Same! though tbf that's less psychic and more being excited to play lol.In post 5, northsidegal wrote: wow, i must be psychic, i checked mafiascum right as the thread started
HEAL: northsidegal
VOTE: keychain
HEAL: Keychain
Same! though tbf that's less psychic and more being excited to play lol.In post 5, northsidegal wrote: wow, i must be psychic, i checked mafiascum right as the thread started
HEAL: northsidegal
VOTE: keychain
Also yes fun intro, but either you'reIn post 6, northsidegal wrote: hold on, i need to harness this psychic energy while it's still in my body
yes... yes, i see it....
the scumteam is keychain and delta
For a true rehash it'd have to be a lurker slot replaced what felt like a dozen times until I got a good scumbuddy to carry me, so you know... keep an eye out for thatIn post 16, Bingle wrote: Sorry we couldn't do a rehash of your first game, Keychain. I guess you'll just have to settle for a subpar scumbuddy.
You can plan out a post and also be psychically checking ms as the game starts, I don't see how the two are related? My comment was more sparked by Umlaut saying he(?) liked the intro and adding you to his coalition, since I personally wouldn't get much tell from a pre prepared post. Also semi interested to see if you'd admit you prepared it.In post 25, northsidegal wrote:well that would mean that i was lying about the psychic coincidence of checking mafiascum right as the game started, no?In post 14, Keychain wrote: Also yes fun intro, but either you'rewayquicker at finding images than me, or I assume this opening was planned out considerably ahead of gamestart
is that what you think?
Oh damn your third eye is right, somehow I didn't connect the psychicness of you arriving early to your psychic reads and just assumed you were going to come in with psychic reads regardless, so that would indeed be an amazing coincidence. This all makes sense now, carry onIn post 37, northsidegal wrote:perhaps my third eye is just closed, but to me i would say planning out in advance a post about what an amazing coincidence it is that you checked mafiascum just as the thread opened opened would be redundant / probably dishonest. it's not really clear to me what explanation there would be otherwise – i wouldn't consider repeatedly refreshing the page or anything to really be a "coincidence" or "psychic".In post 32, Keychain wrote: You can plan out a post and also be psychically checking ms as the game starts, I don't see how the two are related? My comment was more sparked by Umlaut saying he(?) liked the intro and adding you to his coalition, since I personally wouldn't get much tell from a pre prepared post. Also semi interested to see if you'd admit you prepared it.
to actually answer your question, no, i didn't prepare anything. i just googled "crystal ball"
I was camping the micro queue and then hassling people to join the game, your read of the frantic energy is correct and IIn post 36, Bingle wrote: Interesting, we're seeing almost exactly the opposite thing here. I thought Key's entrance had a lot of frantic energy that came across as awkward, but is explained by the excitement she had in joining the game and therefore null to me.
<3In post 60, northsidegal wrote: i feel as though i'm unintentionally bringing a lot of negative energy here despite being excited for my first game in a while with a lot of people i'm familiar with. so, just to say it explicitly, i'm excited to be here with all you guys
This was not the response I hoped for! Though I'm also eager to hear from KawaiiKame and N_M, whenever they have the time to make their entrances.In post 75, Deltabreedy wrote: Considering 2 people haven't posted yet, I'm waiting until we hear from the remaining slots before I start plopping together a coalition.
What progression?In post 85, Umlaut wrote:In post 83, patchwork wrote: delta.... that's not what i'm saying?? im not sure how you're taking it that way. i feel like your vote on nsg feels like a stretch, and it's based on "not contributing" when they have in fact been taking part in discussion and the stupid psychic thing, when it's pretty normal to make jokes earlygame.This is a pretty towny progression on patch's part, I think.In post 84, patchwork wrote: anyways policy tr for delta i'll probably revoke this later but he's just been generally towny so i might not
In post 89, KawaiiKame wrote:Town mindsetIn post 82, Deltabreedy wrote: I think when we eventually get contributions from them, reading into the wider game and associatives gives me a better chance of putting together a town-only coalition and winning us the game. I'm much more comfortable with using my vote than with trying to build a coalition to generate and develop my reads in the meantime.
