@McStab - So the wagon on PMy is to make him somehow claim, right? Is there any other motivation under it? Do you actually think he's scummy?
So, you did it again, you think someone is scummy but you vote another person, why is that?
In post 48, evilpacman18 wrote:Closed normal - the wiki has a list of roles considered normal. Any of them can appear with any applicable normal modifier. Setups are created by the mod, and approved for normalcy and usually balance by a small group of reviewers. There's no way to predict what might be in the game and trying to outguess the mod is generally a bad idea....
In post 180, Maenara wrote:
Look at his ISO. He is definitely not saying enough, chooses to defend a person he sees is under attack in order to establish later town-cred. When then accused of this, he keeps doing it in order to not attract attention by altering his play, but still defends himself against the allegations, before proceeding to... Vote for the person attacking his accusor, calling said person opportunistic and then being so himself?
Methink this is scum trying to establish some town cred for later use.
In post 30, Jun wrote:Now for a clarification question:
-Do we know anything about the roles in this setup except that they are balanced by the Normal Game Review Group? Should I expect something similar to a C9++ setup in which roles are determined based on a formula and thus the role list can be guessed at due to flips?
In post 44, evilpacman18 wrote:Jun's post is bad because it goes like this
>FOS on someone he thinks is scummy
>makes contrived RVS vote after just saying someone is actually scummy
>lulzy ignorant setup speculation on a closed normal. (I mean he knows what a C9++ is but doesn't know how a closed normal works? That's kinda bull don't you think? I don't even know what a C9++ is.)
In post 47, NJAC wrote:@EPM - Jun is an actual newb so his (her?) question about the setup is honest imo, In fact I've only played two newbie games and I do have some questions about this setup too.
In post 829, Maenara wrote:Also, NJAC is still totally scum for doing nothing, reappearing at the most convenient of times, and being unwilling to do anything risky at all.
In post 827, qwints wrote:NJAC: Pick a target. All you've done on Day 2 is label Shinori as "incredibly anti-town" before backing off that claim in your very next post. Who should we lynch?
In post 837, qwints wrote:NJAC: Pick a target. All you've done on Day 2 is label Shinori as "incredibly anti-town" before backing off that claim in your very next post. Who should we lynch?
In post 849, theomoaner wrote:P-edit: NJAC, the "masons" are confirmed as communicating outside this thread, not confirmed town (it's most probable they are but...). Don't follow them blindly.
In post 866, qwints wrote:I could certainly be persuaded to switch my vote to 10506670 or Telo since I think both of them have been scummy.
In post 848, NJAC wrote:In post 829, Maenara wrote:Also, NJAC is still totally scum for doing nothing, reappearing at the most convenient of times, and being unwilling to do anything risky at all.
When are those convenient times and why are they exactly convenient for me? Did I mention I had RL stuff to deal with?
I do wantIn post 1030, Maenara wrote:They're so obviously a scum-team. Do you want me to do it on a post-by-post basis?
In post 904, buldermar wrote:
NJAC:
NJAC did not vote Shinori on day 2. Instead, the first vote was on Elei.
And after the claim:
In post 794, NJAC wrote:UNVOTE: Eleison
I'm not sure about Shinori, but if he's town then at least one scum being on his wagon makes sense to me. So, one (or even two) of Mae/Hiraki/numbers/buldermar/Rubik would be scum in a Sinori-flipping-town scenario. Of course it needs a flip and that's assuming there's no bussing here.
In post 848, NJAC wrote:VOTE: Maenara
Q: Why do you think Mason should lead our actions? Would you be willing to lynch Shinori? What information are you hoping to gain from a Maenara lynch?
Notes: If Shinori flips town, that skews NJAC's alignment towards town (because of the absence of an opportunistic vote).
In post 954, Hiraki wrote:NJAC will be tomorrow's lynch, qwintz.
In post 1099, dividizzle wrote:@buldemar regarding post addressed to me. What do you mean what use is it? Do you want me to make up a firm view when I'm not that confident. I'm sorry, I won't do that. You are telling me that you are 100% sure about the alignment of every player in this game? If I had to decide now I would say he's town but obviously I'm not sure, I apologize if my lack of omniscience inconveniences you. By the way treat this post as if it came before his most recent potential scumslip, which I haven't thought through.
In post 1081, buldermar wrote:Honestly, looking at post 914 I don't currently recall what reasons I had in mind (I think you're the first to ask, and post 914 was quite a long time ago). I think I could remember by reading my previous posts, but I'd rather not spend time reading them again just for that. If it is important to you, or if you can't trust that I had different reasons, let me know and I'll do my best to recall it.
In post 1120, Maenara wrote: Because the guy whose lynch I didn't advocate, but which I compromised on, turned out to be town? Because the guy who constantly tunneled on me D2 was killed during the night?
Look, there's such a thing as scum creating WIFOM, but I wouldn't be stupid enough to highlight it in the very first post of D3, posted 17 minutes after the day started, if I'd been the one to kill him.
Now can we please kill the obvious scum of obviousness?
In post 1121, 10506670 wrote:And I just don't think Maenara is scummy.
In post 1293, Maenara wrote:2) Depending on me is stupid. Depend on Buldermar or Theo, depending on which side you lean to. Duh.
In post 1300, buldermar wrote:Actually, now that I think more about it claiming masons as scum would almost always be suboptimal, and I think Eleison especially realizes this. Currently I'm leaning towards not lynching and hoping that an investigator will investigate one of them and claim.
smashbard, would you elaborate on your current scumreads?
In post 1296, Smashbard wrote:If you are to lynch a mason, which is a horrible idea, then I volunteer. After I flip, I will be sorely be dissapointed in you guys if Elieson dies tonight as a confirmed mason and no protective role tries to save him.