Mass Effect Mafia (Draw)

[nintendoaddict1]

/confirm

DAMN YOU, GHOST.

[nintendoaddict1]

Well, I've never had a Redirect power before, but I guess I do something like 'X redirect to Y'

My wincon is accomplished when all infected and indoctrinated folks are dead. Or, for some, dead again. (Note: flavor)

[nintendoaddict1]

Don't directly quote your role PM. Plus I trust no one's "wincon" after I posted it because anyone could just have easily asked the mod for a protown wincon after my post.

And what was stopping

you

from asking Mod for a protown wincon in the first place?

FoS Guru

[nintendoaddict1]

vote: hiraki

because I don't like him (not really )

Vote: Rhinox

for beating me to the punch. Only

I

can vote Hiraki in RVS, you know.

[nintendoaddict1]

Lynching governor on Day 1 doesn't really sound like a great idea.

Vote: Sathoris

cause he's a roleblocker. Just a shot in the dark really.

Can a Governor Govern themselves?

[nintendoaddict1]

A governor saving himself will only do so as anti-town unless his wagon is a scumfest, which in itself will also tell us something.

VOTE: PV

Death to tali.

Right, because if they are town they know they are town and since it is 1-shot anyway, using it on themselves would be uber-scummy.

I lost her on the suicide mission, cause I didn't take her side in the argument. But, at least I took Joker's advice and took pictures. heheh.

[nintendoaddict1]

Nintendo,Silent...why is your vote still on someone who it is piratically a waste of a lynch today if they can just save themselves?

Cause it was RVS.

Which reminds me,

Unvote

[nintendoaddict1]

^^^ ITT scum backup now realizes that if he wants to get the governor shot I have to not use it today??

Caught scum-universal backup is caught.

Vote: ender

[nintendoaddict1]

^^^ ITT scum backup now realizes that if he wants to get the governor shot I have to not use it today??

Caught scum-universal backup is caught.

Vote: ender

toog is the backup though

My bad.

Vote Toog

[nintendoaddict1]

-Toogeloo pushing the governor lynch while being universal backup is terribad

-Silent Wraith's blatant bandwagon and then attempting to pass it off as "RVS" is even worse to me.

Unvote Vote: Silent Wraith

Yeah, these are things people have already said, I know.

--Wraith

Your hydra has someone with 'Wraith' in their name, doesn't it?

[nintendoaddict1]

My initial vote on Governor was RVS. Picked a power I didn't want scum to have. My callouts since then haven't had anything to do with Power, or are you not paying attention?

Picking who to vote for does not = RVS at ALL. Even if it was in the RVS your vote was not.

Vote stays.

[nintendoaddict1]

I don't think you understand what Random is. You specifically chose nintendo, did you not? Did you go to Random.org, plug in a list, and it came up with nintendo for you?

I had a list of people's roles I didn't want scum to have, I chose Governor.



Christ, are we really having an argument over semantics of what constitutes a RVS vote and what doesn't? I guarantee you that I am not the only voter that chose something specific using it in the RVS as a way to get reads.

I don't think you understand RVS. Here, quoted from the Wiki:
"At the beginning of a game of Mafia, there is very little information to be had. As a result, initial votes are made with no substantial reasoning offered. These are often referred to as random votes.
While many random votes are based on the generation of a random number (by a die or some other oracle),

they are just as often based on arbitrary factors, such as avatars, nicknames, or even other random votes.

"

Bolded for emphasis. Your caught, deal with it. Your AtE isn't gonna work. Oh, and striking a deal where we lynch you anyway? Are you just giving up to try to prove something? I smell a gambit, but it's not working.

[nintendoaddict1]

I just told you, I had a list of roles I didn't want scum to have. I chose Governor from that list as my vote.

Yeah, I gotta hear this. Unless your lists includes every role in the game, you are gonna look mighty scummy. ANY PR in scum control is a bad thing, but if you're scum you wouldn't care about that would you?

[nintendoaddict1]

why would you quote someone else saying their win con, but refuse to answer yourself?

Easy- he's nervous.

[nintendoaddict1]

I am willing to strike a deal right now with the entire town.

