VOTE: fireIn post 17, fireisredsir wrote: i bet it's baltar
This absolute ZOOMER is going to ACCUSE ME.
VOTE: fireIn post 17, fireisredsir wrote: i bet it's baltar
well that's not creepyIn post 24, Skygazer wrote: hellbooks: i looked at ur post history and i'm like 95% sure we've met irl !!!
I don't associate with people, so now I know you're a liar.In post 37, hellbooks wrote:What do you meanIn post 35, VP Baltar wrote:well that's not creepyIn post 24, Skygazer wrote: hellbooks: i looked at ur post history and i'm like 95% sure we've met irl !!!it was at the pre-game scum mixer event.... u were there too if i recall
![]()
zoomer madness continues.In post 36, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: VP BaltarIn post 35, VP Baltar wrote:well that's not creepyIn post 24, Skygazer wrote: hellbooks: i looked at ur post history and i'm like 95% sure we've met irl !!!
![]()
This is a strong case.In post 46, Meuh wrote:In post 34, VP Baltar wrote:VOTE: fireIn post 17, fireisredsir wrote: i bet it's baltar
This absolute ZOOMER is going to ACCUSE ME.
VOTE: Fire
Baltar has never been wrong!
You can be an honorary millennial. You touch grass on a regular basis.In post 49, tris wrote: hey, VP Baltar. am i zoomer nonsense or not?
O rlyIn post 55, fireisredsir wrote: i can see his soul
OMG SHE ADMIT ITIn post 68, hellbooks wrote: I ... THE SCUM
Zoomer contentIn post 75, Skygazer wrote:solving is the wrong word but like "trying to advance the gamestate" is maybe the right combination of wordsIn post 73, Skygazer wrote: fireisredsir giving early town pings for the solving
Like, on the one hand, this is kind of a BS reason from fire...the reason it is BS being that fire has a mediocre track record of reading me correctly and I've kind of barely done anything this game yet.In post 89, osuka wrote:what the fuck is this? either you have something or you don't. if you do, then you should just point it out and if you don't and it's "dependent on a pattern of behavior" then you shouldn't come off so strong because then you'd just make whoever it is you're talking about very acutely aware of the fact that you're watching them closely. this is either horseshit disguised as townposting or just kind of stupid, but i can't immediately tell whichIn post 81, fireisredsir wrote: id rather not elaborate yet bc it's sort of one of those things that is dependent on a pattern of behavior and it's a little early to call out exactly what ive seen so far and how it compares to my expectations bc it's a sort of small sample of posts and maybe im wrong and saying it allows him to adjust. ill tell u later tho shhh
That's all you got from so many people discussing you?In post 122, Ausuka wrote:I'm kind of, uh, I don't know the word for it but this game is just likeIn post 115, VP Baltar wrote: I find the fire, skitter, ausuka, osuka group has something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. It's like a series of overreactions that contribute to the next. To be fair to ausuka, she's just kind of there, so would love her take on those other three specifically.
Hellbrooks is maybe millennial.
"wow ausuka is SOOOO awkward lol she must be scum"
"lol that's just ausuka lmao"
like what do i do with that really
Why are you voting me again?In post 133, Skygazer wrote:i dont like this ausuka post but i like my baltar vote as wellIn post 122, Ausuka wrote:I'm kind of, uh, I don't know the word for it but this game is just likeIn post 115, VP Baltar wrote: I find the fire, skitter, ausuka, osuka group has something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. It's like a series of overreactions that contribute to the next. To be fair to ausuka, she's just kind of there, so would love her take on those other three specifically.
Hellbrooks is maybe millennial.
"wow ausuka is SOOOO awkward lol she must be scum"
"lol that's just ausuka lmao"
like what do i do with that really
Adding to this: I don't know sky...do they have a history with ausuka I should be aware of?In post 179, skitter30 wrote:So you think sky came into this game planning to push you? Not sure how else to understanf the first paragraphIn post 177, Ausuka wrote: I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
The post i made was like maybe somewhat defensive but the idea that I wouldn't say something like that as town is pretty ???
I also think when you said I was great at town, you didn't really believe that and were saying it because it was conducive to a d1 push on me, and that's backed up by you seeming to have like no idea about my town game and admitting as such.
You're the one who essentially said "I think you came into this game with this attack planned." I'm putting zero words into your mouth.In post 186, Ausuka wrote:I feel like words are being put in my mouth here? Is it really that unusual to have ideas of how you might push people you have some history with if you roll scum against them?In post 182, VP Baltar wrote: Ausuka, why do you think sky in particular would come after you?
How else should a person read this?In post 177, Ausuka wrote: I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
Why would you have a bag of tactics to use against a player if it wasn't pre-planned? Is that how you play as town, with strats to manage different players you have a history with, regardless of their alignment?In post 188, Ausuka wrote: No, there is a difference between coming onto the game with an intention to specifically target a player, and having ideas of things you might used against them based on your history together.
You're saying there is a difference, and I asked to elaboratable that point because i dont understand how anyone could read the post i quoted differently ... and well here we are.In post 191, Ausuka wrote: I don't understand what you're talking about
What is my vibeIn post 169, Skygazer wrote: but mostly just vibes ig
You said star was "planning" to use it against you. I guess it just feels a bit like circular logic to me. I asked regardless of alignment because the alignment is actually a really important thing to consider when weighing a person's criticisms against you, but you seem to be working from a start and end point of star!scum.In post 203, Ausuka wrote:Who said anything about 'regardless of alignment'? If you roll scum, against a player you just played scum with, is it really so ridiculous to think maybe you would try and see if you could use that to your advantage at some point?In post 201, VP Baltar wrote:You're saying there is a difference, and I asked to elaboratable that point because i dont understand how anyone could read the post i quoted differently ... and well here we are.In post 191, Ausuka wrote: I don't understand what you're talking about
Noting this feels like a bit of a better explanation of your thought process than what you were giving me.In post 204, Ausuka wrote:I think you would be more likely to either steer clear of meta or read my more recent town gamesIn post 195, Skygazer wrote:is this elaboratableIn post 184, Ausuka wrote:I think after coming back and seeing that after three years of neither of us playing on this site, my scum game is incredibly different to how it used to be, town skygazer probably interacts with my meta very differently to what you have doneIn post 178, Skygazer wrote: i think there's a p strong difference between me remembering you have a really strong town game and me not remembering what your town meta is like
I don't think you really try and use my old meta in this way
I don't think think a particular post from hellbrooks is towny per se (though I'm sure I could dig in and better understand my own feeling here.) I think what's townie from brooks is the free wheeling vibe. There is a transparency of to her posting that reads to me like clearly saying things off the top of your head, which is a quality I generally associate with being town because you aren't afraid to say the wrong thing. Admittedly, I think brooks is cool and I'm susceptible to being too easily charmed by friendlies.In post 212, tris wrote: why does everyone think that post is towny?
I'm just more surprised they had a feeling worth expressing at that point in the first place.In post 216, Meuh wrote: But if Fire knows they aren't particularly good at reading you, wouldn't it then make more sense for them to be reserved on their feeling on you? Isn't it natural for them to decide to wait for something more substantive before outing the read completely, because of this track record?
I'm not great at remembering details of games, especially when it's been a minute. I have a vague recollection of Ausuka feeling attacked that game and being kind of bummed out. Which isn't really the vibe I've had this game.In post 236, Meuh wrote: However, I still feel like the dance game and Ausuka being town there would be seeping in the way he engages with her, which I know has been the case for myself and Fire has also mentioned it. Feeling kinda meh here
Hmm, I'm not sure that's a great reason but I believe you believe it I guess.In post 273, Meuh wrote:
4. Ausuka's response to the push reminds me a LOT to the early push on her in the dance game, where she was town. The intensity of it, the feelings around it, the counter-scumread on someone who was scumreading her...
Unless Ausuka is very good at replicating this set of feelings and reactions as scum (she might be, I've only played once with her and she was town), to me this just lines up very well with her town game and the general stance she held when a lot of people were questioning her and the lack of backing down felt right.
Pedit: Section 4 should answer this heehee
Do you see alignment in those pairs or you just PoE'd the game?In post 278, Meuh wrote: Current feeling: VPB/Osuka team, if town in there then scum in Skitter/Hellbooks
Rest can be town
I agree with this and I don't understand fire's strong town read there. I think ausuka is pretty null at best.In post 301, skitter30 wrote: I mean i think my read on ausuka changed with her response to the initial callout (i.e. in 122), the read changed from a ping to a legit scumread there
I then thought ausuka's approach to sky was p bad and scummy: her approach in 177 is quite questionable, particularly the bit abt how sky was planningyo come into this game pushing ausuka. At that point my read was p solid
On top of that, i don't think ausuka has been solving really- i don't know what her reads are other than sky, and her response to being sr has been quite flat
I think calling this read 'static' is rather unfair ...
Wrt fire tbh i think i was a bit annoyed he was voting me and that may have been coloring that, i'm kinda over that now tho.
Fair. Relative to everyone else in the game.In post 303, fireisredsir wrote: i def wouldn't call it a strong townread but there's been things that i think are town
I really don't understand the argument that the dance game is evidence you're town here. I also think you're misreading skitter pretty blatantly in point 2.In post 337, Ausuka wrote: To elaborate on what I mean
1) it's a point that fire and meuh brought up, about the dance game specifically - I feel like it's something town is likely to think about? Like, yes they can reject it for whatever reason, but not like reading the game or responding to the concern feels odd
2) it's not just the 'awkward entrance' thing - you have been portraying basically everything i post as like totally unreasonable to the point it can't be town and implying that it is surprising anyone would read me as town. i don't really think that's all that compatible with believing someone is a good scum player.