HEAL: Deltabreedy
These posts as a total contribution so far from someone who (from a skim through their completed games) often posts multiple times over the course of a few minutes and asks a lot of questions is the shadiest thing I've seen this game, and picking the most popular coalition (Dunn's one, which is the same as Umlaut's and mine plus Delta) without even putting themself in it makes me want to throw out my whole coalition for having Kawaii's scum buddy in it
I guess I don't find this particularly AI personally - it could also be that Delta is one of the players patch is familiar with here so it's easier to engage with him over his arguments but separately from whatever read they end up with.In post 93, Umlaut wrote: Arguing a bunch with Delta and saying his arguments against NSG make no sense, and then saying he's town. It seems like Patch is just giving their thoughts instead of trying to push some specific position or idea.
big fan of this response feels like a very town thing to be concerned about, not sure scum would immediately identify that as an issue. plus generally agreeing with the Bingle analysis on Delta there HEAL: DeltabreedyIn post 126, Deltabreedy wrote: I think it's NAI, but dropping the 'Newbtown' as a qualified when discussing my play will only serve to delegitimise reads and arguments that I develop further down the line. I'd appreciate you recanting and reconsidering the wording.
sometimes new players are also vulnerable to townreading explanations more than they should, but being new (to the site or mafia) shouldn't in itself a reason for people to doubt you yeahIn post 129, Bingle wrote:Disagree strongly. Newbtown frequently have better reads than established players. The only real change is how they're likely to react to certain situations, like injokes between fogeys.In post 126, Deltabreedy wrote: I think it's NAI, but dropping the 'Newbtown' as a qualified when discussing my play will only serve to delegitimise reads and arguments that I develop further down the line. I'd appreciate you recanting and reconsidering the wording.
Not the mod but coalition has to happen first. From Coalition section of game rulesIn post 131, patchwork wrote: wait mod what happens if we reach a lim before we vote on a coalition
I do wonder if that means if we're at elimination majority then we lock in a coalition that fails, does the elimination immediately happen? We should probably avoid thatIn post 1, lilith2013 wrote: During the Coalition phase, elimination votes will still be counted but no elimination can occur until a coalition has been locked in.
I actually didn't know this until you inned to the game under Bingle - I'd seen a BingleIn post 187, Bingle wrote: I'm Bingle. Also Jingle.
Though I understand you didn't actually use the heuristic, being put in the "more inactive" half of the game because I try to condense my thoughts instead of bloating pages with one thought per post rankles a bitIn post 165, northsidegal wrote:interestingly, this exclusion pool exactly follows the heuristic that scum tend to be found in the lower half of posting frequency.In post 164, northsidegal wrote: i think right now my exclusion pool looks like {kame, dunn, keychain, umlaut}
the direction of causality that you think that follows depends on your faith in my abilities as a scumhunter.
Also that north should be in there for sure, and Delta should probably be in there (unless he's scum with Bingle which I can't get out of my head). I know I just said I try and condense my thoughts but instead I'm steadily making myself late for work by having more thoughtsIn post 188, Keychain wrote: My main feelings on the coalition are that Bingle, Kawaii, N_M shouldn't be in there.
Yeah that's fair, I didn't really take the time to check how long it had been and think about timezones etc before making that comment so it was definitely based entirely on my feeling.In post 223, Umlaut wrote: (I get it but it's annoying to take one night off Mafia and see people react this way)
Yeah that's what I was thinkingish and decidedIn post 252, northsidegal wrote: to angleshoot this a little bit, assuming that NM is telling the truth about just randomly remembering, i imagine that if he had posted in the mafia PT before the game started he probably would have realized the game had started earlier. something to think about. (hopefully site rules haven't been updated to the point where i can't say this)
why would I address it? I think you generally have good reads. If you're town I think you'll probably correct yourself over time without me needing to try and convince you. If you're scum you're scum. what else is there to say except it would be hilarious if you were town and eliminated me D1? That's what I've mostly been thinking about your read which isn't game productiveIn post 255, northsidegal wrote:the main source of my scumread on you at this point is that this is the first time that you've even acknowledged that i have been scumreading you, even though i've brought it up in some way about every third post of mine.In post 250, Keychain wrote: Is that the main source of your scumread on me north?
Patchwork and kawaii joined last month (though I don't know their prev mafia experience), do you regard their reads as less important than your own or anyone else's on that basis? I think you bring clarity to the game in any case even if I don't agree with the reason for your reads/votes, by the way you react and the way people react to you, which I find really helpfulIn post 256, Deltabreedy wrote: That's three people now who are pretty committed to newb-reading anything I say. Any argument I make can now quite easily be countered because a third of the playerbase now holding that narrative. There scarcely seems a point to me playing, there's now a ready-made argument against anything I say from now to game end.
