I've taken a long sabbatical since the mess that was my Team Mafia game to try and rekindle my enjoyment of Mafia as a whole. I hope we can all get along and not instantly turn to s***-slinging as I find that really takes the fun out of the game 
Hiya GrumpyIn post 115, Grumpy Cat wrote:Is that the legendary Flopz that just posted??"!?"?£$£"!???
it's gonna take me a few hours to parse his words. give me up to 24 hours to respond please
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
. Cute cat btw, give me a bit to catch-up in the thread. Must have been some interesting developments to have 5 pages so fast 
In post 11, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:Please refrain from using that word, Dongempire.
In post 14, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:I am referring to the use of the word "lynch" rather than "elimination" or another similar term.
In post 15, Alisae wrote:why do u care
In post 17, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:The historical connotation does not translate well into the context of the game, and has potential to personally offend some users. I find it odd that you would choose to argue about something not-game-related you presumably do not care for, but this is not the time nor the place for such discussion.
Let's keep this all above board friends, there's no need to start an argument over this. Why don't we keep this type of discussion to a seperate threadIn post 19, Alisae wrote:Like you decided to be the word police, so I'm questioning why you decided to be the word police.
Am I not allowed to do that?
I'm going to assume you're yolking here Windows and not being overly defensive. Nice quip btw Hopkirk, very funnyIn post 33, WindowsXP wrote:Trying to case people in RVS? Scummy.In post 24, Hopkirk wrote:You've got a lot of nerve just coming into the game making jokes instead of contributing anything. I'd give you a finger of suspicion, but that would make typing hard so I'm going to have to go with a vote instead. VOTE: Windows XPIn post 22, WindowsXP wrote:I suggest we use the term Uninstall. But perhaps I am just biased.
Not sure what you mean by this??? Who doesn't like a cheeky XD or :3
Woah, can we not go down this rabbit hole pls. Even if you are joking, that's a bit in poor tasteIn post 63, Hopkirk wrote:Screw you then. I was trying to not get super agressive and toxic this game but you're not giving me much option.In post 61, Grumpy Cat wrote:I disagreeIn post 60, Hopkirk wrote:I think we should try to move away from this type of low effort posting. Could anyone who agrees please quote my post then say 'I agree' (nothing else obviously).In post 59, Grumpy Cat wrote::OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WTF, why do you and Grumpy keep throwing shade at me before I even joined. This is supposed to be a nice and chill Micro game and you're being unnecesarily rudeIn post 67, Hopkirk wrote:Flopz hasn't posted yet so I think I need to shade him a bit.
I once saw Flopz use dice based randomness for a 'random vote stage' vote. The funny thing is that he didn't even use the random tags or anything. He just rolled a d20, took a picture of it, then for the nexttwentypages he just couldn't seem to grasp what everyone was saying, that he could have just rolled the dice more than once and only uploaded the picture when he got the result he wanted. Like he kept insisting things like 'no my phone doesn't have enough storage to keep that many pictures' then started uploading screenshots of his phone's storage. He had some long sound files of himself singing the complete soundtrack of Wicked in the shower. Nobody asked since it was clearly a sound based file, although I guess there was an implication that he was filling his phone with random stuff to back up his argument.
Honestly, can you stop. This is not funny anymoreIn post 73, Hopkirk wrote:Idk. I don't really want to reread the game because he was so toxic in it that I really don't want to reread it (and the mod didn't update the first post with roles or anything smh).In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
This isn't true, he's just being annoyingIn post 78, Grumpy Cat wrote:Oh damn, I wouldn't be opposed to policy launching him then it becomes a serious issue? We should put some pressure on him to make sure he behaves.In post 73, Hopkirk wrote:Idk. I don't really want to reread the game because he was so toxic in it that I really don't want to reread it (and the mod didn't update the first post with roles or anything smh).In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
VOTE: Flopz
What is this????? I would never say anything like this, why are you being so toxicIn post 93, Hopkirk wrote:Seems a bit low for Flopz 'I hate you guys' Flopz. Even that time he was playing 'we need a fourth' he was still in 3 toxic 1v1s. He just kept quoting his own posts. That wasn't a fun game, but I did learn a lot about my mother.In post 89, Grumpy Cat wrote:I feel like the scumteam are scared of the pure solving power we're exhibiting right and I don't really blame them
Flopz especially is heavy lurking. He usually has around 200 posts and has got into 2 or 3 toxic 1v1s by now
*sigh*In post 105, Hopkirk wrote:Ooh, can I pet it?
