon in #18. Then in #55 he voted Layla and said her vote seemed opportunistic, yet his vote itself (to me) felt opportunistic. Lastly in #131 he wants votes on Flavor Leaf (Papa Leaf?) but he doesn't vote FL but Tea instead. These 3 events make me slightly Scumread him currently.
VOTE: Vorkuta
In post 236, Wake1 wrote:I noticed that Reund doesn't support Layla's wagon in #103, so if Vork flips Scum and Layla flips Town I'll revisit this later.
This is surface-level beyond belief.In post 237, Wake1 wrote:Likewise, Fish Townreads Vorkuta in #205. If Vork flips Scum I will be taking a closer look at Fish.
In post 238, Wake1 wrote:Currently I don't understand the wagon on Tea.
Could it be boiled down for me please?
I really don't get the 'worried by lack of resistance' feeling, considering at the time of writing Tea only had 4 votes to NorwegianBoyEE's 3, and I've seen at least a couple of people defending Tea. This feels like he's actively trying to look not opportunistic.In post 290, Wake1 wrote:Lack of resistance on Tea wagon has me slightly worried.
I feel like he’s being unnecessarily conspicuous.In post 370, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Why are you getting town feels from Norwegian? What specifically?In post 339, Luca Blight wrote:NorwegianBoyEE, Fish Monger and Reundo are giving me town feels so far.
Although this did ping me a bit as well.In post 371, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Literally wtf is that post? How is he getting townread?In post 351, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Omg what’s going on? Wake is scum now? I’ll post my thoughts a bit later ahhh!
I had scanned through, and when I had considered it for a few more moment the Layla RVS explanation pinged me.In post 413, Almost50 wrote:I liked you for the post just before this none and was getting ready to move your name to the Town leans group, but this brought you back to the middle group of nulls. It's not scummy it itself, but you voted Tea so I got the impression you were all caught up until that point, so why did you suddenly have that change of heart?In post 67, Luca Blight wrote:The whole'crafting an RVS vote before getting a role PM' thing seems weird to me, though. I could see this being a lie, because I can't imagine why anyone would make an RVS post before the game has even opened.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Layla
This pings me. 'In post 433, Wake1 wrote:Day 1 is just crazed paranoia and I can't deal with it, and if you want to lynch me for that and take a gamble go ahead.
Having scanned through the thread I thought Tea was the scummiest at the time, but when I had time to digest what I'd read I thought the Layla thing seemed like it could be a lie. Would it have been townier of me to keep this progression of thought to myself instead of sharing it?In post 455, Almost50 wrote:Because it's aIn post 424, Luca Blight wrote:Why is it scummy to suddenly have a change of heart?suddenchange of heart. It feels as if it came off the left side, as if you realized you made a mistake and tried to correct it immediately. Maybe I'm not explaining it the way I should, so just accept that I think it was unwarranted. I had expected you to either stay on Tea for some time (if only for a test reaction) or to have not voted him in the first place.
Like, what if I voted you right now, only to unvote and vote elsewhere (say between Wake/Tea/Nor) in my very next post? How would you feel about me in that hypothetical situation?
You’re misrepping me here, I’ve had Tea as a Town-lean for a while now.In post 510, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Luca initially scumreads Tea and TR's me. Then when the narrative is appearing to be switching [Tea loses votes and posts a case] he immediately goes back on his principles and votes me. It sure looks like a scummy and opportunistic wagon hop to me.
Why?In post 507, Chemist1422 wrote:okay I really hate the timing of thisIn post 494, Luca Blight wrote:I'm starting to re-consider my NorwegianBoyEE view. Ive played with him before when he was Town and he was similar in terms of his activity and not being overly serious, but looking back at that game he definitely showed more care in sorting people than he's doing here. It feels like he's being more floaty, which doesn't seem out of place with his scum meta, at a glance.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: NorwegianBoyEE
That’s because he’s been looking more Townie.In post 574, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk about Vork but between Wake and Tea I definitely prefer lynching Tea. It looked like his wagon has been deflating while others have gained traction.In post 573, Dunnstral wrote:I'd prefer to lynch Wake or Vork
It's funny, at the time of this post I could hardly have disagreed more with these reads.In post 262, Tea wrote:town
{Chemist Billy}
{Layla GE}
---
{Luca Reundo}
{Vork Norwegian}
scum
there's a pretty big difference between the tiers separated by the line btw.
Also curious about this vote.
How have you gone from this PoV to Townreading Chemist?In post 274, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’ve played 2 games with Chemist and he was scum in both of them. All he did was lurk. I don’t see anything town indicative from him. Why are you townreading him Tea?
And this doesn't suggest a Town-lean. What's changed between now and then?In post 481, NorwegianboyEE wrote: Vorkuta wagon: The main problem i have with Vorkuta right now is that he seems to be much more low-key than his scumplay in haunted village where he was very active and even said shit like "apathetic town loses games!" yeah brilliant Vork. I'm not sure if the difference here is that he has a more subdued townplay or he is trying a different scum tactic of just staying low and not being the center of attention.
In post 610, Luca Blight wrote:If you're Town then you're displaying some terrible tunnel-vision, especially given it's D1 with so many low-content slots, but tbh I think my read on you is correct.
I don't believe you're reading Tea in a rational manner.
You’re basing your entire view on the game on Tea being scum. That’s tunnel vision.In post 613, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Where's the tunnel vision? I've been cased as scum by Tea, and now i want to flip him because i don't think he's genuine and i know i'm town. That's possibly the best lead i've got so far.