OMGUS
VOTE: Bell
~Luke
P.S. Gonna go ahead and apologize to the mod for the inevitable posts that I forget to sign. I generally don't sign in a hydra, but will try my best given the rule.
Wow. I made it 1 postIn post 35, The Bombay wrote:I don't think that Furtive would fake claim miller as scum, so he can go to the town pile
I am kind of thinking that StarPower appearing to not know that there is a 3rd party makes them more likely to be town.In post 10, Kokabiel wrote:JUST the delegation?In post 7, Star Power wrote:Hello everyone! I am here, ready to be a shining light against the delegation!
VOTE: DeasVail
I am so sorry.In post 37, The Bombay wrote:I am kind of thinking that StarPower appearing to not know that there is a 3rd party makes them more likely to be town.In post 10, Kokabiel wrote:JUST the delegation?In post 7, Star Power wrote:Hello everyone! I am here, ready to be a shining light against the delegation!
VOTE: DeasVail
Seriously doubt that the actual 3rd party would not be too self-conscious to frame it that way, so imo town>scum>3rd party
This feels like you misunderstood. My point was that the mafia would beIn post 40, Flavia wrote:But mafia can't collaborate with the 3rd party in this game. Everybody losses. So,In post 37, The Bombay wrote:I am kind of thinking that StarPower appearing to not know that there is a 3rd party makes them more likely to be town.In post 10, Kokabiel wrote:JUST the delegation?In post 7, Star Power wrote:Hello everyone! I am here, ready to be a shining light against the delegation!
VOTE: DeasVail
Seriously doubt that the actual 3rd party would not be too self-conscious to frame it that way, so imo town>scum>3rd partymakes sense mafia would be as interested in this 3rd party as the town.Or not that interested yet as the game just started.
can you vote kokabielIn post 76, Frogsterking wrote:IMO I don't think you are a dull player so if you haven't seen anything suspicious yet then I think you should reread and be more open to being skeptical and critical of others. I think the idea of whether or not most posts are NAI is tricky. In this particular game I believe that a lot more AI content than usual has been created.In post 74, DeasVail wrote:I tend to think that most posts are probably NAI, at the end of the day. But particularly in the early game I think it’s helpful to think about whether particular posts are more likely from town, and to push on anything that might be from scum. For the posts made thus far, I had some thoughts along the lines of “this could be from town”, but then also counter-arguments in my head about why what I thought was town, wasn’t necessarily.In post 54, Passenger wrote:rcan you please explain what you mean by “make posts AI in your head?”In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
For example, I agree that Star Power’s post isn’t particularly indicative of scum, but I also can’t townread that post. In the end it’s just a colourful way of saying “let’s kill scum!”
can you vote kokabiel?In post 80, DeasVail wrote:Why didn’t you ask me?In post 77, The Bombay wrote:can you vote kokabielIn post 76, Frogsterking wrote:IMO I don't think you are a dull player so if you haven't seen anything suspicious yet then I think you should reread and be more open to being skeptical and critical of others. I think the idea of whether or not most posts are NAI is tricky. In this particular game I believe that a lot more AI content than usual has been created.In post 74, DeasVail wrote:I tend to think that most posts are probably NAI, at the end of the day. But particularly in the early game I think it’s helpful to think about whether particular posts are more likely from town, and to push on anything that might be from scum. For the posts made thus far, I had some thoughts along the lines of “this could be from town”, but then also counter-arguments in my head about why what I thought was town, wasn’t necessarily.In post 54, Passenger wrote:rcan you please explain what you mean by “make posts AI in your head?”In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
For example, I agree that Star Power’s post isn’t particularly indicative of scum, but I also can’t townread that post. In the end it’s just a colourful way of saying “let’s kill scum!”
-marci
Also, saw 2 different people taking this seriously.In post 50, Bell wrote:Must be scum out of ideas.In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
If it makes you feel better, Bell's reactions to your claim were my exact reactions too.In post 134, furtiveglance wrote:Bit late for random. I guess you want more explanation then. I think 21 comes to the conclusion that I'm trueclaiming a bit too quickly. 33 as well. Feels a bit "meh, not sure" which Bell was like as mafia in The Turing Test.In post 133, Flavia wrote:Random or serious?
~LukeIn post 146, The Bombay wrote:It is not a matter of having a ton of reads, which is what they seem to be trying to turn it into, it is a matter of scope.
The entirety of Koka's iso prior to our vote (3 posts)
Spoiler:
Other then jumping on a single thing from StarPower, who are they trying to sort? Who are they asking questions to?