Eh, it's better than fixing boxing matches like Flopz. I use 'boxing match' in the loosest possible terms here. I still disagree that going to retirement homes and punching the residents counts as a boxing match, but Flopz has got a powerful right hook (GrumpyCat already posted the profile pic he uses on his dating apps) and doesn't like it when I try and disagree with how he defines words.In post 98, Grumpy Cat wrote:Are you accusing me of fixing my roles? Ngl that's kind of toxic to accuse me of cheating like that
Please ignore what you've heard. I've literally played 2 games here and stopped after that because of the toxicity. I was hoping it might be better this time but maybe notIn post 117, Ydrasse wrote:flopz ive heard scary things about you
I think he just thinks he's being funny
It's still RVS so I wasn't expecting anything to really be substantive. He is being weird but I won't say that's alignment indicative. The jokes are fun at all but can we not take it too far pls. I like the whole cat motif you've got going on, hopefully we'll see more of itIn post 143, Grumpy Cat wrote:RVS joke shenanigans. Shocking I know, but I didn't actually want to policy launch Flopz before he'd even posted
Yh, I've done it. Was going through the thread from the beginning. It always feels weird to me when I answer later posts before I've finished reviewing the pastIn post 152, WindowsXP wrote:Flopz, I'm going off of break but I'd appreciate if you answered my question. If you missed it just check my iso its a recent post.
What makes you say that Ydrasse?In post 164, Ydrasse wrote:i will live and die by alisae being town this game
What!!!!! ReallyIn post 174, Grumpy Cat wrote:If you're feel hard done by the limited selection of emojis you can use, Flopz, feel free to use the [img] tags to link any animated emojis you find online.
In post 178, Ydrasse wrote:the detective hat fits snug on alisae and does not feel as if it was stolen awayIn post 173, Flopz wrote:What makes you say that Ydrasse?In post 164, Ydrasse wrote:i will live and die by alisae being town this gameSpoiler:
(and also 169 after all that questioning feels nice n real)
I'm sorry that you were taken from us just when you extended an olive branch towards me. I'm sure this would have become a beautiful friendship.In post 294, Hopkirk wrote: I would like to deeply and sincerely apologize to Flopz for any pain or suffering he may have experience in relation to my vicious mockery. I should have paid more attention to his feelings. Hurting your feelings was never my intent here Flopz and I hope we can move away from this shocking and tragic incident together. Just think of the things we can do together. If we work in tandem there's no fight we cannot win.
I failed to realize the importance of caring about other people's feelings here and I want to fully apologize for that Flopz. It was wrong of me and I won't do it again. I like to think this whole experience has made me a better person.
Now on to more serious matters, Dong, why did you keep your vote on Ico after expressly stating they are in line with their Towngame? Would it not make sense to move your vote elsewhere at that point?In post 242, Donempire wrote:Also, icos behaviour is so far in line with his towngame. I dont doubt it
Yh, that's why I'm asking why you didn't stop the vote (and not why you started the vote, my vote on Ico was also RVS) after you said Ico was town in your eyesIn post 337, Donempire wrote:Because it was an rvs vote
Grumpy, I'm on my hands and knees here. Can you please please please please please please stop saying Launching. I'd rather you say the "Word that starts with the letter after K" or something equally ridiculous but the use of the word launch is causing me real physical pain that I didn't expect would happen from this. There is no joke, I'm being completely serious here.In post 392, Grumpy Cat wrote: Launching scum is slightly preferable, but there is utility in launching launchbait if we think they'd be a liabilty in LyLo, since we can flip town!them with small consequence. I can't see launchbait this game though (yet).
Apart from his huge brain, great worldplay, and jealousy from haters due to the fact that he is a huge proponent of the singular best diety in any pantheon,In post 389, Alisae wrote:Btw what do we think of the Hopkirk kill?