Lynch me today. If I flip town, tomorrow, no if ands or buts, you lynch Reck. I don't give a shit if a Cop scans him innocent. He dies.

Would love to hear responses to this.

Oh, and striking a deal where we lynch you anyway? Are you just giving up to try to prove something? I smell a gambit, but it's not working.

[nintendoaddict1]

Other than that, Toog is mighty fine. His first vote is actually glorious.

This doesn't sound like the TownHiraki I know.

[nintendoaddict1]

Toog is town.

...

Other than that, Toog is mighty fine. His first vote is actually glorious.

But that's the point.

Scum don't take these high risk maneuvers. They fit in with the crowd.

Toog has done too many things that aren't good townie to allow me to see him as town.

Ender, and probably Jason.

First you say Toog is town, then you don't see him as town, now you don't put him in your scumlist?

[nintendoaddict1]

The second is written incorrectly.

What I meant to say is that Toog has done too many things that have been noted to be scummy or radical. He hasn't fit in with the crowd, he's made himself stand out.

Can scum do this? Yes.

Are we lynching plausible scum who can do this on D1? No.

Excuses for a mistake you didn't catch before posting.

[nintendoaddict1]

how do you know what is in my head?

Wait, you're not den- hold on. Lookie what was on the next page!

The funny part is, you've never denied that this wasn't in your head.

FoS jason

[nintendoaddict1]

^^ lol nice try.

With what? You're being too vague.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think it is self evident what my last post meant.. you are both attempting to put words in my mouth.

Still not denying it. I'd vote you, but my vote is already on your partner.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think it is self evident what my last post meant.. you are both attempting to put words in my mouth.

Still not denying it. I'd vote you, but my vote is already on your partner.

Stop pushing something on something I didn't even say. You are now pushing a case of ' What you were thinking but didn't say in thread' which is complete BS. How do you know what I was or was not thinking.

Lets see...

I say It is not right to give a pass on a Newbie, even though I don't think he did anything scummy. I would not use the newbie card if I did think he was scummy as a way to explain it.

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was thinking it, and didn't deny it.

Its not up to me to deny it, it is now up to you as my accuser to prove I was thinking that.... can you do that? if not, then you have nothing. Your case is weak at best.

Pushing on something you didn't say? Exactly! You still haven't denied it being true. Three times now you have dodged this issue while redirecting to me. Never said I knew what you were or were not thinking, how's that for pushing something I didn't say? You're doing the same thing now.

It's not that I think you were setting up a lynch, but your refusal to deny that was what you were doing in the first place that makes you scummy.

Why is it not up to you to deny it? We are questioning YOU about something YOU did, yet, You will not answer unless we have evidence? How about dodging the issue here? Is that not enough evidence for you?

[nintendoaddict1]

What is it exactly I did apart from attacking someones stance of giving a newbie a seemingly free pass for something he would vote a non newbie for?

Now you're just plain ignoring the post completely.

Screw it.

Unvote, Vote: jason

You need to die first.

[nintendoaddict1]

Im not ignoring the post I just dont need to deny anything as I never even so much as implied it in the first place. what you are pushing is plain crap.

Its a null issue, close to a void issue and you seem intent on strawmanning it.

Please show any indication that I was thinking that I could be setting up tomorrows lynch. Can you? if not then I don't need to deny anything. Only if you could show indication of me thinking it can I then deny or confirm anything.

You know what you sound like right now? "I'm not saying if I set him up for a lynch... but I'm not saying if I didn't either."

You are deliberately withholding information that is CONSTANTLY being asked of you, for what? Cause you think it's a crap case. Wow. Of course scum would say that when they are shitting themselves. Any indication you were thinking of setting up lynches?

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

[nintendoaddict1]

Oh wow, now that I've actually taken the effort to put two-and-two together I realize that Hiraki/nintendo's beef with Jason is totally contrived and a blatant misrep.

Unvote Vote; Nintendo

Hiraki's is ewewewew but Nintendo is the one blowing the issue out of proportion and basically sheeping Hiraki. Maybe I'll make a more detailed explanation for this later, if I'm bored.

--Wraith

You aren't seeing his contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

[nintendoaddict1]

Usually Hiraki would have something to say at this point regarding me, so, Hiraki? What do you think of this jason x NA1?