Thanks! the lack of it from you is why I'm scumreading youIn post 269, KawaiiKame wrote:I'm getting this flow of consciousness feel with you which is why I'm town reading you I feelIn post 267, Keychain wrote: - the most obvious point to me that I'm posting off the cuff far more than I'd normally be comfortable with in a game with players I'm familiar with
I absolutely have not read the history of this setup! and you are wrong - acknowledging you having me at the bottom of every readslist without any other comment beyond your rvs psychic thing is not something I'm particularly interested in directing conversation towards because like I said, it does shit for me figuring out who's town or scum. As town I interact in ways that support developing my reads and leave you to yours, as scum I have a lot more interest in adjusting other people's reads, especially of me. I only brought it up when I did because you suggested a reason and it became interesting since it seemed similar to my read on Bingle.In post 277, northsidegal wrote: this is, in my opinion, the complete wrong mindset to have (as town) when playing this setup. we need to be striving for absolute perfection in the coalition, and if we fail in that it gives us valuable information in that we've gone wrong somewhere before we've even had an elimination. empirically, this also ignores the actual history of the setup –most times that town has won the coalition, they win it through passing a correct coalition.
it's not so much that iwantyou to defend yourself as it is my expectation that you already would have at least acknowledged the matter if you were town.
welcome!
Damn coldblooded! I think late arrival then contributions from N_M have been towny.In post 303, Eiralox wrote: I'm willing to hurt not_mafia in a heartbeat
God yesIn post 317, Umlaut wrote: I feel like Delta/Eira is spewed town here
I'm glad you've found plenty of setup spec to entertain yourself! Though I do think Umlaut's strategy appeals more to me, especially since it's late enough that I can't even tell if you're suggesting we put scumreads on the coalitionIn post 316, Bingle wrote: So, the thing I didn't explain earlier is this:
Coalition Victory > 2 Scum in Coalition > 2 Scum outside of Coalition. If you are absolutely sure that scum will be on the coalition, you want both scum on the coalition. You also want high priority nightkills on the coalition, because then scum is forced to make the suboptimal choice of narrowing the coalition pool if they want that person dead. Which is why nsg is 100% on the coalition. Delta slot (Hey Eir) is pretty obvtown at this point.
Not_Mafia, even if he were modconfirmed town, is a shit option for a coalition slot, because scum will never shoot him, unless we actually commit to the policy elim. I'm not interested in the policy elim at the moment.
If we choose an accurate coalition, game is over. If not, limming on coalition is a 30% to hit scum (naive calculation with the assumption that P(1 on and 1 off) and P(Both on) are the same) and off coalition is a 12.5% to hit scum. If we can increase the odds that both scum are either on or off (by seperating S/T reads and collecting S/S reads) we approach a 40% lim rate on D1, which is a pretty good consolation prize.
It's like Monty Hall, the odds of switching your choice giving you a car are better than you might intuitively guess.
Ok I'll keep biting because I'm legitimately curious about this nowIn post 323, northsidegal wrote:it's not about "directly arguing I'm town", which i don't expect. it's mainly about the persistent avoidance, which i have seen scum do beforeIn post 314, Umlaut wrote: This sort of seems like you're assuming Keychain sees the game the same way you do. I tend to agree with her that directly arguing I'm town is typically a waste of time.
I feel like the timeline from my perspective should be clarified here: I wasn't engaging while you were just putting me at the bottom of your readslist because I don't expect your reads to be instant perfection and left you space to reassess.In post 330, northsidegal wrote: i find the idea that you expected me to at some point just go from "i will never be okay with a coalition that includes keychain" to townreading you to be, if not somewhat unbelievable, at least a very surprising mindset. it makes me wonder – if thatdidn'tend up happening at some point, wouldthatbe the point at which you finally brought anything up yourself? would you just hope that a coalition passes that manages to include you anyways, and people ignore my read on you? or would you just not expect to be in the coalition? you've said already that you don't expect the coalition to pass anyways. i don't think that i could really say that this is a scummy mindset, but i find it again very surprising to come from town.
i don't think that my conception of your behavior is actually as strange as you're implying. if, as you've said, you believe that you're playing your towngame here (or otherwise in a towny manner), i don't think that it's entirely unreasonable to be at least somewhat concerned or interested in someone whose reads you've indicated you trust completely misreading you. town wins this setup by forming strong, mutual townreads.
