Miccro 821: Welcome Micc Mafia! (D1)

Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #211 (isolation #0) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:20 am

Post by UC Voyager »

hello!!! im going to go ahead and read the other pages and try to make something of an actual post!
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #214 (isolation #1) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:44 am

Post by UC Voyager »

okay...

I dont have any strong opinions on what i read, but i didn't really take my time, so i might go through again


i do want to look more into these past 3 pages. and i want to iso a few people, and try to make an opinion.

everyone? what are you current stances on the game. because im a bit behind, any opinions that are up to date are better than me looking at your opinions from several pages ago.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #215 (isolation #2) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:44 am

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 213, bill1148 wrote:I'll wait and see what the two replacements have to say.
yea. a lot of replacements all at once can be painful.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #218 (isolation #3) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:00 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

2 718's posts are very interesting. he created this rating system to describe how scummy people are. other than that, i see nothing that resembles scum or town hunting. All together, there isnt much he has done that has helped progress the game.

I really like what im seeing from horror. his post show good opinions, as well as him trying to scum hunt and he is doing a good job of explaining his ideas, and is not vague.

Alonzo's posts all seem very short, but i dont know weather to think its bad or good. it is kind of dull, but still. id like to see some more of your thoughts.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #226 (isolation #4) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:40 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 220, 2 718281828459 wrote:OK, let me start with
Alonzo
, who is both first alphabetically and the one who most seems to be requesting a scan.
Spoiler: This is Long
In post 130, Alonzo wrote:I think Maf men is town here based off personal meta**

small print
In my two previous games with maf men I called scum when he was town, Then in the next, read town where there was scum.

But that aside, Im thinking he's town here, as this is more in line with our first encounter.
Congratulations on your first game-advancing post all game! None of the previous posts (of which you made like 6-10) were game advancing at all.
In post 173, Alonzo wrote:Can you run the math on my slot, I wanna see how I score!
OK, I admit I missed this post completely.
In post 185, Alonzo wrote:Analyze my slot!
The day I read this post I was too busy to do so. Now that I have more time I can do so.
In post 197, Alonzo wrote:Jokes aside, E! seems to be giving reads selectively here, whilst also maintaining his clumsy ways. I cant see use for either when pushed.
The selective reads were because
In post 208, Alonzo wrote:Yo Horrordude did I ever tell you how much I hate your avatar??

Everytime I try to read one of your posts, I just end up tunneling the clown
I disable avatars altogether. Signatures, names, and other profile stats are enough to differentiate users.
In post 216, Alonzo wrote:
In post 212, bill1148 wrote:Inferno's most pro-town post just happens to be asking for a replacement...
Starting to think the same about Mafmen
But are you thinking the same about Inferno? MafMen is just sort of neutral for me, although perhaps I should read that slot...


Final verdict: Not very much information, but what is there is townish. So I say Alonzo gets a
5
.

P-Edit: UC Voyager... how is that
not
scum hunting?
the reason i say that it isnt is because your just making reads. and that is not a towny thing to do. town do it yes, but so do scum. they make reads to slowly try to make a push on someone who is town. town/scum hunting is where you ask questions and look for things that can point to someone being town.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #227 (isolation #5) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:42 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 225, bill1148 wrote:Mafmen has said a few subtle things which makes me believe he's town. tbh his replacing out only cements that.
what post? tbh, i havent gone over his iso because i took over his spot so i know my role, but i would like to know why you think im town, and how does him replacing out make me town?
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #230 (isolation #6) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:46 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

I really dont like Bill's reasoning. i feel like he is trying to towntell when he makes these things like i read a few of his posts and some are towny....there isnt even a brief description. i also dont like him thinking that a replace out is AI at all. its really not. though that can be just a bad read.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #233 (isolation #7) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:59 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 11, 2 718281828459 wrote:VOTE: MafMen

Maf stands for mafia. Direct admission of guilt.
rvs
In post 30, 2 718281828459 wrote:Raise your hand if you
still
say Micc as either "mihk", "myk", or possibly "miss".

I am not an alt.

