Trouble in The Cougar's Den (Game over!)
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
Read the game. I had a lot of questions that Heartless would ask on spot. Otherwise:
@RR
In post 88, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 77, Cephrir wrote:In post 75, ika wrote:Hey ceph. DO you think we have a neutral in the game?
I have no idea, and I don't really care right now.
I take it you don't think Ika was soft claiming then?
Why do you care about what Cephrir thinks?
In post 95, Reasonably Rational wrote:Ika did look like he was soft claiming neutral to me. It looked like he was testing the waters to see if he would be instantly PLd if he claimed or not.Ika sometimes does strange things that don't make sense though, so there's really no way to tell until he gets around to telling us what he was doing there. I personally can't read ika if my life depended upon it.
I don't understand why you wouldn't have immediately brought this up if this was a concern of yours. It's weird you served this as an afterthought, only after Cephrir responded to Ika. If this was how you felt, I don't get why you wouldn't just directly confront Ika for answers about his role - he's in the game, you can ask him. The bolded portion is just especially bizarre to me. You're taking such a passive stance about your confusion of ika's alignment when there's things you easily could be doing to elucidate the situation. It looks like posturing.
In post 359, Reasonably Rational wrote:BPC wagon is crap. his post IS a little concerning, but it's hardly enough to wagon someone over.
Wagons can be used for the sake of generating a response, not just for lynching. You obviously know that.
In post 361, Reasonably Rational wrote:With all that said, two data points are insufficient for me to feel like BPC is scum.
And because of that fact, I think this is entirely unreasonable. You can have one scummy "data point" (not that scumtells are quantifiable) and have that serve as reason to push someone - it's called scumhunting. People using wagoning as a strategy to scumhunt, not just to make players flip.
@BOTLANE
In post 128, BotLane wrote:In post 35, Reasonably Rational wrote:
I went and looked at the opening post just to be sure my memory wasn't faulty. The mod hasn't specified whether the scum do or do not have day chat. Your statement has an implicit assumption that they do. Care to explain that?
Love,
Drixx
VOTE: Reasonably Rational
That is not a town post.
Of all the bad posts RR made, this is the one that isn't town? Why?
In post 131, BotLane wrote:I find it really hard to believe that they missed the time stamps.
You expect a lot from people
In post 131, BotLane wrote:Kthx both didn't find this either as well as attributed something to him that he didn't say. This looks like a bus attempt.
Why would someone bus their partner on page 2
@BPC
In post 130, BipolarChemist wrote:In post 128, BotLane wrote:In post 35, Reasonably Rational wrote:
I went and looked at the opening post just to be sure my memory wasn't faulty. The mod hasn't specified whether the scum do or do not have day chat. Your statement has an implicit assumption that they do. Care to explain that?
Love,
Drixx
VOTE: Reasonably Rational
That is not a town post.
my immediate thought is that it seems like some throwing under the bus. haven't really read into their other posts yet, but from skimming, I've found long in the past (like 2 years i think?) that Drixx tends to talk himself in circles no matter the alignment and it seems like that trend is continuing. I'd probs vote them but IDK where the vote count is at right now
I guess this doesn't matter anymore regarding getting a response..but noone would "throw their partner under the bus on pg1, especially by trying to point out a scumslip their partner made. That's shitty. I don't believe you believe this. I agree with Heartless's analysis. Sorry for thinking this was a lurker wagon. I'm looking forward to the replacement.
@davesto
In post 245, davesaz wrote:Cephrir is really hard to read in iso. Roughly half (I did not actually count) of the posts are one-liners which give no clue as to context. At least half of that is not game related. Use of one-liners could be just playstyle as some people like to treat it like a conversation. However it does make me want to go back and see what is being discussed then to see if this could be a distraction tactic.
He's just comfortable. Cephrir is town
@Cephrir
In post 341, Cephrir wrote:bpc is town because of performer's bizarre actions towards him, and incidentally he never even delivered the reasons he promised herry
I think associative tells on D1 are harmful. BPC is scummy in his own right, Performer's behavior doesn't make that irrelevant.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 420, MattP wrote:
In post 95, Reasonably Rational wrote:Ika did look like he was soft claiming neutral to me. It looked like he was testing the waters to see if he would be instantly PLd if he claimed or not.Ika sometimes does strange things that don't make sense though, so there's really no way to tell until he gets around to telling us what he was doing there. I personally can't read ika if my life depended upon it.
