You invited me to the dance, you dance with me. It's the rules.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Normally I'd say that you can't steal my gimmick, but given that my gameplan this game is to just mess around all of D1 and D2 until I'm conftown on D3 (by the way that D3 Innocent Child claim? Not a joke.), I'll allow it.In post 11, Brian Skies wrote:Town
Brian Skies - The pinnacle of what obvtown should be.
Less Town
andriod18 - Can't even spell its own name.
Katsuki - Who doesn't like cupcakes?
Somewhat Town
Wisdom - One of the more underrated D&D stats.
mastina - Might get herself lynched anyway.
Human Sequencer - Somebody has to defend the RVS.
grapes - The Mod felt the need to confirm something from him for whatever reason.
No Idea
Purrcocet - Is this supposed to be a floating cat head?
Ginngie - Pick a color.
Nosferatu - Colors are hard.
Moment - No idea.
Dunnstral - No idea.
A Little Scummy
Kokichi Oma - Danganronpa.
Less Scummy
zMuffinMan - Just look at that avatar.
Scum
Nancy Drew 39 - What happened to the other 38 of them?
Kaede Akamatsu - Danganronpa.
hebichan - The most pretentious Pokemon.
VOTE: Kaede Akamatsu
(Btw this would be one of the reasons why I'm intending to basically do nothing for two gamedays. I WANT people to doubt me. Because doubt keeps me alive until that point, at which I can just pull the trigger, and then suddenly, BAM! Conftown, will reveal the reads I've had the whole time but been keeping semi-secret, and from there fuck the scum over. They'll never know what hit 'em.)In post 42, Wisdom wrote:town dont want to look towny
Neither did I; I just assumed this was one of those games where you pair off into lovers on D1 with the odd-man-out leaving the dance and from that point onward kills/lynches take out two people due to the lover mechanic.In post 55, zMuffinMan wrote:tbh didn't even check the setup, was assuming this was a standard alice game
Not a fakeclaim.In post 79, Dunnstral wrote:Nice fakeclaimIn post 77, mastina wrote:BTW investigatives should stay off me; they'd be wasting their action.
I'm a D3 Innocent Child.
If you are wondering, no, not automatic; I have to manually trigger it.
I'm not a main character; my confirmation comes from a different method altogether.In post 132, Human Sequencer wrote:Wrt innocent child shenanigans it's possible they have something to do with the "main characters" this setup is based around
They will when I try so hard to not try!In post 236, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Claiming D3 IC isnt a good way of garneing suspicion lol xDIn post 231, mastina wrote:I kinda want to see how much suspicion I can garner on my slot prior to D3 tho.
I doubt anyone would suspect you now.
When I have a more definitive read, I'll let you know, but right now it's too early to tell. I used bold tags for good reason; I'd say about a 2 right now.In post 239, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:On a scale of 0-10 how much confidence you have in this. You'd be one of the few people I'd trust to read Kokichi correctly.In post 237, mastina wrote:Kokichi's the only read I have which is actually south of null right now
Because nobody does mastina like mastina does.In post 250, Brian Skies wrote:Like, you've seen me do this before, and I wasn't copying you then. So why do you still think I'm copying you now. Lol.In post 227, mastina wrote:Normally I'd say that you can't steal my gimmick, but given that my gameplan this game is to just mess around all of D1 and D2 until I'm conftown on D3 (by the way that D3 Innocent Child claim? Not a joke.), I'll allow it.
That'd be their funeral then because it'd turn this game from "not exactly something I want" to "oh fuck you I AM GOING TO WIN THIS SHIT" mode.In post 252, Brian Skies wrote:Or they'll just do to you what they did to me and vanillarize-neighborize you.
I have my reasons.In post 262, Andriod18 wrote: This is no excuse to not post any reads because you can die before hand.
I mean.In post 264, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think she's a D3 IC at all, and she's going to come up with why it was a good gambit when the time comes, or say she can be somehow roleblocked, or something
I told you I'd win the bet.In post 267, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Well, I stand corrected.