I think there is still one player who has not posted?
bla
In post 33, 2 718281828459 wrote:So is this a case of LAUWSN? (Look At Us, We're So Null)
bla
In post 54, 2 718281828459 wrote:Just so we all know, Penguin put MafMen to L-1.
k
In post 61, 2 718281828459 wrote:I called it out because we are in a 7p game and did not want someone to accihammer.

I guess I like some early pressure. Although not sure if the pressure is real since at least 2 of the votes (including mine) were RVS.

Penguin, why did you wait to answer bill? I might not have been online and you would have waited for quite a while.

(Also, especially early on, I find it easier to make content when I have something directed at me to respond to, or something I can actively pursue ((which is not that common)). This happens with any alignment.)
kind of hunting. ehhh
In post 83, 2 718281828459 wrote:Uh, when I "called Penguin out" on the L-1, I never meant to imply that I
disagreed
with it, but more that I wanted to
emphasize
the reality of it.
This is not inconsistent with me not removing the vote.
no hunting
In post 92, 2 718281828459 wrote:I am lost...

Unofficial vote count.
MafMen (1): 2 718281828459
Inferno (2): bill1148, horrordude0215
PenguinPower (1): Alonzo

Not Voting: all others
nice vote count
In post 93, 2 718281828459 wrote:For the record, at this point while I do have a slight scum lean on Inferno, I am not willing to vote there. Or really anyone else at this time.
UNVOTE:

(Is anyone here paranoid that any lynch or night action could result in something ridiculous and unexpected happening? Like a "boomerang" or "2x forced vengeful" ability? I hope not, because I know better than to waste my time worrying about such things.)

Ugh... early day 1 is so hard. Can I just like hibernate until we get into the later day 1?
k. we got an unvote. not really any hunting though
In post 97, 2 718281828459 wrote:Actually, instead of just saying day 1 is "so hard", I should actually give it a try. P-Edit: Here you go.

Code: Select all

         Neutral
       ___________
Scum  /  3  4  5  \  Town
Lean / 2         6 \ Lean
    /           /   \
   / 1         /   7 \
   |          /      |
Scum 0       /     8 Town
   ---------O---------
(the 6 is not related to anything in particular)
  • Alonzo: We kind of have to excuse the low-quality posts etc due to life circumstances. Although, he did do 2 RVS votes...
    NA
  • bill: Also sort of left, and has made 2 posts that are game-advancing (42 and 58). Lurking is anti-town, but not scummy.
    3.5
  • horrordude: I like the way that they build an argument for voting Inferno even though I am not ready to vote there myself. The methods that they used are pro-town.
    5
  • Inferno: "Scum." is just too abrasive. And then you say you were not serious. Then you vote, and then take it back because you "almost" hammered. If you had not hammered, why take the vote away?
    2.5
    for now.
  • MafMen: Rebutting the RVS vote is a little silly, but why say I am a town read and then suddenly reply that it makes no sense? And why is it scummy to point out in a factual way that someone is at L-1? Even with all this, it could be completely innocent, so
    4
    is my read here.
  • PenguinPower: Hey, did you know someone
    almost
    accihammered? The posts have several fallacies but I cannot find anything really
    scummy
    here.
    4
we got some reads here. not hunting
In post 131, 2 718281828459 wrote:
In post 98, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 97, 2 718281828459 wrote:PenguinPower: Hey, did you know someone almost accihammered? The posts have several fallacies but I cannot find anything really scummy here. 4
They didn't almost "accihammered" if you think they are scum. Given your read on Inferno, that seems to be the case.