I don't understand why you wouldn't have immediately brought this up if this was a concern of yours. It's weird you served this as an afterthought, only after Cephrir responded to Ika. If this was how you felt, I don't get why you wouldn't just directly confront Ika for answers about his role - he's in the game, you can ask him. The bolded portion is just especially bizarre to me. You're taking such a passive stance about your confusion of ika's alignment when there's things you easily could be doing to elucidate the situation. It looks like posturing.
When I said "I don't understand why you wouldn't have immediately brought this up if this was a concern of yours." I was referring to this:
In post 95, Reasonably Rational wrote:Ika did look like he was soft claiming neutral to me.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
VOTE: Spiffeh
In post 289, Spiffeh wrote:Btw I think RR has obvtowned at this point and the fact that they have the most votes is stupid.
How?
What are your strongest scumreads?SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 426, Heartless wrote:because out of the 17 other people in the game, there might be someone else townreading that entrance and i would like to hear why.
That's not what I was trying to ask. Clearly you aren't townreading my entrance I want to know whySlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 436, Heartless wrote:In post 427, MattP wrote:In post 426, Heartless wrote:because out of the 17 other people in the game, there might be someone else townreading that entrance and i would like to hear why.
That's not what I was trying to ask. Clearly you aren't townreading my entrance I want to know why
/shrug
there's really not that much there to town read. the push on RR is mediocre and i actually think the ika angle is kinda' bad.
I don't agree, it was weird. It's not like that's my biggest issue with the game. A lot of the opinions I had were explored prior to my entrance in the game. The things I pointed out were things people didn't mention prior to my replace inSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 441, Spiffeh wrote:Ok ew says this and then doesn't even jump on the largest one? This is just a glorified excuse to not be contributing.
Like I get that Teridax not voting after saying we need a wagon is dumb, but it's not scummy. It's such an easy vote.
In post 446, Heartless wrote:spiffeh, your vote's not doing much on teridax. move over to performer.
Clearly he didn't care much about it anyway considering he switched immediately.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
This is Spiffeh's voting history over 20 pages and every case he's made:
In post 17, Spiffeh wrote:In post 13, BotLane wrote:@Kthx- What do you think about Spif's suspicions?
Nervous?
In post 64, Spiffeh wrote:
In case it wasn't obvious my vote wasn't entirely serious. It became more serious after BotLane asked someone else what they thought of my push on them. This came off as self-conscious and insecure. So I'll keep my vote for now.
He voted BotLane and said the vote became legitimate at this point.
In post 150, Spiffeh wrote:I don't like that in post 98 Peregrine ignores the relevant discussion to comment on something that is pretty much pointless.
VOTE: Peregrine
This is the only time he references a scumread on PV the entirety of the game (despite providing a reads list now)
In post 155, Spiffeh wrote:I agree with Heartless about NS. I disliked the "confused onlooker" role he tried to take on to kind of acknowledge the situation but not commit one way about it which I find scummy. Idk if that makes sense but it does to me.
This is the only time he references a scumread on NS the entirety of the game (despite providing a reads list now)
In post 289, Spiffeh wrote:Ok yeah
VOTE: davesaz
Btw I think RR has obvtowned at this point and the fact that they have the most votes is stupid.
Votes dave. This is the only time he references a scumread on dave the entirety of the game (despite providing a reads list now)
In post 441, Spiffeh wrote:
In post 425, MattP wrote:What are your strongest scumreads?
Performer, Teridax, maybe MonkeyMan (although someone said earlier that they expect shitposts from him?). I'm scum reading d3x head of Botlane but the Ank head seems business as usual so idk about that one.
These are Spiffeh's current scumreads. What happened to dave? What happened to Peregrine? What happened to NS? Peregrine and NS have barely provided any substance, where did those reads go? There's no story to his reads. The reads he does provide (all listed in this post) are so shallowSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
I cared for a moment how you felt because you're my strongest townread, but whatever, you'll change your mind.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 512, Firebringer wrote:Honestly Matt you were much more aggro in the DisneyUPick than this.
