This is clear misrepresentation. If
Also, using a speech mark in place of an apostrophe? That's a scum-tell if I ever saw one...
VOTE: Dramonic
DIE SCUMBAG
BUT I ONLY DID IT BECAUSE I LOVE
In post 12, Shadow Dancer wrote:Hmm... I don't know most of the players here...
In post 19, Gaoth wrote:tbh, i've seen so many people come in and talk about how many/which people they know during RVS that i was starting to think it was just a part of it. I personally don't think its scummy here. your reason for voting him is largely based on the way that you read into what he said.
I hope i satisfactorily responded to your unnecessary goading, hoppipster.
In post 20, Oversoul wrote:In post 15, Hoppster wrote:In post 12, Shadow Dancer wrote:Hmm... I don't know most of the players here...
"I TOTALLY HAVEN'T BEEN TALKING IN MY PRE-GAME SCUM QT - LOOK, I HARDLY KNOW ANYBODY HERE! IF I HAD A SCUM QT I WOULD KNOW MORE PEOPLE!"
Jumping to conclusions I see? At least we are out of RVS.
In post 20, Oversoul wrote:In post 18, Hoppster wrote:hey Gaoth what are your thoughts on serious votes
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Gaoth
This is just my insurance to make sure you don't miss this post like you appear to have missed my last one.
Hoppster.
[redacted]
[redacted!]
[REDACTED!]
In post 21, Shadow Dancer wrote:OK, first impressions so far:
- Gaoth has the winds.
- Hop is silly and doesn't make much sense... But if his vote was so serious, why did you unvote immediatelly just to prod-vote Gaoth?
- Over is fencesitting hardcore... Producing posts this long with mostly useless quotes in them is unethical this early in the game! Tell me, Over, which use doyousee in an early "Upick-choice" claim. And what exactly do you mean by "u-pick choice" the complete list that every one sent to Slaxx or just what roles we actually got?
In post 22, Mystery_Account wrote:I will need to have this game saved to this secret account. But more on me later. Maybe. Actually only if I feel like it, to be honest. Just remember: To the scum - I am watching you. And to the town - I am watching over you.
But first, to you Oversoul. Do you think that is honestly a good idea? Having good Warriors claim their picks is very dangerous for them. And scum can most likely claim their choice without worry. After all, any warrior can take any side in any given situation. So I am against it.
In post 53, Benmage wrote:vote hoppsterpost 15 scummmmy..havent read past pg1.
currently limited access for anterior dislocating my shoulder yesterday during rugby.... ..mri monday *fingers crossed*
neat info.... this shot they ended up giving me directly into my shoulder because i was still conscious and they couldnt give me any more anesthesia is called fentanyl which is 100 times more potent than morphine.....like a boss.
In post 55, killerjester wrote:This Shadow wagon is pretty messy
In post 56, EtherealCookie wrote:Something about Shadow Dancers comment on Hoppster in #21 I'm not a fan of and I'm not 100% what. I think it's because the "so serious" comment seems unecessary except to lessen his position there, and given the context of it being a vote on you, it falls broadly into the area of attacking your attacker. Not too bothered about that though, it's minor if it's there at all.
Translates to:
"SOMETHING ABOUT HIM IS SCUMMY I DONT KNOW WHAT BUT IM GOING TO VOTE HIM BUT I THINK I KNOW HERE LET ME EXPLAIN BUT WAIT ITS PRETTY MINOR."
Unvote
Vote: Primate
In post 59, Robocopter87 wrote:Robo is here. Meaning scum are obviously screwed.
VOTE: Scumhunter
You tricky son of a gun. You thought by naming yourself the finder of scum that people would believe you to be town.
I didn't buy it.
In post 60, Scumhunter wrote:Trolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll tiiiiiime.
I'd just like to take a moment to thank slaxx for giving me such an amazing role. It's a shame to waste such a role on a game with this terrible of a player base though. Seriously this game is like the retard room at a special ed convention.
vote: killerjesterbecause I wish I was a jester.
In post 63, Sir Bastion wrote:meanwhile the wagon on shadowdancer may end because quite frankly (and in comparison to another game I am currently in quite positive) he performed the correct intelligent response to such a wagon.
Ignore it.
There was hardly a case on him of any worth and while I'd hoped pressure might have made him make a mistake. He didnt. Good for him.
+1 smarty points
Doesnt make him town though.
In post 52, Shadow Dancer wrote:Hmm... That does nothing... OK
vote Tragedy
Hey, CAT, I found the ideal avatr for you!
