Marathon 7 (MM 1)

Raffles · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:47 am

/in
30 mins for a day? That's insane. I like it.

Raffles · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:44 pm

If speed is the way it's going to be done, I suggest a new lynching system

1. Whoever has the most vote will always die.
1.a. If the most votes are placed on no lynch, (i.e. specifically

vote: no lynch

) then the lynching will not occur.

2. In an event of a tie, the time will be extended by 10 minutes. Everyone must decide voting between the people that are tied. If no decision is achieved after this, then it is no lynch.

Raffles · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:06 am

no start?

Raffles · Post Post #19 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:19 am

Ah true, sorry summer time.

Raffles · Post Post #23 (isolation #4) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:01 am

Start!

Raffles · Post Post #29 (isolation #5) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:20 am

Vote: Occult

Me not like cults.

Raffles · Post Post #40 (isolation #6) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:26 am

Unvote, FOS Occult

Pooky, Scum?

Raffles · Post Post #44 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:28 am

Raffles

scum

Raffles · Post Post #51 (isolation #8) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am

I loved the mute mafia game.

Raffles · Post Post #55 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:32 am

M-M, can we have vote count at every single page?

Raffles · Post Post #62 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:34 am

What the hell is VRK = gg in the first place?

Raffles · Post Post #72 (isolation #11) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:36 am

I think Pooky has turned into an evil bear...

unFOS, FOS: Pooky

Raffles · Post Post #78 (isolation #12) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:39 am

God, Battle Mage. We would never be able to tell.

Raffles · Post Post #84 (isolation #13) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:43 am

was that a claim?

Raffles · Post Post #89 (isolation #14) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:44 am

This is a speed game, need to move things along quickly.

Raffles · Post Post #97 (isolation #15) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:46 am

Wasn't this only supposed to be just with basic roles?

unFoS, FoS:LB

Raffles · Post Post #103 (isolation #16) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:48 am

Vote: LB

Raffles · Post Post #106 (isolation #17) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:48 am

Stated at the 0th post.

Raffles · Post Post #111 (isolation #18) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:50 am

I think it was more of an attempt at digging what our roles are.

Raffles · Post Post #119 (isolation #19) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:53 am

when I think I've given enough time

Raffles · Post Post #134 (isolation #20) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:00 am

happy with my vote.

Raffles · Post Post #137 (isolation #21) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:01 am

Opportunistic? I gave a reason. Trying to dig our roles.

Raffles · Post Post #146 (isolation #22) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:04 am

Only you can ask, we don't know your role for sure.

Raffles · Post Post #152 (isolation #23) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:05 am

Thats a hammer

Raffles · Post Post #245 (isolation #24) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:09 am

YES! FINALLY! I CAN SPEAK!

All the way along, I was banging my head on the screen screaming "lynch VRK! VRK!"

In my opinion, things couldn't have worked out better for day 2.

D1 - We tried to lynch LB, I noted VRK's vote after me. And I thought, "shit, it might be him". But LB survived the lynch, proving he was a townie. What kind of a scum is an unlynchable?

N1 - Now at this stage, I was ready to pounce on VRK. But I got killed!

D2 - I was definitely inclined to believe Pooky's claim that he was bullet proof. If there is unlynchable (more improbable role than bulletproof), then there is no reason why there shouldn't be a bulletproof. LB is a townie 100%, only person left is the one claimed townie - VRK.

I reckon VRK might have had a chance if he claimed cop and given an guilty investigation on Pooky. That's my thoughts.

Raffles · Post Post #265 (isolation #25) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:26 am

I agree that no lynch would have been a better option for D1. I suppose being under pressure made us think "we should" lynch someone...