Joke's on them if they vanillaize me, actually. I'd laugh my ass off if they tried.In post 274, grapes wrote:I'm gonna guess she's on a team with a vanillarizor or something and planned to explain it away that way or something
Not exactly right, but also not wrong!In post 346, Purrcocet wrote:i get the sentiment but the Nancy Drew 39 votes are kind of ew
I buy Katsuki's D5 Innocent Child claim if Katsuki has the two-phase-shifted equivalent of my role. (I
I don't.In post 437, Nosferatu wrote:kokichi can be town too i think, i like the mood
With the exception of Dunnstral and Nosferatu, your list is literally an exact inverse of mine.In post 482, zMuffinMan wrote:isaac
hs
mastina
moment
kokichi
purr
grapes
andriod
dunnstral
-----LYNCH BELOW THIS LINE----- <-- i want to move this line a couple notches down but i can't in good faith
nosferatu
wisdom
hebi
kaede
ginngie
nancy
cupcake
Yeah uh the problem there is...literally every single wagon there except for Kokichi Oma and maybe, maybe,In post 584, zMuffinMan wrote:now is the part of the day where people should start forming larger wagons instead of having lots of small ones
Moment [4]- Nosferatu, Nancy Drew 39, Purrcocet, Wisdom
Katsuki [4]- zMuffinMan, Dunnstral, Kaede Akamatsu, andriod18
Ginngie [2]- Moment, Human Sequencer
Wisdom [2]- Kokichi Oma, Katsuki
hebichan [1]- grapes
Kokichi Oma [1]- mastina
mastina [1]- hebichan
Nancy Drew 39 [1]- Brian Skies
Not Voting [1]- Ginngie
the wisdom, kokichi, mastina wagons should probably collapse and move to a different wagon because they really aren't viable
Funnily enough, that would just so happen to be my strongest townread!In post 650, zMuffinMan wrote:kaede is most likely scum, yesIn post 646, Wisdom wrote:moment/dunn/kaede
at least we have one read we agree on
I believe we do indeed!In post 762, Purrcocet wrote:we have a d3 and a d5 ic?
Self-explanatory. On N1 and N2, nobody in this playerlist is dumb enough to--knowing the composition of this playerlist--nightkill a player based off of their ROLE, aside from potentially you two. (And even then, it's doubtful.)In post 777, Purrcocet wrote:In post 774, mastina wrote:Literally nobody in this playerlist (aside from maybe Nancy Drew or Purrcocet?) would kill me for my role alone,
Not by personality. I'm no protection role bait by personality.In post 782, zMuffinMan wrote:i see noIn post 774, mastina wrote:ESPECIALLY not when I am easily protection role baitso i can only assume this was a serious remark
Nancy's town so the wagon there is bad, but the players on the wagon aren't themselves overly sketchy. Some names on it could be scum, sure enough, but I can confidently say there's a maximum of one scum in there, if that.In post 793, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:You lost meIn post 789, mastina wrote:The wagon composition on her has a few players who could be scum, but most of them aren't likely to be scum, especially not with each other. So, not the best place to wagon but also not the best place to "lynch the people on this wagon".
I'm actually fairly sure this is town from him. It's not 100%, but if this is a scum him he is doing everything right.In post 801, Kokichi Oma wrote:Mastina what do you think of wisdom
I voted you with bold tags, now it's vote tags for emphasis of read strength shift.In post 804, Kokichi Oma wrote:Mastina you already voted me before. You sure you're paying attention? Why am I scum?
Can?In post 817, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Can you explain Gingie? ngl you're one of the people i trust to read gingie correctly, although that comes with the caveat that i can trust you to be town.
Would you believe me if I said I had an idea of what?In post 840, Purrcocet wrote:if we have 2 ics there must be a disadvantage somewhere else
Investigatives should stay off of me because a gunsmith would get a guilty on me; rolecopping or vanilla copping or neapolitaning me would be a waste because my role would be proven come N2 with a successful vig.In post 77, mastina wrote:BTW investigatives should stay off me; they'd be wasting their action.