Also, feel free to point out any fallacies in my posts instead of making a sweeping statement. Hard to respond to those, and I don't think that I have made any fallacious statements.
First off, it is possible for scum to truly hammer accidentally -- it is just
also
possible for them to fake it.
Second, most of the fallacies were about how you handled me stating in an informative way that someone was at L-1.
In post 104, bill1148 wrote:
In post 97, 2 718281828459 wrote:Actually, instead of just saying day 1 is "so hard", I should actually give it a try. P-Edit: Here you go.
  • Alonzo: We kind of have to excuse the low-quality posts etc due to life circumstances. Although, he did do 2 RVS votes...
    NA
  • bill: Also sort of left, and has made 2 posts that are game-advancing (42 and 58). Lurking is anti-town, but not scummy.
    3.5
  • horrordude: I like the way that they build an argument for voting Inferno even though I am not ready to vote there myself. The methods that they used are pro-town.
    5
  • Inferno: "Scum." is just too abrasive. And then you say you were not serious. Then you vote, and then take it back because you "almost" hammered. If you had not hammered, why take the vote away?
    2.5
    for now.
  • MafMen: Rebutting the RVS vote is a little silly, but why say I am a town read and then suddenly reply that it makes no sense? And why is it scummy to point out in a factual way that someone is at L-1? Even with all this, it could be completely innocent, so
    4
    is my read here.
  • PenguinPower: Hey, did you know someone
    almost
    accihammered? The posts have several fallacies but I cannot find anything really
    scummy
    here.
    4
Would love to hear your reasons as to how I come across as "lurking." Personally, I felt that way about you immediately after your "Mafmen at L-1 kthxbai" post, though I was willing to wait longer to say anything to see if that held consistent later.
When I made that list, you had only made a few posts, and they were almost all filler. I realize that "Lurking is anti-town, but not scummy" seemed more like an accusation than the intent which was to just inform.
Oh yeah, and in complicated day 1s, I prefer to make daily big posts than 6 tiny posts per day. (It becomes the opposite when down to 3-5 players with not much going on.)
In post 120, Alonzo wrote:
oooh this is new... where did you get this from?
I made it.
In post 124, MafMen wrote:{Penguin, Alonzo, Inferno}
{horror, bill}
{2}

2 - His early callout of the l-1 is phrased really awkwardly, not liking his tone, especially the one I quoted in . Slight Scum.
Penguin - Town by default if 2 is scum, seems really dedicated to this game. Slight Town.
horror/bill - One of these is scum, one of these is town, I'm not sure which, but I'm confident in the fact they can't both be town, null.
Inferno - Town by default, like his tone. Slight Town.
Alonzo - Guttown, not a strongread. Slight Town.
Post 122 was this, right?
it's still a callout nonetheless

but if youre so cautious you could unvote yourself rather than just sticking to it and notifying everyone about it being l-1 which is as if you intended for him to look scummy because of it.
At the time, I liked the L-1 just because it might cause a little bit of pressure even though I knew well that two of the three votes were random. As far as I can tell, it did generate content, although not completely what I expected.
In post 143, 2 718281828459 wrote:@Penguin: OK, I guess I misattributed a post to you. I thought you made either this point twice or you got off-put twice by my MafMen-at-L-1 comment.
In post 62, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 61, 2 718281828459 wrote:I called it out because we are in a 7p game and did not want someone to accihammer.
Why are you concerned about a derphammer? This isn't the Newbie queue, and my vote was literally right below the votecount.
In post 145, 2 718281828459 wrote:Like, I wrongly thought that
PenguinPower
had either
(1) gotten on me for my L-1 notice
multiple times
even after I explained it, or
(2) gotten on me
multiple times
for talking about accihammers even after I explained that scum can truly hammer accidentally.

It must have been someone else.
In post 161, 2 718281828459 wrote:I am starting to get lost here...
In post 162, 2 718281828459 wrote:It does not help that I think I accidentally lost a post I was writing, and I cannot remember what it was.
In post 167, 2 718281828459 wrote:Here, I will look at Inferno in-depth. The quotes are just in the order that I decided to click the Q+ buttons.
Spoiler: A Bit Long
Score: 4.00
(uses the same 0-8 scale)
In post 139, Inferno390 wrote:Horror, I really don’t have a response for you, because to be quite honest, what you’re saying is a very accurate way of looking at the situation. If I was trying to read myself unbiased, I would come to the exact same conclusions you did.
Which is one of the reasons I’m finding you Town this game, because you have a very genuine grasp on the game so far.
OK, so is this just admitting that it is legit to read you as scum? Why not explain how your actions would make sense from the perspective of a townie? This loses you 0.20 points.
Score: 3.80
In post 105, Inferno390 wrote:Hi
I haven’t had time yet to do a major catchup on the thread
And so may not for a fair amount of time.
What I do have is:
E might be scum?
Horror is pro town.
I suck at this game.
Will elaborate next chance I get.
You never elaborated on this for many posts. Why might I be scum? You lose another 0.30 points for that.
Score: 3.50
In post 89, Inferno390 wrote:Okay Penguin
So far I find that MafMen feels very waffly and does not seem to have very good answers to your questions. I would also say that the tone of his posts comes from scum, but that’s just me.

