The Odds - you've been brainslugged

[eldarad]

/in

[eldarad]

are we confirming?

/confirm

[eldarad]

nah, what you want is someone in the middle of the pack

vote scotmany

[eldarad]

hey Quag

Gaspar, why is feeling lucky worthy of suspicion?

[eldarad]

scum can be lucky too you know...

[eldarad]

You shouldn't question the numbers they're obv not arbitrary

scum happy with their quoted odds maybe?

unvote
vote OhGodMyLife

[eldarad]

that wasn't OMGUS. But you do suck anyway

[eldarad]

hey who should i vote for

why don't you tell us what you think?

[eldarad]

i would like to note at this point that i'm eating a delicious sandwich for lunch

it has lettuce, medium cheddar pieces, smoked turkey breast, carrots, and slices of bread (since i don't have any crutons)

that actually sounds really nice.
But I'd prefer to hear your thoughts on the game. Cheers

[eldarad]

i would like to note at this point that i'm eating a delicious sandwich for lunch

my sandwich wasn't that delicious unfortunately.

WHOA we have to clear up a vital error by me

it's a SALAD, not a sandwich

and IH my salad is better than your sandwich

i forgot to include that i have some lite ranch dressing in here too

I did wonder why you would add crutons to a sandwich.

[eldarad]

and slices of bread

You put bread IN a sandwich? Sux.

Obv numbers are a fairly good guideline for Day 1 as we don't know much else. Therefore: FoS everyone who's voting people on low percentages. Like scotmany. And eldarad.

why do you think the numbers are a better basis for voting than behaviour?

[eldarad]

funny, because I don't remember you saying why you thought I was scummy

[eldarad]

why do you think the numbers are a better basis for voting than behaviour?

i didn't say that. i said numbers are a fairly good guideline. in the (hypothetical but fairly realistic) event that both you and Quagmire act weirdly i would rather lynch you. Nyah.

OK, but I asked you that because you were questioning why I was voting for someone with a fairly low percentage. (ie, OGML)

[eldarad]

scum can be lucky too you know...

unvote vote eldarad

how exactly is this explaining your vote?

[eldarad]

So? IH isn't me.
Why would I care?

And you were advocating following the numbers - a policy which, coincidentally - would lead you to be one of the last suspects

[eldarad]

So? IH isn't me.
Why would I care?

And you were advocating following the numbers - a policy which, coincidentally - would lead you to be one of the last suspects

And you're going after him for a policy which, concindentally, would lead to you being one of the first.

yeah, i'd be 2nd or third. But it would involve the town following a lynch policy based on numbers. Which is a stupid policy.

Agree or disagree?

[eldarad]

when did this epiphany take place OGML?

[eldarad]

Dumb? Yes. Scummy? Not really, and I'm interested in what makes you think it is.

Because it's a policy of self-interest, rather than a policy that benefits the town

[eldarad]

Dumb? Yes. Scummy? Not really, and I'm interested in what makes you think it is.

Because it's a policy of self-interest, rather than a policy that benefits the town

Is it really? Do you find anyone other than people who are statistically less likely than average to be scum (OGML, Quag, Tin) whom are pushing numbers to be "self-interested"? I'd say if there are no better indicators to you at the moment, than playing numbers is a rather pro-town thing. It allows you to base yourself in something real.

It's over-reliance on the numbers that is a bad idea.

Yeah, I'd broadly agree with that.

To your 1st question, caf is pushing for a numbers based lynch, off the top of my head

[eldarad]

imo IH is a distant third in scumminess to eld and xd

I can't see any reasons you've given that indicates why either one of us is scum, so care to share what's going through your head?

Have you even read my posts? I've given reasons in response to everything eld has said, and fosed you after the relevantly scummy post.

no, you haven't given any reasons at all. You just keep referring us back to your original vote. And then saying that at some point your reasoning changed

[eldarad]

No...

1. you vote for me
2. at some point, your reasoning switched from voting because of 25% to voting because of scummy behaviour
3. when asked when this epiphany took place, you referred us to when you voted

Indeed, looking at the posts you just quoted, the change of reasoning takes some place after your initial vote. But somehow you didn't want to admit that

[eldarad]

well, I've said everything I want to say I guess.

I'm a vanilla townie

[eldarad]

eldarad is voting himself?

no I'm not?

[eldarad]

I'm voting OGML, if you hadn't already twigged

[eldarad]

EBWOP: i am voting eldarad. Not myself.

why are you voting for me again? I forget.

[eldarad]

Fun game.
I haven't been under fire like that in a near-real time game. It was great!
Well done scum, completely owned the town...

But man, I need to sleep...