In post 65, Shadow Dancer wrote:@CAT: Wrong question. Right question is: Why didn'tyouhave any desire to find out what a "mystery" vote does?
In post 73, Sir Bastion wrote:I do not join the case of primate because its the same case against me, and since I know the case against me is false, then unless some other factors are introduced (how primate defends himself being chief example) then there is from my perspective no case to begin with.
In post 76, Sir Bastion wrote:That leaves Primate and Bastion, both players didn't really find anything majorly scummy about Shadow, but voted him anyway off of partial leads. I think it's likely one of these two players is scum.
In post 76, Sir Bastion wrote:'zis is a very good post.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Primate
Why is is a good post?
In post 118, GhostWriter wrote:SD is first up to bat, seeing as I actually don't have a scumread on Tragedy yet, and I feel that's an important component to my KJ read that I'd like to have.
In post 56, EtherealCookie wrote:Something about Shadow Dancers comment on Hoppster in #21 I'm not a fan of and I'm not 100% what. I think it's because the "so serious" comment seems unecessary except to lessen his position there, and given the context of it being a vote on you, it falls broadly into the area of attacking your attacker. Not too bothered about that though, it's minor if it's there at all.
Translates to:
"SOMETHING ABOUT HIM IS SCUMMY I DONT KNOW WHAT BUT IM GOING TO VOTE HIM BUT I THINK I KNOW HERE LET ME EXPLAIN BUT WAIT ITS PRETTY MINOR."
Unvote
Vote: Primate
In post 134, Tragedy wrote:
Gee, I wonder how everyone's not noticing Dram.
I don't understand how you like that vote.
In post 137, Primate wrote:I think Oversoul, Duplicity are town as hell.
I suspect Catfish, Killjester, Etheral Cookie, Shadow Dancer are probably town.
Benmage, Dram, Tragedy explicit are can't tells.
Everyone else I need to think about. Specifically Bastion. I've seen a couple of things I'm unsure about and I don't know whether to vote him or put him in the suspect town slot. That'll be some point tomorrow, not another two days.
Unvote
In post 139, EtherealCookie wrote:by the way mr. hoppster
stop
buddying
me
(itsobviousnow your last three posts have involved me somehow)
In post 145, EtherealCookie wrote:Primate, why would you say you have a power role?
That seems hardly intelligent.
In post 156, Sir Bastion wrote:I want to hear a better reason how Hoppster has singled out the same post by EC twice I aksed him and his answer was:
It was a good post from EtherealCookie because he pointed out something very scummy that might have gone unnoticed otherwise.
Which is fine even if I disagree on the quality of the post, but he repeats quoting it again exactly 50 posts later in post 132
[...]
Even if you accept the reasoning why its good the first time, the need to repeat it again 50 posts later feels odd to me and I'd like answers.
In post 159, Duplicity wrote:@ Sir Bastion -I'd rather not go into the exact disagreement right now but I'll explain it later in the day.
In post 26, Primate wrote:Something about Shadow Dancers comment on Hoppster in #21 I'm not a fan of and I'm not 100% what. I think it's because the "so serious" comment seems unecessary except to lessen his position there, and given the context of it being a vote on you, it falls broadly into the area of attacking your attacker. Not too bothered about that though, it's minor if it's there at all.
In post 82, Hoppster wrote:Primate was all over the place with his "well this might be scummy but it might not be don't know why but it could be because of perhaps that but then again not but yeah because I can but might just be me actually it doesn't matter hey I don't think it even exists but still I may as well".
In post 160, Hoppster wrote:from what I gather, you havetwothreetypes of reads:
Town
- Probtown
- Null / Don't know / Need-to-think-about / Suspect town(?) / No read for the moment
In post 162, Sir Bastion wrote:PR can mean Post Restriction fyi.
The whole George bush fiasco hints it is more likely power role though.
In post 165, Tragedy wrote:Hoppy wrote:
Also:
In post 160, Hoppster wrote:from what I gather, you havetwothreefourtypes of reads:
Town
- Probtown
- Null / Don't know / Need-to-think-about / Suspect town(?) / No read for the moment
Scum
Fixed That For Me
FTFY. Don't misrep either. 'Cause I had to reread and realize that he made Town/ProbTown/Duneven/Scum list.