My soul can't take it for some reasonIn post 437, Grumpy Cat wrote:What's wrong with launch lol
Gonna quickly jump in my wayback machine to get a definite answer on if this was serious. I kind of really want to knowIn post 33, WindowsXP wrote:Trying to case people in RVS? Scummy.In post 24, Hopkirk wrote:You've got a lot of nerve just coming into the game making jokes instead of contributing anything. I'd give you a finger of suspicion, but that would make typing hard so I'm going to have to go with a vote instead. VOTE: Windows XPIn post 22, WindowsXP wrote:I suggest we use the term Uninstall. But perhaps I am just biased.
100%, I'll answer whatever question it takes!!! Just stop using that awful wordIn post 441, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz plsIn post 346, Grumpy Cat wrote:I'm sad Hop died :[
Flopz, do you think scum!you could be convinced to kill Hop on n1 by your partner?
I'll change "launch" to "lunch" if you answer this for me
Do you now promise to change the word. I better not see any other weird variations like lonching or lanchingIn post 444, Grumpy Cat wrote:Okay, I buy it
In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: There's soemthing else i wanted to share but i will out it when the time is right.
Cheers, I always wondered how that workedIn post 448, Grumpy Cat wrote:I forgot how good your sig was lul. Go into settings and make it so your sig is attached to all your posts, duffer
From the top left:
User Control Panel>Board Preferences>Edit posting defaults>Attach my signature by default
In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I am not happy that Ico was hammered so soon, but they were a good PL regardless the way they were playing entitled.
Those are very interesting to read side-by-side, those two statements seem a bit disanalogous to me ngl as the first statement kind of doesn't really work with the second being a thing. Unlike Alisae, you're not saying "oops I didn't mean to"In post 419, WindowsXP wrote:I will say that it is my fault for not announcing L-2.
In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I think there is still scum within hopkirk/GC.
That's actually amazing to read. It's like I'm reading a book that contains a list of the most hilarious two subsequent posts. How do you talk about Ico dying while somehow ignoring the post right next to it that explains the poor death of Hopkirk?In post 419, WindowsXP wrote:Oh. Lol. Hop died. That might change some dynamics.
As you don't want to reveal your alt (which also means you don't have to show any proof), when you say gameS, do you mean multiple games or just one? Better yet, can you say how many games you've both been in together. Nobody is going to super-sleath and go through all of Icos games to see all of the people they've played with and then try to narrow that down so you'll be safe, I give my scout's honour on that.In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: Also as for the games i "read". I must come clean and say I did lie and was using games that we both played in and was trying to apply meta. At the very least i wanted to get them to make some concrete stances that werent rooted in some 1v1.
Why on earth did you feel that you were likely to die? I really want to know the trail of logic for that one.In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I expected to likely die(no dead thread pm ): ) so i didn't bother using my free time i had between work shifts to draft anything up, but I will look through everyone at some point whenever i can.
Ask me whatever you want and I'll answer it, just promise not to use the word "launch" and we'll be goldenIn post 419, WindowsXP wrote:I'd also like to hear more from flopz.
Your two big leading active drives were on both Ico and Hopkirk who both ended up as being town.In post 458, WindowsXP wrote:and re: being likely to die: I'm active. I drive conversation. I ask questions. I lead. It's a no brainer to have me as a potential kill targettarget. I have been N1d and N2d as VT many times.
I would say even more so than me yh. This is purely based on me knowing his in-person feelings for Mafia as a whole (I can say with complete certainty that GC will prioritise his enjoyment (specifically tied to our participation) over the most optimal nightkill (in the hyperspecific scenario that killing one of us two would be the most optimal kill), this is only in this specific circumstance and on N1 (maybe N2 depending on the gamestate). I would be very hard-pressed to see GC nightkill me or Hop N1In post 483, Ydrasse wrote:admittedly i don't know the depth of bonds btwn you/flopz/hopkirk but i remember reading this post earlier in the day and not liking it and that still stands. like, do you haveIn post 395, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz is town unless his scum partner really dictatored the kill. Flopz/I never kill Hop night 1 here, since we joined this game together for the lols.In post 389, Alisae wrote:Btw what do we think of the Hopkirk kill?
I'll look through this ISO to see how strong his scumreads were. 1 minthatmuch faith in flopz to say that?
similarly, flopz, do you think this holds true for gc?
