If I had to peg any one player for going after one of the newly deceased, I'd have to say bloojay going after blackhawk:
Cam
I'm not sure what you mean...he didn't have two votes on him when I cast suspicion on him to start with? He had no votes, I made a valid point about the bloojay/blackhawk rivalry, and decided that there's a better chance that bloojay would've gone after blackhawk than anyone else. Why would you ignore those votes? It's not like they were random. To not even comment when 2 out of the first 4 posts of the game have your name in it, and not just random votes?Werebear wrote:Vote: mathcamfor casting suspicion on someone who was voted two times on day 1. C'mon, Mathcam. I'd ignore those votes too. Why would you treat it like Bloojay is flying under the radar?
Hm, I didn't realize I came off this way, so I apologize for that. I make enough dumb moves playing mafia that sure, I take some pride when I make an argument that works. I guess we'll just have to disagree on this particular case, then...I think this point was still very valid. I think bloojay killed Blackhawk specifically because they knew each other outside of mafia.Werebear wrote:You're very very fond of pronouncing yourself"Mathcam - Defender Of The Town and Finder Of Scum"
Not only this, but it's the weakest of weak claims. (Doc). Except possibly townie, but even then, from a mafia's point of view, there's no guarantee that thereDo we now unvote Totem on the basis of a vague, weak claim and bandwagon someone else?
Well I'm not exactly sure what that means, (presumably by intent), but since I won't be around between today and the deadline, I'm going toeven dying from the hands of the mafia this night would be better for town than lynching.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I still find him a little suspicious, I just don't want to be one of the 5 lynching him at deadline because they weren't around for the weekend, in the case where everyone else somehow realized he was innocent. I'll accept a full portion of the blame for getting him lynched if he's innocent.(mathcam's a wi-imp! mathcam's a wi-imp!)
What makes you think I would play dumb? Or that I would be playing?jeep wrote: I will ask: mathcam, I'm glad you did so, but why did you decided to give us two days in a row? You really shouldn't try to play dumb, it stands out too much. Can you do so multiple times? My list is less sure now but in order: Phoebus, MeMe, Mathcam (strictly because of the lame attempt saying "my ability is pro-town")
-JEEP
Well, I appreciate the sentiment, but just because we're independent thinkers doesn't mean you're not in a perfect postition to win this game if you're scum. You've survived to the endgame and you've nailed several scumbags. That's going to make it very hard for me to get you lynched. And I can't speak for werebear and Corsato, but I think I might have to confess to being particularly sheep-like in this game. It's kind of hard not to when you're pulling scum out of a hat for us.mathcam wrote:if you're scum, you're in a perfect position to win.JEEP wrote: Because you, werebear, and Corsato are just sheep that follow the loudest person... hmm??? I haven't followed modargo's play enough to know if he is likely to do so, but I KNOW that the three of you are independant thinkers that aren't going to follow me because I'm steering the town.