For a second I was like "What is the
VOTE: Almost50
You know why, monkey. No one's gonna leave you alone, so you had better start playing already.
because I'm going bananas. Just don't monkey with my business if you please.In post 53, Joan of Arc wrote:Why are you voting yourself, then?
There goes the town points I gave you for the reasoning behind your vote on JoAIn post 67, Dunnstral wrote:Now wait a minuteIn post 66, Torque wrote:I like the fact A50 claiming he's not speaking in channels actually I think scum will just lurk and not claim so
Somebody said something about claiming channels to weed out scum who weren't posting anything in their channels
What's stopping a50 from being scum who, seeing that, came up with something so that he doesn't look bad for initially hiding?
Mind signing your posts, please? I am assuming this was Amz??In post 70, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:A50 is town or he/his partners are much better than me.
Yes. On both your logic and conclusion. However, the conclusion is anyone's guess still (no one can tell for sure what my alignment is until I flip .. or get checked by an investigative). The logic though is faulty because it would have been much much easier for scum me to just start posting in the channels I'm in and claim I didn't want to do so before the game officially started, or that I wanted to to see who was in the channel(s) first.In post 74, Dunnstral wrote:Why? Am I wrong?
Did you know that 97% of percentages scummers use in their debates are actually made up?In post 152, Morality wrote:In addition, I was pretty talkative in a channel, and I made a comment questioning the channel’s thoughts if I told them I was unable to speak in the main thread.
Almost50 bringing up the subject of being in channels and not outing themselves stood out to me simply because I had also thought about doing that, so it was a mind melt of sorts. I’m about 85% sure that A50 is town because of it, as opposed to the 72% I feel about the majority of everyone else. BNL’s comment brings him down to about a 60%, which at the moment, is most likely from what I have perceived. Yes, I made all those percentages up, but consider me an artist who is painting a mental picture for you to see where I’m coming from.
I .. thought .. this was the game .. modded by mastina. What was so hard to understand here?In post 173, Gamma Emerald wrote:wdym "what was the mod doing"?
Just ignore their claims to have identified you and keep on playing the way you do right now.In post 211, Joan of Arc wrote:Well, there goes my attempt to become a better player.
Why am I not surprised? It's that ole devil calledIn post 214, mastina wrote: Meanwhile:
VOTE: Reasonably Psychotic
Don't think there's much point in me hiding that scumread anymore.
In post 217, Spike and Jet wrote:knowing you, you might not be in any channels and are just making us paranoid
I'm even nearer (i.e. I second that notion. How is Robert the towniest, or even townie at all?)In post 234, Near x Mello wrote:whatIn post 233, Spike and Jet wrote:robert is the towniest person in this game so far
~Near
Good idea, although "standard" Priests do not get modkilled for attempting to hammer. But yeah, better safe than sorry.In post 250, Spike and Jet wrote:@toog
check with the mod that you wont get modkilled for 'testing' it
Hmmm.. I dunno, but -since this is an Anime flavored game- maybe a good start would be to..In post 293, Elena Fisher wrote:What type of dance would you like me to perform~
Actually, you can't be more
Actually, I don't (know). Please explain.In post 331, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:That was Yuno
In post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:Nothing to do with alts, everything to do with you hemorrhaging scum-exclusive info previously.In post 267, Almost50 wrote:@Gamma: How am I supposed to answer this now? You know my alts, right? Would you be kind enough to figure out the rest?
In post 356, Near x Mello wrote:heh you reminded me of death note mafia where you kept posting in wrong threads and wrong accounts
~Near
(Vote: this dude)In post 327, Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:My inactivity in this thread until now was due to life being busy, not deliberately avoiding the thread.
Why did he have to include the phrase "in this thread"? I take it that it was "subconsciously inserted" there. He could very well have been active in the scum PT.In post 363, Near x Mello wrote:hes been equally inactive in channel 5 if it helps you
dont really agree with you there, its just wording
~Near
If you've rolled Jester; this isn't the way to play it. If you have a post restriction; you should claim it. If you're trying to mimic someone else's play style; it ain't working. I am currently struggling to come up with a scum pair that don't make sense for you to be their 3rd.In post 371, Clemency wrote:everyone needs a snazzy pair of sunglasses
In post 582, Vedith wrote:Because I'm top voted and I got worried and panicked.In post 581, Almost50 wrote:@Vedith: Why PB?
You should vote with me.