[nintendoaddict1]

Nintendo, why have you ignored our posts proving you are misreppnig..especially the 'I actually said it' claim by you that has been proven wrong and why are you sticking so close to Hiraki? you really are sheeping him to the point I feel you could be trying to buddy him.

Oh, me? I'm not gonna answer your questions, I'm just gonna dodge around them.

Sound familiar? It's what you were doing. I haven't ignored them. See? I gave you an answer right there and you know what? It wasn't hard. I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

And I'm not that stupid as to go and try to buddy to someone who is always gonna think I'm scum anyway.

[nintendoaddict1]

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

Oh really?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it.

[nintendoaddict1]

It really shows in Mini 1156 between him and Pine.

iirc Pine was scum there.

[nintendoaddict1]

I can guarantee he is scum

How do you plan on doing that?

Vote: ender

[nintendoaddict1]

again another nintendo misrep I believe. Read the FULL post/sentance. and stop quoting only part of it. He is saying that

With the OMGUS
The Bandwagonning
and also the other reasons

And with those reasons he can guarantee Marco is scum (I disagree) but this is another case of Nintendo trying to misrep to make someone look bad.

Or he could be badtown.

jason, why the hell did you make a second post saying the exact same thing? Your buddy is getting lynched today and you're not going to stop it.

[nintendoaddict1]

why did you not quote the full sentance?

Fine.

"I can guarantee he is scum, I called it first."

I don't see how the "I called it first" bit changes anything. It's easy to call scum when you are scum, cause when they flip you look pro-town, but it's all WIFOM.

Where's my case? Look back a few pages, it's there. I'm not about to waste my time explaining it to you again, only to have it fly right through your head.

And will you be freaking patient? Holy shit man, I'm so sorry that I can't post every damn second.

[nintendoaddict1]

And yes, I actually want you to lay out word for word what your case is on me

I already did, look back on the last few pages.

[nintendoaddict1]

I want it in words

So yes, please in your own words... I want to hear it in YOUR own words why I am scum,.

Well I didn't shove my hand in someone's ass and make someone ELSE say it, so yes, I'VE already said it, in MY words. If that's not good enough for you, then tough shit.

[nintendoaddict1]

I want it in words

So yes, please in your own words... I want to hear it in YOUR own words why I am scum,.

Well I didn't shove my hand in someone's ass and make someone ELSE say it, so yes, I'VE already said it, in MY words. If that's not good enough for you, then tough shit.

There is no case from you thats why. OK question.. is it the 'I wasn't denying it' and the 'I actually said it' stuff? from a few pages back

Well I don't see any other case I made against you in this thread, so what do you think?

[nintendoaddict1]

well that has been disproven as nothing but misrep and lies by multiple people, and others have told you to shut up as its not a case.

Lies?
No sir, I was quoting what you said. So the lies were yours.

[nintendoaddict1]

What is it about the explanations proving you wrong is it you still disagree with enough to peruse a case of lies and misreps.

I don't know if this is a statement, a question, or some new form of grammar.

P.Edit: *facepalm* too lazy to go back and read for yourself, eh? Why should I tell you what you said? You forget or something?

[nintendoaddict1]

Ive read back, I am asking you to show me right now what it is I said, or what I have lied about.

Why are you so reluctant to put point by point your case? If you gen believed I was scum, you would have no problem stating again why.

As for the comment, I am asking what is it about others who say you are wrong, and have disproven your BS on me that you disagree with... does that make sense,

Show you what you said? Like I said before, I quoted everything I wanted to quote already and to quote it again would just waste time.

Being reluctant? How about you being reluctant to just go back and re-read the last few pages? I do believe you are scum, I think you are just going to ignore whatever I say about you anyway so I'm saving you the trouble and time by just referring you to the last few pages.

They can say whatever the hell they want about me. Doesn't change what I think.

he has been proven to be wrong, lying

Where have I lied?

His lack of willingness

jason is not willing to go back and read, yet, I am scummy for being unwilling?

[nintendoaddict1]

no your scummy for pushing lies

Where did I lie? You haven't answered that.

[nintendoaddict1]

no your scummy for pushing lies

Where did I lie? You haven't answered that.