In post 166, Benmage wrote:In post 74, Hoppster wrote:In post 53, Benmage wrote:vote hoppsterpost 15 scummmmy..havent read past pg1.
currently limited access for anterior dislocating my shoulder yesterday during rugby.... ..mri monday *fingers crossed*
neat info.... this shot they ended up giving me directly into my shoulder because i was still conscious and they couldnt give me any more anesthesia is called fentanyl which is 100 times more potent than morphine.....like a boss.
SO THE LEGENDS ARE TRUE.
What does this mean?
Still trudging..... got some good meds
In post 164, Sir Bastion wrote:errrrr
isn't it the opposite of that? >_>
Might have misread his post, Is GB a role or a post restriction?
Someone earlier mentioned George Bush. I'm not too worried about him as a threat. It'll soon become obvious if he is here, because as soon as we vote for anyone else for lynch he will rig the system LIKE HE DID IN 2000. DONT MIND SEEING HIM WIN THIS TIME.
In post 229, Duplicity wrote:Also the way that SD is trying to make multiple relevant posts in a row instead of sticking them all together should make him obv-town. What he's essentially doing is keeping the battery running.
In post 231, Shadow Dancer wrote:That's not the reason. It's just my usual posting style. Also I doubt that the battery runs solely on post count... It's probably closer to word or line count, most likely taking into account how many players are active. Hence it's even more important that the lurkers finally post.
In post 275, Benmage wrote:In post 270, Hoppster wrote:... also, Benmage, do you actually want a response to that GreyICE thing?
Why else would I have asked for it... twice now??
In post 289, Scumhunter wrote:Town reads (from strongest to weakest): Gaoth, Killerjester, Tragedy, Hoppster, Oversoul, Duplicity
In post 257, Duplicity wrote:direct quote: "i have a good idea how the battery works from reading into it and watching and playing a few of vi's games, there's multiple factors and variables andSo Mister Duplicity, the battery operates on postcount you say?
In post 291, Benmage wrote:I'm much more experienced and quite frankly... much better than you.
[...]
In conclusion: MOAR HOPP VOTES.
In post 291, Benmage wrote:Lets go back a few steps and review:
-I initially vote you and call you out for being scummy in post 15. Instead of trying to understand where I am coming from, and doing the town-thing (fixing the error of an incorrect townie)... You choose to do a classic scummy response and make a joke of it. The joke of course a way to both sidestep whatever reasoning I may have on you, and to also undermine said reasoning.[/b]
In post 291, Benmage wrote:In post 15 we get an early.. very serious approach from Hoppster. He calls out rvs back-n-fourth voting as being unproductive, he votes Shadow Dancer and later comments that he moved his vote off of shadow dancer because a scummier person came along.. not that he no longer felt Shadow Dancer scummy.
So lets review. Hoppster votes Shadow Dancer and accuses him of having "fun" during the rvs... being unproductive, and therefore anti-town and scummy.
Yet when Hoppster is voted by me he....?? Has fun with it and makes a joke of it. He, by his own definition is being unproductive antitown, and scummy. He's further unproductive in how long it takes him to finally answer me. And then his answer still only contains jabs to undermine me.
In post 292, Benmage wrote:In post 290, Hoppster wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: dramonic
Yeah, I changed my mind. Dramonic is worse than Primate - he's actually provided no content whatsoever.
Lurker hunting...classic I dont want to make waves scum.
In post 293, Benmage wrote:First, for the sake of irony. I'm going to illustrate how completely idiotic and hypocritical scumhunter is.
In post 311, dramonic wrote:im commenting on your reading skills SH ;p
In post 357, dramonic wrote:Aren't you looking for an easy wagon <3
In post 368, GhostWriter wrote:I keep going back and forth with a lot of people (Benmage, Over, SH, and Primate are the 4 I'm looking at mostly).
In post 370, CATFISH wrote:Lots o homework.
In post 373, Shadow Dancer wrote:Other stuff turned up... SO nothing new from me today... Sorry.
Code: Select all
[unvote][/unvote]
[vote]Dramonic[/vote]
In post 374, Oversoul wrote:Why am I a wut?
In post 375, Sir Bastion wrote:Hmm I'm surprised you are making people so aware of the battery if you let it drain out draconic is going to get lynched unless he convinces people to move wagon.
This is going to get you what you want right? Either he contributes enough to save himself or he's dancing a foot off the ground
In post 379, Benmage wrote:You want to talk about active lurking. Look at EC he is the epitome of coasting. Go ahead... ISO him, puhlease. He's all minimal comments on nothing of consequence!
EC is the lurker togo.
Hoppis more then just the lead wagon. It's also who most people can agree to be happy with seeing get lynched.