This is again a playstyle thing I think rather than a town/scum differentiation.north wrote:i'm having a hard time finding the words to explain exactly how i disagree with this. like, if i had a cop innocent on someone who you were strongly scumreading, probably the first immediate thing i would do would be to ask you why you were scumreading that person. earlier this game, i saw that delta was making some reads seemingly based on people being unhelpful, so i said something to the effect of "hey, i think that you're making a mistake here". i don't think that what i'm saying here is fundamentally different from any of that.asking about your read of me is meaningless because I know it's wrong!
Leaning scum - I feel like he has good posts but what feels like most of them are generic helpfulness/coaching and setup discussion, I associate too much of that with scumIn post 349, Umlaut wrote:Where are you on Bingle right now?In post 327, Keychain wrote: Umlaut I desperately want you to be town since you're in sync with my thoughts on everything except bingle but that also makes it so hard to read you
I'm excited to see how this goes.In post 350, Bingle wrote: Bingle - conftown from my POV
Eiralox - treating this as spewed town today. The particular frustration at N_M is a town one, I think. I doubt scum gets that upset over N_M being unreadable when N_M doesn't look unlimmable.
Not_Mafia - I'm not going to bother partner hunting N_M, I don't think that's a useful way to spend my time.
northsidegal
Dunnstral
Umlaut
patchwork
KawaiiKame
Keychain
That's 15 scumteams for me to examine. I can handle that.
would love to hear whatever your most recent reads are even if they're not rock solidIn post 311, patchwork wrote: i'm honestly not too sure on who to coalition but i'm currently trying to figure out who i Don't want in my coalition. maybe i'm making some wrong choices here but i just listed the three names that felt the most towny to me
probably going to think about it more though, i haven't really analyzed players yet.
bye!
While that's an excellent callback to that game proving your memory is better than mine, "what progression" was not asking him to explain the townread, I just didn't see any progression between the two posts so was asking about that.In post 387, Bingle wrote: Locksmith: 92 Seems like it could be partner/partner. First point of interaction between the two, and it's a request from Key to have Umlaut explain a townread on patch. This is a great way as scum to cement a townread on your buddy, which I know Keychain knows having used it to great effect in her literal first game.
patch are you normally pretty confident as town or no?In post 367, patchwork wrote: or maybe im just shit at the game idfk
best buds 4 life unless you're scum in which case... pocketed 4 life. but also N_M over BingleIn post 384, Umlaut wrote: Like I know I should probably be doing something better than just sitting on my heals but I think NSG/Keychain/Eira are all obvtown and Bingle is, if not obvtown, the best candidate we have.
I feel like I've been pretty clear on my Kame thoughts! they seem like nervous scum to me and I'll feel awful if I'm wrong and I tunnelled them like this but oh well ignorance is blissIn post 392, Eiralox wrote: I need some guidance on northsidegal, I'm not sure whether to trust or not to trust.
I'll also like your opinion: if I'm considering to heal KawaiiKame and patchwork(I might be) do you suggest I stay away from them completely or can they actually be good picks?
understandable, but can you give like a rough list of the players from most wanted in the coalition to least? I'd like to get more opinions from youIn post 391, patchwork wrote:i'm usually not very confident at allIn post 389, Keychain wrote: patch are you normally pretty confident as town or no?
I agree he has good posts though I'm not sure they outweigh the fluff that feels more empty to me - people naturally have different posting rates, it's more of a percentage thing, and by percentage I mean how much I feel like it's one or the other because I haven't counted. 226 is certainly one of those good posts. 57 is one of the posts I was thinking of more as generic helpfulness with not much personal opinion though.In post 354, Umlaut wrote:A lot of them are that, but Bingle is also the top poster in the game. If you take away the kind of content you're talking about, what's left is still pretty good I think. I found 57, 124, 139 for example to be good while also being about forming reads and advancing the game. I also think the read on Kame in 154, while I disagree with it, is not the sort of thing scum makes up (unless the team is exactly Bingle/KK maybe, but on balance still towny), and the questioning me for clarification in 226 just felt... like a real question, which I suppose it could be but I feel like scum wouldn't care so much to ask as long as I'm townreading them on net.In post 352, Keychain wrote:Leaning scum - I feel like he has good posts but what feels like most of them are generic helpfulness/coaching and setup discussion, I associate too much of that with scumIn post 349, Umlaut wrote:Where are you on Bingle right now?