Oh yes he did. Lol, read back.

Thank you, JASON, for that answer. Y'know... to the question I asked JASON.

[nintendoaddict1]

Oh, and the whole "I'm done with this, if you can build a case then build one" thing. So any attempt to use him not answering you to, somehow, paint yourself in a townier light fails.

Funny you should mention that. You don't think the whole "I'm done with this" post is scummy?

[nintendoaddict1]

Lie 1

Im not ignoring the post I just dont need to deny anything as I never even so much as implied it in the first place. what you are pushing is plain crap.

Its a null issue, close to a void issue and you seem intent on strawmanning it.

Please show any indication that I was thinking that I could be setting up tomorrows lynch. Can you? if not then I don't need to deny anything. Only if you could show indication of me thinking it can I then deny or confirm anything.

You know what you sound like right now? "I'm not saying if I set him up for a lynch... but I'm not saying if I didn't either."

You are deliberately withholding information that is CONSTANTLY being asked of you, for what? Cause you think it's a crap case. Wow. Of course scum would say that when they are shitting themselves. Any indication you were thinking of setting up lynches?

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

Lie 2

Oh wow, now that I've actually taken the effort to put two-and-two together I realize that Hiraki/nintendo's beef with Jason is totally contrived and a blatant misrep.

Unvote Vote; Nintendo

Hiraki's is ewewewew but Nintendo is the one blowing the issue out of proportion and basically sheeping Hiraki. Maybe I'll make a more detailed explanation for this later, if I'm bored.

--Wraith

You aren't seeing his contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

there are more, I am sure you can look back

1. Fair enough, but those are not lies, but misreps.
2. Wait... what happened to being done with this?

[nintendoaddict1]

Sorry, I do have to ask this, as it is important to the case against Nintendo..

if you admit that it was a misrep on your part, why is your vote still on me.

Cause I still think your scum.

And that's twice since you said you were done that you spoke about this.

[nintendoaddict1]

Nintendo, what is the scum intention of him bringing it up twice, then?

Cause he lied when he said he wouldn't talk about it anymore, that's why. He even said he was done with it AGAIN, so really he lied three times.

[nintendoaddict1]

Nintendo, what is the scum intention of him bringing it up twice, then?

Cause he lied when he said he wouldn't talk about it anymore, that's why. He even said he was done with it AGAIN, so really he lied three times.

And that makes him scum?

Lynch this guy already..

He lied... and you wonder why he is scum?

[nintendoaddict1]

Lynch all liars? Really?

Okay, what is the town motivation for lying? Since you care so much about analyzing motivation?

[nintendoaddict1]

Gambits are lies, lies to protect your role, lies that are not intentional, etc., etc.

Well, that is all certainly interesting, but what is the town motivation for lying?

[nintendoaddict1]

Lying for a gambit. Lying to protect your role. Lying on accident, because you tried to ignore someone flailing around, but you just couldn't because it was so scummy.

Myself and jason are accusing each other of lying. Here's what I get from you:

"Lying is scummy, X lied, Y lied. X is scum, but not Y."

[nintendoaddict1]

you flat out lied to make me look bad... that is the difference.

I said I was done, but then had more to say on the matter and had more questions for you as you did not let it go. Seriously.. quit pushing crap my way. IF someone continues to push a case on me after I said I was done, off course I am going to then reply.

Again, no. I later realized they were misreps and even said so, you need to be more precise in what you say. Yeah, you've said you were done many times, but never stuck to it. So, really, you meant "I'm done talking about this UNLESS someone else brings it up, then that makes it okay for me to go back on what I already said TWICE before."

So anyway, if he thinks I am scum, and Toog is my partner... why is your vote on Ender, Nintendo? surely you would be voting me, or my partner. so why ender?

Wow. In a game this size, there is definitely more than TWO scum, so I think at least the three of you are scum with probably one more person. Just because I think you are scum, and my vote is on someone else, does not mean a thing.

[nintendoaddict1]

if you realized they were misreps, why the hell did you still beat on about it for so long??

Cause I still think your scum.