Of course, but I wouldn't be worried N1, especially when D1 ended as abruptly as it did. It's not like I was under any scrutiny from Hopkirk so that detracts from my only reason for ever considering to kill himIn post 483, Ydrasse wrote:you admit that you think hop was doing the most explicitly... well, explicit scumhunting. do you think as scum you would be worried about town!hop being able to read you?In post 443, Flopz wrote:100%, I'll answer whatever question it takes!!! Just stop using that awful wordIn post 441, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz plsIn post 346, Grumpy Cat wrote:I'm sad Hop died :[
Flopz, do you think scum!you could be convinced to kill Hop on n1 by your partner?
I'll change "launch" to "lunch" if you answer this for me
Playing with you guys was the reason you finally got me to try another forum game after the mess that was TM so I don't think I would kill you or Hop N1 unless I had a reaaaaaaaaaaally good reason.Spoiler:
While looking through your ISO yesterday I was reminded of this post. Thinking on it, I am having an incredibly hard time actually believing that this is genuine. It just seems like a reeeeeeeeeeeaaaaally bad attempt to ATE or some weird feels-based play. Nobody in their right mind would believe Ico's typo, which they instantly aplogised for and said it was a typo, was anything but a typo. The fact that you acted so offended over this innocuous mistake seems incredibly blown out of proportion.In post 229, WindowsXP wrote:Also as a side note, please do not use gross ableist language. I am uncomfortable with it and its grossly inappropriate to use in game.I will not be asking you directly again.
GC, would you disagree at all with my take here?In post 505, Flopz wrote:I would say even more so than me yh. This is purely based on me knowing his in-person feelings for Mafia as a whole (I can say with complete certainty that GC will prioritise his enjoyment (specifically tied to our participation) over the most optimal nightkill (in the hyperspecific scenario that killing one of us two would be the most optimal kill), this is only in this specific circumstance and on N1 (maybe N2 depending on the gamestate). I would be very hard-pressed to see GC nightkill me or Hop N1In post 483, Ydrasse wrote:admittedly i don't know the depth of bonds btwn you/flopz/hopkirk but i remember reading this post earlier in the day and not liking it and that still stands. like, do you haveIn post 395, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz is town unless his scum partner really dictatored the kill. Flopz/I never kill Hop night 1 here, since we joined this game together for the lols.In post 389, Alisae wrote:Btw what do we think of the Hopkirk kill?
I'll look through this ISO to see how strong his scumreads were. 1 minthatmuch faith in flopz to say that?
similarly, flopz, do you think this holds true for gc?
Do not worry my dear chum, I am still browsing the selectionIn post 511, Grumpy Cat wrote:FLOPZ DON'T GO TO LUNCH
Bruh, this is CbeebiesIn post 519, Grumpy Cat wrote:I don't even know what Rastamouse is, I don't browse iFunny
Wow, he actually just memed and left. I was kind of waiting for something to happenIn post 518, Grumpy Cat wrote:Pretty sure Dogem is trying to distract us and lead us down random avenues of discussion so that we forget this is a mafia game and end up talking about Rastamouse for 10 days.
Woah, not sure how I'm just talking about meta but whatevs. Yes it seems scummy, in how utterly out of proportion that was, and literally every other person here disagrees with your take that this was intentional.In post 525, WindowsXP wrote:506 - tell me how you "accidentally" press the n key in that convenient location when typing windows. The w and s key are on the left side of the keyboard. I absolutely thought it was intentional and the fake coverup made me more agry. So get out out of here with that. Not sure why you latching onto this kinda shit as "scummy". Wanna elaborate on that? What else I've done pinged you as scummy?
Flopz do you normally only hyperfocus on meta argumenrs? I see you've done so a lot on this page.
What? I'm actually baffled by how you can link anything I have said to this statement. You stupified me, amazin'In post 535, WindowsXP wrote:Flopz
1. This argument sucks and you're wrong so if you wanna argue in good faith i suggest you drop it because what are you trying to say? That im partners with ico and its scum theater? Get outta here
Imagine trying to force end the day so we can't continue to ask questions as well as put more focus on the lurkers, not scummy at all btw. Thank goodness GC unvoted in time.In post 564, WindowsXP wrote:"Saying you'll do a tactic"
Yeah no seeya VOTE: Windows
Im town get dong tomorrow and its gg.