Just some examples off the top of my head: Did they have thoughts on furtive's claim, did they have a reaction to Bell's reaction? Did they have thoughts about me in light of my response to their only stated suspicion? No clue, because the only thing in the entire game that was apparently worthy of comment on was exactly 1 star power post.
-----
The fact that their reaction to our vote was to attack, instead of asking any kind of questions (like I don't know, "why are you scum reading me?" or "was that a serious vote") shows that they are more interested in attacking / discrediting us, then sorting us.
I am even more happy with our vote then before tbh.
In post 153, Passenger wrote:I wasn’t using it as an excuse to vote DeasVail, I thought that DeasVail’s post was weird before I even saw Bell’s post, and then when I turned the page and saw his post it clicked in my mind.In post 139, The Bombay wrote:Also, saw 2 different people taking this seriously.In post 50, Bell wrote:Must be scum out of ideas.In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
I am pretty sure that this was a sarcastic/ joke post from Bell. Which made passenger latching onto it as an excuse to vote DeasV pretty bad.
In post 154, Passenger wrote:Also how do you even come to the conclusion that I’m using Bell’s post as an excuse to vote DeasVail? I add on to Bell’s post and provide my own reasoning on top of it.
Like I said, I think I used the wrong words when I said "as an excuse."In post 55, Passenger wrote:This is also what I thought. It seems like DeasVail is playing from the point of view of someone who is looking over posts with a checklist of tells to appear useful, rather than engaging in actual solving.In post 50, Bell wrote:Must be scum out of ideas.In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
VOTE: DeasVail
I do agree with you that it felt weird when deasnails invited himself to your wagon like that, it felt like he was a pick me and just wanted to be on my side lol, but I didn't really pay that much attention at the time since I was more focused on you.In post 89, Kokabiel wrote:The difference is that Marci invited you, whereas Dease invited himself. Marci can invite anyone, so how would that make it SvS?
In post 142, Kokabiel wrote:The vote itself isn't bad, it's the fact that she is calling other people to join it. Pushing someone without any reason is dumb and anti-town.In post 128, Passenger wrote:Why do you think it’s scum behavior?In post 85, Kokabiel wrote:This, on the other hand, is NOT cute at all. I fail to see how calling acquaintances to join a... RVS? vote is town behavior
While anti-town doesn't necessarily mean scum, it's the best thing i have right now and getting rid of people like this in absence of better alternatives is a great move.
I decided to scumread this instead of seeing it as bad town because i doubt she would make such a blunder as town.
This reads snarky for...no reason..? I haven't even posted all day while being at work.. It did give me a moment of doubt ngl, but give me something to actually tr you on, anyone can do this as any alignment.In post 145, Kokabiel wrote:Marci please enlighten me with the amazing reads you got from pages 1-3. Luke has been doing all the lifting for you so far and i can't say i'm impressed even as a joke.In post 138, The Bombay wrote:S
Marci said she wanted to vote Koka because her iso was "beyond useless"
I kinda hip shot you town based off of your interaction with Furtive. It was a combo of the tone feeling right, your conclusions on furtive being identical to my own, and you also immediately spot checking the flavor to match it with the claim.In post 200, Bell wrote:Not sure if Luke is being too generous here with me.
Frog, if you are getting the feeling that Flavia is scummy, while also getting the feeling that she feels isolated. Why is your conclusion "she is the most active groupcum" and not "she seems like 3p"?In post 193, Frogsterking wrote:My alleged "psychoanalysis" indicates Flavia is the type of player who doesn't feel confident in faking SvS interactions or making up reads on scum buddies. I think almost all of the above are Town, if not all. I also don't think Flavia has interacted with their partners very much if at all. My "pychoanalysis" extends deeper however; Flavia feels isolated and Flavia is the most active groupscum.
But, even then, it feels like you are defaulting to a Group Scum answer, instead of considering the 3p thinking about the win state for the 3p (in which everybody losses) vs win state for the mafia (which requires the elimination of the 3p)In post 193, Frogsterking wrote:Insight into Flavia's point of view: they think a lot about scum win con and not much else.In post 40, Flavia wrote:But mafia can't collaborate with the 3rd party in this game. Everybody losses. So, makes sense mafia would be as interested in this 3rd party as the town. Or not that interested yet as the game just started.