[nintendoaddict1]

@Nintendo-Jason issue. So Nintendo misrepresented Jason and accused him (?). Then Jason pointed this out and Nintendo kept pushing that he didn't misrepresent Jason and has already stated all his reasons (which is a lie). Finally, Jason quoted Nintendo and Nintendo admitted that he misrepresented Jason. But what about the lies about

not misrepresenting

Jason. And yet, Nintendo keeps on calling Jason scum.

And Nintendo accuses Jason of lying because Jason said he was done with this argument and yet made another post about it.

After all this, Hiraki is calling Jason scum and not Nintendo.

This feels an awful lot like a weak attempt at trying to protect a mafia teammate.

[nintendoaddict1]

Almost like mafia buddies trying to disassociate themselves with each other.

Me and Hiraki? Scumbuddies? That'd be the day. I honestly look forward to that, as I cannot even begin to comprehend how THAT would turn out. It would probably have some kind of end-of-days effect to it, a few million will die(including us), and let's just say you won't want to eat the fish. Ever. Anywhere.

No, I've never seen Hiraki as scum, and he's acting the same now as when I've played with him before.

[nintendoaddict1]

Why is the Nintendo wagon not going to flip scum, In your opinion, Reck? he has admitted to lying and twisting to get a lynch.. that is scum, what town motivation is there for that?

I. Never. Lied. I said they were misreps. Now you are just misrepping what I said.

[nintendoaddict1]

Why is the Nintendo wagon not going to flip scum, In your opinion, Reck? he has admitted to lying and twisting to get a lynch.. that is scum, what town motivation is there for that?

I. Never. Lied. I said they were misreps. Now you are just misrepping what I said.

You DID lie before admitting they were misreps, IIRC.

Where.

[nintendoaddict1]

/facepalm. someone want to explain to him that using false and made up information to push a lynch is lying? Also, you still need to address these.

do you think it is ok to push BS on someone as long as you think they are scum then, facts dont actually matter

Can you link me to games you have played with Hiraki as town please?

Lynch all liars? Really?

Okay, what is the town motivation for lying? Since you care so much about analyzing motivation?

OK, what is town motivation for pushing a case you know is nothing but Misreps, and then admitting to knowing it was but using it anyway to get someone lynched?

1. If it gets scum lynched, it gets scum lynched.

2. http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... =2&t=17230
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=17488

3. See 1

[nintendoaddict1]

So you openly WILL push a case you know is wrong and not true to get someone lynched, correct?

Wow. Nice misrep.

I am starting to notice you are misrepping as much as you are saying I am misrepping.

[nintendoaddict1]

So you openly WILL push a case you know is wrong and not true to get someone lynched, correct?

btw, how's that "I'm not talking about this anymore" thing working out for you?

[nintendoaddict1]

It's a question, not a misrep of anything. You have a chance of denying it.

I did. When I called it a misrep.

It's a question, not a misrep of anything. You have a chance of denying it.

he already admitted it

Another misrep.

[nintendoaddict1]

OK, heres the million pound question.

If you are so sure I am scum, present your case on me now! seriously, I am actually begging you, please oh please post your case on me right now!!

Nah, cause all your going to do is call it a lie and a misrep so there's really no point. Also, since you're scum, why should I do ANYTHING for you?

[nintendoaddict1]

Why is the Nintendo wagon not going to flip scum, In your opinion, Reck? he has admitted to lying and twisting to get a lynch.. that is scum, what town motivation is there for that?

I. Never. Lied. I said they were misreps. Now you are just misrepping what I said.

You DID lie before admitting they were misreps, IIRC.

Where.

When you said Jason was thinking about setting up a lynch on a newbie. I don't recall Jason ever saying he was thinking about it. Just that newbies shouldn't be discounted just because they're new.

Oh wow, now that I've actually taken the effort to put two-and-two together I realize that Hiraki/nintendo's beef with Jason is totally contrived and a blatant misrep.

Unvote Vote; Nintendo

Hiraki's is ewewewew but Nintendo is the one blowing the issue out of proportion and basically sheeping Hiraki. Maybe I'll make a more detailed explanation for this later, if I'm bored.

--Wraith

You aren't seeing his contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch

, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

I don't actually recall the bolded.

I say no... the case is now I was thinking it, and didn't deny it.