You are giving off scum tones on me bad.
I love how people try to always use incredibly outdated meta as talking points
Your reads provide no content for discussion if you post then bare bones and say it's gut. What are you even trying to accomplish?SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 516, Firebringer wrote:In post 513, Spiffeh wrote:Why wouldn't you want to hear his reason for scum reading you to progress your read on him?
Because it didn't seem like he had a serious read, that seemed like a reaction test.
I am not stupid.
I was going to say "gut" if you asked for my reason, but I do think your entrance into the game is at the very least useleasSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
It has nothing to do with disregarding your reads, they are useless because unless you provide some sort of understandable reasoning iit's not like you're going to persuade anyone to alter their own line of thinking. It's so clearly obvious that's what I meant, not that I meant people should not take your reads seriously.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 531, Firebringer wrote:In post 529, MattP wrote:It has nothing to do with disregarding your reads, they are useless because unless you provide some sort of understandable reasoning iit's not like you're going to persuade anyone to alter their own line of thinking. It's so clearly obvious that's what I meant, not that I meant people should not take your reads seriously.
I have had this argument before, I don't care to go into detail at this moment for any of my reads.
You were not obvious in your meaning.
I literally explained my feelings in detail in 519
In post 519, MattP wrote:Your reads provide no content for discussion if you post them bare bones and say it's gut. What are you even trying to accomplish?
and then summarized it in 520 less descriptively by saying your reads are useless - you quoted both posts in your response so you obviously didn't miss itSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 530, Cephrir wrote:I don't think that game is outdated maybe that's because i've played like one since then
For some reason I thought it was much longer ago - time moves a lot slower in the medical school universeSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
@Heartless, I'm not going to quote you because your post is too long
In regards to you saying my points in my catchup post are innocuous and not-huge-deals, the point I was making is that there were OTHER more-important things about players that bothered me of greater magnitude than a lot of the things I posted, but there was no point in just reiterating something someone else said prior to my replace-in. The only reason to point things out is either to draw attention to them to cause wagons (which is pointless considering ppl have already drawn attention to these things, the game is short so there's no point of bringing them back up when they happened RL days ago, and a lot of people have similar reads to me so what's the point of harping on earlier mentioned points) or to demonstrate my reasoning so people believe I'm genuine. The latter is not something I even considered doing when catching up - if you have issue with my reads and want me to explain them to get a better sense of ME, then I will gladly do so.
The only people I thought were not getting enough attention during my catchup were Spiffeh and BotLane - I didn't like BotLane's entrance into the game since I believe his asking Kthx to rate several things from 1-10 read weird and I'm familiar with Ank and do not like his play here. For the former, I'm actively pursuing. For the latter, I have no interest in doing so right now.
This point about the timing of the ika comment is bunk and it's really just an artifact of how a conversation between twenty people is going to go. Of course there's going to be a lot of conversations going on that you're not directly involved in at a particular time. There's nothing particularly sinister about Reasonably Rational jumping in on another conversation. There's also nothing particularly sinister about the whole "direct engagement" issue either. The way I see it, it's more of a playstyle difference than anything.
You are excusing people for inconsistent or untimely behavior (Spiffeh, RR) by saying the game is hectic and we should expect inconsistency rather than just letting people respond on their own.
^That's fine? I never said every point in my catchup post was supposed to be scumhunting. I just posted things that I felt were relevant. Neither of my two points I made there were inherently scummy - one was call someone out on bad logic to see how they would reply - one was me genuinely telling a townread I think their logic is less than useful.The last two points are more addressing perceived flaws in fundamental scumhunting principles.
From what he's said about us, there's a pretty reasonable expectation he should be on our wavelength:
For the record, there is a dissonance between you bringing up legitimate questioning I wanted to VS. us having similar overall interpretations of play throughout a 20 page game. We are for the majority on the same wavelength with some disagreement. I'm pushing Spiffeh because he had received no attention up to this point and noone else seemed to think he was scum. I felt it was useful to pursue that and engage that player over others when we had over 15 days left of the day phase.
Regarding Spiffeh, his thoughts processes are incredibly peripheral and he feels disengaged. This is not what I expect of his play.