I'm a D3 Innocent Child.
If you are wondering, no, notautomatic; I have to manuallytriggerit.
Again, I specify TRIGGER. I also was very careful with my wording. I never said that I would trigger my action ON D3. I said, QUITE SPECIFICALLY, I would be conftown on D3 after HAVING triggered my action.In post 231, mastina wrote:I guarantee you.
On D3, after I have triggered my action.
I will be conftown.
My confirmation method comes from being a fucking vig.In post 233, mastina wrote:I'm not a main character; my confirmation comes from a different method altogether.In post 132, Human Sequencer wrote:Wrt innocent child shenanigans it's possible they have something to do with the "main characters" this setup is based around
Vanillaizing an innocent child wouldn't do much because I go without being conftown in most games, but I was specifically putting A LOT OF EFFORT into the strategy behind my vig; being vanillaized after I worked so hard on that would be a "fuck you".In post 253, mastina wrote:That'd be their funeral then because it'd turn this game from "not exactly something I want" to "oh fuck you I AM GOING TO WIN THIS SHIT" mode.In post 252, Brian Skies wrote:Or they'll just do to you what they did to me and vanillarize-neighborize you.
"Bite the bullet" was another hint, but the strongest hint here was "roles I'm not particularly fond of". What role have I on NUMEROUS different occasions stated I absolutely loathe? That's right. Vigilante. I hate them with a passion, but they have one particular use--being made conftown. It's a SHITTY way to become conftown, but it's becoming conftown nonetheless.In post 774, mastina wrote:I have my reasons.In post 262, Andriod18 wrote: This is no excuse to not post any reads because you can die before hand.
Put it this way.
If a townread of mine gets run up, I'll defend them.
I'll give thoughts on players randomly. Some of these may even be productive.
But I've no reason to give full reads before then.
Also this is a good way to help ensure Idon'tbite the bullet before D3. The suspicion on me helps me stay alive.
I know how to play roles, even ones I'm not particularly fond of. (I mean, I love being conftown, but this is a fairly shitty way to get it.) And I promise you, this is the best possibly strategy for me holding this role.
Here I basically admitted that I was in fact not a D3 IC, because the D3 IC claim was precisely this: misleading, and exaggeration, but still the truth, because by shooting N2, I'd be conftown on D3, just as good as an IC.In post 778, mastina wrote:I never lie about being conftownable as town.
Exaggerate, yes.
Mislead, sure!
But lie, fuck no, I know better than that.
So I guarantee you.
I will be conftown.
The assumption here was that I wouldn't be vanillaized N1 (after all, they thought I couldn't be conftown until D3 so why vanillaize me N1?), and if they attempted it N2, it presumably wouldn't stop my shot from going off. Thus, why the joke would be on them if they had tried; I'd still have fucked them over with the shot.In post 781, mastina wrote:Joke's on them if they vanillaize me, actually. I'd laugh my ass off if they tried.In post 274, grapes wrote:I'm gonna guess she's on a team with a vanillarizor or something and planned to explain it away that way or something
Here I stated my suspicion that Katsuki had an Night 4 Vig. I was VERY careful about my wording. Not "two-day-shifted". Two PHASE shifted. And I suspected Katsuki would be able to give details of this.In post 799, mastina wrote:I buy Katsuki's D5 Innocent Child claim if Katsuki has the two-phase-shifted equivalent of my role. (IsuspectKatsuki would be able to share details about my role from their own, if so inclined to share, which I imagine Katsuki is not.)
So that's not a lynch ever happening because Katsuki is going to be just as conftown as I am, albeit two phases later than I will be.
The disadvantage I am referring to here is how Vigs require KILLING, to REMOVE a player from the game--yes, they become conftown by having done so, but shots are DISPROPORTIONATELY likely to be on town (thus why I hate vigs), on top of the chance of failure (thus the gambit to help ensure I'd succeed).In post 851, mastina wrote:Would you believe me if I said I had an idea of what?In post 840, Purrcocet wrote:if we have 2 ics there must be a disadvantage somewhere else