[nintendoaddict1]

LOL DUDE.. SERIOUSLY? YOU ARE STILL PUSHING THIS????

Not pushing anything, he said he couldn't remember it, so I posted where you said what I was talking about. You're misrepping again.

P.Edit: Cause I still think you're scum.

[nintendoaddict1]

Sorry, my mistake meant to bold it. As much as this back and forth with Nintendo is both funny, and wanting me to pull my hair out.. I am now going to go and get drunk. Nintendo, I look forward to see what your true case is on me. (if you show it)

You have been misrepping me with almost every post.

[nintendoaddict1]

Sorry, my mistake meant to bold it. As much as this back and forth with Nintendo is both funny, and wanting me to pull my hair out.. I am now going to go and get drunk. Nintendo, I look forward to see what your true case is on me. (if you show it)

You have been misrepping me with almost every post.

No, I have not. CASE NOW PLEASE...I want your case on me right now.

I want evedience I am scum
I want evedience I was thinking it
I want evedience I am misrepping you.

Nintendo, even if you believe 100% someone is scum, it is still not alright to push a case you know is false.

I already said that the thinking bit was a misrep, so why are you still wanting me to make a case based on that?

marco, I was just quoting it that time to show you where I originally got that from.

Why is the Nintendo wagon not going to flip scum, In your opinion, Reck? he has admitted to lying and twisting to get a lynch.. that is scum, what town motivation is there for that?

I wasn't lying. Misrep.

So you openly WILL push a case you know is wrong and not true to get someone lynched, correct?

Not what I said. Misrep.

It's a question, not a misrep of anything. You have a chance of denying it.

he already admitted it

I didn't admit to that. Misrep.

[nintendoaddict1]

A question that needs urgently answered.

OK, actually. Who are your strongest town reads, Nintendo?

Reck, marco and Peregrine.

[nintendoaddict1]

see my posts on last page. /facepalm

I asked if you thought it was ok to push a lynch full of misreps your reply was

1. If it gets scum lynched, it gets scum lynched.
3. See 1

So you openly WILL push a case you know is wrong and not true to get someone lynched, correct?

Not what I said. Misrep.

you do realize what a ? is right?

it was me asking you a question, NOT making a statement...

Nintendo, do you have a case on me at all or don't you and are just hanging on to the misreps you already admitted to?

I doubt you are convincing anyone

I know what a ? is. I am saying no, that is not what I said, and in fact, never said. Read better.

[nintendoaddict1]

So if you knew I was me asking a question, then how could I be misrepping you?

Because the question was asked under the assumption that I would say yes to it.

[nintendoaddict1]

So if you knew I was me asking a question, then how could I be misrepping you?

Because the question was asked under the assumption that I would say yes to it.

So we go back to the question, if you knew your case on me was a complete misrep, why did you then keep pushing it.

Am I still pushing it? When was I still pushing it?

P.Edit: He is talking about my reads on my scumbuddies in another game.

[nintendoaddict1]

see above Marco, I actually hit submit too early and didnt finish it.

I was taking reads from Nintendo on his scum partners in a game where he was scum, and comparing them to who are his town reads here on the basis we can get info from his flip later. I wanted to see if he gave town reads on his scum partners (which is why i asked him for town reads in this game) and try to get a Meta on him.

You asked me for town reads before I gave you the link to the games I've been in, so, are you saying that you are only asking me for town reads in THIS game because of the reads I gave in another game(which I only linked to you AFTER you asked fro town reads from me)?

[nintendoaddict1]

Seem thats the thing,.... I really dont even know myself what you are pushing now.

You ask me why I keep pushing something, then, say you don't know what I am pushing?

[nintendoaddict1]

contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

You know what? The whole "The case was now I was thinking it and didn't deny it" bit? I really read that as him saying "I was thinking it."

[nintendoaddict1]

He admits the mistake. And yet, I am still pessimistic. Are you going to finally drop the BS against Jason?

*whisper* probably not *whisper*

I'll drop it, but I've still got my eye on him.

And that wasn't really funny.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

Urgh, read what he said. Toogeloo is not saying HE thinks you are VI... he is talking about others (sathoris) thinking you are VI. Seriously, Nintendo you need to read what is said, and understand the context it is in. I am not going to say this is another misrep (even though it is) I think you need to pay more attention to things.

