it actually kind of doesIn post 19, no lunch wrote:This post makes no sense.In post 16, Fuscosco wrote:this has a few implications.
my first instinct was to think scum would want to do this.
but my second is that town that was forked with a suspected scum (though likely scumread themselves) could deny the scum their kill
and that we should make sure that we provide clear lists of people to target with the second fork so that they can immediately shut down scum.
i foresee an issue where availability will cause 'unfair' priorities of action.
double fork is like a lynch, why would we let a lynch candidate have a vengeful shot
can't argue with thisIn post 21, Skygazer wrote:i think bins could be scum