What do you think about Windows' self-vote and the questioning leading up to it?In post 631, Ydrasse wrote:is there anything ppl want me to talk abt/answer?
Sorry lad, Windows kind of tired me out and I didn't really want to have to wade through this mess. This is literally the reason I stopped playing after Team Mafia.In post 747, Grumpy Cat wrote: Flopz HELP, give me some lighthearted vibes to encourage me to read through.
He's talking about you misgendering Windows. Your view on windows aside, it's common courtesy to use people's preferred pronouns. (windows you should add them onto your account so it's more visible)In post 755, Donempire wrote:?In post 749, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:I can see how that must have been a challenge for you. Do not fret, once your brain eventually develops to that of an adult I am sure you will understand the level of patheticness you are displaying here.In post 748, Donempire wrote:I should have known when he asked us to refer to him by them
It was excrutiating talking to you but it'll probably be hilarioud reading back with hindsight
Good job windows
In post 842, WindowsXP wrote:can you read 28/29?In post 841, Flopz wrote:Can I just not read the previous pages because I don't want to give myself a migraine. If there were any questions for me can someone just send me to the post. If I really have to I'll look through the other pages but I really don't want to.
wrt my interactions with ydrasse and the things i brought up.
One page later:In post 681, WindowsXP wrote:anyways I still think dong is scum unless proven otherwise for the evidence i provided earlier.
This is the same thing you did with Ico too. Just blatantly making things up, especially when people question you, and whenever you get called out you try and pull a reverse uno and say no its whoever accused you who is scum. It's just so tiring. Time and time again Windows has used their "evidence" as the crux of their points and then eventually says they were "exaggerating" to find out if the other party were actually scum. I'm a fan of the simple answers, with the simple answer being Windows is just trying to shade anyone that ever questions them, using any means necessary to try and flip the dialogue around (usually unsuccesfully).In post 707, WindowsXP wrote:I fudged that evidence and over exaggerated it tbh. I just had a really strong vibe that they were scum. Getting shitpushed can make that kinda read happen.
And I never will.In post 33, WindowsXP wrote:Trying to case people in RVS? Scummy.In post 24, Hopkirk wrote:You've got a lot of nerve just coming into the game making jokes instead of contributing anything. I'd give you a finger of suspicion, but that would make typing hard so I'm going to have to go with a vote instead. VOTE: Windows XPIn post 22, WindowsXP wrote:I suggest we use the term Uninstall. But perhaps I am just biased.
It's certainly possible but Idk if I'd call it probable. Windows has been screaming to high heaven for the whole game about how everyone but them is bad faith, after realising they were scum-read by basically everyone at that point, saccing themselves to prevent more dialogue which will make it harder to find their partner instead of trying to fake-slip to appear more town. If Windows is town, Windows should know nobody is gonna listen to their dying words and lunch who Windows wants to lunch so what is there to gain from suicide. You could argue that it would help locate scum if windows is town but at that point, windows was unanimously scum read so it wouldn't have made a difference.In post 874, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz, what do you think of my reasoning for Wandows-town here? Ignore the As, Miso got on my keyboard.In post 799, Grumpy Cat wrote:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I want to flip Paladin today. I think Wandow's WIM is town-indicative, especially since as scum they probably just want to self-hammer when given the opportunity given all the vocal players are scumreading them. This feels like a lot of effort for little reward if they're scum. Yes, there's the "storing Wandows-scum to lunch tomorrow" thing, but I never really think that was going to take off. Wandows-scum can just do the minimum effort to ensure they're not SO obvscum, that they're not stored for tomorrow, but lunched today instead, but they're going above and beyond. Maybe they're some kind of freak and scum!Windows is actually efforting in the hopes they can completely turn the opinion on their slot around, and not be lunched today OR tomorrow, but there's like no indication that was going to happen, even after pages and pages of effort, soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo I'm thinking Windows is town3r">R????"$$£
A few hours later after realising they made yet another inconistency (like saying they checked their PM but didn't really check their PM in regards to Hopkirk's death).In post 858, WindowsXP wrote:Can you quote where I admitted the self vote was for towncred?
