In post 9484, Bellaphant wrote:Are we just lol voting math with no replacement or VCS? Isn't this the definition of peer pressure?
P-edit ?
what changed ur mind LMAO
In post 9484, Bellaphant wrote:Are we just lol voting math with no replacement or VCS? Isn't this the definition of peer pressure?
P-edit ?
what changed ur mind LMAO
you made a jokeIn post 9606, Lukewarm wrote:... pooky literally told you that we were joking.
This is 0% bullying :/
pretty sure that wasn't the post that sparked my leaving
I brought it up in that game as well, so you've got very little time to correct your course before I decide to enact Article Zero.In post 260, Tracer Bullet wrote:I would like to remind everyone that Gamma is still at E-2 and nobody should put him at E-1 lest he make a fast escape via the window.
I want to see if there are things he will do yet.
I thought you were better than this.In post 9611, Lukewarm wrote:I seriously doubt marci would have been offended by any of this dialogue...
I'm gonna stop engaging with you now.
but you weren't saying it to be serious, were you? you were tagging along on pooky's joke, one that I was not comfortable with. and following my declaration of my discomfort, instead of actually doing anything adult, you opt to double down and call me unreasonable for feeling put down. you sicken me.In post 9619, Lukewarm wrote:Actually.
It is a perfectly valid function of this game for me to call someone out for their vote. Marci did in fact vite Mathblade.
Even if I was 100% serious, that was something that is absolutely within the bounds of this game.
I do not think it appropriate for you go call that bullying. And if anything, that crosses a line.
And it is just the kicker that it was actually a joke.
Anyways, I hope std locks this thread soon
what is this in response to, and I'm not trying to limit your interaction with her at all? I'm just saying to please actually listen when someone expresses that they'd wish for a certain course of action to stop. you can still make jokes, but not ones that feel like someone else is the butt of it. I'm aware I've done the same myself but it was part of the game in a way when I made that sort of joke before, this is just needlessly antagonistic.In post 9621, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't think it's fair for you to limit my interactions with Marci unless she explicitly makes it clear that I'm not allowed to joke with her
why is it a bad reason wtfIn post 9694, Lukewarm wrote:8245 - this is a surprisingly bad reason for Marci to think that Math is scum lmao
ohIn post 9699, Lukewarm wrote:Pooky is suggesting that I am scum with Math, because for half of day 1 I leaned town on math.
whats her flavor?In post 10119, Dancing Puppets wrote:Drap tracked Bella to Bell and is claiming macho doc with apparently also being informed that there’s another macho player in the setup.In post 10114, Off The Hook wrote:wtfs going on
Stand by.In post 10131, Lukewarm wrote:So I feel like this would be too random of a thing for Bella to make up for no reason.In post 10128, Bellaphant wrote:In post 10119, Dancing Puppets wrote:Drap tracked Bella to Bell and is claiming macho doc with apparently also being informed that there’s another macho player in the setup.In post 10114, Off The Hook wrote:wtfs going on
No, I didn't say informed anything.
Not in Portland was doctor, other woman macho. I think not in Portland is Juliet's first focus ep.
But my role pm did not have episode names to describe me. It just said my role.
I kinda believe, regardless of her alignment, her pm probably has that, because there seems to be no reason to just make it up full cloth
But it an odd thing to not be consistent across role pms
I was trying to find the original post that started this topic off because I thought it had gone unaddressed, but since Pooky added something I'll respond to the latest part of the reply chain I found:In post 10041, Dancing Puppets wrote:Gamma didn’t fake anything. His anger was still genuine. Your assumption of it impossible for scum to be genuinely upset is wrong.In post 10034, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im not trying to kill oth
gamma is capable of faking anger as scum
see slaughter hour
And Gamma was extremely clearly upset that if Math flipped town, Marci would get blamed for that.
okay never mind the "stand by"In post 10134, Lukewarm wrote:Wait.
I'm dumb.
I do have that.
Mine just blended in well enough that I didn't realize that is what was happening, even when I was looking for it.
Ignore me
You're ignoring nuance that I'm 99% sure I've spoken about with you in proximity countless times.In post 10160, Dancing Puppets wrote:So then I don’t get it Gamma, what is “whack” about our position?In post 10157, Off The Hook wrote:I was trying to find the original post that started this topic off because I thought it had gone unaddressed, but since Pooky added something I'll respond to the latest part of the reply chain I found:In post 10041, Dancing Puppets wrote:Gamma didn’t fake anything. His anger was still genuine. Your assumption of it impossible for scum to be genuinely upset is wrong.In post 10034, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im not trying to kill oth
gamma is capable of faking anger as scum
see slaughter hour
And Gamma was extremely clearly upset that if Math flipped town, Marci would get blamed for that.
Both Pooky and Nancy's positions here are wack. I'm pretty sure I've iterated multiple times to them that I don't fake emotion as scum, I just angle it differently. To cite events in Slaughter Hour, I was legitimately pissed no one listened to me on Infinity, but towards the end of that event I ceded the point because I knew I could gain sway once my read was proven correct. And the reason why I said both are wack was that in the original post Nancy said my emotion here was genuine, ignoring the above point.
I do have to ask, Pooky, what emotions are you saying I faked that game? To make that accusation with no specificity runs a dangerous line, as I had emotional aftershocks from that game that have lasted until very recently.
