Are you mortals ready to play? Because Zues, your god is!
I'm OBV TOWNING THE FUCK outta this game, so fall in line, OR ELSE. I will be going through and inspecting you mortals, and those that do not please me.... Well, we will get to that!
CLAIM OR DIE!In post 32, Mistyx wrote:VOTE: chk
i dont think you got a post restriction
vax, is there a reason you're pushing for flavor claims?
Spelling is for mortals to worry about. I will continue to spell my name the way I want and you will understand.In post 53, Jake The Wolfie wrote:lowkey scumreading Zeus for repeatedly misspelling their name.In post 34, Vaxkiller wrote:IF ANYONE SHOULD DARE SCUM READ ZUES, POSTNOWOR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!
goog gods. god is in good, so my wagon is good. Bask amongst my glory.In post 58, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Just because you're a god doesn't mean your wagon is good.In post 55, Vaxkiller wrote:Be on the wagon with a god! Gods wagon.
Noted. Will revisit this later.In post 82, Porkens wrote:My flavor would give scum a great guess at my role.In post 79, cassowary wrote:Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
So tell me yours.In post 131, Flea The Magician wrote:I can promise you flavour is NAI.
I didn't even think about it. Just such a weird thing to nit-pick out of the all the other material he has said.
Why did marky vote them?In post 171, Fidget wrote:Uncrowned (4): Mistyx, Marky Mark, Cassowary, Flea The Magician
I feel pretty confident there is scum on this wagon (or to a lesser extent, Uncrowned is scum, but that is not my current thinking).I think this is a much better justification for voting Uncrowned than him being scummy for not contributing to the discussion. This is actually something I was considering myself. The last game I have seen of Uncrowned, he mentioned intentionally playing different to try out a new playstyle. It was less effort than his usual style (However, he did not naked vote in RVS, and he did have early reads, so not totally slacking so much as trying somewhat less). He was town that game, though.In post 144, cassowary wrote:Re other thoughts, I find uncrowned's opening super weird - like, why come in that way? If you hadn't caught up on the game to have other opinions, why cast a vote in your first post when we were already kinda coming out of rvs? Feels like scum trying to imitate slacking town. I'll join the uncrowned wagon for the sake of having a vote somewhere.This doesn't strike me as very good faith. Based on what criteria are you considering Uncrowned's response an over-explanation, and why does that make him scummy, in any case?In post 156, Flea The Magician wrote:Uncrowned calling out an over explaination with an over explaination seems dodge to me. VOTE: Uncrowned
*sips tea and noms a biccie*
VOTE: Flea
I dont think uncrowned!scum makes this commentIn post 208, Uncrowned wrote:I like Porkens and NotKnown
Mark is >rand scum atm but there's decent chance he's just clueless town
I had a logical reason in my head, but now it evades me. Trying to process where I was at and I'm getting this:In post 215, Porkens wrote:Could you go into more detail as to why?In post 211, Vaxkiller wrote:I dont think uncrowned!scum makes this commentIn post 208, Uncrowned wrote:I like Porkens and NotKnown
Mark is >rand scum atm but there's decent chance he's just clueless town
I dont remember u in bears, were you in a hydra?In post 203, Marky Mark wrote:I'll drop VAX a cheeky FOS too - lots of posts, but fairly thin on any scrutiny/analysis/reads. Could be posting style tbf, but feels very different to the Bears mini where we played together.
?In post 236, Marky Mark wrote:Still keen to hear back from both Vax and Not Known on the questions I asked them btw
Dad?In post 219, cassowary wrote:Dang, L-2. Careful with that wagon, Eugene.
Gut. Wagonomics. No reason. You choose. We are also like 10 pages in. Were you this chatty in bears?In post 292, Marky Mark wrote:In post 273, Vaxkiller wrote:?In post 236, Marky Mark wrote:Still keen to hear back from both Vax and Not Known on the questions I asked them btwIn post 214, Marky Mark wrote:Not the first time you've voted me with minimal explanation Vax (unless your reason is that you think I'm wrong about uncrowned, which you have alluded to).
Why vote Porkens earlier in 163? I'm not sure you explained that one either
For the full comment.In post 211, Vaxkiller wrote:I dont think uncrowned!scum makes this commentIn post 208, Uncrowned wrote:I like Porkens and NotKnown
Mark is >rand scum atm but there's decent chance he's just clueless town
I arrive at the start of the game. Zues thanks you.In post 366, GreyICE wrote:Luckily glorious leader is here.
No no no. Role-fishing will come day 3, maybe, and I'll yell at everyone for thier role.In post 366, GreyICE wrote:Vaxkiller noting a need to rolefish is p. funny.
Blame cheeteroy? I think he made it... someone here did. Maybe I'll change it at some point if I get someone else to draw me one.In post 366, GreyICE wrote:Vaxkiller and Grendel's avatar are both basically brown blobs. I've decided they're the same person. Also, they're the same person.
Great song.In post 390, GreyICE wrote:piss up a rope