Seems like another attempt at trying to fix their slips.In post 861, WindowsXP wrote:Oh hold up, the fake hammer slip was for towncred. the self vote was serious. I think I should clarify that. Those are 2 separate actions to me. Yes my intent with pretending to self hammer were to get reactions and to farm a townread. I fully admit that.
Adding on to that, in terms of the increased effortposting, they could just be going full tryhard to salvage any semblence of townieness. The fact that you're questioning whether Windows is indeed scum shows the fruit of their labour.In post 879, Flopz wrote:In post 874, Grumpy Cat wrote:Flopz, what do you think of my reasoning for Wandows-town here? Ignore the As, Miso got on my keyboard.In post 799, Grumpy Cat wrote:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I want to flip Paladin today. I think Wandow's WIM is town-indicative, especially since as scum they probably just want to self-hammer when given the opportunity given all the vocal players are scumreading them. This feels like a lot of effort for little reward if they're scum. Yes, there's the "storing Wandows-scum to lunch tomorrow" thing, but I never really think that was going to take off. Wandows-scum can just do the minimum effort to ensure they're not SO obvscum, that they're not stored for tomorrow, but lunched today instead, but they're going above and beyond. Maybe they're some kind of freak and scum!Windows is actually efforting in the hopes they can completely turn the opinion on their slot around, and not be lunched today OR tomorrow, but there's like no indication that was going to happen, even after pages and pages of effort, soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo I'm thinking Windows is town3r">R????"$$£Spoiler:
And let you end the day without getting more info from pally as well as maybe from Ydrasse's replacement. NtyIn post 881, WindowsXP wrote:Holy fuck the reach. Did you stretch before making that reach? Vote me if im scummy.
Looooooooooool. It's like on one hand, I just want to lunch Windows right here and now so I don't have to think about them anymore, however, the darn setup makes that a less optimal choice to winning the gameIn post 884, Donempire wrote:No, you see, if you dont vote windows NOW and kill them then you are just mafia trying to misylynch them tomorrow. Trust me, their tactic is a guarentee %100 winrate tactic (In post 883, Flopz wrote:And let you end the day without getting more info from pally as well as maybe from Ydrasse's replacement. NtyIn post 881, WindowsXP wrote:Holy fuck the reach. Did you stretch before making that reach? Vote me if im scummy.) so just listen to them and win lol
Wow, it really doesn't feel like Ydrasse has more posts than me yet that is the caseIn post 878, Flopz wrote:Ydrasse post incoming...In post 842, WindowsXP wrote:can you read 28/29?In post 841, Flopz wrote:Can I just not read the previous pages because I don't want to give myself a migraine. If there were any questions for me can someone just send me to the post. If I really have to I'll look through the other pages but I really don't want to.
wrt my interactions with ydrasse and the things i brought up.
I blame myself for not shitposting earlier when GC and Hop were at full force Anyways, Ydrasse has done quite a lot of nothing, basically. Skimming through her ISO, there's nothing particularly meaty there, she had a good post in 483 but there wasn't any follow up. It seems more likely that she was just doing enough to coast than to actually attempt to solve. Which of Dong and Ali are you leaning closer to? And do you still think Ydrasse v Windows is most likely TvT (because I really can't see it)?In post 800, Grumpy Cat wrote:My page 32 solves turns out is Paladin + Dogem/Alisae. Let's see how that works out for me.
Can you be more substantive with these reads when you get the chanceIn post 867, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:I will have to go easy on the evidence for the time being as I am off to bed shortly.
Dongempire's pushes are inconsistent and has taken an odd tone in certain posts.
Ydrasse's early contributions seemed to me like appearances and no more. I need to read this slot fully to compare more recent posts but nothing has struck me as overtly town-sided.
Alisae has presented the clearest intent to solve of any other player thus far. I stand by my belief that the first day hammer was accidental, but I'm not sure scum would have reacted to such a mistake as Alisae did.
Grumpy Cat seems to be expecting more from me. I am not entirely sure whether I prefer the idea that they are town solving or that they are trying to arrange my miselimination/pocketing depending on my response to their pushing.
I cannot find any thoughts on Flopz at the moment, sorry. And you seem obviously town to me.
) so just listen to them and win lol