~GE
In this post:In post 10168, Dancing Puppets wrote:I’m really not following?In post 10167, Off The Hook wrote:You're ignoring nuance that I'm 99% sure I've spoken about with you in proximity countless times.In post 10160, Dancing Puppets wrote:So then I don’t get it Gamma, what is “whack” about our position?In post 10157, Off The Hook wrote:I was trying to find the original post that started this topic off because I thought it had gone unaddressed, but since Pooky added something I'll respond to the latest part of the reply chain I found:In post 10041, Dancing Puppets wrote:Gamma didn’t fake anything. His anger was still genuine. Your assumption of it impossible for scum to be genuinely upset is wrong.In post 10034, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im not trying to kill oth
gamma is capable of faking anger as scum
see slaughter hour
And Gamma was extremely clearly upset that if Math flipped town, Marci would get blamed for that.
Both Pooky and Nancy's positions here are wack. I'm pretty sure I've iterated multiple times to them that I don't fake emotion as scum, I just angle it differently. To cite events in Slaughter Hour, I was legitimately pissed no one listened to me on Infinity, but towards the end of that event I ceded the point because I knew I could gain sway once my read was proven correct. And the reason why I said both are wack was that in the original post Nancy said my emotion here was genuine, ignoring the above point.
I do have to ask, Pooky, what emotions are you saying I faked that game? To make that accusation with no specificity runs a dangerous line, as I had emotional aftershocks from that game that have lasted until very recently.
~GE
~GE
You said "Gamma can't fake these emotions so he's town". The issue is IIn post 9855, Dancing Puppets wrote:Well, take Gamma’s outburst at the end of d2 for example, where Gamma clearly misread Luke’s and Pooky’s trolling of Marci. Why does scum!Gamma ever flip out like that if Math flips scum? Gamma was clearly worried that they would get run up in the event of a Math townflip.In post 9849, RCEnigma wrote:Nancy talk to me about OTH because they have been sliding in my reads since day 1.
Gamma is pretty much incapable of faking that level of emotion. OtH is NEVER scum here.
what threw me off was Math's stance on Taly/Ceph reminded me of his stance on me in PYPIn post 10138, Dancing Puppets wrote:Taly was not scum. Math clearly didn’t gaf whether he voted Ceph or Taly.In post 10130, Dancing Puppets wrote:1) Cephrir was diverted from Math. How and why?In post 10127, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Look at it for what? That was a portion of the game that I completely missed
2) Was Taly scum as well? That relates to 1.
3) Should we start from the position that D1 Taly's reads were worse or equal for scum than Cephrir?
~Titus
you kinda did??? re: 10179In post 10034, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im not trying to kill oth
gamma is capable of faking anger as scum
see slaughter hour
ahIn post 10146, Lukewarm wrote:We have been informed that there is a minimum of 1 vanilla townie in this set up. And they do not have an episode title in their pm.In post 10144, Dancing Puppets wrote:apparently every role pm has an episode title in it for whatever reason
Which is why people who have not said if they are a VT or not should probably not weigh in on this convo
I don't really know how well our role ties to our episode but our episode does feature our character prominently.In post 10239, Lukewarm wrote:This would mean that episodes are unrelated to the roles actually.In post 10235, Best Bird wrote:Everybody Hates Hugo
Because that is before it is revealed he can talk to dead people.
Episode titles in role pms appear to just be chosen based on episodes which that character is the pov character for the flashbacks.
But the character flavor matches role ability pretty 1 to 1
on what?In post 10285, Best Bird wrote:Starting to agree with ceph tbh.
In post 4622, MathBlade wrote:VOTE: Klick
Can someone explain Klick TRs?
I am talking with C&G and we agree on Klick being possible scum.
do u think looking into nks will help us progress?In post 10416, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:But they're still PRs over a complete unknown in Bell.In post 10414, Enchant wrote: These PRs also useless.
wow why r u so defensive....In post 10420, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Do you think I'm the only one doing it and do you only have a problem with me doing it?
In post 9433, Bell wrote:C&G is off, but I can smell the fake role posturing from here.
If they're actually just neighbor VT here they're playing exceptionally badly as either alignment.
I'll leave a 0 star review on their yelp page.
In post 9359, Bell wrote:There some reason you didn't find Mala's announcement weird or anything? They claimed they could talk to dead people and only really retracted it a lot later.In post 9349, Best Bird wrote:Potentially one of them. I only have one more shot.In post 9348, Lukewarm wrote:Will you be able to talk to Dunn and Frog on day 3?
In post 9282, Bell wrote:Malcolm's pretty focused on a single take at a time. There's less substance an more size to it, like they're ballooning up a post.
Their reasoning is pseudo reasoning because it takes shape in the form of what would be interesting rather than what is likely.
r u actually scum?? enchant CLEARLY wants bella dead why would they redirict it they must be jokingIn post 10578, JohnnyFarrar wrote:You do what now
i sorryIn post 10583, Lukewarm wrote:A little late to be saying this lmaoIn post 10579, Off The Hook wrote:i wish day was longer honestly, there was something i wanted to like talk about but not outright say
if you think this? who du u thinks scum?In post 10670, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think taly and c&g town though
oh where?In post 10711, Lukewarm wrote:I feel like corwin spewed Mala town personally.In post 10680, Off The Hook wrote:im kinda lowkey starting to think malakittens is scum >.>
In post 10693, Off The Hook wrote:i wonder if theres any dead persons role people are currently curious about rn..?