If you had said anything else I would have suspected you were lying. This is the one and only reason I thought might make sense for that vote.
What are you on about? Who said anything about theIn post 722, mastina wrote:It really isn't? It's something by FAR more likely to come from a scum-Cerb than a town-Cerb.In post 698, Almost50 wrote:P-edit: Now THAT's a good attempt at moving the game froward. I look forward to seeing this dialogue.
Admittedly the intended goal is admirable enough, but no amount of nobility changes the alignment behind the action; it's still scum even if it's something which is pro-fun. (Cerb isn't the type of player to be happy with a victory through apathy as scum--he'll TAKE a victory through apathy, but he won't be HAPPY about a victory through apathy. I'm not entirely sure whether if given the choice between victory through apathy or loss through lack thereof which he takes, probably did at some point but have since forgotten, but I know that if given a choice between assured victory through apathy or less-assured-but-still-plausible victory through lack thereof, he'll pick the latter.)
Please enlighten us all, because -if for nothing else- I have modded him on both Overkill episodes and this is exactly his TOWN play that I saw from above.In post 723, mastina wrote:I am intimately familiar with Toogeloo's playstyle having many games' experience with him so I know what type of player he is, and he's one of my strongest scumreads.
For now, it's a gut feeling (and certainly not the strongest of my reads). Gamma & Pink Ball though are strong TRs and I'm confident they're both Town.
Separately, it does seem to be weak indeed. However, there are some other (even weaker) indications that -collectively- add up to a "not-so-strong yet not-too-weak" reasoning.In post 828, Near x Mello wrote:cmon, thats weak. "easy" wagons happen on scum all the time.
I agree with your gamma and pink reads.
~Near
No. If they thought town would do the job for them they would stay clear off the wagon and play for time. Maybe they thought it "could" go through without them and now are considering throwing their weight behind it towards the end of the day, but for now are hoping that the town still does the job for them.In post 831, Torque wrote:@A50: If Vedith is a villager and is an easy push as you say, scum has all the incentive to hop on his wagon yet the wagon came to a halt
Either there is scum already voting there or Vedith is a wolf
Not positive, but I think this implies we have 3-4 + 1 3PIn post 838, Torque wrote:uh we cant only have 3 wolves in this game, right
Of course I could be wrong as it could also apply to 4-5 scum and no 3 P (and tbf I misread it as "there are 3 scums" and overlooked the "at least" part). So, maybe I am wrong about someone who is currently on my weak trs pool, but that doesn't negate my argument (nor does it support it either)In post 2, Tatsuya Kaname wrote:TODAY'S SETUP
.1At least 3of you are confirmed. (We all hate it when your favorite anime content (and NOT PIRATED), gets a stupid copystrike)YouTube CopyStrikers (Scums)
. Almost everyone else are confirmed2.Anime Content Makers (Towns)
There might, or might not, be third party member(s).
This may sound straneg (me answering for Wisdom, that is) but I think we're mind melding. I too was tempted to SR you some. I mean, if I was told (by the mod) there's one (and only one) scum on the Vedith wagon I'd say that'd be you or Clem.In post 843, Torque wrote:wisdom get off of your fence and scumread me if thats even a real read lmao
when did you even tunnel me btw
In post 954, Almost50 wrote:Hi
You certainly have been lucky, because it happens to me all the time (even when I choose to play on different accounts) that I now keep checking my role PMs before I post in most threads (and I sometimes still get mixed up)In post 1018, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:Is that really that "normal"? I've seen it mentioned *twice* in this game, but have NEVER before seen this phenomenon.In post 1017, Pink Ball wrote:This is why I can't answer your question, Gamma. Thought you would understandIn post 1013, Vedith wrote:Getting mixed up on setup or roles etc when in multiple games is not strange.
Someone? Anyone? Is this as weak as it feels to me, or have I just been lucky in all my previous games?
-Yukiteru
ANOTHER strange role for Toog?!!In post 1025, Toogeloo wrote:For example, on Night 2 for me, if anyone targets me for any reason, I die. But only on Night 2.
At the time you placed this vote mastinaIn post 1156, Drixx wrote:I would prefer Martina but that’s not gonna till I don’t think so...
My vote was already on you from before. I meant toIn post 1166, mastina wrote:Says the guy who makes a recent vote that sucks big time.In post 1088, Almost50 wrote:@Gamma & @Pink Ball: Your recent votes suck big time. VOTE: mastina needs more votes on her