Never said HE thought I was VI, I was responding to everyone tho thinks so.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

Urgh, read what he said. Toogeloo is not saying HE thinks you are VI... he is talking about others (sathoris) thinking you are VI. Seriously, Nintendo you need to read what is said, and understand the context it is in. I am not going to say this is another misrep (even though it is) I think you need to pay more attention to things.

Never said HE thought I was VI, I was responding to everyone tho thinks so.

When I said 'you' I did mean everyone.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

*facepalm* At least its a sliding scale of bad.

Fact is, if this is a policy lynch, town gets the following:
1) The elimination of a player who is acting scummy and not pulling their weight scumhunting wise.
2) PoE: at least one person is not scum that's known.
3) The elimination of a player that would be dragged to lylo because they're acting scummy.

Scum get:
1) A mislynch.

This post sounds like you are under the impression that I am town.

[nintendoaddict1]

are you implying you are scum?

No, just giving my opinion on what he said.

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

*facepalm* At least its a sliding scale of bad.

Fact is, if this is a policy lynch, town gets the following:
1) The elimination of a player who is acting scummy and not pulling their weight scumhunting wise.
2) PoE: at least one person is not scum that's known.
3) The elimination of a player that would be dragged to lylo because they're acting scummy.

Scum get:
1) A

mislynch.

Bolded. That's not implying you think I'm town?

[nintendoaddict1]

I think he is saying that Nintendo needs to die regardless since as either scum or VI, he is a bane to town's existence. As scum, we get rid of one of them, as VI we alleviate our stress of his presence. Scum get a mislynch if he is town VI.

Based on the comment, I think Sathoris believes Nintendo to be town, but is willing to get rid of him simply because of the VI status.

You think I'm VI now? You obviously don't know about the time I outed the Doc...

*facepalm* At least its a sliding scale of bad.

Fact is, if this is a policy lynch, town gets the following:
1) The elimination of a player who is acting scummy and not pulling their weight scumhunting wise.
2) PoE: at least one person is

not scum

that's known.
3) The elimination of a player that would be dragged to lylo because they're acting scummy.

Scum get:
1) A

mislynch.

Bolded. That's not implying you think I'm town?

Found another one.

[nintendoaddict1]

no, he is going over all scanarios of your lynch/flip.

If he was going to go over every scenario, under the "scum get" he would have put "lose one scum", wouldn't he?

[nintendoaddict1]

EBWOP: If it's a scum lynch, the advantages are obvious.

Oh, you say that NOW.

[nintendoaddict1]

wraith: why policy lynch when he can be vigged?

Re-Re-Redirect.

Are you ever gonna actually contribute the the game?

[nintendoaddict1]

the same could be said of Reck, Nintendo. You have yet to ask him if he is actually going to contribute.... why?

imo he is posting a lot more content.

[nintendoaddict1]

the same could be said of Reck, Nintendo. You have yet to ask him if he is actually going to contribute.... why?

[Reck] has made some content posts.. not many though.

in one post, you say I've actually made some useful posts
in another, you say I'm not contributing at all

COGNITIVE DISONANNNNNNCCCEEEE

inb4misrepaccusation

[nintendoaddict1]

Nintendo, who else do you think is scum in this game aside from me?

toog and ender

[nintendoaddict1]

attn vig shoot jason thx

FUCK JASON *IS* THE VIG

I seriously want to lynch him.

there is another vig, you know.

[nintendoaddict1]

TBH Ender's vote on Jason comes off to me as scum putting their vote in a "safe" place, because putting Nintendo at L-1 would look really scummy as an act of self-preservation. Yet I cannot understand why on earth Ender is voting Jason when he

should

by all means be trying to save himself.

Putting ender at L-1 would look less scummy?

[nintendoaddict1]

Vote: ender

YUP. CLAIMTIME. L-1.

Forgive me for sounding stupid, but do you expect Ender to claim something different than what's on the first page?

XDXDXDXDXD

[nintendoaddict1]

Unvote.

Vote: Ender

That's hammer.

So, ender, are you REALLY town?

[nintendoaddict1]

Scene, please.