Either way, I would probably sort this into the scum pile.
VOTE: MafMen
This seems like a legit read but you completely ignored me and horrordude. So you get 0.10 points for the read.
Score: 3.60
In post 90, Inferno390 wrote:Oh I nearly had a heart attack
I thought I hammered MafMen there
I’ve got to pay more attention to vcs.
UNVOTE:
So wait. What happened?
(1) You tried to hammer and then realized you did not, so you un-voted. Why hammer so easily? That would cost you 2-3 points there. So I
give the benefit of the doubt
and assume it is...
(2) You almost thought you accidentally hammered, and realized you did not. So you un-voted even though you did not even need to. But I thought MafMen was scum in your view? You lose 0.3 points for this inconsistency.
Score: 3.30


Let's rewind some more.
In post 34, Inferno390 wrote:Since discussion needs to happen:
In post 28, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 22, Inferno390 wrote:Your PM.
Should have a player name in it.
That is your alt.
I am quadz08.
Penguin is Kison.
Who are you?
Um...no. I thought we were just joking. Why would you claim your Role Pm?
In post 29, PenguinPower wrote:So far it's looking like ListMod name is NAI though. That's good.
Scum.
Why would flavor ever be AI? And what is so wrong with claiming it?
VOTE: Penguin
Scum.
OK, maybe not that definitively, but I did that to mock your post. See how differently it feels when
you
are the target? You do not need to be that abrasive so quickly. And you said "Scum" and not something like "I hate this" which is an emotional statement. Your behavior there loses you 0.3 points.
Score: 3.00
In post 163, Inferno390 wrote:Bill, if you have something useful to say about my play, do so.
Otherwise, shut up. No one wants your crappy trash.

Alonzo: Heck no. I only have two strong reads across 6 people. Not nearly enough.
Inferno, if you cannot be nice, then shut up. No one wants your bitterness unless you are scum and you keep doing it so that we lynch you.
(Again, this is mocking your tone. Tone in and of itself is not AI, but it intensifies my scum read on you. Taking off 0.1 for that.
Score: 2.90


Final Score:
2.90
.
Let's now turn to bill and see if we get a higher score there.
In post 168, 2 718281828459 wrote:Short answer: I intend to vote for Inferno as soon as I confirm that it will not hammer.

Spoiler: Kind of long
Let's start with our standard
4.00
and see where we go.
In post 52, bill1148 wrote:
In post 50, Alonzo wrote:Ok gang. Mrs Alonzo is in the hospital RN bringing forth Spawn of Alonzo. Not sure how this is going to effect things gamewise, but your patience is appreciated.

Alonzo
Congrats.

unvote
Vote Inferno
-0.1
for the fact that doing a second RVS is usually not done and you never explained your vote. All non-RVS votes should be explained.
3.9

In post 100, bill1148 wrote:
In post 62, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 58, bill1148 wrote:Why did you vote for Mafmen?
I like wagons as a vehicle to move on from RVS. I find they are good starting points to generate content from players beyond "voting for the lulz." I also like to use VCA as a large portion of my figuring things out.
Meh. 271 brings up a good point about 2 votes being RVS. Not necessarily real "pressure," in my opinion.

[...]
In post 69, Inferno390 wrote:
In post 25, bill1148 wrote:I fail the see the benefit of listing which mod we are, other than for scummy rolefishing purposes.
Here Penguin
This is the shading I’m talking about
I find it ironic that you actually quoted this and yet still couldn’t find it

Also, I’m not a fan of it either, but I honestly don’t have a way to follow up on or step gracefully away from s***ty play
If anyone has a tip or two for that, it would be great if they could share
"I'm just bad" is not an encouraging defense.
Where was "I'm just bad"?
In post 83, 2 718281828459 wrote:Uh, when I "called Penguin out" on the L-1, I never meant to imply that I
disagreed
with it, but more that I wanted to
emphasize
the reality of it.
This is not inconsistent with me not removing the vote.
Sowing the seeds of dissent?
Uhhh... what?