Just because our votes are dissonant the moment I enter the game doesn't mean I'm unwilling to coordinate with you as the game progresses I literally just joined a game where you all have been in continuous play and for where you are in the game there has been a fluid progression. I had to catch up 20 pages and then take the bullet points I developed during that catchup and hit them during my entry. How do you expect my entrance into the game to be "coordinated" with your play, when I have the added responsibility of "catching up"?He's not trying to coordinate his vote with ours to wagon a common scumread though. He also apparently has absolutely nothing to say about Performer, the person we're voting and someone who Antihero posted a case on.
I think Performer is scummy, for the record. Regardless of him not even being a leading wagon when I replaced in, there was the added fact that he hadalreadyreceived pressure whereas Spiffeh had not. Just voting Performer for reasons already mentioned would have been a waste of my time during my replace-in.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 544, Heartless wrote:they already did respond on their own. but even if they didn't, the case just sucked. people just lose interest in reads, that's how larges go. fuck, look at what happened w/ me and my bpc read in this game.
here, let's just get to the goddamn bottom of it once and for all. why would spiffeh letting go of reads scummy? just at the most basic level?
It's more so that I don't think Spiffeh is actually THINKING this game, which goes along with his posts lacking any content and which goes along with him forgetting his prior reads. I think if he was legitimately putting thought into the game he wouldn't be having inconsistencies in his reads. Both his lack of much content and his inconsistencies make me think he is not thinking about the game, as in not putting effort into scumhunting - that is NOT what I would expect of town-SpiffehSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 548, Heartless wrote:In post 546, MattP wrote:In post 544, Heartless wrote:they already did respond on their own. but even if they didn't, the case just sucked. people just lose interest in reads, that's how larges go. fuck, look at what happened w/ me and my bpc read in this game.
here, let's just get to the goddamn bottom of it once and for all. why would spiffeh letting go of reads scummy? just at the most basic level?
It's more so that I don't think Spiffeh is actually THINKING this game, which goes along with his posts lacking any content and which goes along with him forgetting his prior reads. I think if he was legitimately putting thought into the game he wouldn't be having inconsistencies in his reads. Both his lack of much content and his inconsistencies make me think he is not thinking about the game, as in not putting effort into scumhunting - that is NOT what I would expect of town-Spiffeh
you think spiffeh's posts lack content...?
i don't agree with that
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... ct[]=26341
This simply isn't anything comparable to his level of engagement as town. Prior to my pushing he had like 16 posts over 20 pages, almost all very short with minimal to no pushing on other players. That's not like Spiffeh.
Even in a vacuum, his play just in this game is so effortless. I guess we just don't agree right now.SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 577, ika wrote:In post 576, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Vote: Performer
I hate it when people replace out for how other people are acting in a game. Pretty worthless reason for replacing out.
So i should jsut be apathetic and prod doge allthe time cus i dont want to speak in the potenatialy toxic envirometn?
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't think there's anything toxic about the game right now?SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
Things have been happening, it's not like the thread has gone staleSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 605, Performer wrote:In post 604, MattP wrote:I don't think you really had any fun but yw
eh. Thanks Matt
<3SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 623, Cephrir wrote:who shoots a bulletproof enough times for them to need a backup?
Actually good ptSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
Yeah but you also thought performer was scum and they kept you alive despite you both being equally townreading
You're more vocal, they could have chosen to kill you to take away that voice from town, but they killed Maxous, the quieter universal townread with only one other consistent scumread other than performer - RRSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 662, Cephrir wrote:In post 653, MattP wrote:The Maxous kill makes RR definitely look worse
Maxous seems especially like a scum kill based entirely off his reads.
I don't know about that, he was also quite obvious town and a less likely protection target than Heartless or myself.
Yeah the other explanation is he was an unlikely protection
Either way let's wagon Teridax so he does somethingSlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
In post 706, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 703, LicketyQuickety wrote:Prolly my most controversial read at this point in time is that Dave looks to be Town right now.
Why would any read be controversial at the start of day 2? Day one is crapshoot wherein we got lucky. Day two just started, and you are tossing out reads without any reasons. Did you pick up the scum rag and start rubbing all over yourself on purpose?
You're really nitpicking whether something is "controversial" and using that to validate a scumread?SlappyKrust-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre