[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8191204 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 633: Marvel Dual Universes uPick - Game over! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #52 (isolation #7) » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:55 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 47, TellTaleHeart wrote:One thing we didn't do last time that we probably should've done a lot more of was take advantage of flipped town's cross-earth reads.
In post 53, Alabaska J wrote:Seems inherently worse than playing two micros simultaneously that give you plenty of information about each other
My point on that matter is that players will confuse their reads accross the earths. For example I will townread you for things you do on this earth and then associate that with Earth 2. It makes everything more complex. No lynching can be good if you don't have a good scumread. I am just telling you all, a compromise lynch at the end of the day isn't the best.
And day 1s meta as of late, is to do a horrible compromise lynch and the success rate on lynching scum is very low for that.
You should keep better notes, or pay closer attention then. No Lynching is not the appropriate response to resolve this issue. Better scum hunting, and working together is.
I'm pretty sure that no one had this problem last game, and if they did, it wasn't a serious issue.
Post
Post #86 (isolation #14) » Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:39 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 71, Alabaska J wrote:It's three pages in, barely anyone has posted, and we are arguing about theory because of what is most likely a semantic misunderstanding.
Post
Post #158 (isolation #20) » Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:08 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 132, Ircher wrote:Alabaska --> Null leaning Town --> ISO is 100% RVS/Theory; while not a bad thing necessarily, Alabaska doesn't seem to necessarily be trying to scumhunt either. I'm thinking town though cuz of the depth of responses, but it's hard to tell atm.
This feels awkward and clunky. Plus, I feel like the town read is, not only unwarranted, but should have been a scum read.
Post
Post #159 (isolation #21) » Tue Aug 16, 2016 9:09 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 137, Fire Assassin wrote:Also Xky feels slouching this game, he doesn't feel like his normal self to me. I would normally call that scummy, but I think its just circumstances and not anything alignment indicative.
In post 143, lilith2013 wrote:Currently townreading Clumsy and scumreading Ircher's 106 and 107. Overly serious reaction to what is quite obviously a joke by Mcmenno. Also continues to townread Mcmenno afterwards. Usually if I think someone is attacking me for no reason I'd start scumreading or at least pushing them.
Fair enough about reactions, but the other part....
So you are saying that just cuz someone attacks you with poor reasoning means you should immediately OMGUS? The answer is no; we don't deal in absolutes. If it truly were a joke, McMenno wouldn't continue to push it; anyway, intent is the important part, not necessarily the reasoning, and I find McMenno's intent to be town-motivated.
Again, clumsy reasoning from Ircher. I don't like it.
Post
Post #182 (isolation #24) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:43 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 165, Fire Assassin wrote:Theres I believe 2 other people who said they didn't like Lilith and or Clumsy. Yet I am the only one voting either of them.
Instead you have Alabaska wagon that is pretty horrible imo, since I don't think pressuring him will give us much info.
And ircher which is a bad wagon, and has my number one scumread on it.
In post 185, PantherPunt wrote:I sincerely appreciate the low postcount. I plan on going hard at some point during the workday today
Scum be warned
I feel like I just wanna policy lynch you for playing me so hard in The Woodshed...
I love when a game finishes and I just start one with someone else. Because I feel like I have a really good feel for their play and am able to tell if it feels the same or different from what I just experienced. My favorite is playing with someone who was just town and now their scum bc I can confidently drive their lynch d1. It's called getting Vedith'd.
It's relieving for me this game, because I should be an easy town read for you. Unless your scum, but in that case I highly suggest choosing to TMI/fakeread me as town.
I feel like I'll have an easy time reading you obviously.
You were an easy town read for me last game....but you were scum.
Quite a bit actually. I have a fairly elaborate spreadsheet setup for every game that I play.
@xkfyu
how do they differ when you're town vs when you're mafia? ooc
Very little, actually. I have a few different tabs on each sheet where I track various things. The only real difference is in the actual notes that I take. They are actually geared towards different goals, depending on my alignment.
Post
Post #258 (isolation #31) » Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:04 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 217, Fire Assassin wrote:He is shit posting in the way that I kind of expect from him as town if I am going to be honest.
Though I would like more content form him.
You know, if we could, as a site, agree to lynch all shit posters immediately in games, people would eventually stop shit posting.
In post 217, Fire Assassin wrote:He is shit posting in the way that I kind of expect from him as town if I am going to be honest.
Though I would like more content form him.
You know, if we could, as a site, agree to lynch all shit posters immediately in games, people would eventually stop shit posting.
That would be nice.
I mean if you want to policy lynch anyone who doesn't fill pages upon pages with 500-word essays about how punctuation indicates scumminess for "shitposting", then go right ahead, but it isn't going to help you
oh, and as I always say, put your vote where your voice is
:^)
I would, except for the fact that that wasn't a jab at you necessarily. From my limited experience with you, as far as shit posters go, I'd say you're pretty mild.
Post
Post #262 (isolation #33) » Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:56 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 247, Ircher wrote:1. 183 --> Unexplained vote hop from Xk.
2. 192 --> Disagree with the observation concerning McMenno's wagon --> I read it as town cuz I'd expect scum to show some slight paranoia. Your reasoning however is backable and valid. I don't see how pointing out a contradiction is a survivalistic mindset though.
3. 194 --> I disagree with the evaluation of my post 10 as I don't see how one could find it as anything but null. Also didn't really have a huge problem with Fire's entrance as setup spec to often dominates the beginning of games in my experience.
4. 199 --> Disagree about reaction wagons; I feel scum can just as easily push them (and use them as a valid excuse to wagon hop/fake -scumhunt) if not better than town. I like the other comments though not concerning McMenno.
5. 202 --> I never really followed up cuz I felt it wasn't worth pursuing; McMenno seemed to be heavy in confirmation bias so the lack of a response felt to me like he was (and indeed he is) deathtunneling me. Perhaps I should've persisted, but I felt it would've been counter-productive to the game state. (It was an exaggeration after all)
6. 215 --> I agree with Fire's sentiment; while the case is there with some evidence, I think you aren't using meta correctly.... Sometimes, it seems you disregard meta too much; other times, it seems you are using meta too much to push a scumread.
I dislike Panther's push of a pre-flip association between Fire & McMenno and voting the lesser of his scumreads, but I can follow the reasoning for that.
Other than that and my general disagreement with his perspective, I find Panther to have a high chance of being town.
As I was reading this post, I was fully expecting to get to the end and read that you were scum reading Panther, or at least me or McMenno. But after all that, the only conclusion that you draw is that Panther is highly likely to be town?
I don't feel like the conclusion follows from the premises.
In post 247, Ircher wrote:1. 183 --> Unexplained vote hop from Xk.
2. 192 --> Disagree with the observation concerning McMenno's wagon --> I read it as town cuz I'd expect scum to show some slight paranoia. Your reasoning however is backable and valid. I don't see how pointing out a contradiction is a survivalistic mindset though.
3. 194 --> I disagree with the evaluation of my post 10 as I don't see how one could find it as anything but null. Also didn't really have a huge problem with Fire's entrance as setup spec to often dominates the beginning of games in my experience.
4. 199 --> Disagree about reaction wagons; I feel scum can just as easily push them (and use them as a valid excuse to wagon hop/fake -scumhunt) if not better than town. I like the other comments though not concerning McMenno.
5. 202 --> I never really followed up cuz I felt it wasn't worth pursuing; McMenno seemed to be heavy in confirmation bias so the lack of a response felt to me like he was (and indeed he is) deathtunneling me. Perhaps I should've persisted, but I felt it would've been counter-productive to the game state. (It was an exaggeration after all)
6. 215 --> I agree with Fire's sentiment; while the case is there with some evidence, I think you aren't using meta correctly.... Sometimes, it seems you disregard meta too much; other times, it seems you are using meta too much to push a scumread.
I dislike Panther's push of a pre-flip association between Fire & McMenno and voting the lesser of his scumreads, but I can follow the reasoning for that.
Other than that and my general disagreement with his perspective, I find Panther to have a high chance of being town.
As I was reading this post, I was fully expecting to get to the end and read that you were scum reading Panther, or at least me or McMenno. But after all that, the only conclusion that you draw is that Panther is highly likely to be town?
(Ooc means out of curiosity. Sorry I am sometimes in modes where I use a ton of acronyms and not sure what dictates when those times are.)
I type all of my posts in Notepad++, and then copy/paste them into the reply box to use the formatting/vote/etc buttons. I copied over my post, then I changed the wording, and I apparently didn't Ctrl+A before pasting it again.
Post
Post #274 (isolation #36) » Fri Aug 19, 2016 9:54 am
Postby Xkfyu »
Lol the quote and my two paragraphs were what was in my text editor. The top half was the first iteration. Then I changed the second paragraph and copied it all again for the second half.
1) bunch of posts about votes on him
2) talking about ircher then backing off of it when it actually got some traction to vote lilith for some really weak stuff (and has not pushed it or engaged her whatsoever afaict...lilith had to engage)
3) hasn't talked about the majority of the player list
My willingness to lynch you, and unwillingness to lynch Lilith.
Why are you scumreading me and why are you townreading Lilith?
All you've done is call every other wagon that isn't Lilith "bad," when Lilith's wagon is the worst one of all. None of the reasoning that I've seen for voting Lilith stand up to any scrutiny. McMenno doesn't even feel strongly about his case against her. You can tell by the way she had to push him to respond to her responses to his case.
Post
Post #368 (isolation #45) » Tue Aug 23, 2016 2:08 am
Postby Xkfyu »
Following McMenno's claim, I think I want to move the wagon to someone else. I'd still rather lynch him over Lilith though, so I'd like to see if anyone is willing to switch to either Ircher or FA.
Post
Post #451 (isolation #49) » Tue Aug 23, 2016 3:11 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 441, PantherPunt wrote:so we're going to lynch someone who won't be here to claim it seems. so apparently claiming anything just saves you from being lynched... in a role madness game...........
Not necessarily. But claiming Watcher, and not being counter claimed, does.
In post 441, PantherPunt wrote:so we're going to lynch someone who won't be here to claim it seems. so apparently claiming anything just saves you from being lynched... in a role madness game...........
Not necessarily. But claiming Watcher, and not being counter claimed, does.
It kind of makes it more unlikely there is a watcher with the fact it's role madness.
I'm not talking about a hard counter claim. A Tracker or a Follower, or some similar soft counter claim would suffice since there it would be highly unlikely that town has more than one of those types of roles.
In post 441, PantherPunt wrote:so we're going to lynch someone who won't be here to claim it seems. so apparently claiming anything just saves you from being lynched... in a role madness game...........
Not necessarily. But claiming Watcher, and not being counter claimed, does.
It kind of makes it more unlikely there is a watcher with the fact it's role madness.
I'm not talking about a hard counter claim. A Tracker or a Follower, or some similar soft counter claim would suffice since there it would be highly unlikely that town has more than one of those types of roles.
Not really?
I don't quite agree with this.
Remember camns game of almost all trackers
You aren't really trying to use that game as evidence that there could be two Watcher type roles are you?
Post
Post #469 (isolation #53) » Tue Aug 23, 2016 3:30 am
Postby Xkfyu »
In post 465, Fire Assassin wrote:I am just saying that you and I have no idea what the setup really looks like, mod said he tried to balance it, but his sense of balance maybe widely different than our own.
I am with you that it should self resolve but I don't think it makes TTH more likely town because no one CC
Also what Lilith said about people not being here.
I'm not claiming that she's town, I'm saying I'm not lynching her.
And the amount of people present is irrelevant. Even if I was the only other one here, if I couldn't counter claim her, I still wouldn't lynch her.
Those who aren't here now will have plenty of time in D2 to counter claim her, if they can.