Neither of these last two changes the score, they are just confusing.
In post 89, Inferno390 wrote:Okay Penguin
So far I find that MafMen feels very waffly and does not seem to have very good answers to your questions. I would also say that the tone of his posts comes from scum, but that’s just me.

Either way, I would probably sort this into the scum pile.
VOTE: MafMen
In post 90, Inferno390 wrote:Oh I nearly had a heart attack
I thought I hammered MafMen there
I’ve got to pay more attention to vcs.
UNVOTE:
First, I have the complete opposite interpretation- he feels town to me. Second, in the span of three minutes between these posts, you went from voting him and calling him prob-scum, to going back two pages, reading the official vote count, realizing that your vote would be fourth, then formulating another post plus unvoting when it wasn't even necessary?
This earns you
+0.2
for your calling out Inferno's... weird play.
4.1
In post 108, bill1148 wrote:Still trying to decide between whether Inferno is actually dense, or a scum trying to play obv-dumb.

And no idea where the pro-town reading of horror is coming from. Scummiest player here besides Inferno.
And no idea where the pro-scum reading of horror is coming from. One of the most null players here.
(I kind of like mocking posts.)
-0.1

4.0
In post 158, bill1148 wrote:Inferno has resorted to full-on nut licking.
...ok? Like can you elaborate.
In post 164, bill1148 wrote:
In post 163, Inferno390 wrote:Bill, if you have something useful to say about my play, do so.
Otherwise, shut up. No one wants your crappy trash.
Well saying "terrible" over and over again would be mundane.

And actually, I do think it was useful because it sums up your two previous posts perfectly.
Yeah, I kind of have to award you some town points for this.
+0.25
because Inferno's play is both annoying and nontown.

Final Score: 4.25
[/quote]
In post 170, 2 718281828459 wrote:VOTE: Inferno (also, that
2.90
was not supposed to be a greenish color...)

L
-
1
In post 172, 2 718281828459 wrote:
In post 150, Alonzo wrote:I want to say something about 2.718 and our previous game together but I'm having trouble articulating what I mean without giving a really wishy washy read.

TheTLDR is E! iwasn't the easiest townread, And posts like oh look this wagon is L1 just seems so E! Without wanting to put him down his style is quite 'clumsy' from my experience.

Now theres this new 'scum dial' he devised and I dont think E! from last game uses the term 'fallacy', which suggests to me he's been on the wiki reading articles and swatting up.
I assume "reading articles and swatting up" is meant in a non-AI way? Because I did decide to change my strategy a bit. I know they always say that you have to play to win this game and not try to build a meta for future games. However, I decided to try to do
both
: building a new meta (I hated the old one... 1876 was a total scum failure) while also playing to win the current games.
Im not however gonna give a read on how he flips here, because I really dont know.
Well, at least you care to admit it.

(Why does my name keep getting factorialed?)
In post 184, 2 718281828459 wrote:Alonzo: From what I could tell, it seemed like if Inferno were somehow innocent, then bill would be scum. So I looked at both and thought about who was more scummy, and it came out as Inferno. So I voted for Inferno. This should be a better pressure wagon than the "pressure wagon" on MafMen.

Let's get the content going!
In post 189, 2 718281828459 wrote:
In post 187, bill1148 wrote:Replace out.
Whoa, whoa...

Is this telling
MafMen
to replace out, or declaring that
you
are replacing out?
In post 217, 2 718281828459 wrote:All right, the reason I only gave 2 ISO reads is that I thought that Inferno was scum but I wanted to read bill because bill seemed like the one to be scum if Inferno was not, given their interactions.

ISO reads coming soon.

i would go through everything else and point out how it is not scum hunting but ima be leaving here and a sec and wont try to finish this from mobile.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #234 (isolation #8) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:00 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

sorry that kind of destroyed it self in the end. its hard to do those massive posts because they tend to break. :p
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #236 (isolation #9) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:02 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

i dont even know how that happened. really.......:p

this is called barely back to the game after a few months and shouldnt be trying to do fancy long posts like that
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #261 (isolation #10) » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:15 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

Bill...I really hope your joking...
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #291 (isolation #11) » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:50 am

Post by UC Voyager »

I'm sorry I didnt post at all yesterday. I was planning to when I got home, but my friends wanted to do crap til like 7 or 8. Then my dad to watch game of thrones because he wants me to finish what's out before the end of the month so he can cancel the HBO subscription.