I was mainly responding to where you said he came to "the conclusion that I'm trueclaiming a bit too quickly." I was trying to tell you that I came to the conclusion just as fast.In post 348, furtiveglance wrote:Bell just said I probably was telling the truth. Considering that 1) there are 2 possible reactions to my claim (townread or scumread) and 2) anyone who scumreads a Miller claim will immediately look desperate (scum motivation for townreading me), this kind of 'mindmeld' is not at all improbable. So it has far less value than a mindmeld usually has, which isn't much even then.In post 141, The Bombay wrote:If it makes you feel better, Bell's reactions to your claim were my exact reactions too.In post 134, furtiveglance wrote:Bit late for random. I guess you want more explanation then. I think 21 comes to the conclusion that I'm trueclaiming a bit too quickly. 33 as well. Feels a bit "meh, not sure" which Bell was like as mafia in The Turing Test.In post 133, Flavia wrote:Random or serious?
This implies thoughts about you as a player wrt claiming Miller. I agreed with those thoughts about you as a player.In post 21, Bell wrote:I think you probably are a miller since I don’t see much point of you coming up with that on your own.
Rather it doesn’t seem to be part of your wheel house.
Do you like to fake claim? Have you fake claimed before?
Your role is that, you, as aIn post 455, Kokabiel wrote:I suppose it's time to come out with my modifier.
When i get modconfirmed the government receives a notification that the delegation will find out their identity during the next night phase(N2 in this case) unless i get killed.
Residents = townIn post 489, Bell wrote:So the moon light dancer who is an advocate used an ability that does not confirm their alignment but does out "The Government" in 2 turns unless they die now.
Is the government town or scum?
Nancy just called Mastina scum. Nice. It sure does help when they just admit to being a scum slot.In post 451, N.Y. M wrote:I also think that locktowning Bombay this early reads like possible tmi to me because while I do think Bombay is very likely town, a locktown read this early seems kind of suss.
In post 296, N.Y. M wrote:MASTINA'S PERSONAL READSLIST (no consulting hydra heads):
LOCKTOWN:
{The Bombay, furtiveglance}
Given they don't get the result until Night 2, what stops the government from just... killing you tonight?In post 492, The Bombay wrote:Your role is that, you, as aIn post 455, Kokabiel wrote:I suppose it's time to come out with my modifier.
When i get modconfirmed the government receives a notification that the delegation will find out their identity during the next night phase(N2 in this case) unless i get killed., activate your ability.townie
And then thegets a mod pm, saying that the3rd partywill be informed of their identity, unless you, ascum team, are eliminated this day phase.townie
Meaning, if you live, thengains information?the scum team
In post 284, Kokabiel wrote:an additional on-death trigger, and no it's sadly not a vengeful.
I find it hard to believe that the 3P's reaction to getting a PM that says "if you don't get Koka killed, then you will be outed to the scum team" is to immediately naked vote you and then call you scum.In post 455, Kokabiel wrote:I didn't say anything so i could watch the votes on me and their reasonings and Catguin looked like he had an eureka moment right after i got Modconfirmed. And AFTER that he asked what the hell a moonlight dancer is.
And it would be fairly immediate, seeing as how the advocate reveal is post 256.In post 262, PenguinPower wrote:it be scum
In post 525, Lukewarm wrote:Have you ever played scum before? lolIn post 523, Kokabiel wrote:It's not immediate. Penguin already scumread me even if he didn't state it. He broke character with his comments right after the announcement which is a pretty big tell. And now he is lurking because he doesn't feel pressure
You don't just... throw yourself out there after getting a PM like that.
Even if it he knew he needed you dead, it would also be a goal for him to not look terrible when you flipped with a role that says "on Fri Nov 11, 2022 5:43 pm, the 3p player got a PM that said that your win condition now requires the death of Koka" ?
In post 552, Frogsterking wrote:@Luke
I'm not going to resort to ad hominem this game because I don't want to be that kind of player and overall I think you're playing quite well, but I think you're propensity to trust Roden right now might be the death of us all because I think Passenger/Bell/Roden is an extremely tight team solve.
Frog, I think that you are not re-evaluating Roden's actions in light of his ability reveal. Roden having an Advocate ability explains his focus on Koka over Passenger.In post 430, Frogsterking wrote:You claim to scumread Passenger and Townread me but most of your ISO looks motivated to shade my slot and cause the Kookaburra wagon to go through instead of the Passenger wagon.
This looks like it was a trap question laid by a townie with that ability. His activation phrase was "Represent Residents," and he is checking to see if Koka's also has the word Resident baked into it.In post 386, Roden wrote:How did you activate your ability?
