*flails around*
I Wish I had a knuckle sandwich to throw.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Where did you get that information, Tar? I want to accuse you of knowing that because you are scum, because I can't see anywhere in public where the mod has said WHAT exactly is going on, regarding the scum groups and so on.Tarhalindur wrote:No, I'm, like, saying that there are people in this cafeteria who, like, want to take over this school, and they're, like, responsible for this food fight somehow.
We must, like, totally get them sent home before we, like, lose control of the school! Who's with me?
One! Two! Three! Four!
Let's go find some scum to smore!
Except that smart scum would have noticed some of hte PR's some players have and latched onto it, forming some of their own. I would love to think that we have five cleared players right off the bat, but that seems unlikely. The PRs do not seem to wholly interrupt the ability of those players to play - they are more 'flavoring' than anything else.Sir Tornado wrote: I really don't see the mafia being post restricted at all. In fact, in some of the PR games I have read, mafia were the ones do did not have a PR.
Nightfall - what about your food doesn't seem to fit?Nightfall wrote:something Yama said made me think. This may seem like fishing but I want to ask if we should think about discussing it.
Yama said that the food in his lunch box doesn't match his role. Neither does mine.
And yet I didn't say we should lynch him or not, did I? DID I???Battle Mage wrote: I didn't say we shouldn't lynch Sir T. I said that we shouldn't lynch him YET. I'm surprised at you being someone in favour of cutting discussion short.
He appears to me to be pro-town. He is figuring out what his food does (instead of just using it willy nilly like jdodge) - he seems to have some sort of a pr (which I think has been discussed is less likely to make him scum, but doesn't rule it out), and while he has not been the best at hunting scum, he's NOT making incredibly .... thoughtless posts like "This is a scum, guys, but let's not lynch him because I don't want him to have the satisfaction of the doubt".Battle Mage wrote: I'm gonna make this very simply for you Skruffs. In your next post, i want you to tell me what YOUR thoughts of Sir T are. I dont want any 'JESTER? ROFLMAO' type of stuff. I want to know what you make of him. I mean, you don't think he is a Jester, and you dont appear to find him scummy, so i'm intrigued to see your explanation for his behaviour.
I have not been avoiding it. I have simply been keeping my attention on you - something you are tryign desperately to shift, without getting yourself into more trouble. What made you feel the need to both discredit sir t and 'defend' him at the same time?Battle Mage wrote: Much as it is nice to catch someone in the act of fabricating a case out of nothing, i would like to hear some opinions on something else from you-a topic which you have been deliberately avoiding. Sir T.
Sure.Battle Mage wrote:I don't even recall Jordan suggesting Jester first, but again, assuming you have your facts straight, you won't be opposed to showing me?
"Sir T is scum, but let's not lynch him."Battle Mage wrote: I don't entirely understand your last paragraph. One minute you accuse me of pushing Sir T too hard, and the next you suggest that i'm somehow DEFENDING HIM? rofl.
How so? You are saying that by paying attention to your scum tells, I was being non-committal to Sir T?Battle Mage wrote:I'd say this is a good example of distancing from reality, Skruffs, because i'd be inclined to say that it was your non-commitalness with regard to Sir T, and pushing of a counter-wagon, really fits the description of defence.
Telling totwn day one in a game where there may or may not be nightkills to not lynch someone YOU FEEL is scumym because they may be a jester... is... far fetched reasoning, even for you, BM. Yes, flavor wise, a jester would fit in nicely, but the game-equivalent would be a 'quick-n-easy day one lynch' by the mod, who is rewarded by 'winning' for himself for helping start up the game.Battle Mage wrote: Oh and i should note, as i end up saying in every game it seems, Jesters are not as unlikely as some people would have you believe. If you'd been in as many games with Jesters as me, you would probably be wary of them as well.
You are threatening me for pointing out scum tells? When you know that I could very easily be lynched? Okie dokie. I'm just glad I got the chance to publicly note this.Battle Mage wrote: Anyway, i eagerly await your responses-custard pie in hand.
BM
I don't seriously think it, no. I have no idea one way or another. All I "actually" know about this game (From post 1) is "We're night. Most of you are sleeping, some of you are scheming and gossiping. No night actions tonight, but those that are allowed to talk, can! ", for whatever that means. With 23 players, there almost HAS to be another way to eliminate players from the game other than by lynching, or else this game will go on for a very, *very* long time. I was going to say that nobody died n0, but apparently no nightactions were allowed n0, so that explains that. So I'm not *Quite* as ready to think there are no nightkills, actually, I'm pretty sure there ARE if nightactions weren't allowed.Erg0 wrote:Skruffs, do you seriously think this game might not have nightkills? Or are you just stating a hypothetical?
Why is it suspicious that I do not know (like you seem to know) that Sir T is scum?Battle Mage wrote:Exactly. Hence my suspicion of you.Skruffs wrote: And yet I didn't say we should lynch him or not, did I? DID I???
BAmboo = frenchJDodge wrote:BTW, Bamboo, Sir T, Jordan and foolinc are scum
Oddly, i always thought that 50 was a higher number than 20. Or are you claiming to need a lower percentage to be lynched?Battle Mage wrote:Yeah that's right Skruffs. Whinge and bitch and moan because you are getting some stuff thrown at you. Completely ignore the fact that i am closer to be lynched than you.
I never associated senile with sensitive. I based me being sensitive on going up to 10% with only two pieces of cheap food. And now up to 50% with a few more. Why do you assume that i am more resilient? You seem to be going against the obvious in making false assumptions.Battle Mage wrote: I dont understand your claim. You say you are 'senile'. That doesnt mean sensitive. In fact if you are too senile to care, it probably gives you heightened resilience, because the food thrown at you doesn't bother you so much.
Again: 30% to lynch? Why would you say that?Battle Mage wrote: Nonetheless, it is probably time to claim. I reckon i'm about 10% away from dying.
Note you claimed townie earlier in the game, when asked who you were aligned with.Battle Mage wrote: Anyway, i dont have a power role. I'm the Librarian (I'll go hook out the name in a sec). I suppose this explains the prunes, but im not sure what the rest is for. I'll go hook out some flavour too. The only good thing about my role is that i have a significant number of BB notes, which i can dispense to unruly students.
How did i lie about being the lunclady? You mean when you were fishing for how bad behavior notes, and i called you on it?Battle Mage wrote: *Erm, i'd also like to draw people's attention to Gorrad. Tell me, kiddo-why are you so quick to believe Skruffs when he hasnt claimed a role, or anything concrete. Plus we now have evidence that he lied about his character.
Wow, and didn't you say that people were scum for siding with me against you error-filled predelictions?Battle Mage wrote: And even more unnerving is the fact that you consider Skruffs being a 'Dinnerlady' to be a scumtell against me.![]()
Skruffs, talking to Battle Mage when BM first started helping scum wrote: and sorry if i am acting 'high and mighty', i promise you most of it is just inwards groaning. It's not meant to be condescending.Once you think someone is scum, you tend to ignore anything else in the game and focus on that person being scum, no matter what else happens.Except in Sir T's case, you've moved off of him and are focusing on me, instead. I'm surprised you haven't suggested that I was trying to eliminate the chances of him being a jester because 'i really know he's a townie and want him to be lynched'.
IF skitzer turns out to be scum, go after Erg0.Erg0 wrote:I'm disappointed that skitzer appears to be out of range for a lynch, though there does seem to be a good percentage of the food still at large. I'm going to hang on to my scarce resources for a little longer so that I can hopefully do some good with them.