And...
VOTE: xReckonerx
For being too good in the last game I played with him and catching scum before I'd had a chance to do it myself
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
In post 162, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Can everyone really not even see that kuribo isn't even trying to scumhunt?
In post 175, Lowell wrote:unvote, vote kublai, sleeplessassassin is also scum.reck, spring, sociopath and kuribo are town.Print this and put it up on your wall. Someday it will be worth money.
In post 188, Kublai Khan wrote:Also, after sleeping on it, I'm not digging the case on kuribo anymore.
In post 198, Grimmjow wrote:Oh my shit what is this 8 pages already how have I not been keeping up with this game.
In post 234, kuribo wrote:Why the fuck do you think I usually replace into games instead of starting from scratch? BECAUSE I FUCKING HATE STARTING FROM SCRATCH. I can't read people for shit unless the ball is already rolling. It's one of my weaknesses as a mafia player, and one that apparently has only been excaberated by taking two years off.
In post 209, elvis_knits wrote:Chunkykev unvotes his RVS vote without revoting. Scummy.
In post 182, chunkykev wrote:At work just now but will reread later when at home and hopefully find some reads of my own.
In post 239, kuribo wrote:I didn't say I wasn't angry, I said I'd type however the fuck I wanted
In post 270, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Hi. Some reads:
Reck -- unsure, but he's ALWAYS hard to read for me. I'll be keeping a very close eye on him.
chunkykev: Was kinda scummish, not as much now. Will also keep an eye on.
elvis: Bizarre, but I've never played mafia with her before; I only know her from GD/MD/62. Will watch.
SpyreX: Another one that's notoriously hard for me to read.
kuribo: I'm biased, because I still loathe him from our last game. Will try to be objective.
Fate: Fuck me running, I still hate this guy. Useless, and likely scum. His joking of bussing is likely not a 'gambit' or 'ploy' so he's probably pretty much the scum mouthpiece.
KK: Don't think I've played with him before; must read older games.
DGB: Always scum. Always.
Elli: always scummy-looking, but never scum. Absolute town here.
Grimm: Don't know him; had a dream of him recently which makes me wary; reserving judgment.
Hindu: Must refrain from kneejerking on him. He's probably town or 3rd party.
Rhinox: Annoying avatar, what else needs to be said?
Lurkalicious Lowell: Pssh. Non-entity.
In post 287, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Chunky, kuribo's scumminess should be obvious. It's almost like he WANTS to be lynched. He is posting random nonsense and getting overdefensive rather than pursuing a suspect.
In post 290, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Kuribo is just obvscum. He isn't pursuing any suspects and is just wasting space with his posts. Anyone who calls him scum is just an asshole in his eyes.
In post 300, SocioPath wrote:UnvoteVote: Sleepless Assassin
In post 302, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Chunky, it looks like we can get used to that with this group.
In post 304, Lowell wrote:In post 301, chunkykev wrote:In post 300, SocioPath wrote:UnvoteVote: Sleepless AssassinAnd we have another vote with no explanation. Very helpful there, Socio Any thoughts or reasons to add at all?I find it weird that you care so much about this, actually. You and sleepless dating or something?
In post 319, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Chunky, I always do that with my first vote.
In post 322, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I don't joke/random vote. Second vote in this specific game was early enough that I treated it like a first. I haven't made a third vote, but when I do, reasons will probably either be obvious or stated in that post or both.
In post 24, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Vote Reck
In post 63, Sleepless Assassin wrote:unvote, vote spring
In post 354, chunkykev wrote:@Sleepless Assassin: Are you happy for people to vote or say they have a scum read on someone without a good reason or explanation? Post#302 suggests thatyou are notbut I just can't get over the feeling you were just trying to sound like you were agreeing with me for buddying up purposes. So what are your views on voting or giving scum reads without reasons (at this point in the game, not in the random/joke vote stage)?
In post 356, springlullaby wrote:Vote reckI still find sleepless ass scummy. But reck's wagon jump is scummier atm.
In post 358, Grimmjow wrote:@DGB: What are you doing this game? Other than just popping in to make random assertions as to who is scum and who is town.
In post 321, chunkykev wrote:@DrippingGoofball, will you be adding anything at all on day 1 or just continue with seemingly random scum/town reads with no reason or explanation to discuss?
In post 360, xRECKONERx wrote:skimming isn't scummy
In post 365, Grimmjow wrote:2) At the time I had posted that, I had just seen DGB's jump into the thread, and it wasn't until I posted that I came across your post.
In post 446, Sleepless Assassin wrote:before anyone hammers, let me do a big post with reads on everyone.
In post 450, Rhinox wrote:Well lots of people have been useless up to this point, and thats entirely independant on the number or lengths of posts one has. This is a large game, you can't expect everyone to be leading the conversation, you end up even worst than the clusterfuck this thread has been so far.
In post 460, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Khan - A lot of people say he's town, and I tend to agree. So. Joke votes Spy.Explains SDC for me.Asks Reck ab out his "SDC has scum" post. Does his list, votes Kuribo. Explains list to Pine, asks for better reads from Pine. Explains Kuribo vote, admits it's weak because it's early. A lot on Kuribo then switches to reck (huh?). Adds me to his list while removing Fate, Pine, and ZD. Meh, this'll be my weakest town read I think. His reconsideration of Kuribo seems weird, but I think it makes sense. And he seemed to tunnel on Kuribo for a while. Mostly looks fine though.
In post 33, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 31, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Reck, I've been away a little while. Wanna fill me in?
I'm not Reck, but I'm pretty certain it refers to the fact that they are a sort of clan...
...that screams at you....
.....Until you die.....
...
VOTE: SpyreX because he needs to spend less time on mafia and more time with his family. C'mon everyone. Let's help him break his mafia habit.
In post 488, Kublai Khan wrote:Your play in this game has been composed of nothing be challenging other people's votes and reads, yet your reads and votes are very scarse.
In post 488, Kublai Khan wrote:Anyone who calls anyone else town is particularly distasteful to you.
In post 488, Kublai Khan wrote:Anytime you have expressed any suspicion, you've not backed it up with any kind of vote.
In post 488, Kublai Khan wrote:Anytime you have expressed any suspicion, you've not backed it up with any kind of vote. To wit:In post 296, chunkykev wrote:While I agree that Kuribo is looking scummiest just now In post 307, chunkykev wrote:Sleepless has moved up my scum list as the post seems inconsistent with his own actions and nothing more than buddying up to me.These are the only two players you've called suspicious, and both of them have had the biggest wagons on them. By not voting, you're soft-backing those wagons with a "I'm for them, but I'm not going to put myself on record as supporting them". You're playing exactly like a mafioso who is extremely tentative about joining a wagon unless he knows it's going to be a lynching wagon.
In post 555, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Okay, so. Reality visited me the last couple of days. In the future, you will most likely be hearing my Great Wisdom much more frequently.Now, who to choose. Rhinox and DGB are quite scumalicious currently.Hmmm. Eeny, meeny, miny, mo.unvoteVote: DGB
In post 602, Kublai Khan wrote:Your vote isn't more IMPACTFUL because you vote less.
In post 602, Kublai Khan wrote:To wit:In post 572, chunkykev wrote:It has not gone unnoticed that your (Khan%u2019s) attack on meheated up soon after I brought up a possible link between you and SA(You mentioned I should put a vote down in post #420. I questioned SA about a possible link to you in post #473 and then you call me scummy for the first time in post #477). Could be coincidence, but I%u2019ve learned to keep a close eye on any %u201Ccoincidences%u201D you notice in a mafia game.What the fuck is this double-talk? You say it might be a "coincidence" (note sinister quotation marks), but you acknowledge that my reason for calling you scummy is for reasons stated prior to the basis of your "coincidence".
In post 602, Kublai Khan wrote:And you don't back up your suspicions with a vote, you just want other people to think of me as scummy so you can jump on the wagon later on. Pussy.
In post 604, Kublai Khan wrote:I know where DrippingGoofball stands on every poster in this game, including who she can't get a read on because they haven't posted enough.
In post 604, Kublai Khan wrote:I don't know where chunkykev stands
In post 642, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'd rather be lynched than persevere in a game full of cranky people while my life sucks eggs.
In post 669, Kublai Khan wrote:But your "Enough's enough. Khan is going to get his wish..." post is straight up appeasement and blame shifting. I checked your iso, you've never asked DrippingGoofball any direct questions about any specific reads, you've just asked vague-y "Are you going to contribute?" questions which are insulting to answer for anybody.
In post 669, Kublai Khan wrote:Unfocused scum-hunting
In post 669, Kublai Khan wrote:Shattered Viewpoint- Absolutely weak lurky play.
In post 672, Kublai Khan wrote:She's also done the "fuck this game, just lynch me and get me out of it" as town (Metropolis:Revisited). Which is what her play in this game reminds me of.
In post 678, elvis_knits wrote:In post 656, chunkykev wrote:
However, in the context of the game, don't mean to sound harsh, but that is no excuse. If you can't play the game you should be asked to be replaced. If you are playing the game then you must be held accountable for your play and I still expect reasons for your reads and votes - it would be wrong to treat you differently to anyone else. If you have reasons then share them and you must have reasons if you are town.
This is such bullshit. I hope I'm still voting you.
Most people in this game are throwing out unsupported reads. Most of the players here are gut players, and most of them are not explaining their reasons. Fixating on somebody who doesn't have the time to fight you off, instead of attacking someone who might eviscerate you, is cowardly and scummy.
In post 688, elvis_knits wrote:But you're also voting DGB. Why is DGB the worst?
In post 674, chunkykev wrote:If Shattered fails to give me a decent answer to my questions, or continues to ignore them, then I would support a Shattered lynch.
In post 691, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 669, Kublai Khan wrote:tl;dr xRECKONERx isn't scum-hunting. He's fucking around and jumping on wagons. Scum-tell.
are you willing to stake your life on that?
because I'll go 1v1 with you in a fucking heartbeat if it gets me out of this game faster
In post 700, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:No. I have bigger fish to fry at the moment.In post 656, chunkykev wrote:@Shattered - Could you please answer my question in post #572?
[/quote]In post 702, Hinduragi wrote:unvoteVote: Hinduragi
In post 719, kuribo wrote:In post 689, chunkykev wrote:I would say DGB is one of the worst because she has continually ignored my questions and continued to post reads with no reasons behind them.
oh bullshit, she can't answer your questions if she's not reading the game / half-assing it / whatever she's doing
also, your post assumes that she gives enough of a damn to make a change to her style just because you asked her to
In post 689, chunkykev wrote:When I put my vote down, she was online and I was hoping to get an immediate reaction after continually being ignored. I did, and it didn't address any of my concerns. All she said was she didn't care and still gave no reasons for her previous reads so I am happy to keep my vote where it is just now.
In post 724, kuribo wrote:In post 703, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 696, Hinduragi wrote:Do you REALLY think Grimmjow's town or are you defending him because you're boyfriends?
He has legitimately done nothing scummy or worthy of suspicion, and the way everyone wants to keep throwing shit his way screams apathetic lurkerhunt instead of genuine scumhunting.
I agree with this. Grimm's no scummier than say, MME who's obviously flaking, or Shattered who's a retard, or that guy whose name escapes me that asked to be replaced like ten pages ago
It's pretty obviously shooting fish in a barrel.
In post 726, Max wrote:No Daykill Has OccuredI have included the vote in #702 for consistency
In post 728, elvis_knits wrote:Everyone who just celebrated the fake vig death of chunkykev should be voting him.
In post 744, Lowell wrote:Not sure why the wagon on sleepless seems to have fizzled out. unvote, vote chunky. Let's see if this one can stick instead.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:Problem with that is, I do agree with him on that point--- but this isn't MD, and you're not going to change the playstyle of those that do this.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He did finally drop a vote onto DGB for this, but... what? This wasn't worthy of a god damn vote until he was called out for not voting and until Shattered QuoteTags, Elli, Fate, and I were already on the wagon.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:Why accuse someone of not answering your attacks when you already know they're barely reading the game? I mean, listen, I personally think if DGB has too much shit going on in her life to give this game the attention it needs, she should just replace out and we'd all understand. Not like her slot's in a fucked position anyway. But to try and paint it as if she's intentionally ignoring you? That's disingenuous as all fuck.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He doesn't even express an interest in Shittered QuoteTags until after it's pointed out that he's been ignoring people who aren't DGB.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:I really don't like how chunky seems to be trying to modify his shit to adapt to the criticisms he's called out on.
In post 747, kuribo wrote:In post 746, chunkykev wrote:Firstly, how could I have known she was not %u201Creading the game / half-assing it / whatever she's doing%u201D? I don%u2019t know her personal life and she only posted about that after I had put my vote down. I have explained this already%u2026
lolwhut
In post 638, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Here's what.
My husband threatened to leave me, said he'd been miserable for 26 years and there was nothing I could do to change his mind. I ran to find a job because I was going to have to make ends meet more solidly than with my web income alone.
I am now spending my days lining up lightbulbs and climbing giant ladders to move merchandise at a hardware store, for minimum wage. At 46. With a Master's degree in Molecular Biology.
He's back, but I'm not taking any chances.
So.
I'm sorry if I'm not in the mood for long winded cases.
You're getting what I can give.
If that's not good enough, lynch me.
In post 674, chunkykev wrote:I have continually asked Goofball about her posts (yes, not about the specific reads, but if she's going to give reads on multiple people then I want reasons for them all). The fact she has continued to ignore my questioning and continued to post reads with no reason is enough for me to put my vote down and hopefully get some answers from her.
You absolutely did accuse her of ignoring your questioning after she explained what was going on.
This isn't a matter of opinion, it is irrefutable fucking fact.
In post 748, kuribo wrote:In post 746, chunkykev wrote:You've got to be joking. If you are trying to build a case against me, how about actually looking at the facts?I voted DGB in post #637 and being accused of ignoring people that are not DGB happened after that (in post #678 and is clearly wrong). I%u2019ve %u201Cexpressed an interest%u201D in Shattered in post #296 and #572, and I even asked Shattered to respond to my earlier posts in post #656, in the very same post I responded to DGB and before I was accused of ignoring people that are not DGB.So why did you claim I hadn%u2019t expressed an interest in Shattered until after I was wrongly accused of focusing just on DGB? Deliberately ignoring the facts to make me look bad or a genuine mistake?
I'm not saying you ignored DGB, I'm saying you ignored everyone BUT DGB and waited until it was viable to throw your vote down.
In post 750, kuribo wrote:what does this even mean, expressed an interest?
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He doesn't even express an interest in Shittered QuoteTags until after it's pointed out that he's been ignoring people who aren't DGB.
In post 757, Pine wrote:Pfft. You're still in the process of going down hard, so while that added detail is somewhat pertinent, it is also largely irrelevant.
In post 814, SocioPath wrote:Now that scum daytalk has ended, I think we should lynch Seraphim.
In post 827, Rhinox wrote:So SA makes a big post and you pick out one insignificant little point and dedicate a whole post to it? what was the point of this post?
In post 844, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 840, chunkykev wrote:Chunkykev can talk his way out of anything because his answers are honest townie answers. Easy to explain anything when you are honest town.
Yeah, I used to have that "Come at me with your case! Let's wall and I'll prove you wrong!" attitude as scum. It's so painfully transparent now.
In post 847, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:In post 805, xRECKONERx wrote:Guys Spy is scumIn post 837, xRECKONERx wrote:This Spy wagon needs more votesIn post 840, chunkykev wrote:Also, how is Shattered avoiding any more attention? He is one of my top scum choices just now.
Hush now, the adults are talking.
In post 856, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I've spoken with the Mod about this issue.
In post 572, chunkykev wrote:Any chance of sharing that great wisdom any sooner? I am incredibly pissed off with DGB as I questioned her about her useless list of reads with nothing behind them, yet she continues to do them, and I do find that scummy. However, I have pulled you up for doing the exact same thing and you have not responded to me (your post #270 which I questioned in post #296). So I want to know why you have a scum read on DGB when she has basically done the exact same thing you did.In post 555, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Okay, so. Reality visited me the last couple of days. In the future, you will most likely be hearing my Great Wisdom much more frequently.Now, who to choose. Rhinox and DGB are quite scumalicious currently.Hmmm. Eeny, meeny, miny, mo.unvoteVote: DGB
In post 859, Rhinox wrote:I agree with hindu's assessment of chunky's reaction to the daykill.
In post 746, chunkykev wrote:Hindu, couple of questions. Firstly, I pointed out your "vote" in 702 due to your misquoting yet you haven't corrected it. Why?Also, could you explain your pretend day vig play - reason for doing it and where you got the idea from, what reaction you expected and your conclusions?
In post 860, Rhinox wrote:In post 857, chunkykev wrote:What you refer to as the "insignificant little point," I saw as a potential scum slip. In my opinion, Khan did not explain SDC and, if SA is mafia, it could easily have been a slip by SA referring to something said in their QT. What is wrong with picking out one part of a big post if you believe it is a scum slip?
Is this the first time you mentioned it might be a scumslip? I didn't get that the first time I read it it just seemed like you picked a small part of the post and refuted it as never happening and calling SA scum for it.
In post 473, chunkykev wrote:In post 460, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Khan - A lot of people say he's town, and I tend to agree. So. Joke votes Spy.Explains SDC for me.Asks Reck ab out his "SDC has scum" post. Does his list, votes Kuribo. Explains list to Pine, asks for better reads from Pine. Explains Kuribo vote, admits it's weak because it's early. A lot on Kuribo then switches to reck (huh?). Adds me to his list while removing Fate, Pine, and ZD. Meh, this'll be my weakest town read I think. His reconsideration of Kuribo seems weird, but I think it makes sense. And he seemed to tunnel on Kuribo for a while. Mostly looks fine though.
Could you point out exactly where Khan explained SDC to you, or was it not on the thread? I've just double checked through his ISO and don't see any such explanation unless you mean this…In post 33, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 31, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Reck, I've been away a little while. Wanna fill me in?
I'm not Reck, but I'm pretty certain it refers to the fact that they are a sort of clan...
...that screams at you....
.....Until you die.....
...
VOTE: SpyreX because he needs to spend less time on mafia and more time with his family. C'mon everyone. Let's help him break his mafia habit.
Which I would hardly call an explanation of the SDC as it was incredibly clear before this that they were a clan (you even admit reading it in the queue, which is where I immediately figured out it was a clan).
When you said he explains SDC for you I was looking for him telling you who they are. Did he do that on the mafia thread?
In post 862, xRECKONERx wrote:Put your fucking votes on SpyreX.
In post 840, chunkykev wrote:can someone point out any specific games I should look at to see the Spy's meta? If the case put forward is correct, then Spy should be lynched, but I won't lynch based on meta if I haven't seen it for myself.
In post 865, Rhinox wrote:You didn't respond as town should, i.e. flip out, show emotion, give a quick list of reads and reasons before flip, etc. You responded more like scum, i.e. joked about it, no emotion, played it off as if you assumed it was fake, didn't try to be helpful in your last posts before flip, etc.
In post 866, kuribo wrote:kev's totally scum, what he's doing is trying to make it look like SA had the SDC explained to him in the scum's daytalk and scumslipped about it in the thread
In post 872, kuribo wrote:to me, it points to you accidentally using knowledge that you have first hand--- you assumed that everyone knew the scum were daytalking. but why would anyone assume that? 33 pages makes the game feel like it's been going on for weeks and weeks. Not one week and a day. but, maybe i'm just an idiot who didn't notice when the mod said that
In post 878, Hinduragi wrote:chunky wrote:Hindu, couple of questions. Firstly, I pointed out your "vote" in 702 due to your misquoting yet you haven't corrected it. Why?
Also, could you explain your pretend day vig play - reason for doing it and where you got the idea from, what reaction you expected and your conclusions?
Fuck you. I didn't think Max would count it since it was obviously a typo.
You're annoying. I got the idea from my wanting to kill you after reading your post about my vote. I expected it to do SOMETHING because this game is boring. Mission accomplished.
In post 596, Grimmjow wrote:I am far too hungover for this game right now. I will get back into the game later this evening.
In post 699, Grimmjow wrote:Ok, so my main focus game just went into night phase, which means I'll actually be able to pay attention to this one. And not be hungover, either. I'll get back to this later this afternoon.
In post 923, Grimmjow wrote:Oh my fuck, what is this game. It's moving hella fast. I have to catch up later.
In post 461, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Shit, that's only about half the players and still looks massive. The rest can probably be expected by tomorrow. Please don't hammer before I can get it up. I want to get these out there and I want them looked back on later in the game.
In post 901, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll get to those reads when I can. I'll understand if people are pissed.
In post 591, Sleepless Assassin wrote:If I don't, feel free to hammer" Monday, not a "I'm gonna say Monday so come Tuesday maybe people will forget and I can say Thursday" Monday. Seriously, hold me to it.
In post 780, Max wrote:My Milked Eek has informed me that he will be posting tomorrow.
In post 1009, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 966, Max wrote:chunkykev has asked about a week long V/LA from the first, I am considering the appropriate action. Considering the day does not seem to be approaching end I think my first choice will be to replace. If anyone has an objection to this, let me know
@chunkykev - If you do get replaced you should publish your game notes.
In post 1081, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll be doing those reads this afternoon just so everyone knows. Just finished career related stuff that you don't care about that took almost 2 hours, then I have something else that will take maybe an hour, then after my girlfriend's lunch break, this game has my mostly undivided attention.
In post 1083, Max wrote:I am not hunting for a replacement for My Milked Eek
In post 1081, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll be doing those reads this afternoon just so everyone knows. Just finished career related stuff that you don't care about that took almost 2 hours, then I have something else that will take maybe an hour, then after my girlfriend's lunch break, this game has my mostly undivided attention.
In post 1124, Rhinox wrote:Still don't think he's scum but I like this wagon more than reck or spy and nobody seems to be willing to seriously wagon anyone else anyways.
In post 1125, springlullaby wrote:SA wanna claim? Because you are technically lynched already.