To reword, even if he is scum with passenger, trying to save passenger, then he just... does not include the self clearing part.In post 556, The Bombay wrote:Then there is the question of why would he lie to add a fake clear onto himself? Like, if he is scum, then that is a pure lie
The issue here is that I think of Roden's playstyle as more similar to my own then to yours, but I am gonna look more at the game you just postedIn post 561, Frogsterking wrote:I just attempted exactly what you're saying scum would never do and it caused my team to win the game. Please read 555 and 554 again and consider that your own skill as a scum player is causes you to make different choices than someone like Roden or I would
Frog is claiming that it could be a gambit where he either:In post 565, Bell wrote:Why are we considering Roden when they literally just said they would confirm themselves.
My badIn post 579, Lukewarm wrote:To be clear, before Roden's PR activated, I was already scum reading Koka, so this is not really a situation of me trusting the PR stuff over the reads.In post 571, Frogsterking wrote:Y'all kids with your fancy power roles don't have an appreciation no more for good old-fashioned scum huntin'
You just have a whole team solve building out from a preflip of Passenger, which is not how I look at the game at all, and therefore, hard for me to put a ton of weight to the cases you are making.
When I look at koka's play, I see scum motivation.
Like their claim started as "If you kill me something bad will happen" to " wait, you guys are going to kill me anyways, turns out I lied, and really what happens is the 3rd party is outed so long as I live"
Both halves of that claim look designed to survive then actual, real claims.
If we imagine a world where Koka is true claiming, and their role is "I activate, and so long as I live a day, then the 3p is outed" then their play makes very little sense. Why would a townie not activate that immediately at the start of day? Why would they activate it, but then not explain what it did right away? Why would they lie about how it worked entirely?
If this is Koka's town play with such an ability, then I will be kind of baffled tbh.
In post 593, Andresvmb wrote:I’m catching up.
Either of you get a mod pm about Roden?In post 594, JohnnyFarrar wrote: Same
For referenceIn post 599, JohnnyFarrar wrote:No?In post 596, The Bombay wrote:Either of you get a mod pm about Roden?
In post 531, Roden wrote:the secondary effect from my ability let's me send a message to my target mod-confirming me as town. I'd like for this player to announce this, please.
In what game ever has a mod been able to just... publicly confirm that someone used their PR? lolIn post 649, N.Y. M wrote:
@Mod, did Roden send a message to ANYONE?
It sounds like he’s claiming some day version of friendly neighbour.
Also@mod can you prod Flavia?
@Bell, it’s possible but it’s more likely he didn’t send it. Mod needs to clarify this asap.
~Nancy
For the record, my theory here was exactly that frog was the target for the message and then did not confirm lmaoIn post 651, The Bombay wrote:I have a theory, but it is best to just let Roden answer atp.
First, let's assume his informed claim is trueIn post 686, N.Y. M wrote:In post 676, DeasVail wrote:I don't really think that's a fair question to ask of the modAlright then you and furtive can tell me if what Frogs claimed qualifies as bastard or not? I’m not good at mech, so anyone who is, tell me.In post 677, DeasVail wrote:(@nancy)
Luke should know. I’ll probably sheep Bombay on this.
~Nancy
Frog, to be clear, I read this post, and I just strongly disagree.In post 685, Frogsterking wrote:He's not throwing scum by the way: he's gambiting in order to redirect the wagon off of Passenger and to potentially get a mislim on me. Most likely Roden's role provides utility to the scum team and Roden himself is no longer needed to be alive after his abilities activation, whereas scum need Passenger alive in order to activate his ability at night.In post 675, furtiveglance wrote:I'm unsure whether one scum is YOLOing, one town is *throwing* or if the Government is a type of Jester. The Gov didn't sound like a Jester though.
I can link you to a game where catboi was in a hood with frog, and in that hood catboi claimed to be an IC that would be revealed the following day.In post 704, furtiveglance wrote:Did you see my question about scum!Frog's motivation to lie? Surely they could just confirm you and Passenger would get votedIn post 703, Roden wrote:If anyone actually believes I publicly telegraph saving scum buddy Passenger in order to auto lose by Day 3 for literally no reason, I'm kind of at a loss for words
On the surface, this looks eerily like that situation to me.In post 2212, Frogsterking wrote:Until someone can confirm to me that role-changers are illegal in large themes, I believe catboi is a one-shot changeling-type role
The funny thing is that I am actually pretty happy with my play in the exact game you are referencing. I was actively pushing for the elimination of 4 out of 5 of the scum to die the day that they died. Which I certainly value over the day 1 hero solve approach.In post 723, Frogsterking wrote:If Luke is Town then this is strike two for me as far as Town play is concerned. I came into this game with an open mind and what I'm learning is that Town!Luke has <rand reads because they Townread people who kiss their butt, which scum are more likely to do.
There is a 25 post buffer, shared across all days, for going over the post limit.In post 735, Bell wrote:Is there some reason frog has gone over the post limit