Duplicity has said he's willing to lynch EC. I clearly am. I think SH would join.
Let me ask you, what is your position on EC?
In post 56, EtherealCookie wrote:Something about Shadow Dancers comment on Hoppster in #21 I'm not a fan of and I'm not 100% what. I think it's because the "so serious" comment seems unecessary except to lessen his position there, and given the context of it being a vote on you, it falls broadly into the area of attacking your attacker. Not too bothered about that though, it's minor if it's there at all.
Translates to:
"SOMETHING ABOUT HIM IS SCUMMY I DONT KNOW WHAT BUT IM GOING TO VOTE HIM BUT I THINK I KNOW HERE LET ME EXPLAIN BUT WAIT ITS PRETTY MINOR."
Unvote
Vote: Primate
In post 380, Benmage wrote:Dramonic simply hasn't contributed. I'm much less inclined to lynch someone with flat out zero contribution. Then someone whose trying to hide through posting enough to not be a lurker... but content wise, nothing of substance. If dramonic doesn't get his act together it'll certainly be something to press. But his lynch doesn't sit well with me. Posting the way he has, almost begs to be lurker lynched. I think scum dram plays it better.
In post 311, dramonic wrote:im commenting on your reading skills SH ;p
In post 419, Shadow Dancer wrote:Seriously, when I see those walls on this page I wanna vomit over my keyboard. What is wrong with you guys?
Definitely not catching up today
I have NO idea what you're saying here... something along the lines of scum don't bus/distance/make (il?)logical votes?In post 440, GhostWriter wrote:Benmage: [...] The EC vote, though, makes no sense for him to do as scum, in my opinion. Especially after EC tried using an older post to defend himself from the vote.
In post 440, GhostWriter wrote:That said, my SD vote is beyond useless.
In post 440, GhostWriter wrote:EC, however, feels quite viable.
In post 440, GhostWriter wrote:I don't really get the Dramonic case.
^^^ could we have your other reads?In post 371, Hoppster wrote:In post 368, GhostWriter wrote:I keep going back and forth with a lot of people (Benmage, Over, SH, and Primate are the 4 I'm looking at mostly).
Coool so you can give us your reads apart from those 4 then?
In post 445, Hoppster wrote:That attack on EC is a stretch: answering abruptly/bluntly != not answering.
In post 431, Sir Bastion wrote:So unless a replacement is found or someone makes a strong case dramonic will be lynched at the end of today it seems
In post 459, Gaoth wrote:I read him as townie because even with the sarcasm, he still comes off as though he is scumhunting. Also, its not the first time I have seen a townie play like this, *coughchesskidcough* and in my mind scum don't just attack people, sarcastically or otherwise, since they try to not rock the boat.
A WILD RATTATA APPEARS! HYPER BEAM THAT SON OF A BITCH!!!!
In post 463, farside22 wrote:@Gaoth: I learned from Dexter Mafia that sniping and sarcasm is a null tell. I had a town read on a player that was snipping and sarcastic and he was scum. I think the only point I have in favor of EC was his point against Primate, which I agreed with when I read it. Other then that he's just pretty much floating by.
In post 464, Oversoul wrote:EC has been MIA for 4 days. I would like him to please come back. Totally ambivalent as to which wagons I should vote for... >_>
Duplicity, I reread EC I don't understand what you are saying that he is scum from it. ;_; He has similar posting to Dramonic, but it looks more active lurking than Dramonic's posting.
In post 509, Quilford wrote:Hoppster why are you voting Dram?
VOTE: Benmage
I'll finish reading soonish.
In post 511, Quilford wrote:But why is no content a scumtell?
Actually now would be a good time to meta dramonic
answer that anyways
In post 590, Benmage wrote:Are u kidding me. I explained my role and information in full detail. How many times have you seen both fakeclaims (and mislynches due to fail claims) as information is slowly revealed.. and people go "why didn't you reveal all"
I've seen that alot. Simpsons Mafia the cop was mislynched for failclaiming/trailing info D1.
I fullclaimed to denounce a failclaim. But like I said. Just go through with it already... i dont care anymore.
In post 601, CATFISH wrote:Oh my god Tragedy.
But yeah I believe Bastion. Amrun better hurry ~
Can we lynch Tragedy and dram tomorrow?
In post 613, Tragedy wrote:'Cause I said something about specific people?
Going for dram now won't work, I guess, you know?
But I think Oversoul somewhat has a connection with Benmage.
I think.