which reads are you most confident on? (even if that's still not very confident)In post 396, patchwork wrote:meIn post 395, Keychain wrote: understandable, but can you give like a rough list of the players from most wanted in the coalition to least? I'd like to get more opinions from you
delta/eira
nsg
keychain
bingle
kawaii
umlaut
dunnstral
n_m
note that this is a very rough approximation. some players havent' caught my attention so they just naturally have to be nearer the bottom, bingle i used to tr on vibes but now i'm a little more skeptical of, umlaut i literally do not remember being here at all and i know they've been posting it's just like they haven't been really there
same for kawaii they're just not doing anything
n_m's at the bottom because cringe, but their play feels more towny than not
Nah but that's because I don't think effort is AI for bingle (see his earlier comments about how good he is as scum). I've seen him do the scumteam thing as town before, I doubt he'd let himself acquire such an obvious tell by never doing it as scum.In post 403, Umlaut wrote: Bingle's latests posts going through feasible scumteams exhaustively (from their point of view) doesn't strike you as a towny level of effort?
HURT: Not_Mafia then, we need agreement and this is essentially a veto yeah?In post 410, Umlaut wrote: How badly do you want N_M in there? I will pretty much never be comfortable with them as town, I've seen too many of their scum games.
the DREAM, the THEATREIn post 435, Bingle wrote: NSG/Key
including me/um as a pair doesn't follow from your comments about our interactions?In post 435, Bingle wrote: Umlaut/Key
He posted in the wrong game andIn post 450, Bingle wrote:I assume you mean the specific angleshooty thing? Why not?In post 445, Not_Mafia wrote: this angle
What is this line of interrogation? you said yourself that eira is spewed townIn post 452, Bingle wrote:Why not?In post 451, Eiralox wrote:No.In post 448, Bingle wrote:Any inclination to engage with why I'm scumreading patch?In post 447, Eiralox wrote:patchwork
Firstly I'm not going to convince you you're scum so continuing to make me rehash my reasons isn't going to do much, just looks like you're trying to make me second guess my read on you which is since you're already in my compromise bucket. Secondly in your indepth analysis of me/um interactions which covered this topic, how did you miss 398 where I give an example to him? if that doesn't suffice, all the posts I just quoted would also qualifyIn post 449, Bingle wrote:You/um doesn't seem likely, but I'm not taking it off the table as a viable possibility at the moment.In post 444, Keychain wrote: including me/um as a pair doesn't follow from your comments about our interactions?
Also 436 self meta is acknowledged but I'm not just talking about mech but also what I think I called "generic helpfulness" - I didn't call it buddying because I view buddying as targeting a specific player but the generic helpfulness is more a way to look like you're ~progressing the game~ particularly to newer players
Can you point at any posts of mine that look like they're progressing the game but actually aren't?
bother bother, time is running outIn post 434, northsidegal wrote: someone bother me if i don't do a full reread of the game today, please.
why do you take issue with that read - do you think you're lurky regardless of alignment? also why do you trust Bingle's analysis? I'd take it with a huge grain of salt since it doesn't include himself and N_M.In post 462, Dunnstral wrote: Nsg's argument boiling down to "he's lurking so he's mafia" is bothering me and I'm trusting Bingle's analysis on pairings.
Ok you're not wrong here and patch (who is not in the coalition gaining steam) supporting Eira stalling and breaking it up instead of... idk, delivering on that statement in 534 and hammering the coalition so we have TIME to discuss any elim after doesn't feel great for their alignment. It does make me a bit more confident in the coalition that no one has hammered it in the last 12 hoursIn post 551, Bingle wrote:In post 534, patchwork wrote:SecondedIn post 533, Keychain wrote: We have less than four days remaining so at this point I'll take anything that doesn't contain kawaii or dunn to avoid day ending without elimination if coalition failsThese are exactly what give me the bad vibes from patch, fwiw.In post 538, patchwork wrote: Eira not to pocket you please don’t take this as pocketing but I would follow you to the ends of the fucking earth. Literally your vibes are SO on point. You want me to vote someone? Sure. I’ll even help you scumcase them.
spookyIn post 541, northsidegal wrote: actually i am just fully gonna sheep keychain
I love this sentiment and the desire to have everyone weigh in Eira but also - if the coalition is right the game is over, if we're wrong we have very little time to organise an elimination already. We can discuss more and everyone can chip in before deadline if the game is still underway. No other coalition is going to get enough support in time to also discuss an elimination so please put me out of my misery and hammer this so I don't have to count the votes for N_M, I already regret promising to do that, manual votecounting is SO painfulIn post 584, Eiralox wrote: It would be lovely to hear from everyone before there's an actual hammer.