Whatever. Today, not much should be happening. So after school I'll be able to play...
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #321 (isolation #12) » Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:00 am

Post by UC Voyager »

woa. okay. im kind of not home. im in 7th period but i read threw what happened and i got to say Rob has done a lot. im not sure how i feel about what he has done either. he is trying to point out scum motives but some of them just seemed a little skeptical. his entrance was very strange. he went for penguin and didnt say why. he did say "ill bite". was that rvs or is there some explanation to that. penguin hasnt been overly scummy in my opinion and would definitely consider him a town lean. i dont know how much i trust 2 718, but he does have something of a good point about you. im not sure. i will reread them in more detail when i get home and make sure i didnt missread anything and that i have all the information to work with to try to form a read.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #331 (isolation #13) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:40 am

Post by UC Voyager »

oh i see. that is my bad...i feel rather dumb right now. well then

as penguin said

Bill. pls explain
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #334 (isolation #14) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:05 am

Post by UC Voyager »

Alonzo. If you dont have a solid scan read, what do you think about Bill right now. Scummy? Not? What reads are you getting from him
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #335 (isolation #15) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:07 am

Post by UC Voyager »

VOTE: Bill
Until he answer me and Penguins question and does more stuff that is town.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #336 (isolation #16) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:09 am

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 335, UC Voyager wrote:VOTE: Bill
Until he answer me and Penguins question and does more stuff that is Towny and is helpful.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #342 (isolation #17) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:18 am

Post by UC Voyager »

ouch. pls dont try to say your following your town meta. IN FACT, dont even bring up meta in this game. it is notoriously bad and ineffective.
Bill, i can kind of see where your coming from but i mean. its the worst attempt to bait int the history of baiting. I dont know how you thought that work unless you were jsut going to try to get a town tell.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #343 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:20 am

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 339, bill1148 wrote:Since only 3 days left

unvote

Vote 2.718
So we have enough time to consider the claim.

Thank god this day phase is almost almost over so we can get some night actions in, I forgot how much days can drag.
3 days isnt a reason to rush! we shoudlnt take our time, but we should not be trying to rush a lynch when there is still more than enough time to keep hunting. If we are still sitting where we are tomorrow, then possibly, but i think that wont be the case
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #346 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:28 am

Post by UC Voyager »

Guys

Bill has claimed replacing out is AI, given reads with little to no reason behind them, tried the shittiest bait ever, then turns around after barely town hunting and scum hunting at all since i got into game and places a vote on someone easier to lynch purely because there is three days left.

I think we should look into Bill some more.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #347 (isolation #20) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:30 am

Post by UC Voyager »

In post 344, bill1148 wrote:
In post 342, UC Voyager wrote:ouch. pls dont try to say your following your town meta. IN FACT, dont even bring up meta in this game. it is notoriously bad and ineffective.
Bill, i can kind of see where your coming from but i mean. its the worst attempt to bait int the history of baiting. I dont know how you thought that work unless you were jsut going to try to get a town tell.
Huh? What are you talking about?
i was telling alonzo to not bring up emta

and said i kind of understood what you were trying to do with the baiting idea, but it was really shitty.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #350 (isolation #21) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:39 am

Post by UC Voyager »

Bill. check it. you have literally done NOTHING that makes you look town. and things that make you look kind of scummy, but your not going to get me and hopefully not anyone else to vote just because of time without you even proposing a case.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #379 (isolation #22) » Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:13 pm

Post by UC Voyager »

Penguin. What are your current town and scum reads.
so...i don't get enough sleep
User avatar
UC Voyager
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
UC Voyager
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3509
Joined: September 21, 2017
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits

Post Post #473 (isolation #23) » Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:01 am

Post by UC Voyager »

Oh. i was wondering why I want prodded after being without internet for 2 or so days.....I feel kinda dumb now because of how it turned out. Guess we cant always be right. Hmm. 1v6. Doesn't seem to fair. I didnt even get to use my cop ability. 2 716 would have prob been my target
so...i don't get enough sleep

Return to “Mayfair Club [Micro Games]”