My preferred lim pool right now is actually [fire, ausuka, meuh]In post 342, hellbooks wrote: what if we all just took a deep breath and a step back and then wagoned meuh
meuh, are you ok withthat ? just lmk
This post bugs the hell out of me, mostly. Meuh's obv pushing you, but idk how she sees Hellbrooks as your buddy.In post 278, Meuh wrote: Current feeling: VPB/Osuka team, if town in there then scum in Skitter/Hellbooks
Rest can be town
Meuh, I feel like you're talking out of both sides of your mouth about this group of potential scum you posted.In post 309, Meuh wrote:Bit of both. I do townread the other 4 more than you 4, but I also skimmed the combined ISO and the interaction between everyone there felt very blegh. iirc either small interactions shoved at the end of posts or none at all. The puzzle pieces just click quite well within the group.In post 282, VP Baltar wrote:Do you see alignment in those pairs or you just PoE'd the game?In post 278, Meuh wrote: Current feeling: VPB/Osuka team, if town in there then scum in Skitter/Hellbooks
Rest can be town
lol alright.In post 393, fireisredsir wrote:i don't believe that he thinks he's been pretty townie this game, for one
he finds a perverse enjoyment in saying just blatantly completely wrong things when he's scum and then laughing as people trip over themselves thinking that scum would never
Blah, it's a vibe for real.
In post 511, skitter30 wrote:I just mean it I agree with fire's sentiment that this game doesn't feel super clear rn. It would be easier for me if fire just scummed it up, but I nodded through that whole post
Wdym
What is the actual difference between these statements because I do not get itIn post 518, Meuh wrote:I don’t think Ausuka’s “so town she shouldn’t be considered until later”, I just think she’s towny enough that it doesn’t make sense to worry about her rn.In post 493, VP Baltar wrote: @meuh, I don't agree with your "logic" because I don't believe you truly think that's the PoE. I don't believe you think ausuka is so town, she shouldn't be considered until later. This smacks of creative fiction. While I do think skitter was pushing a bit over the top early, I think you stretched that very far to an illogical point of ausuka is towning it up. By ausuka's own admission, she is disengaged. That's NAI.
At first I was kind of thinking similar to a few others that the ausuka push was a little stinky, but like WHY would she do that as scum? She doubled down in the heat and it was clear it wasn't going to get a yeet. But that doubling down actually proved helpful imo in trying to force ausuka to participate in a meaningful way (which has been limited). So outcome is + town, even if the approach was odd.In post 519, fireisredsir wrote:help me out by telling me why you think skitter townIn post 512, VP Baltar wrote:In post 511, skitter30 wrote:I just mean it I agree with fire's sentiment that this game doesn't feel super clear rn. It would be easier for me if fire just scummed it up, but I nodded through that whole post
Wdym
lol tell me I'm right without telling me I'm right
Serious question: what meaningful contributions have you had in your opinion?In post 532, Ausuka wrote: Sorry! Maybe if you participated in a meaningful way I wouldn't have to vote you. Oh well
I'm not asking you to argue. I am too busy for that. I'm asking you to explain to me why I'm wrongIn post 535, Ausuka wrote: im not going to argue with you over which of my posts pass your arbitrary bar for adding valuable content to the game and not being a waste of space because that sounds very unpleasant and also pretty boring and useless
No I don't think you're stupid or making stupid points. I think you're just disengaged, which I don't think is AI. My point is that you're not really playing the game much yet, which is fine...but it doesn't make sense for Meuh to townread you for that. If you think I'm wrong and there is good content there that you think its reasonable for Meuh to town read you off of, I'm open to hearing it.In post 538, Ausuka wrote: I was assuming your angle was implying that my content was dumb and therefore not meaningful. Are you like, asking me to point me to the posts where I have reads, or are you asking me to point to posts where you can argue what I was saying was stupid?
I have no idea what this means.In post 541, Ausuka wrote: like there is room between 'super duper engaged and not demotivated at all' and 'if you claim to have a read on this player you are scum'
I don't think you're reading very closely if you can't follow this. I don't have time right now to post by post explain it to you because I'm going to be driving a lot of today.In post 548, fireisredsir wrote:i think meuh was pretty clear about the fact that her townread on ausuka wasn't because of her being disengagedIn post 539, VP Baltar wrote:No I don't think you're stupid or making stupid points. I think you're just disengaged, which I don't think is AI. My point is that you're not really playing the game much yet, which is fine...but it doesn't make sense for Meuh to townread you for that. If you think I'm wrong and there is good content there that you think its reasonable for Meuh to town read you off of, I'm open to hearing it.In post 538, Ausuka wrote: I was assuming your angle was implying that my content was dumb and therefore not meaningful. Are you like, asking me to point me to the posts where I have reads, or are you asking me to point to posts where you can argue what I was saying was stupid?
i think this is a weird point
im not sure why your read on meuh has anything to with what ausuka thinks about her own content
at least with osuka he was trying to read me off his questions. yours here just feel like busy work